Will somebody please explain to these idiot cops that high speed chase is dangerous to the community
The Fairfax County Cops have already killed a woman in a high speed response...enough is enough
UPDATE: Man who led Fairfax Police on
high-speed pursuit has been arrested
Brandon Forrest, 30, charged with possession of stolen property,
grand larceny
The man that lead police on a high-speed pursuit in Fairfax has
been arrested.
Brandon Forrest, 30, of Washington D.C., was arrested and charged
for the Tuesday, Dec. 6, pursuit from Tysons Corner that ended on
Interstate-395 and Washington Boulevard.
Forrest was taken to the Adult Detention Center where he was
charged with possession of stolen property with the intent to sell and two counts
of grand larceny.
--------------------
Fairfax County Police were involved in a high-speed pursuit this
morning after an investigation uncovered a larceny case at a department store
in Tysons Corner.
Officers attempted to perform a routine traffic stop, but the
suspects did not adhere to orders, which initiated a high-speed pursuit.
The pursuit proceeded out of Fairfax County, and with the
assistance of Virginia State Police and Arlington County Police, the pursuit
ended along I-395.
Copyright 2016 Nexstar Broadcasting, Inc. All rights reserved.
This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or
You know who's on the review board? The cops, their union bosses and police brass
Fairfax
leaders approve police-review board
Thursday, December 8th, 2016 at
8:26am
Virginia’s largest
jurisdiction moved forward Tuesday with creating a civilian board to review
allegations of police abuse, joining the District, New York and other major
U.S. cities that have taken steps to improve police accountability.
Concerns over police misconduct have spread
across the country after a spate of fatal shootings by officers sparked
protests and became part of the debates in the presidential election.
Fairfax County, whose Board of Supervisors approved
the new civilian panel in a 9-to-1 vote, was motivated to act in the face of
sharp criticism over how the county handled the fatal police shooting of an
unarmed resident, John Geer, in 2013.
Adam Torres, who was fired from the police force
two years after Geer’s death, pleaded guilty to involuntary manslaughter in the
case in April.
The case has prompted the county to pursue $35
million in reform efforts, including the hiring earlier this year of an
independent auditor whose job will be to monitor use-of-force investigations.
Fairfax officials also are considering requiring police officers to wear body
cameras.
“What we’re doing here today is taking another
step in making a great police department even better and being a model for the
nation in how we continue to enhance trust between our community and the
police,” said Sharon Bulova (D), chair of the Board of Supervisors.
Last year, Bulova created a police advisory
committee that recommended 202 changes, following public outrage over the
county’s initial refusal to share police internal affairs files with the
Fairfax prosecutor, Raymond Morrogh (D), while he was investigating the Geer
shooting. A county attorney also rejected a request by Morrogh to discuss the
case with county supervisors, without informing supervisors of the request.
The nine-member civilian review board will
scrutinize police department investigations into allegations of police abuse or
misconduct. The board may also refer such allegations to the police department,
but, unlike in some other jurisdictions, will not have any authority to
investigate cases on its own.
If the board does not agree with the police
department’s findings in a particular case, it may request that the supervisors
order the county police chief to reopen the investigation.
The lone vote against creating the review panel
came from Supervisor Pat Herrity, R-Springfield, who called the proposal “an
act of political correctness.”
Herrity argued that there is already enough
police accountability in Fairfax with the department’s internal affairs bureau
and the new auditor position. He said creating a new board would be
“duplicative,” as the county prepares for another tough budget year, and could
hurt morale within the police department.
Supervisor Catherine Hudgins, D-Hunter Mill,
pushed unsuccessfully to allow the board to take testimony from witnesses not
interviewed by police in an investigation, arguing that such an expansion of
powers would help instill deeper trust from residents who are wary of going to
the police.
“We were unresponsive before and it was a very,
very difficult environment to live in,” she said. “Citizens felt we were not
listening, we were not engaged and that we did not want to be engaged.”
After a county attorney told the board that
taking in additional evidence outside of an ongoing police investigation could
make Fairfax vulnerable to a lawsuit, the supervisors decided to allow those
witnesses to submit written testimony that would be turned over to the police.
Bulova said the various police changes being
implemented by the county will help Fairfax avoid police shootings leading to
injury or death.
“We don’t have very many of those in Fairfax
County,” she said. “And we don’t want to have very many of those in Fairfax
County.”
Predator Policing
This is what happens when you give the cops to much money......predator policing... we already pay beat cops to handle DWI.
FCPD
launches DWI Enforcement Squad; out there now looking for holiday partiers
·
By Angela Woolsey/Fairfax County
Times
Top of Form
Bottom of
Form
Drinking and driving is never a good idea, but
it might be especially ill-advised this holiday season, as the Fairfax County
Police Department (FCPD) has dedicated personnel and resources specifically
toward tackling this issue.
FCPD’s driving while intoxicated (DWI)
enforcement squad launched out of the department’s operations support bureau in
Annandale on Dec. 1.
Paid and equipped through a federal grant administered
by the Virginia Department of Motor Vehicles (DMV), the new unit will
exclusively handle incidents and cases involving people who operate a motor
vehicle while under the influence of alcohol and other drugs.
“The value of the work that you will be doing
will literally prevent folks from being killed,” Captain Bob Blakley, who
commands the traffic division of FCPD’s operations support bureau, told the
squad during a pre-patrol briefing. “You all will be the front lines, the tip
of the spear for the police department to curb this behavior.”
According to Robert Weakley, Fairfax district
program manager for the Virginia DMV’s highway safety office, FCPD’s DWI
Enforcement Squad is the third such unit in the state, which is in the second
year of a pilot program that has also started in the Tidewater and Roanoke
regions.
The overall frequency of alcohol-related
crashes in Fairfax County has declined in recent years, and the police
department hopes its new enforcement squad will help continue that downward
trend.
Fairfax County had 523 alcohol-related crashes
in 2015, compared to 600 in 2013, according to Blakley.
FCPD’s 2015 annual report found that, of the
22 fatal crashes in the county last year, seven of them involved alcohol, the
same number as in 2013, when there were 26 fatal crashes in all. The county had
eight alcohol-related fatal crashes out of 23 total incidents in 2014.
“We’ve seen a decline, and we want to keep it
that way. We’re working towards zero deaths,” Weakley said.
The squad has nine officers, including a
supervisor, who were selected based in part on their records for enforcing
highway safety.
Sporting a collective average of 241 DWI
arrests annually over the past seven years, the eight patrol officers on the
squad will work from 7:00 p.m. to 5:00 a.m. in four-day rotations, focusing on
areas around the county that the department’s crime analysis unit has found to
be hot spots for impaired driving.
During its first patrol, the squad was
assigned to work the Mason and West Springfield districts.
The DWI Enforcement Squad will mark a change
in approach for the appointed officers, who normally have to respond to all
calls for service.
“Without having to deal with a patrol area and
having other calls come out that you have to be dispatched to, you’re primarily
dealing with [impaired drivers], so you’re not being diverted,” Pfc. Nicolas
Pyzowski, one of the squad members, said.
Formerly a midnight patrol officer at FCPD’s
Mount Vernon station, Pyzowski says that he has always concentrated a lot of
his efforts on addressing drunk or impaired drivers, in part because those were
the kinds of calls he frequently encountered on the night shift.
So, when he heard the department was forming a
new team solely for this purpose, he immediately applied. He found out that
he’d been accepted shortly after an interview in October.
DWI arrests can be time-consuming, requiring
extensive paperwork, and they can sometimes be confrontational, though Pyzowski
says they’re generally not more dangerous than any other encounters police
officers might have.
Despite these challenges, Pyzowski sees
enforcing impaired driving laws as a crucial part of his duty as a public
safety officer.
“I felt it was very important to make a good
impact on the community to get those drunk drivers off the road to save their
lives and anyone else they could put in harm’s way,” the patrolman said.
Virginia law states that anyone driving with a
blood alcohol content (BAC) of 0.08 percent or higher is considered legally to
be driving under the influence, but drivers can still be arrested with a lower
BAC if their ability to operate their vehicle is impaired, according to the
Virginia DMV.
Driving under the influence of drugs incurs
the same penalties as driving under the influence of alcohol.
Along with increasing its enforcement efforts,
Fairfax County emphasizes that prevention is an important factor in addressing
impaired driving.
“We back this up with a heavy education media
outreach type program, but we know that education alone, it has to work
hand-in-hand with enforcement,” Weakley said. “If someone gets stopped, they
[will] feel safer knowing their police is out there trying to prevent
fatalities and serious injuries.”
THE AGONIZINGLY protracted story of John Geer
The Washington Post
THE AGONIZINGLY protracted story
of John Geer, the unarmed man shot to death by a Fairfax County police officer
as he stood, hands up, in the doorway of his Springfield home almost three
years ago, might finally have reached its end. Yet the county, which pledged
reforms so that no such sorry sequence of events could ever recur, still has
work to do.
Last week Adam D. Torres, the
now-former officer who pulled the trigger, appeared in court to plead guilty to
involuntary manslaughter, belatedly express remorse and agree with prosecutors
to a 12-month prison sentence. If a judge accepts the deal, it will conclude a
saga of police malfeasance, official stonewalling and political paralysis, all
of which left a stain on Virginia’s biggest jurisdiction and its 1,300-officer
police force.
It’s certainly reasonable to
believe, as Mr. Geer’s parents do, that Mr. Torres got off lightly. Four other
police officers contradicted Mr. Torres’s account that he had seen Mr. Geer
suddenly lower his hands, as if going for a weapon. To the contrary, they said
his hands were up when Mr. Torres fired the fatal shot into Mr. Geer’s chest.
Nonetheless, Mr. Torres, who was
jailed without bond in August, will remain behind bars for now. Fired last year
from the police force, he is a convicted felon, and he will never again work as
a law enforcement officer. His punishment is substantial. Mr. Geer’s former partner, who was reluctant to
testify — as was the couple’s 19-year-old daughter — was amenable to the
plea deal.
Notwithstanding Mr. Torres’s
plea, no resolution has been reached for the systemic and institutional
problems in Fairfax laid bare in the aftermath of Mr. Geer’s death. Chief among
these is the glaring lack of accountability in the police department, whose
once-excellent reputation has been badly damaged.
That damage was self-inflicted.
Following Mr. Geer’s unwarranted
death, the department went into a defensive crouch, providing no information on
the case for a year and refusing to cooperate with state and federal
prosecutors. The stonewalling, which the police undertook with the connivance
of the county attorney’s office, which was derelict in its duty, stunned the
top prosecutor in Fairfax. “I’ve never seen anyone act like that in a position
of trust, withholding information,” said the prosecutor, Raymond F. Morrogh.
“It really hurt all the people involved. It was dead wrong. I hope it never
happens again.”
To avoid such a recurrence,
officials empaneled a commission to review police policies and practices. The
commission produced many recommendations, some of which have been adopted,
including new use-of-force guidelines that emphasize restraint and
de-escalation.
Other recommendations are under
review by the county’s elected Board of Supervisors, including ones that would
mandate a greater degree of information-sharing and empower an independent
auditor to oversee internal police investigations in cases involving the use of
force.
A critical test of the county’s
commitment to reform is whether it establishes a civilian board to review
alleged police misconduct. Pushback from unions representing rank-and-file police
should not deter supervisors from ensuring that the panel consists of
civilians, not current and former police. Police departments around the country
have gained credibility from such panels; Fairfax County must not pull back
from the brink of real reform.
The killing of John Geer now looks unmistakably like a police cover up
The killing of John Geer now
looks unmistakably like a police cover up
IN BROAD daylight and at close
range, three Fairfax County police officers saw a fourth officer, Adam Torres,
shoot John Geer once in the chest in August 2013. Two other witnesses, Mr.
Geer’s father and a friend, also saw it. All five of those witnesses agreed
that Mr. Geer, who had a holstered handgun at his feet, had his hands up at the
moment Officer Torres pulled the trigger.
Mr. Geer, a 46-year-old father of
two, committed no known crime that day. He had been speaking calmly with the
officers for almost three-quarters of an hour when the lethal shot was fired.
He then bled to death just inside the doorway of his home.
That was more than 17 months ago,
and still there has been no accounting for Mr. Geer’s death. No charges. No
indictment. No prosecution. And no information until last week, when the
police, complying with a judge’s order, finally released thousands of
documents.
Those documents provide a stark
picture: Only Officer Torres contended that Mr. Geer made a sudden movement as
if going for a gun.
Everyone involved in this case
has dropped the ball and dodged responsibility, enabling what now looks like a
coverup in a case of police impunity.
The police, who did not seek
medical treatment for Mr. Geer or retrieve his body for more than an hour,
falsely claimed Mr. Geer had “barricaded” himself inside his house after he was
shot, then stonewalled prosecutors and the public for months.
The top prosecutor in Fairfax,
Ray Morrogh, punted the case to the feds over a supposed conflict of interest
involving a courthouse shouting match between Officer Torres and a
rank-and-file prosecutor. That seems a far-fetched reason not to pursue the
case.
The feds — first the U.S.
Attorney’s Office in Alexandria, then the Justice Department’s Civil Rights
Division — sat on the case for months more, saying nothing.
Fairfax’s County’s governing
body, the Board of Supervisors, seems incapable of getting its own employees —
namely the police and the County Attorney’s office — to conduct themselves
responsibly and transparently. The supervisors have managed nothing beyond
tut-tutting that things don’t look quite right and calling for a review of
policies.
The Wall Street Journal reported
recently that Fairfax, one of the largest police departments in the nation,
does not regard police-involved shootings as an “actual offense” and therefore
does not report them to the FBI — part of a pattern among law enforcement
agencies that results in no reliable statistics on the number of people police
kill.
That mind-set seems to have
infected virtually every agency in Fairfax, in addition to the feds, that
should have stepped up to see that justice was done in the Geer case. The case
should be presented to a jury, which can weigh Officer Torres’s account against
those of other witnesses. The delay and obfuscation represent a travesty of
justice.
From
the comments section of the Washington Post
Time for Feds to get involved-
for this and any other suspicious police killing.
From
the comments section of the Washington Post
There are people in law
enforcement who should never have been issued a gun and the authority to use
it. Remember Drew Peterson? Darren Wilson? Then there's Timothy Loehmann, a
rookie cop whose former cop boss said was unfit for duty and likely never would
be. His shooting of young Tamir Rice could go down as the fastest murder in
police history. The video of that tragedy leaves little room for doubt. The
entire organization is in desperate need of an overhaul. The fact that the
police are unhappy, to say the least, about being videoed by the public is the
exact reason why more should be doing just that. There are too many unarmed
citizens being shot and killed by police. Their 'shoot to kill' mandate needs
to disappear. This is all going downhill far too quickly.
From
the comments section of the Washington Post
It's funny how every time I ask
who people have contacted about this, what they have done to change things, or
ask for help making something happen, all I get is crickets. What's a word for
people who talk a lot, but do nothing?
From
the comments section of the Washington Post
Mr. Geer didn't assault anyone
before he was shot. Why hasn't the DOJ pursued this case? Why hasn't our
president weighed in? Oh. I see.
From
the comments section of the Washington Post
There will always be good
officers that make bad decisions and bad officers that abuse power. It's what
occurs after these incidents that needs to change in this county. While this
investigation seems to have been completed in a fair a impartial manner, the
people cannot be expected to trust that this will always be the case. That
said, there is no excuse for the obstruction of both state and federal
investigations. If this county will not implement a policy of independent
investigation when an officer takes a life then they at the very least need to
have an oversight committee. The SUPERVISORS (using that term loosely) need to have a
policy allowing 90 days for the department to complete an investigation. The
COMPLETE details then need to be given to a citizens review board. This board
could be made up of community leaders or possibly retired police, judges or
lawyers. The committee would review the facts and then forward their findings
and any recommendations to the Commonwealth Attorney. I encourage you to
endorse independent oversight and use the email addresses below and
respectfully tell the Supervisors how you feel.
From
the comments section of the Washington Post
OK--Washington Post. You and
every TV news person covered the Missouri event 24/7 non-stop. However, we
didn't have that type of coverage for Mr. Geer and you didn't even put these
current articles on the front page. I haven't heard news coverage on TV. What
about equality for Mr. Geer. Could it be because he is a White man? Before
everyone reacts to that question, just think about it. When a White cop causes
the death of a Black person, whether armed or unarmed, whether suspcious
behavior or not, this country reacts. You react with civil unrest and
accusations, whether unfounded or proven. In this instance, there has been
little coverage. So people--where is the outrage for Geer and his family? Where
is the media coverage of the same level as you demonstrated for others? I am
angry with media and you mostly report with your own opinions--few of you have
the right to the name of "journalist" because you don't know the true
meaning of journalism. Mr. Geer did nothing to be shot he and and his family
deserve all the respect and equality as you have provided in other instances.
From
the comments section of the Washington Post
"Mr. Geer did nothing to be
shot he and and his family deserve all the respect and equality as you have
provided in other instances."
From
the comments section of the Washington Post
At least there is no wonder why
the public DOES NOT TRUST POLICE!. They lie, kill, molest and cover up-in the
name of the policeman brotherhood.
This place is the beginnings of a
little Mexico.
From
the comments section of the Washington Post
For those who are interested in
how law enforcement has become "hardened" over the years, I strongly
recommend reading "Rise of the Warrior Cop: The Militarization of
America's Police Forces" written by Post blogger Radley Balko.
From
the comments section of the Washington Post
I served numerous arrest and
search warrants over my career--mostly with one or two other detectives and a
uniform or two as backup. Today, the overwhelming majority are served after a
SWAT team "secures" the location--even if the violation is for some
non-violent offense.
I make no judgment on that evolution just an
observation that what was once done by an adequate number of mere mortals is
now performed by a highly-trained and well-armed team of tactical folks who
operate at a higher level of anticipation, perhaps even expectation, than a
situation requires.
From
the comments section of the Washington Post
Essentially, once a person
becomes a police officer, it's total immunity. The officer can lie, cheat,
steal, beat his wife and your wife too. He
literally can commit rape, robbery and murder while not ever fearing
retribution. Then retire on a full
pension and health care.
Fairfax County could go from wrong to right on police reform
Fairfax County could go from
wrong to right on police reform
Fairfax County will vote Tuesday on a police
reform proposal.
By Editorial Board December 5 at
7:13 PM
FAIRFAX COUNTY will have the
chance Tuesday to go from wrong to right on police accountability.
The county was wrong when it
failed for more than a year to take responsibility for the shooting of an
unarmed man by one of its officers in 2013. It started to make things right
when, after the controversy that followed, the county Board of Supervisors
commissioned a group of civilians to propose accountability-boosting revisions
to police procedures. Tuesday, the most essential of those recommendations — a
civilian review panel to look over investigations of police misconduct — could
finally get the green light.
The panel would allow citizens to
submit complaints about police investigations they think have gone awry through
a channel outside the department. Their peers, all members of the Fairfax
County community, would review those complaints and determine whether the case
deserved a second look. The board has already approved an independent auditor
to monitor internal affairs investigations of incidents involving death or
serious injury.
The review-panel plan has been revised
somewhat since the initial recommendation. For example, while citizen
complainants will retain the right to speak and take questions before the
panel, they won’t be allowed to present new evidence or testimony. And although
the commission suggested the panel have a single representative from a law
enforcement background, it now must have a minimum of one. It’s up to the Board
of Supervisors to appoint a balanced slate of members.
Even with these alterations, the
panel’s approval Tuesday would mark a major turning point for Fairfax. John
Geer’s death more than three years ago made news, and it laid bare broader
problems in county policing. Just this summer, statistics showed that more than
40 percent of use-of-force cases in the county involved black residents, who
account for only about 10 percent of the county’s population.
These troubling numbers
underscore the need for reforms, including outside review. But the county can’t
stop there: Though the police department says it has implemented around 90 percent
of the recommendations under its purview, some remain in progress. A pilot
program for police body cameras, which the board says it plans to turn to early
next year, should top the list.
The citizen review panel is
designed to address abuse after it occurs. The county must continue pursuing
other measures to stop that abuse from happening in the first place.
From
the comments section of the Washington Post
Astonishing that the Washington
Post editors simply signed on to the self-serving claims posted by Chairman
Bulova about progress in reforming Fairfax County police Department.
Why does the Post continue to
ignore the fact that Bulova herself chose to let the Police Department—famed
for its stonewalling, secrecy and lack of accountability -- call the shots on
police reform by turning over responsibility for revisions of the Ad Hoc
Commission to the Police Chief and former Police Chief (now Deputy County
Executive)? Why was there no mention of the facts revealed by Pete Earley and
John Lovaas, two members of the Ad Hoc Commission, who bravely took issue with
the myths being propagated by County spokespersons in the Metro section just
two days earlier?
From
the comments section of the Washington Post
I really thought the chief was
getting it. He needs to be fired if this culture of public deceit is ever going
to change.
The chief declines consent???
His consent is not required!
As for Sean Corcoran, the
President of the police union, he is a clown. He was a commissioner and was
also on the subcommittee that wrote the proposal that included a civilian
review panel. He voted FOR all the recommendations including the civilian
panel. It should also be noted that Sean Corcoran was also the one that said he
finds it "UNBELIEVABLE" that an officer could be charged with murder
while in the commission of his duties. I wonder where the Geer case would be
today if a detective like Corcoran was in charge of the Geer investigation.
After all, he would have ruled out murder even before he arrived at the scene.
From
the comments section of the Washington Post
Geer was obviously just the tip
of the iceberg. It seems like every week some new story about misconduct by the
Fairfax PD emerges. The way to reform the dept. is to make everyone resign and
then re-apply for their jobs and use this to cull the bad apples - starting with
the chief.
From
the comments section of the Washington Post
I disagree with the statement
that the Fairfax Police used to have a sterling reputation. While they may not
have engaged in many unjustified shootings, they have always had a reputation
for being surly at best in their dealings with the public. Many people in
Fairfax attributed that to the fact that the police did not make enough money
to live in Fairfax, and they resented those who did.
From
the comments section of the Washington Post
Pretty much, if the Police Union
is against it, I'm for it, and vice-versa.
From
the comments section of the Washington Post
They sound like Iranians, they
want to review themselves. A great deal if you can negotiate it.
From
the comments section of the Washington Post
The Fairfax County PD is a decent
department. They would be better if the get rid of the holier than thou
attitude. That attitude runs county wide amongst its employees.
Will Fairfax police be reformed?
Will
Fairfax police be reformed?
By
Editorial Board October 17, 2015
THE
UNWARRANTED death of John Geer, the unarmed man shot and killed by a Fairfax
County police officer in 2013 as he stood on the doorstep of his own house in
Springfield, seemed for the longest time akin to death-by-lightning-bolt. A
tragic event, to be sure, but one that imparted no lessons, triggered no
consequences and engendered no reforms. The official response: too bad, just
one of those things.
Owing
to public outrage in Fairfax, that has now changed. After two years of
prosecutorial paralysis, both at the federal and state levels, the police
officer who shot Mr. Geer, Adam Torres, was indicted on murder charges this
summer. And, this month, a county commission established to review police
department procedures emerged from six months of deliberations with an array of
tough recommendations that would establish a new regimen of accountability for
the cops.
The
commission’s recommendations, adopted unanimously, will now be put to the
county’s Board of Supervisors. They deserve robust support, especially the one
most likely to encounter pushback from department: the establishment of a
civilian panel to review allegations of police abuse and misconduct.
Fairfax’s
police department, with 1,400 sworn officers, is, after the state police, the
biggest law enforcement agency in Virginia. Before Mr. Geer’s death, and
several other similarly questionable police shootings in recent years, it
enjoyed a sterling reputation. But the aftermath of the Geer shooting —
witnessed in broad daylight by several other officers (who didn’t shoot) as
well as neighbors — was a textbook case of how not to cultivate the public’s
trust. Basic information, including the name of the officer who shot Mr. Geer,
was withheld. For months, the department offered no coherent (or true)
explanation of what had happened. Prosecutors punted the case to the feds, with
no apparent justification.
Police
and prosecutors finally awoke from their torpor and did their jobs — but not
until Mr. Geer’s family, justifiably angry and bewildered at the official
inertia, filed suit, a U.S. senator started asking questions and county
residents started protesting publicly.
Sound
policies and procedures would prevent another such farce, as the commission
empowered by the Board of Supervisors understood. In addition to its
recommendation that a seven-member citizens’ panel be established to review
alleged police misconduct, the commission urged that an independent auditor be
empowered to oversee internal police investigations in cases involving the use
of force, including when police kill civilians. The auditor would be named by
and report to the Board of Supervisors.
In
addition, the commission laid out an array of reforms whose effect would be to
tilt the police toward 21st-century policies of transparency and
information-sharing, and more restraint in the use of force by officers in
tense situations. Key to that is the deployment of more teams or individual
officers with specialized training in dealing with mentally ill people, who now
constitute big shares of those detained and jailed in the county.
Grumbling
has already begun, particularly about the civilian review panel. The county
police chief, Edwin Roessler, is withholding his consent, and the police union
has rejected it outright.
The
fact is, most of the nation’s largest police departments have such review
panels, and most of them include or are composed of civilians, and for good
reason; that’s whom the department serves. Whether the Board of Supervisors
stands up to the department or succumbs to it will be a test of elected
officials’ backbone and resolve to clean up the police.
the problem with the Fairfax County Police is the problem with the police nationwide
As I have written over and over,
the problem with the Fairfax County Police is the problem with the police
nationwide that there is a frightening number of mentally ill people working as police
officers.
The Fairfax County Mental Health
system had a screening program for applicants to the police department.
Psychological interviewing and testing would decide whether the applicant was
psychologically appropriate for the stresses of police work.
This program was abandoned by the
police many years ago now.
Why are we dealing with this silliness?
The proposed Civilian Review
Board is, by design, limited by it lack of any real power or authority, it has
no investigative power and refers complaints to the police internal affairs
department who sweep it under the carpet as quickly as possible because THE
PURPOSE OF THE FAIRFAX COUNTY INTERNAL AFFAIRS OFFICE IS TO PROTECT THE POLICE DEPARTMENT FROM CITIZENS.
The proposed Civilian Review
Board has no budget for investigation, no subpoena power to compel testimony
and no authority to impose discipline.
So why are we dealing with this silliness?
Fairfax County can restore confidence in its police department
Fairfax County can restore
confidence in its police department
By Pete Earley and John Lovaas
December 2
Pete Earley and John Lovaas
served on the Ad Hoc Police Practices Review Commission.
It has been a year since Fairfax
County announced it would review recommendations by a special commission to
restore public confidence in its police department. Sadly, it has approved only
a handful of changes and has weakened some reforms that it approved, raising
questions about the county’s commitment to transparency and change.
Board of Supervisors Chairman
Sharon Bulova took a courageous step when she appointed a 35-member Ad Hoc
Police Practices Review Commission to examine police practices after the 2013
fatal shooting of John Geer. The unarmed Geer was killed by an officer who was
later fired and who pleaded guilty to manslaughter, but only after 17 months of
stonewalling by the police and the county.
The commission, which included
nine active and former police officials, unanimously recommended 142 changes in
October 2015 to bolster public confidence. County officials divided them into
202 recommendations under four broad categories. Nearly half concerned “use of
force” by police officers. The others focused on police communications with the
public, how officers treat individuals with mental illnesses and creating
independent oversight of the police.
Of the 202 recommendations, only
20 have been approved. Four were rejected. The remaining 178 are listed as
“under review” or “in progress” with no date for completion.
Among those stuck in limbo are
the use of body cameras and requirements to make the police more forthcoming
after officer-involved shootings to preclude a repeat of the Geer failures.
Besides the slow progress, the
board has crippled some recommendations it approved. The commission recommended
the board appoint an independent police auditor to review criminal and
administrative (disciplinary) investigations of officer-involved incidents that
result in civilian death or serious injury and, impanel a civilian review panel
to receive and consider citizen complaints about incidents of alleged police
abuse of authority or other serious misconduct.
In September, the Board of
Supervisors agreed to hire a police auditor, but it sharply curtailed the
auditor’s authority. It rejected hiring two independent criminal investigators
and ruled that the auditor not review criminal matters until after the cases
were officially closed, a legal process that often takes months or years.
Instead of directly monitoring internal investigations, the auditor would be
informed about them through the police chief.
On Dec. 6, the supervisors will
meet to vote on creation of the civilian review panel. Although the
commission’s recommendations were unanimously adopted, including “yes” votes by
police department and police union representatives, Deputy County Executive
David Rohrer, a former Fairfax police chief, and county staff are recommending
the board restrict citizen complainants’ right to speak before the panel and
its ability to question them, forcing the panel to rely largely on
investigations by the department.
Police officers deserve public
trust and support. Public outrage about Geer’s death showed significant
distrust of the police and officers being subject only to investigation by
fellow officers. Before Geer’s death, no Fairfax police officer had been
criminally charged, much less indicted, in a killing during the department’s
75-year history. Also troubling: Of the reported 539 police use-of-force
incidents in Fairfax County in 2015, 40 percent involved African Americans even
though the county’s black population hovers around 8 percent.
If the board hopes to restore
public trust, it needs to adopt the commission’s recommendations for the
civilian review panel and citizens’ rights without tinkering, and it must speed
up approval of the reforms still languishing on the shelves.
This is why the board of supervisors lets the cops run rampant
Do the math................
In Fairfax County, more than
13,000 tickets have been issued for failing to pay full time attention,
which includes texting while driving, said Cmdr. Bob Blakley. The cost of this
citation starts at $97.
"failing to pay full time attention" is an opinion law, in other words the Fairfax County Cops can....and do....make up this offense as a money maker....the more money they bring in, the bigger their cut from the partners on the board of supervisors......
The Fairfax County Cops refused to be regulated, write their own budget and murder citizens and this is the hard coverage they get from the local media
Thanks to the Fairfax County
Police...Santa's coming to town early!
by GOOD MORNING WASHINGTON
Monday, December 5th 2016
As Christmas approaches, children
everywhere will be watching the skies for Santa Claus. in Fairfax County some
very special children won’t have to wait until Christmas Eve! (ABC7)
WASHINGTON (ABC7) — As Christmas
approaches, children everywhere will be watching the skies for Santa Claus. in
Fairfax County some very special children won’t have to wait until Christmas
Eve, because Santa's paying them a visit early. Oh1 Did we mention Santa will
temporarily trade in his sleigh and reindeer for a Harley-Davidson motorcycle?
Police Officer First Class Chuck Reinhard, Mrs. Claus, Frosty, Rudolph and the
man himself Santa stopped by GMW to share all the
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)