They actually believe Fairfax County is going to enact police reform.......I mean, you just kind of want to hug em you know?
Want Police reform Washington Post?
Police reform begins at home,so to speak. Stop treating cops differently than the way you treat cop victims........if a victim is named a suspected police abuse action then the cop should be named as well. Do that and watch how quickly the cops fall into line.
A group called Justice for John
Geer pickets on Jan. 8, 2015, in Fairfax.
(Bill O'Leary/The Washington
Post)
By Editorial Board
EVEN NOW, nearly three years
after the fact, Fairfax County officials seem slow to absorb the lessons from
the coverup, foot-dragging, reflexive secrecy and mulish unaccountability
occasioned by the unwarranted death of John Geer, the father of two who was
shot and killed in his own doorway by a county police officer in Springfield.
Even now, after that public
disgrace, the county’s elected leaders are hemming and hawing over establishing
an all-civilian oversight panel that could render a clear-eyed judgment on
allegations of abuse in Fairfax’s 1,400-officer police department, Virginia’s
biggest local law enforcement agency.
Even now, after withering
criticism of Fairfax’s inertia by a U.S. senator, a judge, citizens groups and
the media, county politicians appear loath to confront police brass and
rank-and-file representatives, who remain intent on subverting the oversight
panel’s independence by stacking it with current and/or former police officers.
And even now, no sense of urgency
impels the formation of such an oversight body, which, though it was
recommended by a police reform commission last fall, seems unlikely to exist
and exercise actual oversight before sometime next year — with luck.
That reform commission was formed
after the shame of the Geer episode assumed such dimensions that the county’s
Board of Supervisors could no longer look the other way. When it finally
delivered its report, in October, after six months of deliberations, it pulled
no punches and minced no words.
Among its voluminous
recommendations, in addition to establishing real independent oversight of the
police, was an overhaul of the department’s use-of-force policies and the
setting up of an auditor, under the Board of Supervisors, who would review the
integrity of internal police investigations.
The heart of the commission’s
recommendations is the establishment of an oversight panel — independent,
staffed by civilians and accountable only to the public. Such bodies, with
varying compositions, exist in cities and other localities around the country,
including New York, Philadelphia and the District. In Fairfax, officials
resisted for years, insisting the elected supervisors themselves could exercise
effective oversight.
The fallacy of that stance was
laid bare by the Geer case, in which the Board of Supervisors appeared
paralyzed, befuddled and tongue-tied as police went mum and prosecutors and the
board’s own lawyers played dodge-the-blame games for the better part of two
years.
Now that there is consensus on an
oversight panel, some supervisors are insisting it include current or former
police officers or county officials, in accord with the department’s wishes.
But what is the point of an oversight panel if the oversight it exercises is
tainted from the get-go by the specter of bias? Do the county’s elected
representatives really think anyone will regard the oversight panel as
meaningfully independent if the police themselves — or their allies or
advocates — are doing the overseeing?
The takeaway from the Geer case,
in which the officer who pulled the trigger now faces murder charges, could
hardly be clearer. Despite many dedicated and fine officers, public trust in
the department is broken in Fairfax. The county must rectify that, and not by
half-steps.
No comments:
Post a Comment