on sale now at amazon

on sale now at amazon
"I don't like this book because it don't got know pictures" Chief Rhorerer

“It’s becoming a disturbingly familiar scene in America - mentally unstable cops”

“It’s becoming a disturbingly familiar scene in America - mentally unstable cops”
“It’s becoming a disturbingly familiar scene in America - mentally unstable cops”

Suspended officer testifies at trial


Beacon detective accused of making false burglary report
The case against a suspended City of Beacon police officer accused of lying to authorities could soon be handed to a Dutchess County Court jury.
Detective Sgt. Richard Sassi Jr. is on trial, charged with falsely reporting an incident to police, a misdemeanor. He’s accused of reporting a false burglary in process on Aug. 31, 2012, to cover up an affair he had with a police informant.
On Thursday, a mostly composed, but sometimes frustrated, Sassi offered his side of that night’s events.
He explained why he used a false name to report the alleged burglary and why he deleted the contents of his county Drug Task Force cellphone before giving it to prosecutors.
“I was concerned that giving my actual name and having that recorded may be an issue for (the informant),” Sassi said.
Sassi said he called police after the informant’s boyfriend broke into her Fishkill apartment, destroyed property and assaulted him.
“I told him he was in trouble because he had broken into the apartment and had committed a burglary,” Sassi said.
He said he restored his phone’s factory settings because he didn’t want his wife or colleagues to find his correspondence with the informant. He said he cleared it because he didn’t want whoever got the phone next to have his contacts.
“At that point, I didn’t consider it evidence,” Sassi said.
Assistant District Attorney Matthew Weishaupt argued otherwise.
“You made sure the government would never know the content of that phone,” Weishaupt said.
Weishaupt said Sassi’s training as a police officer gave him insight into how to get rid of evidence on a phone. Sassi disagreed.
“I don’t recall identifying myself as an expert,” Sassi said.
Weishaupt challenged Sassi on evidence his attorney, Jonathan Lovett, provided the court. Lovett gave the court copies of screen shots Sassi took with his phone of correspondence between Sassi and the informant after the incident.
“You deleted those things that would have been adverse to what you want people to believe,” Weishaupt said.
Weishaupt used phone records to show Sassi had deleted messages in between the ones he provided as evidence.

The trial is expected to continue today.