Haymarket police chief re-suspended, council overrides mayor’s veto
By Tom Jackman
Haymarket Deputy Police Chief
Gregory A. Breeden, suspended along with his police chief for 60 days without
pay. Was previously suspended for 15 days, also with Chief James E. Roop. (Town
of Haymarket)
If you’re keeping score at
home, Haymarket Police Chief James E. Roop is back OFF the job, along with his
deputy chief, Gregory A. Breeden, and Officer Jacob T. Davis, after all three
were suspended last Monday night, then un-suspended on Thursday afternoon by
Mayor David Leake. On Friday night, the town council overrode the mayor’s veto
and re-suspended Roop, Breeden and Davis. So once again, the town of about
1,900 residents is left with three officers to stem the tide of crime in
western Prince William County, at least for the next 60 days.
We still don’t know what
exactly these three lawmen did to earn their suspensions, though Roop and Davis
were ordered to undergo counseling for sexual harassment. In 2005, Roop and
Breeden were investigated by an independent lawyer who recommended they be
fired for sexual harassment. The town council gave them 15 days without pay.
This time, the council launched
its own investigation in mid-December, and decided to suspend Roop, Davis and
Breeden for 60 days in a special meeting on Monday night. Leake, as mayor, did
not get a vote in that, and he felt that the whole matter should have been
investigated independently, and that the penalties for Breeden and Davis were
too harsh. On Thursday, as the Haymarket town charter allows, he vetoed all
three suspensions.
The town charter also allows
the council to override a mayoral veto with a two-third vote, or four of the
six. So after the three officers were reinstated Thursday afternoon, the
council met Friday night in another special meeting. In the video of the
meeting, Leake asked why the officers didn’t get their due process, as stated
in the police general orders. Vice Mayor Jay Tobias said town attorney Martin
Crim advised that the charter trumps the police department’s orders, and until
the council updates the charter, “in which we’d probably look to strike your
ability to veto things out of personal vendettas,” Tobias said, the charter
rules.
The votes to re-suspend the
three officers were held without discussion among the council members, but a
heckler sitting out of camera range chimed in with her own analysis, such as,
“You’re elected by us to represent the town, not your own personal agendas,”
and “I can’t wait until we all get sued and all our houses are taken because
you guys are idiots.”
Roop was suspended unanimously,
Breeden by a 5-1 vote and Davis by a 4-2 vote. Yet another special meeting is
scheduled for Tuesday night, where more of the tangled rivalries and
animosities that animate Haymarket will likely be aired. Whether anyone will
say why the publicly elected board chose to suspend half of its taxpayer-funded
police department for two months is anyone’s guess.
UPDATE, Monday 11 a.m.: Leake
issued this comment on the council’s actions: “I am disturbed and disappointed
by the council’s decision not to reconsider and move forward with an independent
and qualified investigation. No one on council has the qualifications, training
or experience to conduct an investigation and known relationships make it even
more complicated. We owe it to our residents, whom we were elected to serve, to
make sure we do all we can and to make sure that warranted consequences are
duly imparted when and where they are deserved. I also disagree with council
and believe our residents have a right to know what is going on, minus specific
details.”