Detained Woman Claims Cop Texted Her Sexual Photos to Himself
A woman filed a lawsuit Friday against
the city, claiming a Chicago Police officer who arrested her last June went
through her iPhone and forwarded sexual photos of her to his own phone without
her consent.
Lemia Britt filed the suit in
Cook County Circuit Court, claiming the officer invaded her privacy and
violated her constitutional rights when he searched her phone after arresting
her for violating an order of protection June 25, 2013.
The officer and the City of
Chicago are named as defendants in the suit.
According to the suit, Britt’s
purse and iPhone were not inventoried as evidence of any kind while she was
being held at the Wentworth District police station, and the officer didn’t
have any reason to believe the phone contained any evidence related to the
violation of an order of protection.
The officer told Britt he was
keeping her purse and phone safe for her, according to the suit.
The photos the officer
allegedly forwarded to is personal phone were in a password-protected file on
Britt’s iPhone, and they were “of a private and sensitive nature in that they
were sexual photos of [Britt],” according to the suit.
The suit claims the officer
violated the Illinois Constitution’s protections against unreasonable searches,
seizures or invasions of privacy.
It also claims the officer violated
Britt’s constitutional right to equal protection based on sex when he “seized
her photos for his own personal use because she was a female and the photos
were of a sexual nature.”
The five-count suit also holds
the city responsible for the officer’s actions and seeks an unspecified amount
in compensatory and punitive damages.
A spokesperson for the city’s
law department could not immediately provide comment on the suit Friday night.
Off-duty officer shoots man in Lawndale
MICHAELLE BOND, INQUIRER STAFF
WRITER
An off-duty police officer shot
a man in the leg Saturday morning during a fight over dog feces left in the
officer's yard, police said.
The man was treated at a
hospital and released. The officer was treated at a hospital for cuts and bruises
on his head and released.
Police did not name the two men
but said the man who was shot would be charged with aggravated assault.
The officer was outside his
home shortly before noon on the 6400 block of Oakley Street in Lawndale when he
saw a dog defecate in his front yard, police said. He asked the dog's owner, a
39-year-old man from the 6400 block of Argyle Street, to clean up. After a
verbal argument between the two, the dog owner left.
When the owner returned a few
minutes later without his dog, the man and the officer got into a fight, during
which the man punched the officer several times in the face and head, police
said. The man pulled the officer's hooded sweatshirt over his head, leaving the
officer bent over as he continued to hit him from behind, police said.
The officer then drew his Glock
pistol from his hip holster and shot behind him, hitting the man in the right
thigh. The man was taken to Albert Einstein Medical Center. The officer was
taken to Jeanes Hospital.
Internal Affairs will
investigate the shooting and the District Attorney's Office will review it. The
officer will be placed on administrative duty during the investigation.
Palacios police shoot, kill family dog
Knight, an 11-month-old Labrador retriever
mix, was shot by officers with the Palacios Police Department on Feb. 27. The
owners say the dog was spooked by officers shooting at other animals in the
backyard when he broke loose from a chain.
• Bianca Montes • A dog owner wants justice after her
11-month-old Labrador was shot, killed and left to die by an officer of the
Palacios Police Department last week.
Returning from the Matagorda
County Fair on Thursday night, Tiffany Garcia-Duran said she and her family
were devastated to find one of their dogs was missing.
Knight wasn't an outside dog,
she said. He was a puppy that typically slept indoors.
That night, however,
Garcia-Duran, 29, said she left him chained and on his leash in the backyard
with their other dogs.
Garcia-Duran said there's a bar
in the alley behind her home, and she's had previous problems with people
breaking into her yard.
"We've had stuff stolen
from our backyard," she said. "We keep dogs back there to keep people
out."
According to a Palacios Police
Department report, officers responded to a call about a large, aggressive dog
loose near Sixth and Main streets, about a block from Garcia-Duran's home.
A 37-year-old woman complained
the dog was chasing her, according to the report. Garcia-Duran isn't buying the
story. She said the passer-by was probably just startled by the barking.
"We've been called at
least three different times about their dogs," Police Chief David Miles
said, explaining he previously spoke to the family about its dogs being loose.
A leash law in Matagorda County
states dogs must be leashed or fenced in such a way that they do not run free.
"When officers arrived, they
were confronted by that dog," Miles said. "The officer fired three
times."
Miles said officers couldn't
find the dog after shooting it, and he was unable to confirm if they attempted
to contact the family afterward.
"When we got home, he
wasn't there," Garcia-Duran said. "I was screaming, looking for him,
and our neighbors came out and said there were two officers in our property,
and they heard gunshots."
She was shocked.
"I called the
police," she said. "I called them when I thought Knight was missing,
and they said nothing."
The police department does not
have a policy to notify an owner if officers shoot his or her dog, Miles said,
but it does try to notify owners as a courtesy.
He said he's unaware whether
animal control was called to assist with the incident.
Animal control officials could
not be reached Wednesday for comment.
"Our policy is to use the
least amount of force necessary," Miles said. "The officer tried to
avoid the situation by using a nonlethal amount of pepper spray."
Unfortunately, he said, it
wasn't enough "to control the dog."
Garcia-Duran said she later
found an unspent bullet near her back door, leading her to believe officers
shot at her dogs in the backyard. Knight, she said, was probably spooked and
broke away from his leash. She believes he was running from the officers, not
toward them.
Garcia-Duran found Knight's
remains the next day. He was still wearing his broken leash.
"It just breaks my heart
because I feel guilty that I was not there for him," she said. "I've
done my share of crying. I just think he needs justice. It wasn't fair,
especially if he was running."
Suspended Harrisburg cop alleging harassment, retaliation
By Emily Previti |
epreviti@pennlive.com
HARRISBURG — Suspended city
police officer Jennie Jenkins claims her suspension over misspending charitable
funds is retaliation, state officials confirmed Monday.
Jenkins “alleges she’s being
harassed and was suspended in retaliation for opposing unlawful activity, which
in this case is discrimination,” said state Human Relations Commission
spokeswoman Shannon Powers.
Jenkins was suspended from the
Harrisburg Police Department in Octoberamid allegations she'd misappropriated
Police Athletic League funds. At the time, she was adamant about her innocence.
That was the last time she
spoke publicly about the matter.
Her attorney didn't respond
Monday to calls seeking comment.
The state commission began an
investigation Jan. 23 in response to a complaint Jenkins filed Dec. 27, 2013,
against the city.
She jointly filed with the federal
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, Powers said.
About 40 percent of the
commission’s cases are settled before investigations conclude or the
complainant pursues civil action, she said, then declined further comment.
Powers and city paralegal Michael
Brownsweiger declined to release the documents filed by Jenkins, citing the
state Right-to-Know law’s exception for “grievance material, including
documents related to discrimination or sexual harassment.”
Jenkins’ attorney didn’t return
calls seeking comment Monday.
Harrisburg Fraternal Order of
Police Capital City Lodge 12 president Jason Brinker, a detective with the
department, also didn’t return a call for comment Monday.
The state Attorney General's
Office is investigating Jenkins' case on behalf of local police and Dauphin
County Attorney General Edward Marsico Jr. because Marsico served alongside
Jenkins on the PAL Board.
Recently retired police Capt.
Annette Oates had stepped in as PAL director after Jenkins was suspended. It's
unclear whether Oates will continue in the role.
Chillicothe police officer faces sex crime charges
By Chris Oberholtz, Multimedia
Producer
By DeAnn Smith, Digital Content
Manager
By Jamie Oberg, News Reporter
CHILLICOTHE, MO (KCTV) –
A Chillicothe police officer
already in trouble with the law now faces some serious allegations.
There are 9,000 people in
Chillicothe served by a police department of 20. With only 15 of those on
street patrols, the recent loss of four experienced officers has put a strain
on staffing and raised eyebrows over the reasons behind the staff shortage.
"Any time you have people
leave who have 10 years, 15 years, 20 years in the department," said City
Administrator Ike Holland, "you lose that history and experience, so it
impacts the department."
The Livingston County
Prosecutor's Office has charged Brent Allen Schade with first-degree forcible
rape and first-degree forcible sodomy.
His 20-year-old girlfriend,
Amanda Nicole Gault, was charged with forcible sodomy. She was taken into
custody on Thursday.
Schade was placed on unpaid
leave in January after he was issued misdemeanor citations for hindering
prosecution and tampering with physical evidence.
The Chillicothe Police
Department said they began investigating after receiving a report that a
20-year-old had been physically assaulted.The victim went to the hospital for treatment.
Authorities said the attack
occurred starting March 3 and continued into the early morning hours of March 4
at a residence in the 300 block of Cherry Street.
The victim said she had gone to
the residence and drank hard liquor and beer with the two suspects, according
to court documents. She said at one point they slipped something that smelled
and tasted like perfume. After that, she said, she lost control. She said at
that point is when they sexually assaulted her, prosecutors say.
A 16-year-old boy was passed
out at the home and the woman tried to get his help to no avail, according to
court records. The woman said she tried to call 911 but that Gault slapped the
phone from her hands.
According to court records, the
woman said the attack only ended when she vomited all over the bed and bedroom.
Schade and Gault are being held
in the Daviess Dekalb County Regional Jail. Their bond is set at $50,000 each
and they were ordered not to have any contact with the victim.
Because Schade is a police
officer, the Livingston Prosecutor Adam Warren handed the case over to Caldwell
County Prosecutor Brady Kopek.
"It leaves a mark on law
enforcement. If law enforcement is cut, we all bleed," Warren said.
"My belief is I would be harder on him."
But he said some members of the
public might wonder whether he would be too lenient. He said it was best for
him to withdraw from the case.
Warren will handle the
prosecution of Gault.
Retired mounted police officer charged with assaulting teen
PHILADELPHIA - March 6, 2014
(WPVI) -- A retired Philadelphia mounted police officer has been arrested and
charged with sexually assaulting a teenage girl.
Police say 75-year-old Walter
Sasse of Roxborough had a 2 ½ year sexual relationship with the girl beginning
when she was 15. She is 17 now.
The teenager recently told a
friend and her parents about the alleged relationship, and they contacted
The victim rode horses at the
Courtesy Stables at 901 Cathedral Road in Andorra where Sasse worked.
Eventually, she also started working at the stables and that's when the sexual
contact began, according to investigators.
Sasse retired from the force in
1991 after 20 years with the department. His last assignment was with the
Philadelphia Police Department's mounted patrol unit.
He was arrested Wednesday and
charged with sexual assault and related crimes. Bail was set at $50,000. He
posted 10 percent and was released. His next court date is March 25th in Family
Court.
Trumbull officer charged with sexual assault on teen told by judge not to leave state
BRIDGEPORT, Connecticut — A
judge has ordered a Trumbull police officer charged with sexually assaulting a
teenage girl to stay in Connecticut after new information in the case was
discovered.
Assistant State's Attorney
Tatiana Messina would not comment on the new information, but urged state
Superior Court Judge Earl Richards to order the restriction over the objections
of William Ruscoe's lawyer.
The Connecticut Post
(http://bit.ly/1igOYOi ) reports that the defense attorney says Ruscoe
"denies the allegations."
Authorities say the 44-year-old
Ruscoe began texting the 17-year-old girl last March that he wanted to have a
sexual relationship with her and then texted her naked photographs of himself
and his wife. He allegedly sexually assaulted her at his home. They met at a
police cadet program for high school students.
Officers charged with assault waive arraignments
By Mikaela K. Reynolds
DOVER — The two Farmington
officers indicted on assault charges last month waived their arraignments in
Strafford County Superior Court on Thursday.
Sgt. Michael McNeil, Jr., 34,
of Rochester, and Officer Gregory Gough, 24, of Dover, were each indicted on a
single simple assault charge for an incident in which the pair allegedly
assaulted a man in handcuffs in Milton last summer.
According to the indictments,
McNeil grabbed Randy Gray by the neck with his left hand and exerted enough
force to pull Gray's body from a standing position, while Gough allegedly
grabbed Gray's arms and torso and spun his body during the assault.
The pair was placed on
administrative leave after their indictments were handed up by a grand jury on
Feb. 20.
Both men are facing misdemeanor
charges, which could result in up to one year in jail for each of them.
Chief Kevin Willey wrote in a
press release, following the release of the indictments, that police are held
to a higher standard of conduct due to the nature of their work.
“If officers violate those standards in any
way, they will be, and expect to be, held accountable,” he wrote, adding, “at
this time, the charges are just allegations and the officers involved are
presumed innocent. We ask that members of the public reserve judgment until all
facts are known.”
The incident that led to the
assault allegations began last June in Farmington after McNeil, who was off
duty at the time, pulled Gray over after witnessing a road rage incident in
which he believed Gray was involved.
McNeil asked Gray if he had
been drinking after allegedly smelling alcohol on his breath. According to the
affidavit, that is when Gray drove off at a high rate of speed, striking McNeil
in his left arm and leg with his driver's side door. Farmington police said
McNeil was not seriously injured in the incident.
Gray told Foster's he fled the
scene after he asked McNeil to show identification and McNeil refused.
Gray is still being prosecuted
in connection with the incident and is scheduled for trial and jury selection
the week of May 5.
According to Gray, about 20
minutes later McNeil, Gough, and two Milton officers arrived at his home on
Middleton Road in Milton after tracking him down through his car license plate.
He said McNeil came toward him yelling at him as Milton officers handcuffed
him.
Gray claims McNeil grabbed him
by the neck trying to force him to the ground and Gough stepped in to help.
According to Gray, Milton
officers tried to the stop the incident, which he said only concluded when
McNeil fell to the ground. Milton officers then escorted Gray to the back of a
cruiser.
Gray told Foster's at the time
of the indictments, “I was complying with everything they told me to do and not
resisting in any way. There was no need for it.”
Gray said there is video
footage of the event, but it is not currently available.
Assistant Grafton County
Attorney Jack Bell reviewed the case after Strafford County Attorney Tom
Velardi determined it was best to have an outside attorney review the
allegations. Velardi said the switch was necessary because McNeil is an active
police officer and a witness in several cases, including the one against Gray.
The state now has 14 days to
make an offer to the two men. Dispositional conferences will be scheduled for
each of the men.
Parma agrees to pay 16-year-old boy $40,000 to settle police brutality lawsuit
By Brian Byrne
Parma City Council has agreed
to pay $40,000 to settle a police brutality lawsuit brought forth by the mother
of a 16-year-old boy.
PARMA, Ohio -- City Council on
Monday agreed to pay $40,000 to settle a police brutality lawsuit brought forth
by the mother of a 16-year-old boy.
The suit accused officer James
Manzo of unjustifiably striking the boy twice in the head while placing him in
a cruiser following a traffic stop in November 2012.
Filed in November in Cuyahoga
County Common Pleas Court, the suit sought unspecified damages for the boy,
claiming assault and battery, false arrest and imprisonment and professional
misconduct. It states he has suffered continued headaches as a result of the
incident, and incurred substantial medical bills.
Council met in executive
session to discuss the out-of-court settlement, and approved it on
first-reading suspension of the rules, meaning it did not receive the required
three separate reviews.
“I assume they were anxious to
resolve this case because I think they realized patrolman Manzo was completely
out of line with what he did,” the boy’s lawyer, Terry Gilbert, said Tuesday.
City spokesperson Jeannie
Roberts said officials would not comment on the case because it remains open as
the settlement is finalized.
According to the suit, the boy
and two others had just been picked up by his father after visiting a friend
when the van was pulled over by Manzo, who indicated the vehicle was stopped
"because it was circling the block." The boy disputed the officer’s
assertion, leading Manzo to open the van and say, “if you want to be a smart
ass, come here."
As Manzo placed the boy in a
cruiser following a pat down, “he produced a hard object, probably a
flashlight, and struck (the boy) twice in the head without justification,” the
suit reads. Manzo then left the boy bleeding in the cruiser while he radioed
dispatch, allegedly falsely reporting the juvenile had bumped his head on the
window.
“As a potential cover up to any
wrong-doing, the blood from (the boy’s) head which got on (Manzo’s) patrol car
was cleaned up before investigators had a chance to inspect and preserve the
evidence. This evidence would have bearing on the veracity of the attack,” the
suit states.
The boy was transported by EMS
for treatment at University Hospitals Parma Medical Center, where he was
handcuffed to a bed, according to the suit. He ultimately received stitches and
staples to seal a facial contusion.
“I think the citizens of Parma
should be concerned that they have a cop that has a license to go around and
beat minors up like that without suffering consequences,” Gilbert said. “This
was not just an accident, it was an intentional, deliberate act against a
defenseless minor. There’s just no excuse for it. If anyone else did something
like this, they would be hauled off and be charged and have to answer to a
felony.”
A police report for the
incident was not immediately available.
City Law Director Tim Dobeck
said Tuesday the boy has unspecified charges pending against him in juvenile
court.
This is the second allegation
of police brutality the city has faced in recent months. In October,
Independence resident William Zaccardelli, 50, filed a federal lawsuit against
15 Parma and North Royalton officers, claiming he suffered a fractured skull as
a result of excessive force following an early-morning pursuit across those
cities in November 2012. Zaccardelli was later convicted of refusing to submit
to OVI testing in connection to the chase.
Seattle Officials Probe 'Twilight Zone' Of Police Discipline Reversals
BY AMY RADIL
Interim Police Chief Harry
Bailey's recent discipline reversals are coming under scrutiny from the police
auditor and Seattle City Council.
Seattle officials plan to seek
changes to the obscure union appeals process that has allowed reversals of
police misconduct findings.
The Seattle Police Department
has been under scrutiny in recent years from the Department of Justice, the
federal court and numerous civilian-led groups, all of which have analyzed
SPD’s disciplinary process.
But it took a confrontation
between Seattle journalist Dominic Holden and SPD Officer John Marion to put
the spotlight on the ability of the Seattle Police Officers' Guild (SPOG) to
appeal disciplinary findings after the cases are technically closed.
Appeals Puzzle
The appeals process came under
new scrutiny when Interim Police Chief Harry Bailey notified city officials
that he was reversing the findings in Marion’s case and several others, as a
result of settlements with the union. Bailey ended up reinstating the
misconduct finding for Marion, but the disclosure left city officials with many
more questions.
City Councilmember Nick Licata
has worked to improve the transparency of SPD’s process for investigating
police misconduct. But he said this incident revealed what he called a
“twilight zone” within that process.
“The thing that surprised me
the most was how few people understood what was happening,” Licata said. “I had
to sit down with some of the mayor’s staff and explain step by step what I was
discovering and they were themselves discovering it for the first time. It
really was in some ways like a puzzle.”
At a recent City Council
meeting, outgoing SPOG President Rich O’Neill said the City Council and others
outside SPD had no right to interfere with Chief Bailey’s determinations.
O’Neill also said the original case between Holden and Officer Marion should
have been sent to mediation “so the officer and the complainant could sit down
like adults and explain their positions instead of grandstanding in the media.”
Looking For Other Cases
This appeals process can add
several months to a misconduct case. The auditor for SPD’s Office of
Professional Accountability, Anne Levinson, has urged SPD to resolve cases more
quickly. The fact that these appeals drag on for months “undermines
accountability,” she said in her most recent report.
She also said these reversals
based on union appeals could corrode public trust. She’s seeking the data on
how many other cases were reversed in the last few years. SPD has requested an
extension until March 17 to supply it.
Licata said this data could
form the basis for new legislation and upcoming contract negotiations. “We need
to take a look at the current legislation and amend it – because it’s already
part of the code – to make it much more transparent so we know when they are
negotiating away the misconduct findings. And we preferably need to tighten up
the appeal process,” he said.
Hamper The Search For Chief?
The search for Seattle’s next
chief of police is officially underway. The job was posted Thursday and the
deadline for applications is April 4.
O’Neill said the appeals system
review could impede the hiring process. “I fear that the events of the last few
days will hamper our search for a permanent chief of police. Who in their right
mind will want to apply for the job if they have to check with eight different
people and check the political winds before making a decision on an
administrative issue?”
A Brief History Of Police Brutality In The U.S.
By Lina Chappelle
It’s one thing to get a ticket for jaywalking,
but it’s another to get arrested for sitting at a bus stop.
The latest case of questionable
police behavior: the arrest of 25-year-old Abie Kyle Ikhinmwin, a University of
Texas at San Antonio student, who was confronted and accused of committing a
traffic vio lation while at a bus stop near a shopping center. The criminal
justice student questioned the officer in return and was told she was gong to
jail before being dragged by her hair into the back of a police car. Luckily
the confrontation was all on film.
“I’ve never been so dehumanized
in my life,” Ikhimwin said.
Police-on-civilian violence
goes well beyond just minor and unjustified arrests.
There was the recent murder of
18-year-old Keith Vidal, who suffered from schizophrenia. When cops arrived
after his family called in seek help to subdue the teen, they shot and killed
him. One cop is reported to have said “we don’t have time for this” before
shooting the boy.
There was the death of Florida
A&M football player, Jonathan Ferrell. After having a car accident, Ferrell
went to seek help at a nearby home. The woman there, mistaking his need for
help as a burglary attempt, called the cops. When they arrived, Ferrell ran to
them for help and in exchange got shot ten times. A second grand jury has
indicted the officer that killed Ferrell and if found guilty of voluntary
manslaughter he could face up to eleven years in prison.
Don’t forget about 70-year-old
veteran Bobby Canipe, who police shot when he was just reaching for his cane.
Or the brutal mistreatment of Charda Gregory, whose hair was cut off while she
was handcuffed. A list, provided by the CATO Institute’s Police Misconduct,
goes on and on, but where does it end?
A very large part of the
problem is that there are no national standards for police conduct and the
result, as Tony Dokoupil with NBC News explained, is “wildly inconsistent
results” spewed by the court systems. Of the 17,000 police precincts in our
nation, every single one has different procedures. After much research,
Dokoupil found that the rate of police shootings is steadily increasing through
cities in America.
The report reads:
“Charlotte police killed five
people last year, the most in a decade—but less, City Manager Ron Carlee told
the Charlotte Observer, than were killed by police in Washington (49), Memphis
(42), Fort Worth (32), or Austin (17), all of which have seen their own numbers
creep upward.
Boston police (along with their
counterparts at the state level) have fired more bullets in each of the last
five years, hitting at least 23 people last year, 11 of them fatally.
Philadelphia police shot 52 people in 2012, prompting the commissioner to ask
the U.S. Justice Department for a special review. Dallas, Miami, Baltimore,
Chicago, Houston, Las Vegas, Los Angeles, New York City: all have been rocked
by use of force scandals in recent years.”
And while some of the cases
mentioned above get properly tried, many cases that involve police misconduct
are not even addressed.
A study done by William
Terrill, criminal justice professor at Michigan State University, found that of
600 police departments examined, there was not one standard policy for handling
civilian resistance. Basically, police departments are making up procedures as
they go, but that leaves room for major injustices.
“Excess is in the eyes of the
beholder,” Terrill wrote. “To one officer ‘objectively reasonable’ means that
if you don’t give me your license, I get to use soft hands.”
“And in another town,” he
added, “the same resistance means I can pull you through the car window, I can
tase you.”
3 Reasons N.J. Dismisses 99 percent of Police Brutality Complaints
BY BRETT POUSER
The Atlantic City Police
Department was ordered by a U.S. District judge in December to hand over all
internal affairs reports regarding a 2010 excessive force lawsuit in order to
determine if the city has been “deliberately indifferent to the violent
propensities of its officers,” said Judge Joel Schneider in a
mycentraljersey.com article.
This investigation is
indicative of a larger trend in New Jersey; complaints of brutality are
routinely ignored or the offending officers are almost always exonerated. In
fact, just one percent of all excessive force complaints made in central New
Jersey are actually acted upon, even when many of the officers involved have
previous complaints made against them numbering in the dozens, reported
thinkprogress.org.
The number of police misconduct
complaints sustained in New Jersey is seven percent lower than the national
average.
Here are three potential
reasons:
1. FLAWS IN INTERNAL AFFAIRS
PROCEDURES
Internal affairs units serve as
a buffer between officers and lawsuits, insulating them from accountability.
Recently, this has become a hot button issue with several high-profile police
brutality cases making their way to federal court.
The concern is that internal
affairs, responsible for investigating excessive force and misconduct
complaints, has a bias towards protecting the actions of abusive officers. This
is what led the ACLU to draft a petition against the city of Newark in 2010,
accusing it of widespread misconduct in its handling of internal affairs,
according to nj.com. A year after the ACLU’s petition, the city’s police
department was placed under a federal watchdog monitor, a first in the state’s
history.
2. CULTURE OF BRUTALITY AND
CORRUPTION
The ACLU has accused the Newark
Police Department of fostering a culture of brutality among its officers so
“widespread and grave that they warrant outside Federal intervention,” said
ACLU Executive Director Udi Ofer in an nj.com article. The ineffectiveness of
internal affairs units to sustain brutality complaints could be the result of
this violent streak present in police departments across the state.
And this violent propensity is
seen at all levels. Corruption charges have been levied at leading police
officials across the state, according to a northjersey.com article. In March
Anthony Ferraioli, former Hackensack PBA president, along with another officer
plead guilty to charges of aggravated assault of a Hackensack resident during questioning
in 2011.
3. ILLEGITIMATE CLAIMS
Complaints revolving around the
poor performance of internal affairs units have been met with opposition by
police officials. Newark Police Director Garry McCarthy in 2010 insisted that
the numbers don’t prove anything, arguing in an nj.com article that “drug
dealers make allegations against police officers everyday to stop them from
doing their job.” But although it is theoretically possible that the low
numbers are due illegitimate complaints, executive-director of the ACLU New
Jersey at the time, Deborah Jacobs, fired back at McCarthy saying “you’re going
to tell me 200 people made internal affairs complaints and the majority made it
up? That doesn’t make sense.”
The discrepancy between
national and state figures indicates a real problem with how New Jersey Police
deal with complaints of excessive force. Whether this is due to illegitimate
claims of police brutality or because of problems with internal affairs
procedures and a culture of brutality and corruption has yet to be determined.
ACLU: Fight police profiling and misconduct by filing complaints, not in traffic stops
Aaron Knapp
RACINE — A team from the
American Civil Liberties Union will hold a free training session on Thursday
about what residents should do when they… Read more
RACINE — Although one turns to
authorities for assistance with racial profiling and misconduct, fighting a
police officer at the moment of misconduct is the worst approach.
This is according to Emilio De
Torre, Youth and Program Director with the American Civil Liberties Union of
Wisconsin, who gives frequent training sessions around southeast Wisconsin on
how residents should conduct themselves in contact with police and what their
rights are.
While residents have a right to
not give consent to officers without a warrant to search their cars or homes,
he said it is unwise to stand in the way of officers who go through with a
search anyway.
“Verbally, respectfully assert
your right, and then let whatever transpires transpire, because any other
altercation is going to be very bad, but not for the police officer,” he said.
He spoke to several dozen
residents on Thursday at the Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. Community Center, 1134
Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. Drive, in a training session on the rights of
residents and powers of police, particularly during traffic stops.
The session — scheduled to last
90 minutes — went well more than two hours as attendees asked questions and
voiced frustrations about their experiences with police, even to two members of
the Racine Police Department, Sgt. Jessie Metoyer and Lt. Aldred Days, who
attended the meeting.
“There always is criticism,”
said Metoyer after the session. “As supervisors we need to know when people feel
that their rights have been violated.”
The session was hosted by
North/South Outreach, which was founded to offer community events and stop
youth from getting involved in gangs and crime, according to founder Tyrell
Davis.
“Everything is for the community
that I polluted and destroyed once upon a time,” he said, recalling crimes he
committed.
Davis asked the ACLU to host
this session due to recent incidents of racial profiling he said he has
experienced and heard about.
“There’s a lot of racial
profiling going on in my neighborhood and I know it’s not just around here,
around the north side area, it’s everywhere in the inner city,” he explained.
“I chose to be part of the solution and find someone who can give the correct
information to educate everybody else.”
Acknowledging that there is
little a person can do if they feel they have been profiled or mistreated as
the incident is unfolding, De Torre explained that every officer is accountable
to a superior and the recourse is to file a complaint with the department.
He said if every person
alleging police misconduct files a complaint with the Police Department, those
complaints will go to superiors and stack up.
If that fails, he said, the
community should band together and refer the issue to the media, the Department
of Justice, the FBI and higher until the issue is resolved.
“If the police are not giving
you quality policing, if everybody else in the community gets it but not
Latinos, or not black folks, or not white folks, then you have a right to complain,”
De Torre said.
Metoyer noted the importance of
residents and police knowing their rights and how to conduct themselves during
traffic stops and urged residents to find complaint forms in English and
Spanish on the department’s website.
Internal probes detail Sandwich police misconduct
By George Brennan
SANDWICH — Sandwich Police
Chief Peter Wack released the results of two internal investigations this week:
One concludes a police officer lied about his military ranking and another
finds that a police officer violated department rules in an alleged drunken
driving crash.
The internal investigations
were released Wednesday in response to a public records request by the Times
and center on the conduct of three officers — Timothy Kane, Daniel Perkins and
John Manley.
Kane, who is suing the town in
federal court and filed a similar complaint with the Massachusetts Commission
Against Discrimination, never told the town he had been promoted during his
six-month deployment in the U.S. Air Force Reserves in 2011 and, ultimately,
was overpaid by $2,400 by the police department, the internal affairs
investigation concludes.
The town pays members of the
military differential pay while they are deployed, making up the gap between
their federal salary and what they would have earned from the town.
The investigation concluded
Kane violated the department's policy on truthfulness as well as a town policy
that makes employees responsible for telling supervisors about any change in
military rank that would affect pay.
The department's investigation
did not sustain allegations that Kane committed a criminal act of larceny and
cited a separate investigation by the Cape and Islands District Attorney
Michael O'Keefe's office, which declined to press charges against him.
"Patrolman Kane denies any
wrongdoing and we look forward to trying our case in federal district court
where we'll have an opportunity to present all the evidence and let a jury
decide," his attorney Joe Napiltonia said Thursday.
Kane has since paid back the
money, records show. In the report, Kane denied there was an intent to deceive,
saying members of the department knew he had been promoted to master sergeant.
"I did not try to defraud,
it was an oversight on my part," Kane told the investigator, according to
the report.
In his lawsuit, Kane alleges he
was passed over for promotion because of his military service.
Sgt. Josh Bound, who got the
job even though Kane scored higher on the civil service exam, conducted the
internal investigation.
Last week, the town's attorney,
Bradford Louison, called it "ludicrous" to think the town would
discriminate against Kane for serving in the military. At least two other
department members have been promoted after being deployed, Louison said.
In the internal investigation,
Kane acknowledged that he initially told Lt. Michael Nurse that his military
rank had changed at the end of his deployment, instead of one month into it as
military records show. Kane told the investigator he was "distracted"
because he was in a police supply store making a purchase at the time of
Nurse's inquiry, the investigative report shows.
"...I confronted him with
that (military record), that's when he got confused and distracted, that's when
he started to stumble, so I think he intended to lie," Nurse said,
according to the report.
Wack said in an email Thursday
the department cannot release the discipline Kane received because he did not
sign a waiver allowing the town to release it.
The second internal
investigation pertains to an off-duty crash in November involving Officer
Daniel Perkins. Wack determined there was no longer a need to withhold the
public record as O'Keefe's office had requested because the Mashpee police
report was released as part of the public court record.
Like the police report, the
internal investigation says Perkins, fellow officer John Manley and a third man
were coming from Zachary's Pub, a strip club in Mashpee, in separate pickup
trucks when Perkins lost control of his vehicle on Nov. 30 and crashed on Route
130 near the Sandwich town line.
Perkins was injured in the
crash and taken to Cape Cod Hospital, records show. His blood work, subpoenaed
by Mashpee police, shows he had a blood alcohol level of 0.22, nearly three
times the legal limit of 0.08, records show.
Perkins pleaded not guilty to a
charge of operating under the influence of alcohol last month in Falmouth
District Court. He is due back in court March 27.
Perkins refused to be
interviewed for the department investigation, records show. The investigation
concluded he engaged in criminal conduct, conduct unbecoming an employee,
failure to report for duty and absence from duty. He was suspended for 60 days
and served part of that working for the department without getting paid, Wack
said.
The internal probe provides the
first insight into Manley's actions that night. Manley and another unidentified
man, who is not a police employee, took Perkins out to cheer him up — starting
at the British Beer Co. in Sandwich and ending at Zachary's, according to the
report.
Manley said he lost track of
Perkins during the two hours they were at Zachary's and is unsure what Perkins
had to drink, records show. He asked Perkins if he needed a ride before they
left Zachary's but did not believe his colleague was impaired, records show.
When he came upon Perkins'
vehicle flipped on its side, Manley and the unidentified male got out of their
truck, checked on Perkins' condition, found that his injuries were not
"life threatening" and asked a woman at the scene if she had called
police, records show.
"I left the accident. It
was a panic response," Manley, who admitted to having five or six draft
beers that night, reportedly told the investigator. In a follow-up interview,
Manley, a two-year veteran with the department, said, "I was scared of the
repercussions with the department."
Manley told the investigator he
called Perkins at home the next day to check on his condition, according to the
report. He was suspended for three days for conduct unbecoming an employee and
neglect of duty.
Attempts to reach Perkins and
Manley on Thursday were unsuccessful.
Four Latino men confirm sergeant as cop who stole from them
By VÍCTOR MANUEL RAMOS
Four Latino men who are among
those claiming they were victims of discriminatory traffic stops by a Suffolk
police officer said Thursday night that the sergeant arrested in the case is
the man who took cash from their pockets, wallets or vehicles.
The men, gathered at a house in
Coram, looked at photographs of Sgt. Scott A. Greene taken before his
appearance Thursday in First District Court in Central Islip and said he is the
same officer they had learned to avoid.
"I just felt powerless
when this happened, because what could I do if he was a policeman," said a
35-year-old Mexican immigrant, who said the officer took a $100 bill from his
wallet during a traffic stop about two years ago.
"Police are supposed to be
there to serve, protect and help people, not to harass them."
The other three men also said
Greene took cash from them after traffic stops during the last three years.
All asked that their names be
withheld, out of fear of reprisal.
The four said they have spoken
to investigators with the Suffolk County district attorney's office.
Greene, 50, who was arrested
during a sting operation on Jan. 31, has pleaded not guilty to charges of
official misconduct and petty larceny.
Suffolk County District
Attorney Thomas Spota has said he took a $100 bill from a car driven by an
undercover Latino officer.
Thursday's court appearance was
Greene's first since his arraignment immediately following his January arrest.
The 25-year veteran of the
force, a Shirley resident, has been free on bail.
He declined reporters' requests
for comment.
Immigrant advocates have told
Newsday that they know of at least 13 Latino men who have come forward to say
that a Suffolk County police officer stopped their vehicles, frisked them and
took cash.
In court, Assistant District
Attorney Melissa Bliss told Judge Derrick J. Robinson that "more charges
are coming" and the investigation is ongoing.
Robinson set Greene's next
court date for April 23.
Greene, his face somber, sat in
the courtroom's first row, looking straight ahead.
After the brief proceeding, he
walked silently, holding the hand of the woman beside him, as he made his way
out of the courtroom.
"I can't disclose anything
right now," he told Newsday before the court session.
Greene's attorney declined to
comment.
Irma Solis, an advocate with
the community group Make The Road New York, said Thursday night that the
immigrants' complaints, to this point, have centered on one officer.
The men said they also are
concerned about repeated police stops that led to thousands of dollars in
fines.
The Mexican immigrant
interviewed Thursday night, for example, said he now carries two wallets -- one
for his IDs, and another with money, which he hides.
"They are waiting to see
what the results of the DA's investigation reveals," Solis said.
"We are hoping they
conduct a thorough investigation . . . to bring some level of security among
the Latino population."
The advocates said the case
exemplifies the kind of abuses they want to see eliminated from the department
following a December settlement with the U.S. Department of Justice.
The settlement, which set a
plan for reforms, stemmed from allegations of discriminatory policing after the
2008 killing of Ecuadorean immigrant Marcelo Lucero in a hate crime.In the
sting operation, Spota said that Greene pulled over the vehicle and ordered the
driver out. Moments later, the uniformed patrol officer was caught on video
taking the money from an envelope on the passenger seat, then folding the bill
and stuffing it in his left sleeve.
During the stop, Greene ordered
the driver to stand behind his car, Spota said. Authorities didn't say what
reason Greene gave, if any, for stopping the vehicle.
A video camera hidden inside
the undercover vehicle caught Greene removing the $100 bill from an envelope
filled with $1,200 in marked bills, the district attorney's office said.
Authorities and advocates have
said they believe Latino drivers were singled out because some may be
immigrants living in the country illegally who are reluctant to complain.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)