JOHN OLIVER SAYS POLICE ARE BEING HELD ACCOUNTABLE EVEN LESS THAN WE REALIZE
BY RYAN BORT
CULTUREJOHN OLIVERLAST WEEK
TONIGHT
John Oliver is no stranger to law
enforcement...or at least not to covering it on Last Week Tonight. Most
recently, he delved into why police are so rarely held accountable for their
actions, after earlier taking on civil forfeiture, police militarization,
municipal violations and mandatory minimum prison sentences.
While there have been thousands
of fatal police shootings since 2005, only 77 officers were charged with murder
or manslaughter in that time, and only 26 were convicted. The numbers are
staggering, but just as astonishing is how difficult it is to ascertain these
sorts of statistics. In 2015, FBI Director James Comey spoke of the lack of
information available about our police. "We don't have data," he said
at an FBI oversight committee hearing. "People have data about who went to
a movie last weekend or how many books were sold or how many cases of the flu
walked into an emergency room, and I cannot tell you how many people were shot
by police in the United States last month, last year or anything about the
demographics."
Who does track statistics on
police misconduct? According to Oliver, it's a researcher named Philip Stinson,
who accumulated data by setting up 48 Google alerts in 2005.
Police simply aren't held
accountable for their actions the way others with jobs of such high importance
are scrutinized. As Oliver explained Sunday night, there are several reasons
for this. One is that police misconduct is typically investigated internally,
by other police officers, which could be considered something of a conflict of
interest. You want examples?
The Department of Justice
reported that in Cleveland, "investigators told us that they intentionally
cast an officer in the best light possible when investigating the officer’s use
of deadly force." In Miami, an investigation took so long, “at least
two…officers shot and killed a suspect while still under investigation for a
previous [shooting].” In Baltimore, an officer who reported misconduct was
relentlessly harassed by his fellow officers, to the point where they weren't
even sending him backup when he requested it. They also left pictures of cheese
on his desk and a dead rat on his windshield.
It is also remarkably easy for
officers to wipe clean any evidence of previous misconduct, and to do so
legally. In some precincts, records can be thrown out after a certain amount of
time elapses. A Mesa, Arizona police chief even instructed his officers to
“purge your files according to policy." As Oliver notes, "This seems
wrong."
Basically, the system is far more
insular than it should be, and it is designed to protect police officers from
themselves. The justice system only bolsters their relative immunity to
recourse. It is incredibly awkward for prosecutors to go after police officers,
because the former usually have close relationships with the latter, relying on
them to give advice and analyze evidence. If a case against an officer ever
does go to trial, which is very rare, the juries are predisposed to give
officers the benefit of the doubt. Despite recent events, it's difficult for
anyone to override the idea that police officers are trustworthy figures on a
noble pursuit to protect and serve.
Again, out of thousands of fatal
police shootings, only 77 officers went to trial and only 26 were convicted.
So what can be done? Body
cameras, for one. As Oliver points out, police in Rialto, California, saw
complaints against officers fall 88 percent and use of force fall 60 percent
after one year of using body cameras. They have been so successful, in fact,
that officers in Baltimore were reluctant to hand them in after a trial run
came to an end. As Oliver says, “These cops aren’t M. Night Shyamalan. If they
plead with you to let them have a camera again, you should give it to them.”
Other options to heighten
accountability that have been tested include forcing officers to file separate
reports when force is used and bringing in outside prosecutors. However it's
done, it is imperative that officers are held accountable for their actions. As
Oliver says, “A lack of trust in police accountability leads to a lack of trust
in police."
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment