LAPD Honors Officers Who Didn't Use Deadly Force, Much to the Police Union's Dismay "Preservation of Life" award valorizes officers who successfully de-escalated dangerous situations.
Anthony L. Fisher|
The LAPD bestowed its newly
created "Preservation of Life Award" — recognizing officers who take
exceptional care to successfully de-escalate dangerous situations and avoid
using deadly force — on 25 officers at its annual "Above and Beyond"
gala last Thursday night. The new honor is considered to be at the same level
of prestige as the department's highest honor — the Medal of Valor.
One of the honorees, Officer
Danielle Lopez, confronted a man who she believed was pointing an assault rifle
at passing cars. Lopez and her partner were able to convince the man to drop
his gun and arrest him without violence. It turns out the gun was fake.
Another recipient of the
Preservation of Life medal, Officer Ericandrew Avendano, encountered an
ax-wielding man he suspected was suffering from mental illness or was high on
drugs. Avendano spoke with the man and contained the situation peacefully
before backup arrived to assist in subduing the man without shooting him.
Police departments in Camden
(N.J.) and Philadelphia each have their own version of the award, according to
the Los Angeles Times, but the LAPD's union — the Los Angeles Police Protective
League (LAPPL) — thinks the award is a "terrible idea" which will
"will prioritize the lives of suspected criminals over the lives of LAPD
officers, and goes against the core foundation of an officer's training."
In a blog post reacting to the
award's creation last November, the LAPPL Board of Directors wrote:
We recognize the Chief's
intentions, however, the reality is the "Preservation of Life" award
announced Tuesday by Chief Beck is ill-conceived and in actuality has dangerous
implications. Incentivizing officers for "preservation of life"
suggests somehow that this is not what they train hard to do. It suggests that
officers must go above and beyond their normal activities to avoid harm; or put
another way, that officers will be penalized for resorting to an appropriate,
lawful use of force. That is ludicrous. The last thing an LAPD officer wants to
do is to harm, or worse yet, take the life of a suspect.
It's not just the honoring of the
successful deployment of de-escalation techniques that the union has a problem
with, it's the training of such techniques at all. Earlier this year, I wrote
about the LAPPL's opposition to the LAPD Police Commission's recommendation for
new "use-of-force policies that emphasize de-escalation and the use of
minimal force in encounters with the public."
Union Director James McBride
addressed the Commission at the time, warning that if an officer were to die
because the new use-of-force policies caused him/her to hesitate, "there
will be blood on your hands." I also noted:
Union President Craig Lally, once
named a "problem officer" in a blue-ribbon panel's report on
"the problem of excessive force in theLAPD" following the 1991
beating of Rodney King, said the new policies create a "no-win situation for
the officer."
Lally added that if faced with a
potentially violent situation, "The best way to de-escalate is to run
away."
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment