Fairfax County can restore confidence in its police department
Fairfax County can restore
confidence in its police department
By Pete Earley and John Lovaas
December 2
Pete Earley and John Lovaas
served on the Ad Hoc Police Practices Review Commission.
It has been a year since Fairfax
County announced it would review recommendations by a special commission to
restore public confidence in its police department. Sadly, it has approved only
a handful of changes and has weakened some reforms that it approved, raising
questions about the county’s commitment to transparency and change.
Board of Supervisors Chairman
Sharon Bulova took a courageous step when she appointed a 35-member Ad Hoc
Police Practices Review Commission to examine police practices after the 2013
fatal shooting of John Geer. The unarmed Geer was killed by an officer who was
later fired and who pleaded guilty to manslaughter, but only after 17 months of
stonewalling by the police and the county.
The commission, which included
nine active and former police officials, unanimously recommended 142 changes in
October 2015 to bolster public confidence. County officials divided them into
202 recommendations under four broad categories. Nearly half concerned “use of
force” by police officers. The others focused on police communications with the
public, how officers treat individuals with mental illnesses and creating
independent oversight of the police.
Of the 202 recommendations, only
20 have been approved. Four were rejected. The remaining 178 are listed as
“under review” or “in progress” with no date for completion.
Among those stuck in limbo are
the use of body cameras and requirements to make the police more forthcoming
after officer-involved shootings to preclude a repeat of the Geer failures.
Besides the slow progress, the
board has crippled some recommendations it approved. The commission recommended
the board appoint an independent police auditor to review criminal and
administrative (disciplinary) investigations of officer-involved incidents that
result in civilian death or serious injury and, impanel a civilian review panel
to receive and consider citizen complaints about incidents of alleged police
abuse of authority or other serious misconduct.
In September, the Board of
Supervisors agreed to hire a police auditor, but it sharply curtailed the
auditor’s authority. It rejected hiring two independent criminal investigators
and ruled that the auditor not review criminal matters until after the cases
were officially closed, a legal process that often takes months or years.
Instead of directly monitoring internal investigations, the auditor would be
informed about them through the police chief.
On Dec. 6, the supervisors will
meet to vote on creation of the civilian review panel. Although the
commission’s recommendations were unanimously adopted, including “yes” votes by
police department and police union representatives, Deputy County Executive
David Rohrer, a former Fairfax police chief, and county staff are recommending
the board restrict citizen complainants’ right to speak before the panel and
its ability to question them, forcing the panel to rely largely on
investigations by the department.
Police officers deserve public
trust and support. Public outrage about Geer’s death showed significant
distrust of the police and officers being subject only to investigation by
fellow officers. Before Geer’s death, no Fairfax police officer had been
criminally charged, much less indicted, in a killing during the department’s
75-year history. Also troubling: Of the reported 539 police use-of-force
incidents in Fairfax County in 2015, 40 percent involved African Americans even
though the county’s black population hovers around 8 percent.
If the board hopes to restore
public trust, it needs to adopt the commission’s recommendations for the
civilian review panel and citizens’ rights without tinkering, and it must speed
up approval of the reforms still languishing on the shelves.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment