Bronx Police Officer in Ticket-Fixing Inquiry Is Guilty of Drug and Robbery Charges
By WINNIE HU
A Bronx officer at the center
of an internal police investigation into ticket-fixing was found guilty by a
jury on Monday of taking part in a series of criminal schemes to make money.
The officer, Jose Ramos, 45,
was convicted of attempted criminal possession of a controlled substance in the
first degree, the most serious charge against him, as well as attempted robbery
in the second degree and attempted grand larceny in the third degree. He was
found not guilty of a fourth charge, attempted robbery in the first degree.
The verdict came after a nearly
monthlong trial in State Supreme Court in the Bronx, in which prosecutors
played video and audio recordings of Officer Ramos plotting with a police
informer in October and November 2009 to drive a van carrying heroin from the
Bronx to Brooklyn for $10,000, and to steal money from a black-market electronics
buyer and the hotel room of an out-of-town drug dealer.
Officer Ramos, who did not
testify at his trial, looked upset as the verdict was announced in a largely
empty courtroom after less than a day of deliberation by the jury. Officer
Ramos, who has been held in jail, had previously been suspended from the Police
Department.
Officer Ramos’s lawyer, Matthew
J. Kluger, patted him on the back in support. Later, outside court, Mr. Kluger
said they would wait to hear the sentence before deciding whether to appeal.
“Mr. Ramos is disappointed with the narcotics charge,” he said, “but we’ll
regroup and figure out where to go.”
Officer Ramos is scheduled to
be sentenced on Dec. 1 by Justice Michael A. Gross. He faces eight to 20 years
in prison on the narcotics charge.
The trial was just the
beginning of a long court battle for Officer Ramos, the son of a police
officer; he had been on the job for 17 years before his arrest. He faces
additional charges in five other indictments, the most serious of which stem
from an accusation in 2012 that he conspired with his wife to use money from
his police pension to try to have a witness against him murdered.
It was the investigation into
Officer Ramos that exposed a routine practice among police officers to make traffic
and parking tickets disappear for friends and relatives. The investigation
eventually led to more than two dozen wiretaps and the indictments of 16 police
officers, including Officer Ramos. Earlier this month, Lt. Jennara Cobb was the
first officer to be tried. She was convicted by a judge of divulging
information about the investigation in what prosecutors said was an effort to
warn other officers.
The investigation of Officer
Ramos started with a tip in December 2008 that marijuana was being sold by a
man who managed two barber shops owned by Officer Ramos in the 40th Precinct,
in the South Bronx. The man, Lee King, also lived in Officer Ramos’s apartment,
drove his car and used his police-issued placard, prosecutors said.
The police started listening to
Mr. King’s cellphone, and later, to Officer Ramos’s two cellphones. By fall
2009, they had enlisted an informer, Harry Mingo, who conspired with Officer
Ramos to steal money from an out-of-town drug dealer and an electronics buyer,
both of whom were in fact undercover police officers. They also met with a
Miami drug dealer (also an undercover police officer), and later Officer Ramos
drove a van for the supposed drug dealer from the Bronx to Brooklyn,
prosecutors said.
During the trial, Mr. Kluger
repeatedly sought to discredit Mr. Mingo and to portray Officer Ramos to the
jury as a police officer who had made mistakes but had never committed a crime.
Mr. Kluger argued that Officer Ramos was repeatedly caught up in plots devised
by internal police investigators and that he did not know that the van he drove
was supposedly carrying narcotics.
But Omer Wiczyk, the
prosecutor, countered that there was simply overwhelming evidence against
Officer Ramos that showed, time and again, that he had been all too willing to
illegally profit from his badge and connections. “That man is guilty,” Mr.
Wiczyk told jurors on Friday. “The law applies to everyone equally. Apply it
here. Convict him.”
In a statement, the Bronx
district attorney, Robert T. Johnson, said Officer Ramos “clearly shunted to
the side the duty he has to the people of New York City.”
Again...again...we need to have a national minimum IQ for cops, idiot cops, that's 50% of the problem behind the cop crime wave in America
Armored vehicle sent to collect
civil fine from 75-year-old in small town
A small Wisconsin town sends 24
armed officers and an armored vehicle to collect fine stemming from property
dispute.
STETTIN, Wis., Oct. 26 (UPI) --
A small Wisconsin town sent an armored vehicle and 24 armed officers to collect
a civil fine from a 75-year-old man.
Roger Hoeppner is filing a
federal civil rights lawsuit after authorities came out in force to collect an
$80,000 civil fine stemming from property disputes.
Marathon County Sheriff's Capt.
Greg Bean says the armored vehicle was only sent to the property because
Hoeppner initially refused to come out of his house.
"I've been involved in
about five standoff situations where, as soon as the MARV [Marathon County
Response Vehicle] showed up, the person gives up," Bean told the
Milwaukee-Wisconson Journal Sentinel. "People may not always understand
why, but an armored vehicle is almost a necessity now."
Hoeppner was arrested at the
scene, reportedly for not following officer's instructions. He paid his $80,000
fine, after a trip to the bank accompanied by deputies, and was released.
The long-running dispute is
centered on Hoeppner's 20-acre property, where he restores antique tractors and
runs a pallet repair business. The Town of Stettin sued Hoeppner in 2008 over
alleged zoning violations and rubbish, signs and vehicles on the property. The
two sides settled, with Hoeppner agreeing to clean up his property.
In 2010 the town decided Hoeppner
had not complied, and a judge ordered Hoeppner to clear his land. In May 2011,
the judge authorized the seizure of Hoeppner's assets for noncompliance. The
town did haul away a number of items including trailers and pallets and
auctioned them off.
In April 2013, the judge
decided Hoeppner was still noncompliant and imposed a $500-a-day fine in
addition to granting the town's legal fees. Hoeppner appealed the decision and
lost, leaving him $80,000 in debt to the town.
"Rather than provide Mr.
Hoeppner or his counsel notice...and attempt to collect without spending
thousands of taxpayer dollars on the military-style maneuvers, the town
unilaterally decided to enforce its civil judgment," Hoeppner's attorney,
Ryan Lister, said.
Hoeppner says that in all, his
battle with the town has cost him his retirement fund, some $200,000.
In a federal civil rights suit,
Hoeppner alleges Town Chairman Matt Wasmundt infringed on his free speech
rights by preventing him from addressing the board during public comment
periods, and once having him arrested and released without charge.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)