DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE INQUIRY
• US
Justice Dept. lawyers to Portland police: Drop 'us vs. them' mentality in
police training
• Portland
police shouldn't buy body cameras until more money found, budget analysts
suggest
• Attorney
General Loretta Lynch praises 'peaceful resolution' to Oregon standoff
• Loretta
Lynch -- and Officer Paresa -- bring inspiration for George Middle
sixth-graders
• Attorney
General Loretta Lynch arrives in Portland Wednesday to recognize community
policing partners
U.S. Justice Department lawyers
have urged Portland police to drop their "us vs. them'' mentality in
officer training after observing the bureau's annual weeklong refresher
training for its force.
They also recommended that the
bureau minimize use of military combat photos in active-shooter training, include
community volunteers in scenario-based instruction and find a way to allow
residents to share their perspectives about their experiences with officers as
part of training.
"As an overarching concern,
we observed at several points PPB instructors reinforced a sense of PPB being
on the opposite side of the public whom they police and serve,'' the federal
civil rights lawyers wrote.
The federal review of training is
the latest critique of police practices since the Justice Department found in
2012 that Portland police engaged in a pattern of excessive force against
people with mental illness. The federal investigation also found that Portland
police fired multiple cycles of stun guns unnecessarily and failed to wait
between cycles to allow a suspect to follow their commands.
A negotiated settlement reached
with the city and approved by a federal judge in August 2014 calls for a wide
range of changes to police policies, training and oversight and regular reviews
by the Justice Department.
Training Capt. Bryan Parman said
the letter from the federal lawyers is helpful to provide "the Police
Bureau with additional clarity on the requirements of the agreement."
He said the bureau has made
substantial changes since the settlement and will continue over the years to
make sure that police fully adopt its provisions.
The Rev. Leroy Haynes, chair of
the Albina Ministerial Alliance Coalition for Justice and Police Reform, and
the Rev. T. Allen Bethel, coalition co-chair, thanked the Justice Department
for keeping their eye on police training. The coalition was granted friend of
the court status and allowed to provide input on the settlement agreement.
"The DOJ has hit on many
points the coalition and members of the community have been concerned about for
a long time,'' Haynes and Bethel wrote to the federal department.
While the federal officials were
impressed with the bureau's new training center off Northeast Airport Way, its
defensive tactics training and scenario-based training, their review found
lapses in instruction and made these recommendations to the city attorney's
office:
-- Police trainers should
incorporate a review of bureau policies when teaching tactics or technical
skills, whether it's on the use of Tasers or providing emergency medical care
to a wounded suspect. The review found bureau training on less-lethal weapons
rushed and incomplete.
"As much as possible,
technical skills should be trained in the context of the policy governing those
skills,'' the federal assessment said.
-- The bureau should better
examine whether officers have learned the material. The bureau didn't use
written, individual quizzes on policy or tactics to determine each officer's
competency or set any measures to determine if officers learned the material,
the review found.
In one class, instructors gave an
eight-question quiz on the bureau's use of force policy, but officers didn't
write their names on the quizzes. Similarly, the bureau asked officers to fill
out a survey anonymously regarding the weeklong training.
Written on the survey was a note
to officers that it could be subject to a public records request. "That
admonition seems intended to discourage criticism,'' the federal review said.
-- Bureau training on its use of
force policy needs updating. The bureau distributed an easy-to-carry card to
officers on the policy to keep in their pockets or wallets, but the card
already is out of date, the federal attorneys noted. The reviewers also found
the card confusing.
-- The week's 40-hour training
devotes significant time to firearms refresher instruction, but the review said
the training should give more emphasis to officers' decision-making skills and
understanding of policy.
The bureau "could and should
re-enforce the concepts of de-escalation and rendering aid to a subject during
the firearms training, rather than focusing solely on technical skills,'' the
review found.
-- In one of the deadly-force
scenario training exercises, the reviewers expressed concern about the long
delay before officers moved in to provide emergency aid to the wounded suspect.
They discussed their concern with
Police Chief Larry O'Dea.
O'Dea told them that the bureau's
policy has improved. Now, officers wait for a supervisor to respond to the
scene with a tactical shield so officers can approach a suspect safely, he
said. They used to require the callout of the bureau's Special Emergency
Response Team, which could take 45 minutes. Supervisors carry shields in their
police cars, cutting down on the response time, O'Dea told the federal
officials.
Federal civil rights attorneys
said in the review that the change still may not meet the settlement's
requirement for police to provide aid as soon as possible. They also pointed
out that even with the tactical shield, some officers remained just as exposed to
potential harm as they would have been if they immediately gave aid.
-- Maxine Bernstein
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment