THE AGONIZINGLY protracted story of John Geer
The Washington Post
THE AGONIZINGLY protracted story
of John Geer, the unarmed man shot to death by a Fairfax County police officer
as he stood, hands up, in the doorway of his Springfield home almost three
years ago, might finally have reached its end. Yet the county, which pledged
reforms so that no such sorry sequence of events could ever recur, still has
work to do.
Last week Adam D. Torres, the
now-former officer who pulled the trigger, appeared in court to plead guilty to
involuntary manslaughter, belatedly express remorse and agree with prosecutors
to a 12-month prison sentence. If a judge accepts the deal, it will conclude a
saga of police malfeasance, official stonewalling and political paralysis, all
of which left a stain on Virginia’s biggest jurisdiction and its 1,300-officer
police force.
It’s certainly reasonable to
believe, as Mr. Geer’s parents do, that Mr. Torres got off lightly. Four other
police officers contradicted Mr. Torres’s account that he had seen Mr. Geer
suddenly lower his hands, as if going for a weapon. To the contrary, they said
his hands were up when Mr. Torres fired the fatal shot into Mr. Geer’s chest.
Nonetheless, Mr. Torres, who was
jailed without bond in August, will remain behind bars for now. Fired last year
from the police force, he is a convicted felon, and he will never again work as
a law enforcement officer. His punishment is substantial. Mr. Geer’s former partner, who was reluctant to
testify — as was the couple’s 19-year-old daughter — was amenable to the
plea deal.
Notwithstanding Mr. Torres’s
plea, no resolution has been reached for the systemic and institutional
problems in Fairfax laid bare in the aftermath of Mr. Geer’s death. Chief among
these is the glaring lack of accountability in the police department, whose
once-excellent reputation has been badly damaged.
That damage was self-inflicted.
Following Mr. Geer’s unwarranted
death, the department went into a defensive crouch, providing no information on
the case for a year and refusing to cooperate with state and federal
prosecutors. The stonewalling, which the police undertook with the connivance
of the county attorney’s office, which was derelict in its duty, stunned the
top prosecutor in Fairfax. “I’ve never seen anyone act like that in a position
of trust, withholding information,” said the prosecutor, Raymond F. Morrogh.
“It really hurt all the people involved. It was dead wrong. I hope it never
happens again.”
To avoid such a recurrence,
officials empaneled a commission to review police policies and practices. The
commission produced many recommendations, some of which have been adopted,
including new use-of-force guidelines that emphasize restraint and
de-escalation.
Other recommendations are under
review by the county’s elected Board of Supervisors, including ones that would
mandate a greater degree of information-sharing and empower an independent
auditor to oversee internal police investigations in cases involving the use of
force.
A critical test of the county’s
commitment to reform is whether it establishes a civilian board to review
alleged police misconduct. Pushback from unions representing rank-and-file police
should not deter supervisors from ensuring that the panel consists of
civilians, not current and former police. Police departments around the country
have gained credibility from such panels; Fairfax County must not pull back
from the brink of real reform.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment