on sale now at amazon

on sale now at amazon
"I don't like this book because it don't got know pictures" Chief Rhorerer

“It’s becoming a disturbingly familiar scene in America - mentally unstable cops”

“It’s becoming a disturbingly familiar scene in America - mentally unstable cops”
“It’s becoming a disturbingly familiar scene in America - mentally unstable cops”

In NYC, they jail and fire cops who murder people. In Fairfax County the Council helps the cops cover murder up

NYPD fires partner of cop convicted of manslaughter in stairwell shooting after victim's family calls for his dismissal

  Shaun Landau was fired after former partner, Peter Liang, was found guilty in the shooting death of unarmed Akai Gurley
   Landau avoided criminal charges by testifying under immunity agreement
  His termination came hours after the Gurley family called for his dismissal
   Liang could face up to 15 years in prison at his sentencing in April


The New York Police Department fired the former partner of ex-cop Peter Liang less than 24 hours after Liang was convicted of shooting an unarmed man in Brooklyn.
Shaun Landau, the terminated officer, testified for the prosecution during Liang's trial.
Liang was convicted of manslaughter and official misconduct on Thursday for firing his gun in a darkened public housing stairwell in November 2014 as the two officers began a so-called 'vertical patrol'.

The bullet ricocheted off a wall and struck Akai Gurley, 28, who had been walking one floor below with his girlfriend.
Neither officer offered medical assistance to Gurley once they realized he had been hit by the shot. Both testified that they felt unqualified to do so because of poor CPR training at the police academy.
Landau avoided criminal charges by agreeing to testify under an immunity agreement. The police department said he had been fired at the discretion of Commissioner Bill Bratton.
Since Landau was a probationary officer — with less than two years on the job — the NYPD does not have to state a reason for the firing beyond 'unsatisfactory probation,' a law-enforcement source said.
His termination came hours after the Gurley family released a statement calling for his dismissal. Liang was fired immediately after the jury's verdict on Thursday.
 At trial, Liang said he was startled by an unidentified sound as he entered the stairwell with his gun drawn, causing his finger to slip onto the trigger and fire.
But 12 Brooklyn jurors agreed that Liang wasn't telling the truth about how the gun actually went off.
Retired candy-store owner and Juror No. 10, Carlton Screen, told the New York Post that when the jurors tested an unloaded gun it led them to conclude that the rookie had lied about not having his finger on the trigger when it fired.
'It was very hard to pull the trigger,' he said.
'They had another safety that's on the trigger itself, so you have to pull it hard enough to release that safety in order for it to fire.'
Liang had tearfully described his horror when he realized minutes later that Gurley had been hit.
But prosecutors accused him of deliberately firing toward the sound and ignoring the fact that only another person could have made such a noise.
They also said he acted recklessly in drawing his weapon in the first place.
Liang faces up to 15 years in prison at his sentencing in April.
Police-reform activists, who have come to expect disappointment any time an officer is accused in a killing, expressed surprise Friday over the conviction of a patrolman who shot an unarmed man in a housing project stairwell but said they don't necessarily see the case as a turning point in the national debate over police accountability.
'It's definitely movement in the right direction,' said Lumumba Bandele, a demonstrator who attended nearly every day of the patrolman's trial.
But, he added, 'It's not a victory in the larger scale of having made significant advances. We have a backlog of cases that have yet to be investigated, much less indicted.'
It was the first time in a decade a New York Police Department officer was held responsible for a line-of-duty killing.
The outcome stood in stark contrast to many other cases around the country in which police have been accused of killing unarmed black men and boys.