Fairfax County: Support for
Police Auditor, Civilian Review Panel
Supervisors discuss independent
oversight recommendations from Ad Hoc Commission.
By Tim Peterson
Neither the independent
auditor nor civilian review panel would conduct an independent investigation of
the complaint, but would refer the case to the Chief of Police and he to the
Internal Affairs Bureau for investigation. Or as Board of
Supervisors Chairman Sharon Bulova put it: “It’s another portal complaints can
come from.”
Details of an independent auditor
for Fairfax County police and a civilian panel to review cases of alleged FCPD
abuse of authority or misconduct are still being hammered out. However there
was general agreement among County Supervisors at the July 19 Public Safety
Committee meeting that they are in favor of moving forward with the recommendations
from the Ad Hoc Police Practices Review Commission to create both entities for
accountability.
The meeting was held to discuss
the recommendations from the commission’s Independent Oversight and
Investigations subcommittee so that a formal board matter accepting them can be
drawn up in time for a vote this fall.
Public Safety Committee chair
Supervisor John Cook (R-Braddock) opened the meeting with a moment of silence,
and then a perspective on the need for reforms to aspects of the County’s policing.
“We need to be bringing people together,” Cook
said. “How do we further connect the community and our law enforcement, have
that dialogue.”
In reference to creating a
civilian review panel, Cook added Fairfax County would “do what other
jurisdictions are doing, and hopefully do it better.”
TO GIVE AN OVERVIEW of
independent and civilian review of law enforcement, Independent Monitor
Nicholas Mitchell with the City and County of Denver Office of the Independent
Monitor spoke to the crowded Fairfax County Government Center conference room.
Mitchell also spoke as a board member of the National Association for Civilian
Oversight of Law Enforcement.
“There’s the proposition as citizens we’re
obligated to ensure powers are being consistent with the Constitution and our
system of laws,” Mitchell said. “And the proposition with granting of power,
comes respect and accountability to the community.”
Mitchell said there is no one
model for civilian review boards, and that most large cities and an increasing
number of medium and smaller-size cities are forming them. Some are formed
preemptively, others in the wake of critical incidents involving police.
Jack Johnson, chair of the
Independent Oversight subcommittee, reviewed the recommendations word for word.
He explained they were voted through unanimously, including the representatives
from law enforcement and FCPD.
Under the recommendations,
independent oversight of Fairfax County Police would be undertaken by an
independent auditor and civilian panel. The auditor would handle use of force
cases that resulted in death or serious injury. The civilian panel would look
at other alleged FCPD abuse of authority or misconduct. Residents could bring a
complaint directly to the Civilian Review Panel, which would refer the case to
the FCPD for investigation.
In each case, the reviewing party
would not conduct an independent investigation of the complaint, but would
refer the case to the Chief of Police and he to the Internal Affairs Bureau for
investigation.
Or as Board of Supervisors
Chairman Sharon Bulova put it: “It’s another portal complaints can come from.”
Fairfax County Chief of Police
Edwin Roessler said the recommendations are fully supported by his department.
Roessler embraced independent oversight as an important part of trust with the
community. “We’re on the same page. There is no conflict,” he said.
Det. Sean Corcoran, president of
the Fairfax Coalition of Police Local 5000 and a member of the Ad Hoc
Commission, said despite the unanimous commission vote for an auditor and
civilian review board, there are more details that need to be taken into
account before moving forward with the recommendation.
“There’s concern about fiscal costs,” Corcoran
said. “Our internal affairs is strapped as it is right now.”
The Supervisors reviewed a draft
job description for the auditor, who would be a full-time County employee, and
language that would formally set the scope, organization and process of the
Police Civilian Review Panel.
Supervisor Pat Herrity (R-Springfield)
echoed Corcoran in calling for the group to take more time dealing with the
“devil in the details” rather than rushing forward with the recommendations.
“Can we get there in a fiscally responsible
way?” Herrity asked. “What’s this going to cost us? In distraction? Time taken?
Someone needs to make some estimates.”
Herrity questioned whether both
an auditor and civilian review panel were necessary, and if there might be a
better way to “get transparency without creating bureaucracy.”
Randy Sayles of Oak Hill was a
member of Ad Hoc Commission Use of Force subcommittee and attended the majority
of the full meetings. He sat in the front row of Tuesday’s meeting.
Sayles said he thought the day’s
discussion did a “good job” capturing the work of the commission on independent
oversight.
With regard to the composition of
the civilian review panel, Sayles said he would like to see language requiring
a law enforcement representative have a seat at the table. They could be
retired, just not from Fairfax County.
“To speak up and give that perspective,” he
said would be an important addition. “That’s a recommendation I’m standing by
to this day.”
The next Public Safety Committee
meeting is scheduled for Sep. 13 at 3 p.m. at the Fairfax County Government
Center, located at 12000 Government Center Parkway in Fairfax.
