Chicago releases (another) new video of police shooting (another) unarmed black teen
BY COLIN DAILEDA
The city of Chicago released another
long-buried video on Thursday that shows another police officer fatally
shooting yet another black teenager after officials there officially dropped
their objection to its release.
Protests have wracked Chicago and officials
have scrambled to appear transparent ever since the November release of a
similar video in which an officer shot a black teenager named Laquan McDonald
16 times.
This latest video shows an officer gunning
down 17-year-old Cedrick Chatman, who was unarmed and fleeing police when he
was shot and killed.
Officer Kevin Fry, who was not reprimanded
for the fatal shooting, said Chatman turned and pointed a "black
object" at him as Chatman fled, an action not seen in the video.
Fry has been the subject of 30 complaints
throughout his career, according toDNAInfo, and yet he has never once been
disciplined.
Fraternal Order of Police spokesman Pat
Camden attempted to justify the fatal shooting and said Fry had been in fear of
his life.
Camden has lied about police shootings in the
past, and is often among the first officials to try to establish a narrative
after an officer kills someone, an investigation by the Chicago Tribune showed.
Chatman and two friends had robbed a man of
$400 earlier that day, and Chatman had taken off in the man's car. Fry and
another officer recognized the car and approached Chatman, at which point he
got out of the vehicle and fled.
Police initially charged Chatman's two
collaborators with his murder, though they were not at the scene when Fry
fatally shot the teenager.
Chicago Mayor Rahm Emanuel fired Police
Superintendent Garry McCarthy after the release of the McDonald video, and has
desperately tried to appear transparent and dedicated to police reform in its
aftermath.
Protesters, however, are calling for his
resignation, fed up with years of violence at the hands of police and what they
say is an ongoing attempt to cover up the killings.
Have something to add to this story? Share it
in the comments.
Badges don’t change need to say sorry
San Francisco Board of Supervisors President
London Breed’s call this week for the U.S. Department of Justice to investigate
last month’s fatal police shooting of Mario Woods and the San Francisco Police
Department’s use-of-force policies is a sensible move that The City as a whole
should welcome.
Unfortunately, in the political climate of
this city, where our leaders seem content to turn a blind eye to what happened
on the Bayview sidewalk on Dec. 2, such a request is seen as “bold.” Mayor Ed
Lee’s office gave tepid support, observing The City is already conducting many
investigations into the shooting, but “the mayor welcomes independent review.”
The San Francisco Police Officers
Association, which has defended the officers in the shooting, didn’t bother
with such pleasantries, with consultant Gary Delagnes telling the San Francisco
Examiner that Breed’s request was “political posturing” and “grandstanding.”
There should be no tolerance for this kind of
heartless obstructionism. A man died, fatally shot by police officers on a San
Francisco sidewalk. We would like to think we live in a city where those whose
job is to care about how law enforcement is practiced would go to the ends of
the earth to ensure police work is done ethically and professionally, for the
benefit of the department and to give full dignity to those who wear the badge.
We recognize that is not the city we live in, but the realization is painful.
Breed wants San Francisco to follow Chicago’s
example: That city called on the DOJ to investigate the October 2014 shooting
by Chicago police of Laquan McDonald, an investigation that grew to include
examining the police department’s operations.
Breed’s resolution, introduced with the
support of Supervisor Malia Cohen, who represents the Bayview, requests the
Department of Justice “undertake an independent investigation” into the
shooting of Woods, which “raised serious questions about the actions of the
officers involved, as well as SFPD’s training and use of force protocols and
its treatment of African Americans.”
We urge the full board, which could vote on
the resolution by the end of the month, to stand together with a unanimous
approval calling for the investigation.
Several supervisors on Tuesday also publicly
apologized to the victim’s mother, Gwen Woods, who was at the meeting. Even
though it was a gesture, it was overdue. The board should also back Supervisor
David Campos’ resolution to officially apologize to Gwen Woods for treatment
over the death of her son.
Those officers who surrounded Woods, who was
holding a kitchen knife on the sidewalk that afternoon six weeks ago, appeared
to show a blatant disregard for human life. When we talk about the need for
police reform in this country and in this city, the real problem is that in the
decisive moment, our police officers seemed to care less about a man losing his
life than about getting a cut on their hand by trying to disarm him of a knife.
If that proves to be the case, the officers let The City down, they let the
department down and they let the Woods family down.
Yes, the family deserves an apology, and The
City deserves one as well. Police officers are trained to allow us to feel safe
and protected on our streets, and in this instance they produced the opposite
effect.
We need the most thorough and independent
investigations possible, and that includes calling on the federal government to
be involved.
“We do not have at this point the Police
Department that the city and county of San Francisco deserves to have,” Campos
said this week.
We sadly agree. And we concur that a federal
investigation is needed for a true independent review to see that justice is
done.
Rochester should set example for nation on body cameras
Editorial Board
Before long, police officers in the city of
Rochester will be wearing body cameras. That is quickly becoming the norm
across the nation, yet each city is on its own when it comes to developing
rules for the use of those cameras and the videos they record.
That isn't going so well, according to a
report from a coalition of major civil rights organizations. It came up with a
list of recommended rules, and then checked to see how 25 cities stacked up.
None made the honor roll.
The city of Rochester should be the first.
The city is negotiating a policy with the
union representing its police officers. This follows months of work on the
proposed rules, as well as significant input from the Rochester Coalition for
Police Reform — which had been pressing for the cameras even before the fatal
police shooting that set off riots in Ferguson, Missouri.
Before selecting a vendor this week, the city
showed coalition members cameras from four companies.
Unlike some cities, Rochester appears to be
taking a thoughtful, relatively transparent and community-based approach to
outfitting officers with cameras. It is unfortunate the policy was not ready
when the city picked its vendor, but as soon as union negotiations conclude, we
expect the city to make its policy public.
We believe the policy should largely reflect
the recommendations of the Rochester Coalition for Police Reform. In addition
to being well-researched and sound, the group's buy-in is critical to building
trust between police and the citizens they have sworn to protect and serve.
To gain a perfect score with leading civil
rights organizations, the city will have to: make its policy easy for the
public to see; limit the amount of discretion police officers have over when to
record; address privacy issues for both police and citizens; prevent officers
from seeing the videos before they file their reports; delete
"unflagged" footage in six months; make sure videos can't be tampered
with; allow people who complain of police misconduct to see relevant footage;
and sharply limit the use of technology, like facial recognition, to identify
people in videos.
Yes, there is a lot to think about before
putting a body camera on a police officer.
The city of Rochester should be commended for
taking the time to do that. But, as they say, it's not over till it's over. We
urge the union and the city to get it right before they emerge from talks, and
then make sure everyone understands and follows the rules.
In addition, our congressional delegation
should be pushing for a specific national policy and review system to ensure
these cameras are doing what they are ultimately supposed to do: provide a tool
to help improve police-community relations across America.
Cleveland police monitoring team creates website, accepting input for first-year plan
A team of 15 experts from around the country
will oversee the Cleveland police department's compliance a consent decree
negotiated with the U.S. Department of Justice. A Los Angeles-based police
consulting firm, Police Assessment Resource Center, will be paid $4.9 million
by the city. Here are the backgrounds of the team members.
Ryllie Danylko, cleveland.com
By Eric Heisig, cleveland.com
CLEVELAND, Ohio — The team monitoring the
city of Cleveland's agreement with the U.S. Justice Department regarding police
reform has created a website and social-media accounts.
Within the past week, the website
www.clevelandpolicemonitor.net went live, team leader Matthew Barge said. The
team also sent out its first dispatch via Twitter on Friday.
The team also created a Facebook page.
The web presence is a way to keep Cleveland
residents informed as the monitoring team tracks the city's progress in
reforming its police department. The settlement with the Justice Department was
reached in May, and is expected to cost the city millions over at least five
years.
The monitoring team began its work in
October. It now has two offices: one at the Cleveland police department's
downtown headquarters on Ontario Street and one at Lutheran Metropolitan
Ministry, 4515 Superior Ave.
It is now taking public input for a
first-year plan, which will be filed Feb. 1 for Chief U.S. District Judge
Solomon Oliver Jr.'s approval. The plan (a draft can be seen below) will set
deadlines for when the city will have to accomplish certain tasks.
The judge, city and Justice Department are
expected to discuss the first-year plan at a Jan. 28 status conference.
Those who want to weigh in can do so here.
"What we've been telling people is 'the
sooner, the better,'" Barge said.
The Need for Police Reform Is Now Beyond A Reasonable Doubt
The fact that the state hired a disgraced cop
against the recommendations of the police agency that fired him cries out for a
statewide police oversight board.
JANUARY 14, 2016 · By The Civil Beat
Editorial Board
When the Honolulu Police Department fired
Officer Ethan Ferguson four years ago, one might have thought the disgraced
policeman would be done as a lawman. Falsifying reports and lying to
investigators regarding his transportation of an underage runaway aren’t the
sort of offenses a police officer’s career can typically survive.
But as we know now, that’s not the way things
turned out. Ferguson shockingly went to work within a year for the Hawaii
Department of Land and Natural Resources as a law enforcement officer on the
Big Island, with the same authority, power and weaponry entrusted to HPD cops.
Cut to last Thursday, when Ferguson was
busted in another case involving a minor and charged with five counts of sexual
assault. The arrest was based on allegations by a teen that she’d been
assaulted in Hilo by a man in a DLNR law enforcement uniform.
What’s wrong with this picture? How could a
cop fired for serious problems with integrity be hired by another law
enforcement agency in the same state?
The outrageousness of the situation makes an
emphatic case for what’s lacking in Hawaii. We remain the only state without a
statewide standards and training board and one of only six states that doesn’t
give a statewide oversight agency the power to revoke a peace officer’s license
for misconduct.
The facts of this case, still emerging,
border on the ridiculous.
James Nishimoto, director of Hawaii’s
Department of Human Resources Development, confirmed Wednesday in an e-mail to
Sen. Will Espero that both HPD and Ferguson himself acknowledged prior to his
hire by DLNR that he had been fired from his previous job.
“Details regarding the termination were not
provided” by HPD, Nishimoto told Espero.
But HPD now says that’s not exactly the case.
In fact, Honolulu police officials said late Wednesday they recommended DLNR
not hire Ferguson. Still, HPD did not disclose the circumstances that led to
Ferguson’s discharge, even to a brother law enforcement agency.
But DLNR recruiters didn’t need to look far
to find out about Ferguson’s troubled past. A simple Google search would have
told them the story.
Civil Beat’s Nick Grube reported Ferguson’s
firing in 2014 and the offenses for which he lost his job. The story was part
of our ongoing coverage of the lack of transparency when it comes to police
misconduct and discipline in Hawaii. Grube’s piece focused in part on how quick
police agencies are to destroy disciplinary records after an officer has been
terminated, as HPD did in Ferguson’s case.
Police officers have extraordinary power over
the lives of ordinary citizens, and the hiring of any cop who is going to carry
a badge and a gun warrants careful scrutiny of an applicant’s background. It’s
one thing for police officials, encouraged by the politically powerful police
union, toshut the public out when it comes to being able to check up on the
actions of police officers.
But to not disclose to another law
enforcement agency bad behavior that led to termination? Come on.
That point is not lost on Sen. Espero, who
practically breathed fire in an e-mail exchange Wednesday with Nishimiro and
DLNR Chair Suzanne Case.
“Without knowing the discussions between the
applicant and DLNR, I am outraged that DLNR would hire this individual in a law
enforcement capacity. The state needs to err on the side of caution and public
safety when it comes to hiring practices, and from what I know, this did not
happen,” Espero wrote. “There was a red flag on this individual, and the state
disregarded it.”
PF Bentley/Civil Beat
Espero suggests a “zero-tolerance policy” in
considering police officers fired from other departments. “We don’t need second
rate law enforcement officers working in state government,” he declared.
Espero has been the loudest voice at the
Legislature for the creation of a statewide board that would facilitate
training and set professional standards for law enforcement.
Establishment of such a board and greater
transparency in the disclosure of information related to police misconduct are
two of four main reform proposals Civil Beat supports for the coming
legislative session. Were those proposals already law, DLNR at minimum would
have had the facts regarding Ferguson’s past offenses easily at its fingertips
when considering his hire.
Espero is leading a coalition that promises
to introduce these and other reform measures this year, though as he told Civil
Beat in an Editorial Board meeting last month, he is leaning against language that
would give a police standards board power to take away an officer’s
certification.
He should reconsider throwing that political
bone to the State of Hawaii Organization of Police Officers, which has
successfully opposed reform measures for years. The Ferguson case proves beyond
a reasonable doubt the reasons a standards board should have the authority to
certify and decertify officers.
In the session that begins in one week,
legislators must take seriously reform of a law enforcement environment that, at
minimum, allows problem cops to move from agency to agency without their
history being fully disclosed to potential employers or to the taxpayers who
fund their salaries. One girl has allegedly paid a steep price for that lack of
reform.
Her case and numerous others in a law
enforcement system that virtually stands alone nationally in its lack of
adequate oversight cry out for justice. This year, we must not ignore the
cries.
About the Author
The Civil Beat Editorial Board
The members of Civil Beat's editorial board
are Pierre Omidyar, Patti Epler, Bob Ortega, Richard Wiens, Chloe Fox and Todd
Simmons. Opinions expressed by the editorial board reflect the group's
consensus view. Contact Opinion Editor Todd Simmons at todd@civilbeat.com or
808-377-0247.
S.F. mayor Ed Lee outlines reforms in wake of Mario Woods killing
By Vivian Ho
Demonstrators chalked up the ground outside
Hall of Justice in protest of alleged police brutality and those killed by
police officers, Friday, Dec. 18, 2015, in San Francisco, Calif. Mario Woods
was shot an ... more
San Francisco Mayor Ed Lee
responded Wednesday to the outcry over the police killing of Mario Woods with
an outline of proposed and pending reforms and a directive to Police Chief Greg
Suhr and the city’s Police Commission to submit any additional policy and
budget proposals by next month.
In a memo to the Board of
Supervisors, the mayor added to the Police Commission’s ongoing discussion
about the department’s training, use-of-force policies and weaponry by including
a directive for the department to enroll in President Obama’s Police Data
Initiative, with a goal of creating more transparency and accountability.
Lee’s working plan for police use
of force, which commits the city and the Police Department to “a primary goal
of preventing unnecessary officer-involved shootings,” also includes the
creation of a new cultural competency course for officers as well as an
expansion of training on how to avoid or limit subconscious bias.
Lee said in an interview that he
wanted the memo to send a message that he is “very serious about these
changes.” The mayor’s office had prepared the memo for a Wednesday meeting with
the city’s African American Advisory Forum.
“It is really a key element of our ability to
be a successful city, to make sure we speak to our African American community
in a way that breeds even more trust,” he said. “For us to get to a point where
we really have a practice and a policy that lethal force is the last resort, we
have to get more dialogue, we have to get more African Americans involved in
the Police Department, we have to make sure that they can go to other agencies
and they know what we’re doing, and I need to be out there making sure beyond
all this that everything I’m doing is transparent as well.”
Lee’s memo is the latest promise
of reform following the Dec. 2 killing of Woods, which drew outrage when video
of the black man’s death surfaced showing that he was shot several times while
not appearing to directly threaten a group of officers surrounding him. Some
critics have called for Lee to dismiss Suhr.
Police officials said Woods was a
suspect in a stabbing and was allegedly armed with the same knife when five
officers came upon him in the Bayview neighborhood. They said the officers had
no choice but to use lethal force after attempts to disarm Woods with beanbag
rounds and pepper spray were unsuccessful.
Since the shooting, the Police
Commission has opened up discussion regarding the department’s use-of-force
policy for the first time in decades, and Suhr reignited his push to arm
officers with stun guns.
The commission had set a Feb. 3
deadline for a new draft proposal for the use-of-force policy — a proposal that
would include the decision regarding new weaponry — and Lee asked that the
commission and Suhr have any new plans to him by Feb. 15.
“I’m a fan of ambitious
deadline,” said Police Commission President Suzy Loftus. “I definitely agree
here that there is an urgency of now and a lot of folks with good ideas and
solutions that want to understand our direction.”
In addition to the policy talks,
the Police Department issued a bulletin requiring officers to file a
use-of-force report whenever they point their gun at a person, and some patrol
cars are getting equipped with riot shields. Suhr said the department has also
changed firearms training to put more of an emphasis on de-escalation and
less-lethal options.
Lee highlighted those initiatives
in his memo and said he hopes the city’s efforts can help repair trust with the
black community. He said he planned to meet with community leaders often.
“My goal is to do as much as I
can to restore strong trust,” he said. “For this community, there’s a lot of
pain. There are a lot of murders, homicides and fatigue and a lot of stress. I
think I need to do work in additional ways to signify that we want to ease that
stress out. Because of history and because of perceptions, we need to do a lot
more.”
As for calls from some community
members that he fire his police chief, Lee said, “We’re not there. We’re in
disagreement.
“What we’re doing now goes beyond
this chief,” he said. “It goes to how we view public safety, how we operate as
a city. This cannot just be a demand about this chief.”
Next week, Suhr, Loftus and Joyce
Hicks, executive director of the Office of Citizen Complaints, will travel to
Washington D.C. to meet with a Police Executive Research Forum studying the
United Kingdom’s de-escalation techniques. The U.S. Department of Justice’s
Office of Community Oriented Policing Services is also reviewing the
department’s policies, at the chief’s behest.
With the February deadline
looming, Loftus said at Wednesday’s meeting that the commissioners will be
holding a series of informal community meetings across the city to hear from
the public regarding any policy changes.
While some commissioners
expressed concern over the deadline — “I want to do it right,” said
Commissioner Joe Marshall —they agreed it was necessary to move quickly.
“The problem is not new,” said L.
Julius Turman, police commission vice president. “We have a base line of
information to begin with. Let’s take that information out and start refining
that policy and let’s move.”
Vivian Ho is a San Francisco
Chronicle staff writer. E-mail: vho@sfchronicle.comTwitter: @VivianHo
Fairfax County needs to fire the good ole boy running our police department and hire this guy
Head
of LA's police commission on reform: 'You have to change hearts and minds'
by A Martínez and Dorian Merina
Matthew Johnson is president of
the Los Angeles Police Commission. Johnson was elected president of the
commission in September 2015.Maya Sugarman/KPCC
From Chicago to South Carolina,
New York to Cleveland, police shootings and questions of how and when officers
use force are drawing increased scrutiny.
Here in L.A., it's a topic that
we've been taking a close look at, as well. KPCC's investigation, Officer
Involved, found that over a five-year period, from 2010 to 2014, at least 375
people were shot by on-duty officers from multiple agencies in Los Angeles
County. To date, no officer has been prosecuted for the shootings.
L.A.'s police commission is one
group that reviews and adjudicates such incidents. The commission is a
civilian-led body that oversees the LAPD. It has five members who are appointed
by the mayor and confirmed by the city council.
The Commission's new president
Matthew Johnson, the board's only African American member, says he has two top
goals for his new term: reducing crime and bringing down the number of police
shootings. Take Two's A Martínez sat down with Johnson to talk about police
reform, body cameras and the influence of racial bias.
And he started his conversation
talking about his two top goals: reducing crime and bringing down the number of
police shootings. Click the arrow above to hear the interview.
Highlights from the interview:
Through November 7, 2015,
homicides in L.A. were up nearly 12 percent (11.7%) violent crimes were up over
20 percent (21%), compared to 2014. Has the department explained to you what
the root of that increase is?
Frankly, no one really knows the
answer. But let's put it in perspective: we are still at historic lows, even
though we saw those rises in 2015 over 2014, we're still at historic lows.
Should we be panicking? No. But should we be concerned? Absolutely. If you look
at the crime figures from the first half of the year, we were seeing numbers
that were way more significant in terms of increases than where we ended up. So
a lot of the tactics that the [police] department has deployed to combat this
rise in crime are showing that they're working.
Over the past five years, police
in Los Angeles County have fatally shot black people at triple the rate of
other races, such as white and Hispanic people. That’s according to our data at
KPCC and the coroner’s reports on fatal police shootings. When you hear that
number, what do you think?
It brings me back to why I agreed
to take on this position in the first place. It's a huge problem, it keeps me
up at night and it's why I'm sitting in this chair. The problem is exacerbated
with the African American community, for sure, but we need to lower the number
of officer-involved shootings across the board. One of the areas of training
that we're spending a lot of focus on is anti-bias training because a lot of
these issues are subconscious. We need to figure out ways to train our officers
to recognize that bias. When they see an African American person doing
something, they see a white person doing something, when they see an Hispanic,
often times the same act is perceived differently – and that's a subconscious
thing that's not necessarily a conscious thing – the goal of that training is
to eliminate or at least help recognize where that bias could come into these
situations.
In our reporting at Southern
California Public Radio, we've also profiled officers who have taken great risk
or faced dangerous conditions in order to perform their duty. How would you say
police officers are doing in LA?
I've spent a lot of time with
police officers since taking this position...and the consistent thing that I get is that they're doing this for the
right reason. They're doing this for the same reason I'm on the police
commission. They have a desire to help improve our society, to help make a
difference. So it's very painful for them to be in this environment right now,
where there's such distrust. And they want to change it.
In a year from now, or two years
from now, what would you use as a gauge to say that things are turning out the
way you want them to, that [these reforms] have been a success?
I've set very concrete goals. Do
I think we'll be able to accomplish what I'm trying to accomplish in a year? I
would like to say yes, but I think that's probably a little unrealistic. Within
two years if we don't see a significant drop in use of force incidents, I will
have considered my tenure a failure...You can't do it overnight, it's not just
[sitting] someone in a classroom for three hours and they walk out and they're
a changed person. We're talking about a significant amount of training that
10,000 officers have to go through.
Virginia should do this but it won't.....money talks in Virginia, loudly
Maryland
panel recommends major changes to police practices
By Ovetta Wiggins
Washington Post
A Maryland legislative panel on
Monday offered sweeping changes in police policies, including giving officers
periodic psychological evaluations and allowing the public to attend police
trial boards.
Under the proposed changes,
residents would also be given more time to file brutality complaints.
The Public Safety and Policing
Work Group voted to submit 21 recommendations to Senate President Thomas V.
Mike Miller Jr. (D-Calvert) and House Speaker Michael E. Busch (D-Anne Arundel)
for the General Assembly to consider. It spent the past six months reviewing
police practices and devising ways to improve police-community relations.
“It’s a very strong working
package of proposals for reform,” said Sen. Jamie B. Raskin (D-Montgomery), a
member of the panel.
As the national debate continues
over the use of force by police officers, particularly against minorities, the
recommendations send a strong signal that efforts to bolster criminal justice
and police reforms will take place in Maryland during its 90-day legislative
session.
Criminal justice reform advocates
said they were pleased with many of the proposals, specific¬ally those that
would create more transparency when police officers are accused of wrongdoing.
“It’s a really good first step,
and we look forward to working with the General Assembly to strengthen it,”
said Sara Love, the public policy director at the American Civil Liberties
Union of Maryland.
An official with the Maryland
Fraternal Order of Police said the union will work with the legislature to
ensure that police officers receive due process and are treated fairly. The
union has concerns about the psychological evaluations, and a recommendation
would change how quickly officers must cooperate with internal investigations.
The panel called for reducing the
state’s “10-day rule,” which gives officers 10 days to get a lawyer before
cooperating with an investigation, to five days.
“This is just the beginning of
the process,” said Vince Canales, president of the state police union. “We know
there are potential changes coming up in the legislative session.”
The panel’s recommendations are
the third set of proposals from committees recently investigating criminal
justice and policing issues in Maryland. A second committee made recommendations
on the use of police body cameras, and a third recently submitted a 10-year,
$247 million plan to reduce recidivism and the state’s prison population by
focusing more on community-based programs.
The legislature’s focus on police
reform this session will unfold as juries in Baltimore decide the fate of six
officers who were arrested in connection with the death of Freddie Gray.
Gray, 25, died in April after his
spine was severed while in police custody. His death sparked riots in Baltimore
and renewed calls from criminal justice reform advocates for the state to
review policing practices.
[Judge declares mistrial in case
of officer charged in Freddie Gray death]
Busch and Miller created the
panel after the unrest, hoping to repair the relationship between the police
and the community, which is fraught with distrust.
“The workgroup heard from almost
100 witnesses and incorporated many recommendations from members of the public
and law enforcement,” Busch and Miller said in a joint statement. “We believe
these recommendations will make measurable progress in improving policing
practices in Maryland.”
The panel was expected to finish
its work in December, but it ran into trouble reaching a consensus on a number
of issues, including mandatory psychological evaluations for officers.
Police officers are given
evaluations before they join the force, but Sen. Catherine E. Pugh
(D-Baltimore), who was a ¬co-chairman of the panel, wanted routine psychological
evaluations. Del. Curtis S. Anderson (D-Baltimore), who also served as
co-chairman, said he thought officers should have to undergo regular
evaluations, much like they have to requalify to be able to use their service
weapons.
But the idea ran into resistance
from the state police union.
“I think mental-health issues are
a concern and something that should be addressed,” Pugh said.
After a lengthy debate Monday
about whether psychological evaluations should be required every five years,
the panel voted instead to require officers to receive them periodically and
after “traumatic” incidents.
The panel also called for the
creation of an independent Maryland Police Training and Standards Commission
that would focus on setting standards and training for all police agencies.
Panel members said they
repeatedly heard complaints about a lack of uniformity in standards in
departments across the state.
The police training commission
would also develop and require “anti-discrimination” and “use of force de-escalation”
training for all officers. It would also set up a confidential early
intervention policy for dealing with officers who receive three or more citizen
complaints within a 12-month period.
The panel suggests that the
commission require annual reporting of “serious” officer-involved incidents,
the number of officers disciplined and the type of discipline that was given.
Other recommendations include
developing a police complaint mediation program, creating recruitment standards
that increase the number of female, African American and Hispanic candidates,
and offering incentives, including property tax credits and state and local
income tax deductions, to officers who live in the jurisdictions where they
work.
Ovetta Wiggins covers Maryland
state politics in Annapolis.
The point is that the White House sees that the nation needs police reform
At State of the Union, Seattle held up as model for police reform
by David Kroman
President Barack Obama addresses
a joint session of U.S. Congress. Credit: Lawrence Jackson
When President Obama gives his
final State of the Union address tonight, a select group of people will join
his wife Michelle as a living illustration of his agenda during his final year
in office. The tilt will be toward social justice: a voice on criminal justice
reform, an advocate for homeless veterans, a Syrian refugee, an opioid reform
advocate, an empty seat for victims of gun violence.
Joining them will be Seattle
Police Chief Kathleen O’Toole, Obama’s choice as the face of federally driven
reform in a major city’s police department. Specifically, the Obama
administration has singled out O’Toole for her work with “community policing” —
i.e. walking the street more, attending meetings, getting to know community
members — and body cameras, which are meant to quickly answer questions
surrounding police interactions, and altercations, with people on the street.
Support Crosscut
These tools, along with
Department of Justice investigations into the practices of police departments,
have been important parts of Obama’s answer to the deaths of young black men in
cities like Ferguson, Baltimore, Cleveland and others. Seattle is further along
this road than most, and success here would show that there’s hope for success
elsewhere.
But while O’Toole has won praise
in both Washingtons, her department is still very much in the thick of reform.
A seat near Michelle Obama tonight, some believe, may be a little premature.
When O’Toole arrived in Seattle in 2014, she
inherited a police department waist deep in federally mandated reforms. Those
reforms were spurred by a Justice department investigation that grew out of the
shooting of Native American woodcarver John T. Williams in 2010. SPD officer
Ian Birk shot Williams in the back when he refused to drop a knife he was
carrying — a tool of his trade. Williams was hard of hearing. The department
later paid Williams’ family $1.5 million after the shooting was ruled
unjustified.
That was before the police
killings of Michael Brown, Tamir Rice, Freddie Gray and Laquan McDonald — men
who are now household names across the country — put the issue in the national
spotlight.
Mayor Ed Murray hired O’Toole, a
former Boston Police Commissioner, specifically to oversee the reforms. Within
six months of her hiring, she replaced the department’s top brass with two
outsiders and a lieutenant. This, after 35 years of hiring from the rank of
Captain within the department. The Seattle Police Management Association, the
union representing captains and lieutenants, threatened an unfair labor
practice claim, but she managed to negotiate a deal to provide internal
leadership training and the claim was dropped.
Months later, O’Toole was the
only high-ranking public official to offer support to the concerns of the
Community Police Commission, the civilian component of the DOJ’s mandated
police reforms, regarding management of protests and demonstrations. This, for
many, was a sign that she recognized what was important to the people of
Seattle, not just the powers that be within her department.
And last August, O’Toole bucked
the opposition of the Seattle Police Officers Guild, the rank-and-file union,
and fired officer Cynthia Whitlach for her treatment of 67-year-old William
Wingate, an African American man the officer said swung a golf club at her.
(Dash-cam video shows otherwise. Whitlach, who made racially charged statements
on social media, claimed she was the victim of a sort of reverse racism.)
O’Toole specifically cited language regarding de-escalation and biased policing
that had been added to department guidelines since the beginning of Seattle’s
settlement agreement with the feds. It was a reminder that she was committed to
reform.
Support Crosscut
Since O’Toole took over the
department, the DOJ’s police monitor, Merrick J. Bobb, has given her
increasingly positive reviews. Last June, he praised the SPD’s progress on
de-escalation training, data collection, crisis intervention and transparency.
In more recent reviews, he’s lauded members of the department for more
consistently reporting use of force to higher-ups.
“Especially given that, between
2009 and 2011, only 0.04 percent of cases received any significant chain of
command scrutiny whatsoever,” Bobb wrote, “it is a praiseworthy advance in
accountability that SPD … has become far more comfortable with critically
analyzing and scrutinizing officer use of force and holding officers
accountable for their performance during incidents involving force.”
During a stop on her six-city
“community policing” tour last September, Attorney General Loretta Lynch hailed
the Seattle Police Department’s efforts as a national example. Indeed, several
major cities, including New York, have sent delegations to Seattle to learn
from the city’s progress. SPD’s work regarding an early intervention system — a
data-driven approach to catch problems with officers before they balloon — is
being closely watched locally and nationally.
O’Toole is hard not to like. She’s got a
subtle Boston accent and seems to keep her chin up at all times, literally
holding her head high and back straight. A police chief’s got to eat a lot of
criticism and she eats it well. She knows many of the most vocal anti-police
voices in the city by name and addresses them as such. In the face of flurried
questions from the media, sometimes thinly veiled accusations, she never
flusters.
Even amid Lynch’s praise for the
city and department as a whole, it was O’Toole who seemed to get the most
glowing reviews, almost certainly a precursor to her invitation to D.C. today.
Still, O’Toole is not immune to
controversy. Community members criticized her for giving too light a punishment
to the officer who pepper sprayed a local high school teacher at a Black Lives
Matter demonstration last Martin Luther King, Jr. Day. The police unions claim
she maintains an excess of captains while the department lacks for
rank-and-file officers. And there is still clearly tension surrounding the fact
that she went outside the department to hire her assistant chiefs.
O’Toole has also reportedly still
not moved her family to Seattle, renting a home here while maintaining a place
back in Boston. Some say it wouldn’t be a surprise if she were gone by next New
Year’s Eve.
In the end, though, it’s not
these things that worry community activists, but concern over what they see as
a premature celebration of what the department has accomplished. In November,
nearly 50 community groups, many of which were original signers on the first
letter asking the DOJ to intervene in Seattle, mounted something of a mutiny
against the police monitor and Federal Judge James Robart, who is overseeing
the reform, for not advancing legislation that would make some reforms permanent.
Both Robart and Bobb have
maintained that legislation codifying changes to the department ought to be
considered carefully and advanced, if necessary, slowly. Mayor Murray has
agreed. The result, say community advocates, is that O’Toole may be the only
thing holding the reforms together. Were she to leave, the progress could
crumble.
Among other concerns are whether
the department’s neighborhood-level, “micro-community policing plans” are
actually being put to use, and whether the city can realistically deploy body
cameras and answer questions of privacy at the same time. When Mayor Murray
introduced money for full deployment of body cameras in his budget, the results
of the department’s pilot program — which is specifically referenced in a statement
about O’Toole by the White House — were still being reviewed. They have still
not yet translated into broader policy.
Meanwhile, community groups
continue to say they haven’t gotten a fair hearing. During her visit to
Seattle, Attorney General Lynch told reporters she was hearing positive things
from the community about its relationship with the department. Members of the
Community Police Commission, however, say they never actually got the
opportunity to express their concerns to Lynch. “We need an honest discussion,”
said Reverend Aaron Williams, a CPC member. “This was a lot of patting on the
back.”
The department has made progress,
and O’Toole is mostly well-liked — these things are true. And the DOJ
intervention could very well lead to exactly the reform everyone hoped to see.
But the work is not done yet, and if Obama suggests in his speech tonight that
it is, some heads will shake in Seattle.
David Kroman
David Kroman is the city reporter
for Crosscut. A Bainbridge Island native, David has also worked as a teacher,
winery cellar hand, shellfish farmer and program director of a small
non-profit. His Twitter is @KromanDavid and his e-mail is
david.kroman@crosscut.com.
Texas Trooper Who Arrested Sandra Bland Is Charged With Perjury
By DAVID MONTGOMERYJAN. 6, 2016
HEMPSTEAD, Tex. — The state
trooper who arrested Sandra Bland, the Chicago-area woman who three days later
was found hanged in her cell at the Waller County jail, has been indicted on a
perjury charge, a special prosecutor here said Wednesday.
Hours after the indictment was
announced against the trooper, Brian T. Encinia, the Department of Public
Safety said that the state police agency “will begin termination proceedings to
discharge him.”
The charge against Trooper
Encinia, a Class A misdemeanor, was announced at the end of a day of grand jury
deliberations. It carries a possible penalty of one year in jail and a $4,000
fine, prosecutors said.
The charge stemmed from a
one-page affidavit that Trooper Encinia filed with jail officials justifying
the arrest of Ms. Bland, who was pulled over July 10 in a routine traffic stop
in Prairie View, northwest of Houston, for failing to use her turn signal. Ms.
Bland, 28, who was black, was returning to Texas to take a job at Prairie View
A&M University, her alma mater.
Assessing the Legality of Sandra
Bland’s Arrest
A video released by Texas
officials confirms accounts of a physical confrontation between Ms. Bland and a
state trooper. But her arrest and cause of death remain in dispute.
The trooper wrote that he removed
Ms. Bland from her car to more safely conduct a traffic investigation, but “the
grand jury found that statement to be false,” a special prosecutor, Shawn
McDonald, said.
A police dashboard-camera video
of the episode shows an escalating confrontation after Ms. Bland refuses
Trooper Encinia’s request to put out a cigarette. At one point, Trooper Encinia
says he will forcibly remove Ms. Bland from her car and threatens her with a
Taser, saying, “I will light you up.”
Larkin Eakin, Trooper Encinia’s
lawyer, said he spoke to his client after the indictment was announced. “His
reaction was he’s not guilty,” Mr. Eakin said. “When you’re not guilty, you
don’t expect to be indicted.”
The Videos That Are Putting Race
and Policing Into Sharp Relief
The next step calls for a Waller
County judge to issue a warrant, set bond and schedule an arraignment hearing.
Mr. Eakin said Trooper Encinia remained on administrative duty and would appear
for the arraignment when the date was set.
The question of criminal charges
against Trooper Encinia was believed to be the last major issue facing the
grand jury, which began its investigation in August, two special prosecutors,
Darrell Jordan and Lewis White, told reporters outside the Waller County
Courthouse earlier Wednesday. The grand jury had already declined to indict any
of Ms. Bland’s jailers in connection with her death on July 13, effectively
sustaining the medical examiner’sruling of suicide.
Ms. Bland’s family, which has
filed a wrongful-death suit, has expressed frustration and disappointment with
the grand jury, saying Waller County officials have failed to keep them
informed about its progress. Cannon Lambert, the family’s lawyer, has called
the case a “sham of a process.” The Waller County district attorney, Elton
Mathis, appointed an independent panel of five lawyers, including Mr. Jordan
and Mr. White, to oversee the investigation.
Another reasons for cops to stay in the station until we call
New York Police Sergeant to Face Internal Charges in Eric Garner Confrontation
By AL BAKERJAN. 8, 2016
A New York City police sergeant
was served with departmental disciplinary charges on Friday for her role in the
confrontation that led to the death of Eric Garner in 2014.
The sergeant, Kizzy Adonis, was
one of two Police Department supervisors to initially respond to the scene of
the encounter. The charges are the first official accusations of misconduct
against any of the officers involved in the case.
Mr. Garner, 43, died after being
grabbed from behind by one officer, Daniel Pantaleo, who threw an arm around
Mr. Garner’s neck as he and several colleagues tried to arrest him on suspicion
of selling loose cigarettes.
The death of Mr. Garner, which
the Justice Department is investigating, illuminated the aggressive tactics
employed by officersin New York when confronting people suspected of minor
offenses. Agrand jury’s decision not to charge the officers involved fueled
protests in the city and elsewhere and, along with several other
police-involved deaths around the country, led to calls for criminal-justice
reforms.
Mr. Garner, who was unarmed, died
after repeatedly saying he was having difficulty breathing. Representatives of
his family, civil rights lawyers and others, including Gov. Andrew M. Cuomo,
called for changes to the secretive grand jury process.
The Police Department had said
that it was waiting for the results of the federal investigation before
proceeding with its own actions with regard to Mr. Garner’s death. But police
officials were forced to initiate disciplinary proceedings against Sergeant
Adonis because of an 18-month statute of limitations dictated by the state’s
Civil Service law, said Stephen Davis, the department’s chief spokesman. Mr.
Davis said the department had filed the internal charges after consulting with
the United States attorney’s office for the Eastern District of New York.
The statute does not apply to
Officer Pantaleo, Mr. Davis said, because federal authorities were reviewing
his conduct and a “criminal aspect exception applies.” The department has
completed its internal inquiry into Officer Pantaleo, he said.
Sergeant Adonis, 38, joined the
Police Department in 2002. She was assigned to the 120th Precinct on the North
Shore of Staten Island at the time of the confrontation with Mr. Garner, on
July 17, 2014, in the Tompkinsville neighborhood. She had been promoted to
sergeant less than a month earlier, on June 25. Her yearlong probation was
extended by six months last year.
On Friday, she was placed on
modified duty, stripped of her gun and badge, and barred from doing street
enforcement, Mr. Davis said.
Portions of the officers’
encounter with Mr. Garner were caught on video. That footage showed Sergeant
Adonis entering the frame as Officer Pantaleo and his colleagues pressed Mr.
Garner onto the sidewalk after taking him to the ground. A second sergeant,
Dhanan Saminath, arrived, though it is not clear when. He was the anticrime
team supervisor.
The encounter occurred on Bay
Street, outside Bay Beauty Supply. The store manager said he heard the female
sergeant say to the officers, “Let up, you got him already.” An officer looked
up but did not let go, the manager said.
At a news conference on Friday,
Sergeant Adonis stood silently with Edward D. Mullins, the head of the
sergeants’ union, as he criticized Police Commissioner William J. Bratton,
calling the charges “political pandering” at the expense of an officer with an
“unblemished record.”
In an interview earlier in the
day, Mr. Mullins said: “Commissioner Bratton bears the full responsibility for
what occurred on Staten Island in the Garner case. He was the commissioner in
charge of a policy, a failed policy, that should never have been. And that
policy being the enforcement of untaxed cigarettes. And if anyone should be put
on modified assignment, it should be him.”
Mr. Mullins said the charges
against Sergeant Adonis were four counts of “failure to supervise” the
situation.
“We don’t hear about the duty
captain,” added Mr. Mullins, who said Sergeant Adonis was assigned to be at a
meeting, not on patrol, and responded at her own initiative, at the time of the
confrontation. “We don’t hear about a borough commander, a zone commander.”
As a practical matter, the
internal case against Sergeant Adonis will be delayed until the federal inquiry
is complete. While the deadline for filing internal charges against other
officers has not passed, Mr. Davis said that none beyond Sergeant Adonis were
“subject to department charges in connection with this at this point.”
Ultimately, a departmental judge
will make a recommendation to Mr. Bratton about how to address the sergeant’s
actions. Punishment could involve termination. As commissioner, Mr. Bratton is
the final arbiter.
In November, the state’s highest
court declined to order the release of transcripts from the grand jury that
considered evidence in the death of Mr. Garner.
Christopher T. Dunn, associate
legal director of the New York Civil Liberties Union, one of the groups that
sought the transcripts, questioned why the federal inquiry was still open. The
matter, he said, is “not a tough call under the federal statute.”
“This is fine and good, but the
much bigger issue is what is happening with Officer Pantaleo,” he said. “There
is ample basis for a federal prosecution, and we see no reason why the Justice
Department needs more time to decide whether to proceed.”
The Justice Department opened its
investigation in December 2014, and it is not unusual for such inquiries to
stretch past a year. Federal law enforcement officials in New York and
Washington said the investigation remained active.
Georgia Prosecutors Seek Indictment of Officer Who Shot Unarmed Man
By ALAN
BLINDERJAN. 7, 2016
DECATUR,
Ga. — A prosecutor here said Thursday that he would seek a felony murder
indictment against a white police officer who last year shot and killed Anthony
Hill, a black man who was naked and unarmed at the time of the fatal encounter.
“Our
position is that the facts and the circumstances surrounding the shooting death
of Anthony Hill warrant a charge for felony murder,” District Attorney Robert
D. James Jr. of DeKalb County said at a news conference.
Mr.
James’s decision to pursue a criminal case against Officer Robert Olsen does
not guarantee an indictment, in part because Georgia offers law enforcement
officers special protections when their on-duty behavior is being reviewed by a
grand jury.
Mr. James
said that prosecutors would ask grand jurors, when they meet on Jan. 21, to
charge Officer Olsen with felony murder, aggravated assault, violation of oath
of office and making a false statement.
Officer
Olsen could not be reached for comment on Thursday. Neither a lawyer who has
represented him, nor the DeKalb County Police Department, immediately responded
to messages on Thursday, one day after Mr. James said Officer Olsen was
notified of the government’s intention to request an indictment.
Officer
Olsen’s conduct has been scrutinized since last March, when he was called to an
apartment complex in Chamblee, northeast of Atlanta, and Mr. Hill approached
and behaved erratically. Witnesses said that Mr. Hill, whose family said he had
post-traumatic stress disorder after an Air Force deployment to Afghanistan,
had raised his hands or placed them at his sides and that he did not obey
Officer Olsen’s instructions to halt.
In
November, Mr. Hill’s family filed a wrongful-death lawsuit in Atlanta’s Federal
District Court that accused Officer Olsen of using “illegal and excessive
force” against Mr. Hill, 27. That case is pending.
Georgia
law allows some public officials, including police officers, to attend meetings
where grand jurors hear evidence that could yield an indictment. The law, which
supporters say is a vital safeguard for officers who are often required to make
immediate judgments in chaotic circumstances, also permits potential defendants
to address the grand jury, unrebutted and without cross-examination, at the end
of the prosecution’s presentation.
It is not
clear whether Officer Olsen will speak to the grand jury this month, but he
testified last year when a civil grand jury reviewed the shooting. In October,
that panel recommended that officials continue their inquiry.
Lawyers
here said that they would not be surprised if Officer Olsen addressed the grand
jury, and they said such a choice could be central — perhaps even decisive — to
his defense.
“It is
going to go in the way of the police 99 times out of 100 if it’s a close call,
or not even a close call,” said J. Tom Morgan, a former DeKalb County district
attorney who is now in private practice. “It’s got to be very egregious for a
police officer to be indicted when they’ve heard from the police officer as a
last witness.”
But Lance
LoRusso, a defense lawyer who works with the Georgia division of the Fraternal
Order of Police, said the laws here afforded officers a crucial opportunity to
explain their decisions and experiences, and he said the protections helped to
curb potentially overzealous prosecutions.
“It’s a
check and balance on the D.A.,” Mr. LoRusso said.
Although
Georgia’s legal safeguards for police officers are among the country’s most
generous, the state is one of more than a dozen that have enshrined protections
for officers whose on-duty actions draw scrutiny. A police officer in Maryland,
for instance, may wait 10 days before giving a statement to investigators. In
Florida, a police officer has the right to be questioned by a single
investigator.
Despite
Mr. James’s words of caution about the ultimate authority of the grand jury,
Mr. Hill’s girlfriend said Thursday that she welcomed the step toward a
possible indictment, particularly at a time when white police officers
elsewhere have not been prosecuted in the killings of unarmed black men.
“I’m glad
that we have an officer off the streets,” Ms. Anderson said of Officer Olsen,
who was placed on administrative leave after the shooting. “He murders people
because he’s hiding behind the badge
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)