on sale now at amazon

on sale now at amazon
"I don't like this book because it don't got know pictures" Chief Rhorerer

“It’s becoming a disturbingly familiar scene in America - mentally unstable cops”

“It’s becoming a disturbingly familiar scene in America - mentally unstable cops”
“It’s becoming a disturbingly familiar scene in America - mentally unstable cops”

Conviction overturned for officer in 2010 UMd. beating


Judge gives James Harrison probation before judgment Tuesday

COLLEGE PARK, Md. —A Prince George's County Police officer who was convicted of assaulting a University of Maryland student in 2010 during a riot after a basketball game could get a clean slate.
Officers James Harrison and Reginald Barker were accused of assaulting University of Maryland student John McKenna during a celebration after Maryland beat Duke in March 2010. Video captured Harrison hitting McKenna with a baton after he was already on the ground.
Barker was acquitted and has since returned to the force, while Harrison was found guilty.
"He got 30 days of home detention, and that's all he got," said Terrell Roberts, McKenna's attorney.
But earlier this week, Judge Beverly Woodard, the same judge who heard the initial case, threw out Harrison's sentence and instead gave him probation before judgment, meaning the conviction could disappear from his record if he doesn't break the law during a one-year probation period. He could even be a police officer again.
Officials with the Prince George's County State's Attorney's Office said they weren't thrilled with the change.
"We just felt that it was not appropriate to take the jury's voice away and to basically overturn the conviction," said John Erzen, with the Prince George's County State's Attorney's Office.
There was concern during the first trial after it was revealed Woodard's ex-husband was the first Prince George's County officer to be convicted of use of force in 1988. There was no mistrial because she promised to be fair.
Calls to Harrison's attorney were not returned Tuesday, but McKenna's attorney said the decision is a mockery of justice.

"In a case like this that received all this attention because of the gravity of the case, the importance of the case, it merited some reasons for doing what the judge ended up doing, and there was no reason given for this kind of action," Roberts said.