That nagging Dumb Cop Issue
Off-duty police officer accidentally shoots roommate
DC police accidentally shoot man in barber shop
Iowa Cop Shoots at Dog, but Misses, Killing Woman Instead
Undercover APD detective shot by another officer
Off-duty police officer
accidentally shoots roommate
Kate Royals, The Clarion-Ledger
A 28-year-old Brandon resident
accidentally shot his roommate in the head with a new gun Wednesday night at
their home, authorities say.
Zachary Jacob Creel is a
Madison police officer who was not on duty at the time of the shooting.
The Rankin County Sheriff's
Department responded to the incident in the Barnett Bend III subdivision in
Brandon. When officials arrived at Creel's home, roommate Michael Hunter Flynt
was alert and Creel was holding a towel to the wound, according to the incident
report.
Creel told sheriff's deputies
the weapon discharged while he was pulling it from the holster to show Flynt,
striking him on the right side of his head.
Flynt was transported by
American Medical Response to the University of Mississippi Medical Center,
where he was conscious and alert when interviewed by sheriff's deputies, Chief
Investigator Raymond Duke said.
Flynt is in stable condition
and still at the hospital.
Duke said no charges are
expected.
Iowa Cop Shoots at Dog, but
Misses, Killing Woman Instead
Posted by: Carlos Miller in Cop
kills dog, PINAC News,
An Iowa police officer trying
to kill a dog, ended up killing a woman instead.
Not much information is
available at the moment, but we have a PINAC correspondent on the ground in
Burlington, trying to obtain more details.
According to Opposing Views:
A woman in Burlington, Iowa,
was reportedly shot and killed by a police officer outside of her home right in
front of her four-year-old son.
According to reports,
34-year-old Autumn Steele was arrested Monday night for domestic abuse. After
being released from jail, Steele was told she could not return to her home
without an officer to escort her. When she returned to her home to retrieve her
things, she reportedly got into a dispute with her husband Gabriel as he was
loading their four-year-old son into the car.
The officer who escorted Steele
to her home reportedly tried to break up the altercation, and while he was
attempting to intervene, the family’s dog reportedly approached. The officer
allegedly felt threatened by the dog and pulled out his gun to shoot it. As he
fired shots at the dog, one of them reportedly hit the 34-year-old mother in
the chest.
“The dog startled the officer.
The officer began shooting at the dog. The officer was still shooting when he
fell down in the snow,” an eyewitness told The Hawk Eye.
It is not clear at this point
if the dog followed through on the perceived attack on the officer, seizing on
the opportunity that the cop had fallen in the snow.
DC police accidentally shoot
man in barber shop
WASHINGTON (WUSA9) -- D.C.
police say they accidentally shot a man in a Southeast barber shop while
pursuing three robbery suspects.
It happened in the 2300 block
of Martin Luther King Avenue around noon Wednesday.
Police say the suspects got out
of a car and one displayed a handgun. That's when an officer opened fire and
one of the bullets went through the door of the barber shop, hitting a patron.
That victim, an adult male, is expected to be okay.
"I can't believe this
neighborhood is going down like this. They should be more careful especially
police shouldn't shoot into a crowd," said a nearby resident.
Kicia Brown was picking up her
two small children at a nearby school.
"That could've been one of
our children or parent walking to go to get their kids. I'm glad my kids are
okay. It's ridiculous so close to a school zone," Brown said.
The suspects are in custody and
a weapon was recovered. Police are checking to see if the suspect fired his
gun.
Undercover APD detective shot
by another officer
By Nicole Perez And Robert
Browman
Police say the officer – an
undercover detective – was shot by another officer in an undercover drug
operation. The officer, whose name has not
been released, underwent surgery and was in critical condition Friday
afternoon, according to APD Chief Gorden Eden. Another officer was injured,
according to APD spokeswoman Celina Espinoza, but the injuries were minor and
the officer was released from the hospital. Police didn’t say how the second
officer was injured. Two suspects from the narcotics
operation were in custody, Eden said.
The cop crime wave in America continues SAPD officer arrested on theft charge had served previous suspension
Dillon Collier & Bailey
McGowan
A seven-year veteran of the San
Antonio Police Department was arrested Thursday night on a theft by public
servant charge, a third-degree felony.
Konrad Chatys, 32, was arrested
after a New Year's Eve incident in which he is accused of taking several thousand
dollars, a rifle and marijuana from a couple after a domestic disturbance call.
Eyewitness News has now learned
that Chatys served a 15-day suspension from late December 2013 to January 2014
for improper use of city property, according to suspension paperwork for
Chatys.
An Internal Affairs
investigation found in July 2013 that Chatys used his patrol vehicle's computer
to run background checks on three people for non-police purposes.
At the time, Chatys also had a
woman in his patrol vehicle whom he had picked up during a service call in the
7900 block of Pipers Creek, according to the paperwork. Chatys later lied while
being questioned by Internal Affairs investigators in October 2013.
The cop crime wave in America continues Bradenton police officer involved in shooting placed on administrative leave
By KATE IRBY
BRADENTON -- The police officer who shot a man
who was trying to run her down with his car has been placed on administrative
leave, according to the Bradenton Police Department.
Suspect Jarques Randall, 23,
trespassed at Casa Mora Rehabilitation and Nursing Care, 1902 59th St. W., at
about 3:10 p.m. Thursday and Sgt. Anthony Ramdath tried to arrest him. Randall
ran from Ramdath and jumped in a car, according to police.
Officer Nasheka Craddock arrived on scene and commanded Randall to get
out of the vehicle and he refused, hitting her as he pulled out of a parking
space, according to reports. Craddock then fired multiple shots, which struck
the suspect in his vehicle, but he continued driving.
Randall caused a string of
crashes as he fled from police, driving south on 59th Street West and ending
when his car was disabled by a final crash at the intersection of Cortez Road
and 37th Street West. Bradenton police officers and Manatee County Sheriff's
Office deputies were then able to apprehend him.
Craddock was treated for
injuries to her leg at Blake Medical Center and was released Thursday night.
She was placed on administrative leave as the Florida Department of Law
Enforcement investigates the incident, which is department protocol when an
officer is involved in a shooting.
Craddock has worked for
Bradenton since December 2004. She was hired by the Bradenton Police Department
in 2006.
In that time, she has been
suspended 10 times for attendance-related issues, at-fault traffic crashes,
unsatisfactory performance and one issue of unbecoming conduct in September
2010, when she was suspended for three weeks stemming from an arrest for
domestic battery.
Craddock has never been
disciplined for behavior involving weapons or excessive use of force, according
to police records.
The cop crime wave in America continues OKC officer accused of rape receives letter of dismissal Thursday
OKLAHOMA CITY – A police officer accused of
rape while on duty is without a job as of Thursday. Oklahoma City police
officer Daniel Holtzclaw received notice by letter, delivered to his home, that
he was without a job. Holtzclaw is currently on house arrest and was on paid
leave during the department’s investigation. Police say he was fired for
numerous policy violations. Holtzclaw will be facing 36 charges altogether at
his court date set for the end of the month.
The cop crime wave in America continues Affidavit: SAPD officer arrested for stealing pot, cash and a gun
By Mark D. Wilson : January 9,
2015
SAN ANTONIIO — A San Antonio
Police Department officer was arrested Thursday night after allegedly stealing
money, drugs and a gun from a man and woman while on duty last week.
Konrad Chatys, 32, faces a
charge of theft by a public servant.
According to an arrest warrant
affidavit, Chatys was dispatched to a Dec. 31 disturbance in a parking lot at
7999 Potranco Road where Maxine Flores, 23, and Scott Galindo, 22, had been
arguing inside their vehicle.
The affidavit said Chatys
separated the pair and placed Galindo in the back of his marked patrol car.
The officer asked Galindo if he
had anything illegal inside his car and was told that there was a quarter of a
pound of marijuana and a newly purchased rifle, the document said.
Upon searching the car, Chatys
located the marijuana and rifle, along with several thousand dollars wrapped in
a rubber band, authorities said.
Galindo told authorities that
Chatys told him he could be in a lot of trouble for the gun, drugs and money,
but that he would “give him a break” because it was the holidays.
The officer then took all the
property and put it into his patrol vehicle, the document said.
When Flores pleaded with him to
be allowed to keep some of the money because she needed to pay rent, Chatys
gave back several hundred dollars, estimated to be about $1,500, according to
the report.
The document added that Chatys
told the pair he was “letting them get away with too much already.” He told
them he intended to confiscate the marijuana but he would tell his supervisors
he had simply found it and gun, they later told authorities.
Chatys, a seven-year veteran of
SAPD, put the remaining cash in his car and left the scene, the affidavit said.
After leaving, however, Chatys
went to his residence in the 1300 block of Range Field before returning to a separate call.
The document said he never
placed any of the confiscated items into the SAPD property room.
Flores made a complaint to
patrol supervisors against Chatys on Jan. 7.
Concurrent investigations were
opened by the department's internal affairs and intelligence units.
Officers executed a search
warrant at Chatys’ residence, resulting in a warrant being issued for his
arrest.
Chatys has been placed on
administrative leave, as is department protocol. Officers are still
investigating the incident.
"Actions like this have no
place in the SAPD,” said Anthony Treviño, SAPD’s interim chief. “That is why
swift and decisive action was taken on this case when we became aware of it.
Although the case reflects badly on one individual, it is not a reflection of
the over 2000 officers of the SAPD who come to work day in and day out to do
the job with pride and integrity."
Chatys was booked into the
Bexar County Jail late Thursday night. By 8:30 a.m. Friday, he had been
released.
The cop crime wave in America continues Police: Plano Officer Charged With Child Porn
By Todd L. Davis
A Plano police officer is
facing charges of possession of child pornography, police officials say. Plano
Police Department spokesman David Tilley said Collin County sheriffs arrested
55-year-old Richard S. Bradford Thursday. Tilley said that Bradford is a
patrol officer who has been with the department for nearly 15 years.
Authorities said Bradford was released on bond and was placed on administrative
leave while Collin County and Plano authorities investigate.
The cop crime wave in America continues Dallas officer charged with sexual assault found dead in Little Elm
Tristan Hallman
A Dallas officer who was
charged with sexual assault last month was found dead Friday morning at his
home in Little Elm.
David Wayne Kattner, 47, had
been on administrative leave pending an investigation. He was scheduled to go
to the internal affairs division Friday morning with his attorney.
Dallas police officials
confirmed he died Friday in a statement: “The Dallas Police Department wishes
to express its condolences to the family of Senior Corporal David Kattner, who
passed away this morning.”
His wife reportedly found him
dead in the home this morning. Kattner’s cause of death hasn’t been confirmed.
Police had arrested Kattner for
sexual assault, a second-degree felony, after a prostitute told them he forced
her to perform a sex act on him while he was on duty. She told police that he
had forced her to do so twice before. He also allegedly told the woman that he
knew where her daughter lived. Investigators were trying to determine if there
were other women who may have been victims.
Kattner, a 26-year veteran of
the department, was a northeast patrol division officer.
The cop crime wave in America continues Welch Police Officer Charged With Stalking, Harassing
Jeffrey A. Morris
WELCH, W.Va. – The McDowell
County Sheriff’s Office said a Welch police officer faces charges after he
allegedly pulled a woman over and asked her for sex.
Patrick Sherman McKinney, 51,
is charged with stalking and harassing, according to a news release from the
sheriff’s office.
The sheriff’s office said a female victim came
into the office and filed a complaint, stating that she has been pulled over
and asked for sexual intercourse. She said
this has been occurring over a period of the last couple of months.
McKinney was charged and
arraigned before McDowell County Magistrate Daniel Mitchell and a bond was set
at $1,000. McKinney made bond and is
awaiting trial.
The cop crime wave in America continues NO, Settlements Over Police Brutality DON’T Bring Accountability to Cops or Prevent Future Police Brutality
Ed Krayewski
Reason.Com
shocking story of police
abuse from New Jersey, via NJ.com:
In the suit filed in Superior
Court in Newton, Raul Sanchez had said he was on his property in Wantage in the
early morning hours of Nov. 21, 2009 when he saw "four people with
flashlights heading toward him."
The troopers threw him on the
ground, handcuffed him and asked, "Where's the gun?" according to the
suit. Sanchez said he told the troopers he had no gun.
Nonetheless, the troopers
kicked him on his back and sides and beat him with their flashlights, he said.
They continued to beat him after he was handcuffed on the ground and not
resisting arrest, according to the suit.
Sanchez suffered three broken
ribs and a bruised spleen as a result of the attack, according to his attorney,
Jeffrey Patti.
"Luckily, there was no
permanent damage to the spleen and the broken ribs have healed," Patti
said, noting that Sanchez, now 61, was 56 at the time of the attack.
No criminal charges were ever
filed against Sanchez as a result of the incident, Patti said.
He added that to the best of
his knowledge, the troopers have all kept their jobs and none have been
disciplined.
Even being accused of owning a
gun in New Jersey can be dangerous to your health. Sanchez’s lawyer claims
police targeted Sanchez because he complained about patrons of the next door
bar throwing garbage on his property.
The settlement, negotiated by a
deputy attorney general on behalf of the four troopers, protects the state from
having to admit any wrong-doing in the incident by offering money in exchange for
Sanchez dropping the lawsuit. So taxpayers are paying not just for the
settlement but for the thug cops’ representation. The State Police won’t
comment, so it’s impossible to find out if they even pretended to run an
investigation into the serious allegations of corruption made in the lawsuit.
I’m not going to deny anyone
their right to extract as much money from the government as they can when
they’ve been brutalized by government employees but the process of obtaining a
settlement over claims of police brutality does NOTHING to bring accountability
to police. Yet that claim is often floated. Sanchez’s attorney says he hoped
that by “holding those four troopers accountable, future victims of police
brutality can be spared.”
Similarly, a police brutality
case settled in Philadelphia had one columnist suggesting the settlement, which
also led to no discipline of the officers involved in the brutality or the
cover-up, meant “not every cop who behaves badly gets a pass.” Much later in
the piece the columnist admitted that “considering that taxpayers are the ones
indirectly footing the bill and, as far as I know - police declined to comment
- the officers aren't facing any disciplinary action, I'm not sure it's a
lesson learned.” She finished by calling on Philadelphia police chief Charles
Ramsey to investigate the cops’ behavior. And he should. But as Ramsey himself
has stressed before, his options for disciplining and even terminating cops are
severely limited by the police contract, something not mentioned by that
columnist nor many of the others who touch on the issue of police brutality at
all.
How Mobile Apps Can Combat Police Brutality
BY JASON TASHEA
The grand jury tasked with
deciding whether to indict the officer who shot and killed Michael Brown heard
70 hours of testimony. The 60 witnesses and three medical examiners gave
conflicting accounts about Brown’s last minutes. Ultimately, the grand jury
opted not to indict. Their decision left many asking: What if there was a video?
What if there was better oversight of police misconduct? Was Michael Brown a
unique tragedy or part of a larger trend? The ACLU’s Mobile Justice App and
Five-0 are technologies that will hopefully help answer these questions and
protect communities from police misconduct.
Launched in November, ACLU
Missouri’s Mobile Justice App is a civil rights attorney, evidence collector
and homing beacon in one. Jeffrey Mittman, director of ACLU Missouri, says that
the Mobile Justice App will empower communities that often feel a sense of
resignation and defeat when it comes to interaction with the police. “Too often
we see complaints of misconduct against the police fall apart in court because
it’s the alleged victim’s word versus the police officer’s.”
While Congress debates funding
for police body cameras, Mittman hopes the Mobile Justice App will improve
citizens’ recourse with police now. Under the “Know Your Rights” tab, a user
can access a simple list of rights and decisions one can make during a police
confrontation. Users can record videos of their interactions with police, which
are then immediately uploaded to the ACLU Missouri’s server for review and
possible legal action. Already over 500 videos have been uploaded. The upload
is to safeguard against illegal confiscation of phones or deletion of videos.
Finally, the “Witness” feature informs others using the app that someone in
their vicinity is witnessing or involved in a confrontation, thus drawing more
eyewitnesses. Both the video and eyewitness feature are meant to bolster claims
of misconduct in court.
There are concerns, however,
about the real world limitations of this app. “There’s no clear training about
[the app]; pulling a phone out around a cop could get people shot,” says Shauna
Dillavou executive director of Community Red, a group promoting free speech and
activism through technology. Mittman was quick to acknowledge the safety
concern for users, which ACLU Missouri explains to their protest monitors.
Dillavou also thinks the app
falls short in organizing activists. “The [Mobile Justice App] doesn’t collect
the data or images to change the message around police misconduct.” The need
for messaging and a broader conversation is what drove three Atlanta teens to
create Five-0, a national venue for police and civilians to come together and
talk. “Our movement is Partnership Policing,” says Asha and Ima Christian, two
of the three siblings who created Five-0 last summer. Five-0, as opposed to the
Mobile Justice App, accomplishes both community-wide data collection and
reporting, and creates a platform for users to have an earnest discussion about
police interactions. Asha admits, however, that the reporting component is the
most used.
With Five-0, users can access
the “Know Your Rights” information and create an incident report like on the
ACLU’s app. Five-0 differentiates itself by promoting a conversation about
policing. “We want the community to talk to each other, [the app] let’s people
in the neighborhood know what’s going on.” This is critical to understand, Ima
Christian explains by example, if Eric Garner’s death was an isolated tragedy
or related to a chronic problem. By acknowledging trends, Asha Christian
argues, activists will be better armed to tackle systemic problems.
For the three siblings, this
project is as much communal as it is personal. “We have family members that had
negative interactions with police,” Asha Christian continued, “Most of them
didn’t want to follow up with the police. The one time they did there was no
resolution… We want to empower people.” Now, the siblings say, family and
friends that previously shrugged their shoulders at a negative interaction with
the police feel as if they have recourse and that their interaction, whether
good or bad, will be, at a minimum, a useful data point to show policing trends
in their community.
With already 12,000 downloads
and 6,000 active users, Five-0 is looking to improve user experience. Similar
to the ACLU app, Five-0 plans to create an emergency button, so during an
interaction with the police the user can immediately send a text to a list of
contacts with GPS coordinates. They also want to improve police involvement on
the app. Currently, the police can respond on Five-0’s message boards; however,
starting in 2015, Five-0 will launch in eight American cities with police
departments as partners to improve dialogue and efficacy in their communities.
Asha Christian believes that fostering this dialogue will improve
police-community relations. “What we’re doing is less expensive than body-cams,
and just as far reaching.”
Jason Tashea is a is a criminal
law and legal tech consultant and freelance writer. Follow him on Twitter
@jtashea.
The cop crime wave in America continues Boston Police Officer Charged with Assaulting Uber Driver
He also allegedly took the Uber
driver's car.
By Mike Bednarsky (Patch
Staff)
A veteran Boston police officer
is being accused of physically attacking an Uber driver and taking his car.
Police arrested 40-year-old
Michael Doherty, a 16-year department veteran, early Sunday morning, NECN
reported.
The driver for the ride-sharing
service reported that Doherty, an off-duty passenger, accused him of bringing
him to the wrong location. The victim said the passenger physically assaulted
him once he stopped the vehicle.
The Uber driver exited the
vehicle before the passenger jumped into the front seat and drove off,
according to a statement from the Boston Police Department.
The victim, with a passing
motorist who assisted him, followed the vehicle to E. 1st Street and Farragut
Road where the suspect stopped and exited the victim’s car, Boston.com noted.
Uber spokesman Taylor Bennett
issued the following statement regarding the assault on Monday: “Our thoughts
are with our valued partner during his recovery and we are supporting him in
any way we can during this time. We have a strict policy to remove any rider
that exhibits aggressive or abusive behavior from the platform and we have
permanently blocked this rider’s access. We stand ready to assist law
enforcement in their investigation.”
Doherty was placed on paid
administrative leave. He is scheduled to be arraigned Monday.
Suspended Cleveland police officer a "serial abuser of women," per prosecutors seeking $100K bond
By James F. McCarty, The Plain Dealer
CLEVELAND, Ohio -- City police officer David Anderson had three
prior incidents of domestic violence before he was indicted last month on
charges of menacing by stalking, aggravated menacing and domestic violence,
according to court documents.
Cuyahoga County prosecutors on
Monday filed an eight-page motion asking a judge to raise Anderson's bond to
$100,000 to more accurately reflect the seriousness of the charges and his
three previous violent episodes with women.
Anderson is scheduled to be
arraigned on the latest charges on Thursday in Common Pleas Court, at which
time a new bond will be set, he will be asked to enter a plea, and a judge will
be assigned to the case.
Anderson, 51, a city police
officer since 2007, is free on a $10,000 bond posted by Cleveland Police
Patrolman's Association president Jeffrey Follmer. He was released from jail
Dec. 16 -- the day after his arrest.
Anderson, a Second District
patrol officer, is suspended without pay pending the outcome of his case. His
lawyer Henry Hilow said he would plead not guilty to the charges at the
hearing. He decried the prosecutors' motion.
"Officer Anderson is a
good public servant and an outstanding police officer," Hilow said.
"He is ready to vigorously defend himself against these charges. The
request for a $100,000 bond for a fourth-degree felony is ridiculous."
According to the prosecutors' motion,
Anderson already has violated a no-contact order with the victim, his
43-year-old live-in girlfriend, who told police that Anderson called her after
his arrest.
"The state is extremely
concerned that Anderson will do so again," the motion reads, "and
that the mere possibility of any further contact between Anderson and the
victim poses an unjustifiable risk that he will harm her."
According to the motion,
Anderson attacked his girlfriend three times on consecutive days, beginning
Dec. 13, when he shoved her to the ground, causing her head to strike the
pavement and knocking her unconscious.
The next day, Anderson again
shoved the woman to the ground outside their home on South Hills Avenue in
Cleveland. The following day, he kicked in her bedroom door, chased her down
the stairs and shoved her to the landing, where her head was bloodied, the
motion said.
In 2010, North Royalton police
arrested Anderson after he threatened a different girlfriend, knocked out
drywall in her home, broke dishes and slashed the tires on her car, the motion
said. Anderson later pleaded guilty to a reduced charge of disorderly conduct.
In 2009, the girlfriend's
daughter called police to report that Anderson was on top of her mother and
threatening to punch her. But the girlfriend declined to press charges.
In 2005, Cleveland police
arrested Anderson after the same woman accused him of threatening to snap her
neck. He later called her from jail and told her, "If I could have, I
would have snapped your neck. You better fix this," according to the
motion. City prosecutors declined to charge Anderson then.
County prosecutors contend that
police officers must be held to a higher legal standard than the public, and
that Anderson's violent crimes damage the trust essential for officers to
properly perform their duty to protect and uphold the laws.
"When a bad officer breaks
the law, he makes the job of every good officer less safe," the motion
said.
"Because of that
heightened legal standard, this court should set bond at a level that is above
and beyond what this court would normally set for a serial abuser of women with
a history of threats and violence, who has already violated the no-contact
order against him," the motion concludes.
The prosecutors said a larger
bond is also necessary because Anderson faces the likelihood of a prison
sentence, if convicted, providing him a "significant incentive to
flee."
Pittsburgh settles suit with teacher arrested outside community meeting
By Robert Zullo / Pittsburgh
Post-Gazette
Pittsburgh City Council this
morning approved a $52,500 payment to settle a lawsuit filed by a teacher who
was thrown in jail by a city police officer as he was leaving a community
meeting in Homewood on charges that were dropped.
The settlement includes several
changes to police policy and procedures, according to an attorney for the
American Civil Liberties Union who represented Dennis Henderson, 39. The ACLU
called the case a racially motivated false arrest and a clear-cut case of
police misconduct.
Mr. Henderson, a teacher at the
Manchester Academic Charter School, told the Citizens Police Review Board
earlier this year that he was leaving a June 2013 meeting at the Community
Empowerment Association in Homewood and went to his car to get a business card
to give to a journalist. He was arrested after a confrontation that started
when Officer Jonathan Gromek sped by and Mr. Henderson exclaimed
"Wow."
The Citizens Police Review
Board recommended in March that the city fire Officer Gromek. The police
department recommended a written reprimand in November 2013, after the Office
of Municipal Investigations found he violated departmental policy. He remains a
city officer and is assigned to Zone 3, which includes most of South Side.
Cop Fired After Tasing 76-Year-Old During Traffic Stop
Elian El-Khamissi
A Texas police officer was
dismissed from the department for abusing an elderly man.
After an internal
investigation, Victoria Police Department (VPD) fired Officer Nathanial
Robinson for using a taser on 76-year old Pete Vasquez, in an attack that was
caught on dashcam.
In a statement released on
Monday, VPD said that Robinson violated three department policies, including
Conduct and Performance, Use of Force, and Arrest without a Warrant when he
stopped Vasquez for driving with an expired inspection sticker in December.
When Vasquez told the officer
that he was driving a vehicle with a dealer’s tag, which didn’t require a
current sticker, Robinson slammed him onto the hood of the police car, then to
the ground and tased him twice.
Vasquez was handcuffed and
taken to a hospital but was never cited for any crime.
Officer Robinson was put on
administrative leave during the investigation.
He may still face criminal charges.
Fairfax County Releases Statement on Shooting of Springfield Man
By Tim Peterson
http://www.connectionnewspapers.com/
It’s been more than 16 months
since John Geer of Springfield was shot and killed by a Fairfax County Police
Department (FCPD) officer. And since the Aug. 29, 2013 shooting, scant
information on the incident has been provided by the FCPD or the county Board
of Supervisors, such as an explanation of what transpired up to and following
the shooting, and the identities of the officers involved. They’ve kept this
information from the media, the public and the Geer family, citing an ongoing
federal investigation into the death.
That was until Jan 5, when
Fairfax County released a 304-word statement regarding the events surrounding
Geer’s death. For the first time, the officer who shot Geer was named: PFC Adam
Torres, who the statement said, “fired a single shot that struck Geer.”
#“We’ve had policies in place
regarding when a police officer’s name and information is released,” Board of
Supervisors chairman Sharon Bulova said Monday night. “Usually it’s a matter of
weeks. In this particular case it turned out to be an unusual situation that
took longer.”
#Police had been called to
Geer’s house by his partner and mother of his two daughters Maura Harrington,
over a domestic dispute. The statement says officers, “including a trained
negotiator,” talked with Geer for over half an hour while he stood in the
doorway of his house, arms raised above his head and resting on the doorframe.
#“Geer was reported as having
multiple firearms inside the home,” the statement says, “displaying a firearm
that he threatened to use against the police, and refused the officers’
requests that he remain outside and speak to them.”
#Torres then shot Geer in the
chest when he began lowering his hands.
ACCORDING TO THE STATEMENT a
SWAT team entered Geer’s house, after Geer died, and found a loaded, holstered
handgun on the stairs by where he had been standing.
“A large amount of citizens have guns in their
home. Does that give them the right to come and shoot you?” said Jeff Stewart
of Chantilly, a friend of Geer’s for over 25 years who witnessed the shooting.
“At the time he was shot he wasn’t bearing any
arms. He owned them. Why is it relevant to the release? Does a loaded gun show
intent? The burden fell on the police to defuse the situation, let the guy go
inside, chill out.”
Geer’s father Don didn’t hear
about the county’s release until someone called to say it was happening on
television.
“The press release I felt was very tainted
towards the police department,” he said. “It depicted John as being a terrorist
or something, had all these guns in the house. He was a hunter. It didn’t sound
like that.”
THOUGH THE COUNTY’S STATEMENT
refers to a Circuit Court ruling that they “may release some information
pertaining to the Aug. 29, 2013, officer-involved shooting of John Geer,” the
Dec. 22 opinion from judge Randy Bellows was a court order.
After a Dec. 19 hearing in
Fairfax, Bellows quickly turned around a response forcing the county to produce
more than 100 documents being sought by lawyer Michael Lieberman in a $12
million civil suit over Geer’s death. According to Lieberman, the county had
previously objected to all but six of 127 requests for documents.
“That’s pretty amazing to have a judge turn
around and give you a 12-page opinion over a weekend,” said Lieberman. “He
obviously worked on it all weekend, he listened carefully.”
The documents include
everything from 911 calls and witness statements to the medical treatment of
Geer and blood pattern examination. Bellows is holding off granting or denying
production of several documents as they relate to the county’s internal
investigation or the federal investigation. He gave the county 30 days to
produce all the others.
The FCPD has defended their
silence so far through the criminal investigative privilege afforded by the
Virginia Freedom of Information Act (FOIA). The department declined to comment
for this story and the Fairfax County Attorney’s office didn’t respond to an
interview request.
In his opinion piece, Bellows
wrote: “The entity seeking to assert the criminal investigative file privilege
is no longer responsible for any aspect of the criminal investigation and the
entity that is now solely responsible for the criminal investigation has made
it clear that it has taken no step to discourage the custodian of the criminal
investigative files from disclosure of most of the files at issue.”
Bellows referred to
correspondence between U.S. Sen. Charles Grassley of Iowa and Assistant
Attorney General Peter Kadzik, acknowledging that the case currently sits with
the U.S. Department of Justice, not the state’s attorney or the FCPD. Grassley,
ranking member of the Senate Judiciary Committee, sent formal inquiries to FCPD
Chief Edwin Roessler and U.S. Attorney Dana Boente about the case in November
2014. He sent another letter to Fairfax County Commonwealth’s Attorney Raymond
Morrogh in December.
Kadzik answered Grassley that
the FCPD wasn’t instructed to withhold information about the shooting, only the
federal investigation.
Lieberman has continued to
criticize the Board of Supervisors, who have authority over the FCPD and
allowed the silence from that department to continue.
For Stewart and the Geer
family, the continued silence, even with this recent disclosure, has been
frustrating and painful.
“It’s surreal enough to watch your friend get
shot,” said Stewart. “It goes to a whole different level when no one’s held
accountable.”
“I can’t figure out why I’ve had to go through
this miserable 16 months in order to hear anything being done at all,” said Don
Geer. “Closure would be why someone pulled the trigger and killed my son,
that’s as much as I can expect at this point in time. A better idea of why did
it happen.”
“We need to be transparent and
we haven’t been,” he said in a recent interview. “The county attorney is
supposed to provide advice, we make decisions. I think we’ve been following
overly protective legal advice instead of making the right decision in this case,
is really what it boils down to.”
Lieberman said he sees this
action by the county as “preemptive damage control.” He continued, “The only
positive thing I take out of it is some claim they’re finally going to change
the policies.”
Bulova admitted the Board of
Supervisors, FCPD and County Attorney’s policies on information sharing all
need to be examined. "In retrospect,” she said, “our policies need to be
changed to provide information sooner if there is a delay like this.”
She also addressed the possibility
of revisiting creating a citizen’s police advisory council.
“At least it’s getting their attention,” Geer
said. “The idea of the police investigating the police just doesn’t work.
That’s all there is to it.”
Lieberman is optimistic that
future hearings will help produce more documents, and for now at least some
answers to 16-month-old questions are coming forward.
“The nightmare of John’s shooting isn’t ever
going to end,” he said, “but the nightmare of what the county’s done, at least
we can see the light at the end of the tunnel for getting over that part.”
Fairfax Cops Block Geer Killing Investigations
By John Lovaas/Reston Impact
Producer/Host
http://www.connectionnewspapers.com/
#Finally some of the smoke is
clearing. Sixteen months after unarmed John Geer was killed standing in his
doorway by an unidentified Fairfax County Police officer we are getting an
explanation of the wall of silence surrounding his death. In response to an
inquiry by U.S. Senator Chuck Grassley, R-Iowa, the Fairfax Commonwealth
Attorney (prosecutor) Raymond Morrogh revealed why he failed to complete his
investigation into Mr. Geer’s killing and took the unusual step of passing the
case to the U.S. Attorney (U.S. Justice Dept.) a year ago. The Fairfax
prosecutor typically works closely with police investigators looking into
possible abuse or criminal acts by police officers. He depends on their
detective work in deciding whether to recommend charges or empanel a grand jury
(as in Ferguson, Mo. or New York City) to seek indictment. In the case of John
Geer’s death, Mr. Morrogh told Senator Grassley that “the decision by the Chief
of Police…to withhold requested materials effectively prevented me from
completing the investigation and rendering a decision.” Morrogh said that Chief
Roessler, who is appointed by and in theory accountable to Fairfax County Board
of Supervisors, was supported by County Attorney David Bobzien, also a
subordinate of the Chairman and Board of Supervisors in refusing to hand over
evidence. Furthermore, Roessler also refused to cooperate in providing evidence
requested by the Justice Department. Finally, the Justice Department took the
County and Police to court, and a judge ordered Fairfax County Police to
provide the evidence sought. Only now, under court order, have the cops agreed
to cooperate to some extent with the U.S. Attorney’s investigation. We shall
see.
#What on earth is going on
here? Why have we heard nothing from the people who the Police Chief works
for—Fairfax Board Chairman Sharon Bulova and the nine silent District
Supervisors? On Fairfax County’s organization chart, it is clear that the
Police Department--just like the Departments of Community Services, Planning
and Zoning, and Information Technology, for example—reports to, takes direction
from and has its policies set by the Chairman and Board of Supervisors.
Department chiefs can also be removed by the Board.
#Why have Bulova and the Board
not directed FCPD to drop the shroud of secrecy so inappropriate in an open
society, and to cooperate fully with the Commonwealth Attorney and Justice
Department? Indeed, who is in charge?
#Perhaps Chairman Bulova and
the Supes have not noticed the growing agitation here and around the USA about
the lack of accountability of police forces often resembling military units. In
view of the Geer killing and several others here under questionable
circumstances—including Dr. Salvatore Culosi, Randal Leroy Collins, David
Masters, Hailu Brooks—and FCPD’s 72-year history of no officer ever being
charged, Fairfax County may be the impunity capitol of the country. Other
jurisdictions the size of Fairfax County have created independent citizen
oversight panels to assure transparency and open communication on matters of
police abuse and use of lethal force. It is time this County did so as well.
Tragically, Fairfax County’s lack of accountability encourages a small number
of trigger-happy bad actors within the force to abuse their power, and lose for
all the confidence of those they are supposed to protect.
Seven unanswered questions in the Fairfax police shooting death of John Geer
By Tom Jackman
The Washington Post
After Fairfax County on Monday
decided to release the name of the officer involved in the fatal shooting of
John Geer in 2013, and make the new allegation that Geer had threatened police
with a gun, there remain a number of crucial unanswered questions in the case.
Here are our top seven. You can add yours in the comments:
1) Why did Officer Adam Torres
fire one shot at close range and kill John Geer?
After 16 months of silence, the
Fairfax police identified a 31-year-old eight-year veteran from the West
Springfield patrol station as the shooter, but would not say why he fired. Did
Torres think that Geer, after between 30 and 50 minutes of discussion, was
reaching for a gun when he began to lower his hands from the top of the storm
door? Witnesses say Geer’s hands had only reached eye level when Torres fired.
When officers feel threatened, they are trained to fire more than one time.
Other officers were also on scene, with weapons aimed at Geer, but they did not
fire. Was the shot intentional, or an accident? Did Geer say something that
caused Torres to feel threatened?
2) When will a decision be made
about whether to charge Torres with a crime?
The case is now in the hands of
the Justice Department’s civil rights division, which is not known for prompt
decisions (see the Oscar Grant case in Oakland from 2009, or the Trayvon Martin
case from 2012). The investigation, initially conducted by the Fairfax police
homicide section and reviewed by Fairfax Commonwealth’s Attorney Raymond F.
Morrogh, was shifted to the U.S. attorney in Alexandria in January 2014 after
Morrogh ran into roadblocks obtaining internal affairs information from the
Fairfax police, Morrogh has said. The FBI and Justice Department lawyers then
investigated, subpoenaed the same internal affairs information Morrogh sought,
then passed the case to Main Justice in November for a ruling.
The difference between the Geer
case and Grant, Martin, Michael Brown and others is that local prosecutors and
juries made decisions on those cases before the feds got involved. This time,
the feds are the first ones to make a call. And if they decide there was no
civil rights violation — defined as a government entity willfully denying a
citizen their rights — does the case then return to Fairfax prosecutor Morrogh
for a decision on whether state law was violated? How long would all this take?
3) What internal affairs files
were the Fairfax and federal prosecutors seeking in this case?
This has apparently been a
major sticking point for investigators, and several officials familiar with the
case said that both Morrogh and the federal prosecutors were seeking
information not on the shooter, Torres, but on one of the police witnesses. The
issue reportedly is whether the witness has had prior problems with
truthfulness. Fairfax prosecutors are careful not to use witnesses whose
truthfulness has been challenged in court, because it allows defense attorneys
to attack their testimony. Did a police witness in the Geer case offer
corroborating testimony for Torres, or conflicting? This is also complicated by
the legal precedent that statements given by officers in internal
investigations, mandatorily, cannot be used against them in criminal cases,
where they are not required to testify. Morrogh reportedly was not seeking to
prosecute anyone based on the prior cases, but Fairfax County attorneys still
resisted.
4) How will Fairfax County
proceed in the civil lawsuit filed by Geer’s family?
Frustrated after a year of
silence, Geer’s family sued Fairfax police Chief Edwin C. Roessler Jr. and the
county in September, seeking answers. Fairfax resisted providing any pre-trial
discovery, saying the case was still under federal investigation. Fairfax
Circuit Court Judge Randy I. Bellows last month ordered Fairfax to turn over
everything that was obtained before the case went to the feds in January 2014
and gave them 30 days to do so. After two weeks, Fairfax has not yet done so.
In the last police shooting to go to civil court, the 2006 killing of unarmed
optometrist Salvatore Culosi, Fairfax County fought Culosi’s lawyers for four
years in federal court before finally agreeing to pay a $2 million settlement
on the eve of trial. Will Fairfax again take a hardball approach to the family
of a man shot dead by one of their officers?
5) When will Fairfax County
provide a detailed timeline of what happened that day?
After 16 months, the Fairfax
police for the first time revealed not only Torres’s name, but a new claim that
Geer was “displaying a firearm that he threatened to use against the police.”
The police also stated that “a trained negotiator” was involved and tried to
get Geer to emerge from his townhouse, though Geer was not holding any hostages
and was not known to be suspected of any crimes. Geer’s father said he was told
by police that Geer was unarmed, and he does not appear armed in a photo taken
shortly before the shooting, though a holstered, loaded handgun was found a few
feet from the doorway. The Geer family’s lawyer, Michael Lieberman, said he had
never heard any report about Geer displaying a gun or that a negotiator was
involved. What other details do Fairfax authorities have about the case,
including their decision to wait an hour before rendering aid to the mortally
wounded Geer?
6) If the case languishes at
the federal level, will Sen. Charles Grassley get involved again?
Grassley (R-Iowa) is now the
chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee. As the case sat quietly within the
Justice Department, he fired off letters to the Fairfax police chief, the U.S.
attorney and the Fairfax prosecutor, asking what was causing the delay. The
responses to his questions made it clear that no one was silencing the Fairfax
police, clearing the way for Judge Bellows to order them to release information
to the family in the civil case. Will he seek more information if the case goes
quiet again?
7) Why have Fairfax police not
previously stated that Geer was “displaying a firearm that he threatened to use
against the police”?
When Ferguson police Officer
Darren Wilson’s full explanation of why he shot Michael Brown was made publicly
available, it provided a previously missing component to the discussion of why
Brown was killed. Wilson’s version of events came less than four months after
the shooting, but well after the civil unrest it caused. In Fairfax, there has
been no civil unrest, and, until Monday, very little information.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)






















