This moron has way, way, way to much time on his hands.......
Overton police chief Clyde Carter
Cops Raid Little Girls’
“Illegal” Lemonade Stand, Shut it Down for Operating Without a Permit
By Matt Agorist
Tyler, TX — Last week, police
in Texas heroically saved the town from likes of two young girls who attempted
to open a black market lemonade stand. The girls, one 7-year-old and one
8-year-old, dared to try to raise money to buy a Father’s day present for their
dad by setting up a lemonade stand in their neighborhood.
Andria and Zoey Green told ABC
affiliate KLTV they were trying to raise about $100 for a Father’s Day present.
They wanted to take him to Splash Kingdom.
Over the weekend, the two young
entrepreneurs took to the streets with their delicious batch of homemade
lemonade and began to provide willing customers with their product. Only one
hour into their business endeavour, these girls had raised 25% of their goal.
However, their cash cow would
be shut down not long after it started. Overton police chief Clyde Carter
showed up along with the city code enforcer and shutdown their criminal operation.
The girls had violated Texas
House Bill 970, or the Texas Baker’s Bill, which does not allow the sale of
food that needs time or temperature control to prevent it from spoiling. Since
the lemonade would eventually grow mold after being left out for days, police
said they needed an inspection from the health department and a permit to sell
it and deemed their operation “illegal.”
The cost of the permit is $150
dollars.
“It is a lemonade stand, but
they also have a permit that they are required to get,” Chief Carter said.
“I think that’s ridiculous. I
think they’re 7 and 8, and they’re just trying to make money for their own
cause,” said Sandi Evans, the girls’ mother.
The most absurd aspect of this
ordeal is that the police know it’s a ridiculous law. However, they said
ridiculous or not, it’s the law and they’ll keep enforcing it.
“We have to follow by the state
health guidelines,” said Carter. “They have to have a permit if they’re going
to do the lemonade stands.”
Police officers can certainly
use discretion and choose not to “enforce” this law for use in such an asinine
application. The fact that these girls had their good intentions ruined by
those who claim to protect them speaks to the level of discontent with law
enforcement in America today.
The heartening side to this
story is that these young girls are now learning to bypass this tyrannical
system of bureaucratic nonsense. The girls said they will be setting up their
lemonade stand again this weekend. Instead of selling it though, they will be
giving it away, but they will gladly be accepting donations.
Hopefully next week, we aren’t
reading the story of these two Texas girls being raided by the IRS for tax
evasion on their lemonade donations. But in today’s police state USA, it would
be entirely expected.
Imagine this……
You’re having an argument on
the phone with your spouse. You are agitated. You take out a gun and kill an
unarmed man with his hands in the air. Four witnesses saw you do it.
YOU ARE NEVER ARRESTED FOR THE KILLING
AND FOR 17 MONTHS THE POLICE REFUSE TO RELASE YOUR NAME TO THE PUBLIC.
It will take the power of US Senator
from outside your state to get the police to act on the killing you committed
and even with that the cops withhold information on the case.
You get to keep your job but
they send you home for two years….WITH PAY.
The incompetent and corrupt
States Attorney holds off on opening the case for two years.
YOU THINK YOU’D BE GIVEN THIS
SORT OF TREATMENT?
WELCOME TO FAIRFAX COUNTY!
Fairfax prosecutors summon
witnesses in John Geer police shooting
By Tom Jackman June 10 at 7:00
PM
A special grand jury to
investigate the Fairfax County police shooting of an unarmed man nearly two
years ago has been empaneled and prosecutors have begun summoning witnesses to
testify beginning next month, witnesses and the county’s top prosecutor said
Wednesday.
John Geer, 46, was standing in
the doorway of his Springfield townhouse on Aug. 29, 2013, when he was shot
once in the chest by Officer Adam D. Torres while four other officers stood
nearby. According to police reports, Torres claimed that Geer had jerked his
hands down to his waist, but the other officers — as well as Geer’s father and
best friend — said his hands were near his head.
No decision has been made on
whether to charge Torres, 32, a nine-year veteran who remains on administrative
duty. His attorney, John Carroll, did not return a call Wednesday seeking
comment.
Fairfax Commonwealth’s Attorney
Raymond F. Morrogh said Wednesday that the special grand jury was selected by a
circuit court judge this month without the prosecution’s involvement. State law
requires the grand jury to have between seven and 11 members, each individually
questioned and qualified by a judge.
Morrogh said that prosecutors
had subpoenaed about 20 witnesses and that the grand jury will begin hearing
testimony for four days beginning July 27. Two additional days, in early
August, will be added if jurors seek more information.
The prosecutor could not
disclose who had been subpoenaed, and it was not clear how many Fairfax police
officers will be called to testify.
Geer’s father, Donald Geer, and
Geer’s best friend, Jeff Stewart, said they received personal visits Tuesday
from Fairfax homicide detective John Farrell, the lead investigator in the
case, serving them with subpoenas. Stewart said he might be one of the first
witnesses to testify so he can provide biographical details about Geer, a
self-employed kitchen contractor, and because he spoke to Geer that day and
witnessed the shooting from about 70 yards away.
Donald Geer, who met with
Farrell several weeks ago, said it was his first contact with Fairfax police
since shortly after the killing. “As far as the county is concerned,” Geer
said, “I don’t exist, up until the past few weeks.”
Geer said the grand jury
investigation was “a year and a half too late. By the time the grand jury comes
up with something, it will have been two years.”
Although there have been no
charges, the county agreed to pay $2.95 million to Geer’s two teenage daughters
to settle their wrongful-death civil suit. Michael Lieberman, the family’s
attorney, said the formation of a grand jury and the issuing of subpoenas were
“a positive sign that justice may be done in this case. The family’s been
waiting a long time.”
The incident began when Geer’s
girlfriend of 24 years, Maura Harrington, told him that she signed a lease on
an apartment and was moving out, finalizing a breakup they had discussed for
some time, Harrington said. Geer responded by throwing Harrington’s belongings
onto the front yard of their home on Pebble Brook Court. When Harrington came
home and could not stop Geer from tearing up their house, she called 911.
Torres and Officer David Neil
were dispatched, and Geer showed them a holstered handgun, which he placed at
his feet. Rodney Barnes, a patrol officer who is also a trained negotiator,
then arrived to speak to Geer. Over the next 40 minutes, he could not persuade
Geer to come out from behind his screen door, where he was standing with his
hands on top of the frame, police and witness statements reveal. Other officers
surrounded the scene.
Suddenly, Torres fired once.
Geer spun, closed the front door and fell behind it. Barnes radioed that he
heard movement inside, reports show, and police waited an hour before rendering
aid. Geer was dead just behind the front door.
Although Torres said that Geer
had lowered his hands as if reaching for another gun, three officers close to
Torres and another just up the street said that Geer’s hands were around his
head and not moving toward his waist.
Presented with this information
in November 2013, Morrogh asked to see prior internal-affairs cases involving
Torres. Fairfax Police Chief Edwin C. Roessler Jr. refused to provide them,
records reveal. In January 2014, Morrogh sent the case to the Justice
Department so federal prosecutors could obtain the files. The Justice
Department has taken no public steps on the case since then.
In February, after the
internal-affairs files were provided to Geer’s family and to Morrogh, Morrogh
said he would not wait for the Justice Department and would request a special
grand jury. Fairfax prosecutors have used special grand juries infrequently,
and no Fairfax officer has ever been charged in an on-duty shooting.
Tom Jackman is a native of
Northern Virginia and has been covering the region for The Post since 1998.
Reciprocation builds trust
More bad press for Fairfax County....thank you board of supervisors for fearing the police department
The
Gazette
There’s
much to like in a recent agreement between Montgomery and Howard counties to
investigate police-related deaths in each other’s jurisdictions.
If someone
dies in the custody of, or during an interaction with, a Montgomery County
police officer, the Howard County state’s attorney’s office will review the
evidence and decide whether criminal charges are appropriate. Montgomery
County’s prosecutor’s office will do the same for Howard County cases.
It’s a
promising sign that both counties are striving to be fair and accountable when
scrutiny is needed. This especially matters because police-related deaths
across the country — in Ferguson, Mo.; New York City; North Charleston, S.C.;
Baltimore city; and other areas — have sparked public outrage.
In some
cases, there have been strong feelings in the community that officers should
have been held criminally responsible for a death, but weren’t.
It’s
common practice for a police department, when faced with allegations against
one of its own employees, to have a neighboring agency investigate. However,
Montgomery and Howard prosecutors say their evidence-review agreement is the
first of its kind in Maryland.
Jaded
critics could write off this extra step as meaningless symbolism, convinced
that police and prosecutors work closely enough that they will watch out for
each other, no matter the jurisdiction.
Then we
see otherwise, such as when the state’s attorney in Baltimore filed criminal
charges against six officers for the death of Freddie Gray. The skepticism that
the fix is in isn’t universally justified.
Police
work can be remarkably difficult and fraught with grave life-and-death
decisions. Sometimes, killing one person to protect the lives of others is
understandable.
According
to a Washington Post report about a May 19 encounter in Arlington, Va., a man
with a metal pole threatened officers responding to a call about a disturbance.
An officer tried to use a Taser, but it didn’t work at first, and the man hit
the officer in the face with the pole. The officer tried again to use the Taser
and ended up hitting a second officer instead.
When the
man swung the metal pole again, the officer shot him three times in his upper
body, killing him, the Post wrote, based on the latest information from police.
If this account holds true, it’s an example of a split-second decision about
the use of deadly force.
If deadly
violence isn’t justified, a police officer should be held accountable, too,
just as anyone else would.
Montgomery
County already has a pending investigation that Howard County will review — the
May 12 death of Dajuan Graham, 40, of Burtonsville.
On May 10,
Graham was seen acting erratically in the Briggs Chaney area, according to
police. When a woman tried to get Graham to stop walking in the roadway of
Castle Boulevard, he punched the woman in the face, police said. Observers
suspected that Graham was under the influence of PCP.
Graham
reportedly ignored multiple orders by police to take his hands out of his
pockets. An officer then shocked Graham with a Taser. Graham fell down and was
taken to a hospital, where he later assaulted an officer and security staff,
according to police. Two days later, he died.
Montgomery
County police have been open with information about what happened and the
officers who were involved.
That’s a sharp contrast to inexcusable secrecy from
the police department in Fairfax County, Va., after an officer there shot and
killed a man who had his hands up during a call in 2013, according to police
records reported by The Washington Post. It took a court order to force the
police department to release details of the call, including the officer’s name,
17 months later. The county has settled a wrongful death suit with the victim’s
family, the Post reported.
Montgomery
County police and prosecutors have demonstrated that they can be transparent
and straightforward in handling cases of police-related deaths, giving the
community reason to have faith in their impartiality and professionalism. The
reciprocal agreement with Howard County enhances that reputation.
When the board of supervisors finds their principles and fires this police chief we have..............
What Should We Expect From Our Police Leaders?
by improving police
The qualities we expect our police officers to hold and
practice should also pertain to those whose job is to lead them.
But with those who stand to be leaders, more is expected:
Passionate. Leaders must be passionate about that which
they profess and be committed to what they are trying to accomplish. Their
passion should come from their vision of a fair and effective police in
American society and the role of police in making America work for everyone.
Leader. A leader’s style of leading others must be
committed to the growth and development of those whom they lead. Therefore, the
style and manner of their leadership is critical. To permit a leader to use
coercive practices and instill an atmosphere of fear among those whom they lead
is unacceptable. Such negative behaviors shut down the open and collaborative
relationships that are necessary for an organization seeking continuous
improvement of its operations and practices.
Trainer. Even if leaders are committed to an open,
participative leadership style, they must also be committed to facilitating and
providing high-quality training for their officers and employees through their
careers. Effective training is what develops and maintains the skills and
personal control expected of professional police officers.
Experimenter. Police leaders in a democratic society must
be willing to experiment with new ideas and concepts. They must develop an
organizational culture that encourages innovative thinking and challenges
current practices. Those who serve as leaders of police must be aware of
international social and cultural trends and understand and support the diverse
thinking, respect, and tolerance for others that holds together a free society.
In today’s world, any organization which chooses to remain in place soon falls
behind.
Evaluator. Police leaders must be willing to periodically
engage in self- evaluation and open themselves to feedback from employees,
community members, and especially those who use police services – their
“customers.” Leaders must be able to fairly analyze the results of outside evaluation
and be open to new ideas and practices that honest feedback and evaluation
suggest.
Persistent. Police leaders must persist in their efforts
to improve our nation's police. Community members whose police department is in
need of improvement must be assured that leaders will press on. In order to
transform a police department, a leader must be willing to commit to seven to
ten years of continuous effort. Anything less is a foolhardy expectation.
Social media is doing what our elected officals won't do in dealing with the national police problem
Cleveland
Leaders Bypass Prosecutors to Seek Charge in Tamir Rice Case
By MICHAEL S. SCHMIDT and MATT
APUZZOJUNE
WASHINGTON — Community leaders
in Cleveland, distrustful of the criminal justice system, said Monday that they
would not wait for prosecutors to decide whether to file charges against the
police officers involved in the fatal shooting of 12-year-old Tamir Rice last
year. Instead, they will invoke a seldom-used Ohio law and go directly to a
judge to request murder charges against the officers.
The highly unusual move is the
latest sign that some African-Americans in Cleveland and around the country
have lost confidence in a system that they see as too quick to side with police
officers accused of using excessive force against blacks.
The investigation into Tamir’s
shooting was handed to the county prosecutor last week, but local leaders are
skeptical because of how similar cases have ended. In New York, a grand jury
did not indict in the death of Eric Garner, who had been put in a chokehold by
a police officer. State and federal authorities said there was no evidence to
charge Officer Darren Wilson in the fatal shooting of Michael Brown in
Ferguson, Mo. Last month, prosecutors said a white police officer in Madison,
Wis., would not be charged for killing an unarmed 19-year-old man.
“The writing is on the wall,” said a lawyer
for Tamir’s family, Walter Madison, who worked with the community leaders as
they planned to seek charges. “If you look at every other instance, it ends up
unfavorable to the families.”
The community leaders said they
intended to file their request on Tuesday morning in municipal court. One of
them provided The New York Times with copies of six affidavits they planned to
file, which outline the crimes they say were committed.
Ohio is one of a handful of
states that allow residents to request an arrest without approval from the
police or prosecutors. It is difficult to know how the case will play out
because there is little precedent for a citizen to request an arrest in such a
contentious, high-profile case.
Mr. Madison said that he knew
of no instance in which an Ohio judge had ordered the arrest of a police
officer based on a citizen complaint, but that most previous complaints had
been frivolous.
Shooting deaths by officers
over the past year have prompted the most significant national discussion on
policing since the 1991 beating of Rodney King in Los Angeles. The debate has
highlighted, among other things, the differences in how prosecutors handle
cases involving investigations of police officers.
In a typical murder case,
prosecutors often present only their best evidence to a grand jury in order to
get an indictment. Arguments that a shooting was justified are typically not
made until much later, at trial.
In cases involving police
officers, prosecutors are more likely to let grand jurors hear conflicting
testimony or see evidence favorable to the officer. Critics say that has
established two standards for bringing charges: a high one for police officers,
and a much lower one for everyone else.
A task force appointed by
President Obama recommended in March that all cases involving the use of force
by police officers be handled by independent prosecutors to “demonstrate the
transparency to the public that can lead to mutual trust between community and
law enforcement.” In the Cleveland case, however, Cuyahoga County prosecutors
will decide whether to bring charges. Those prosecutors work regularly with
Cleveland police officers, a closeness that activists have said is a conflict of
interest.
After Death of Tamir Rice, Pain
Lingers
Family and friends of Tamir
Rice, 12, struggle with their loss five months after a Cleveland police officer
fatally shot the boy as he played with a toy gun in a park.
By Brent McDonald and Michael
Kirby Smith on Publish Date April 22, 2015.
By going directly to a judge,
community leaders are trying to circumvent that process. Ohio law allows anyone
with “knowledge of the facts” to file a court affidavit and ask a judge to
issue an arrest warrant. If approved, the arrest would be followed by a public
hearing, and community members said that was preferable to allowing prosecutors
to make the decision in secret.
“Here we are taking some
control of the process as citizens,” Mr. Madison said. “We are going to participate
without even changing the law.”
Tamir was fatally shot in
November while he played in a park. A 911 caller had reported that the boy was
waving a gun that was “probably fake.” When officers arrived, they pulled their
car into the park, next to the boy. Within two seconds, an officer, Timothy
Loehmann, shot Tamir in the abdomen. The boy’s gun, it turned out, was a toy
replica of a Colt pistol and fired plastic pellets.
Ex-South
Carolina Officer Is Indicted in Shooting Death of Black Man
By ALAN BLINDER and TIMOTHY
WILLIAMS
Prosecutor Scarlett Wilson,
Rodney Scott and the Scott family’s lawyer spoke after Michael T. Slager, a
former police officer in South Carolina, was indicted in the fatal shooting of
Walter L. Scott.
By Associated Press
A former police officer in
North Charleston, S.C., was indicted Monday by a grand jury on a murder charge
in connection with the April shooting death of Walter L. Scott, which was
recorded by a passer-by and became a resonating symbol in the national debate
about police behavior.
The former officer, Michael T.
Slager, had been jailed on a murder charge since April 7, when the video became
public. Mr. Slager’s lawyers have so far made no request for bail, and his
indictment in Charleston County had been widely expected.
The North Charleston Police
Department fired him after the shooting, which city officials criticized in
stark and unsparing terms.
Despite the intensive publicity
surrounding the shooting, Scarlett A. Wilson, the local prosecutor, said Monday
that she believed a local jury could be impaneled and would be able to arrive
at an unbiased verdict. A trial date has not been set.
Under South Carolina law, there
is only a single murder charge, which Ms. Wilson described as being an
“unlawful killing with malice aforethought” — with the premeditation required
to exist for only a few seconds before a killing in order to gain a conviction.
Mr. Slager was indicted by a
grand jury on a murder charge on Monday in connection with an April 4 shooting.
Credit Charleston County Detention Center
“As long as malice is proven in
the heart and mind, the state has proven its case,” she said.
The case was presented to the
grand jury on Monday morning, and the panel returned the indictment within a
few hours.
“The prosecutors’ work has just
begun,” she said.
Rodney Scott, a younger brother
of Walter Scott, said the Scott family was satisfied with the indictment.
“We are happy and pleased about
that right now,” Mr. Scott said.
Video Shows Fatal Police
Shooting
In video provided to The New
York Times, a police officer in North Charleston, S.C., is seen shooting an
apparently unarmed man after a scuffle following a traffic stop.
Publish Date April 7, 2015.
Andrew J. Savage III, the
lawyer representing Mr. Slager, said in a statement Monday that he had not yet
received material related to the case from prosecutors.
“The grand jury is a formal
step, but just another step in the criminal process,” Mr. Savage said. “Until
we have an opportunity to fully evaluate the state’s case and to compare it
with our own investigation, we will not be commenting on any aspect of the
case.”
The fatal encounter on April 4
began when Mr. Slager, who is white, stopped Mr. Scott, who was black, for a
broken taillight while he was driving in North Charleston, South Carolina’s
third-largest city. A dashboard camera in Mr. Slager’s patrol car recorded the
first minutes of the stop, and the video showed a mostly routine interaction
between a driver and an officer.
But Mr. Scott, 50, soon fled on
foot — his family believes that he ran because of outstanding child-support
obligations that he feared would lead to his arrest — and Mr. Slager gave
chase. Once the officer caught up with Mr. Scott, there was apparently a tussle
over the officer’s Taser.
When Mr. Scott turned and ran,
Mr. Slager fired eight times; some of the bullets struck Mr. Scott in the back.
A pedestrian recorded the
shooting and some of its aftermath on a cellphone and provided the video to Mr.
Scott’s family, which turned it over to the authorities. After the video became
public, many observers focused on a moment in which Mr. Slager appeared to drop
an object, possibly his Taser, near Mr. Scott’s body.
Critics have also accused Mr.
Slager and Officer Clarence W. Habersham, who was the first officer to arrive
after the shooting, of providing insufficient medical attention to Mr. Scott.
Mr. Scott’s death became a
rallying point for critics of police conduct after months of protests about the
deaths of black men at the hands of officers in Ferguson, Mo., and on Staten
Island. People staged peaceful demonstrations in North Charleston, a city of
about 104,000 people, after Mr. Scott’s death.
Mr. Slager, a former member of
the Coast Guard, joined the North Charleston force in 2010. Before Mr. Scott’s
death, Mr. Slager had been the subject of two formal complaints, including one
for excessive force after he used his Taser while he pursued a burglary
suspect.
The city cleared Mr. Slager of
wrongdoing in that 2013 case, but the man involved in the episode, Mario
Givens, has been among those to announce since Mr. Scott’s death that he would
pursue civil litigation against the former officer and the North Charleston
authorities.
Police records obtained by The
New York Times show that Mr. Slager was involved in 19 use-of-force episodes during
his tenure as a police officer, including the shooting death of Mr. Scott and
the encounter with Mr. Givens.
Of those 19 episodes, the
records show, at least 14 involved Mr. Slager’s using his Taser in some manner.
Mr. Scott’s shooting was the only time that Mr. Slager fired his handgun while
on patrol.
A version of this article
appears in print on June 9, 2015, on page A12 of the New York edition with the
headline: Ex-South Carolina Officer Is Indicted in Shooting Death of Black Man.
Order Reprints| Today's Paper|Subscribe
Jarring
Image of Police’s Use of Force at Texas Pool Party
By CAROL COLE-FROWE and RICHARD
FAUSSETJUNE 8, 2015
Protesters gathered Monday at a
swimming pool in McKinney, Tex., where a police officer last week was recorded
throwing a teenage girl to the ground. Credit Cooper Neill for The New York
Times
McKINNEY, Tex. — No lives were
lost. The incident played out at a suburban pool party, not an urban
neighborhood struggling with crime and drugs.
But perhaps it was that
suburban setting that helped make the images so powerful and disturbing. Now a
video of a police officer pointing a gun at teenagers in bathing suits and
shoving a young black girl’s face into the ground has become the latest flash
point in relations between the police and minorities.
The cellphone video, taken at
the community pool in Craig Ranch, a racially diverse subdivision north of
Dallas, has set off another debate over race and police tactics, with activists
calling for the officer to be fired and others arguing that the blame should
fall at least in part on the teenagers.
The video appears to show the
officer, David Eric Casebolt, briefly waving his handgun at young partygoers
who approached him as he tried to subdue the teenage girl on Friday. The
officer ultimately immobilized the girl by putting her facedown on the ground
and placing a knee on her back.
A video shows a police officer
detaining a 14-year-old girl on Friday and pulling a gun on other teenagers
after a disturbance at a neighborhood pool party in McKinney, Tex.
Chief Greg Conley of the McKinney
Police Department said that the video had prompted an internal affairs
investigation and that Officer Casebolt, a patrol supervisor, had been placed
on administrative leave.
One adult man was arrested on
charges of interfering with the duties of a police officer and evading arrest,
Chief Conley said. The 14-year-old girl who had been immobilized by Officer
Casebolt was “temporarily detained” but ultimately released to her parents, he
said.
Benét Embry, the host of an
Internet-radio talk show, lives in the neighborhood and said he had seen the
party grow out of control. Mr. Embry said as many as 130 young people had
attended the party.
He said some of them scaled the
pool’s fence after being turned away from the entrance by a security guard, who
eventually called the police.
“As an African-American male,
of course I had a concern seeing a 14-year-old African-American female in a
swimsuit on the ground,” Mr. Embry said in a phone interview on Monday. “Of
course I had concerns when I saw the officer pulling a gun. That’s when I
started thanking God that nobody got hurt. But I don’t believe that the officer
was coming out to pick on black kids.”
Texas
Police on Pool Party Incident
Greg Conley, the chief of
police in McKinney, Tex., said Sunday that a police officer had been placed on
leave after video surfaced showing him pushing a girl during a pool party on
Friday.
McKinney, with around 150,000
people, is a fast-growing, mostly middle-class suburb with deep racial and
economic divisions. In 2009, according to an article in The Atlantic, the city
settled a lawsuit in which it was accused of hindering the construction of
affordable housing in the western part of the city, which is more white and
more affluent.
The pool party took place on
the west side, in a neighborhood that residents said is usually marked by
friendly relations among black, white, Hispanic and Asian residents.
In a statement, the Police
Department said officers arrived at the pool around 7:15 p.m. on Friday,
responding to a call about a “disturbance involving multiple juveniles at the
location, who do not live in the area or have permission to be there, refusing
to leave.” The department, the statement added, received “several additional
calls related to this incident advising that juveniles were now actively
fighting.”
Mayor Brian Loughmiller said in
a statement that he was “disturbed and concerned by the incident.”
On Monday evening, a diverse
group of several hundred people gathered at an elementary school for a peaceful
protest, waving signs reading, “Don’t tread on me or my kids” and “Stop Police
Brutality.”
Speakers used a bullhorn to
call for the respect all citizens, and for sensitivity training for the
McKinney police.
Earlier in day, activists
outside Police Headquarters said the youths had been subjected to racial bias,
and demanded that Officer Casebolt be fired. Dominique Alexander, the president
of the Next Generation Action Network, a civil rights group, said it was an
“illusion” that youths had been jumping the fence. “They had every right to be
there,” he said.
After the video spread quickly
online, criticism poured in from around the country. The American Civil
Liberties Union of Texas said that it while it did not have all the facts about
the party, “what we do know is that the police response, as seen on the video,
appears to be a textbook case of overuse of force.”
In a video posted to YouTube on
Sunday, a black teenager named Tatiana said her family was hosting a cookout
for friends when a woman insulted them, prompting a 14-year-old family friend
to respond. Tatiana said a white woman had then told her: “You need to go back
to where you’re from” and to “go back to your Section 8 home.”
Tatiana said that she had
replied, “Excuse me,” and that then another white woman hit her in the face and
“both women attacked” her.
Mr. Embry, the neighbor who saw
the party, said he had not seen a fight involving blacks and whites.
He described a party that began
with a D.J. playing music in a nearby park, but that soon grew out of control
as the security guard began turning away more teenagers than were allowed in
the pool area.
The video of the police
response shows Officer Casebolt using profanity and shouting at teenagers as he
and others officers try to round up some of them and shoo others away from a
chaotic scene. He appears to grab the girl in frustration when she does not
leave the area.
In an interview with KDFW-TV,
the girl identified herself as Dajerria Becton. She told the television station
that she had been invited to the party and had not been involved in a fight.
Brandon Brooks, 15, who shot
the video, told a TV station that Officer Casebolt had not confronted him, one
of the few white teenagers at the party.“I was one of the only white people in
the area when that was happening,” he told the station. “You can see in part of
the video where he tells us to sit down, and he kind of like skips over me and
tells all my African-American friends to go sit down.”
Carol Cole-Frowe reported from
McKinney, and Richard Fausset from Atlanta.
Thank you John Foust, Sharon Bulova and the Fairfax County Police, we made another brutality list thanks to your efforts
Help
build a definitive guide to every unreleased video of police brutality
By Shaun
KingFollow
Across
the country, videos of extreme police
brutality and murder exist, but are being concealed by police departments,
prosecutors, and even media organizations. For nearly nine months, a deeply
disturbing video of the Salt Lake City, Utah, police killing of Dillon Taylor
existed, but was concealed not only by police and the district attorney, but
even by the Salt Lake City Tribune.
In
the video, we learned that Taylor, unarmed and committing no crime, posed no
real threat to the officer and was listening to music on his headphones. We
also witnessed the gruesome aftermath of what it truly looks like when someone
is shot at point blank range by the police and then summarily treated like a
criminal. It's one of the worst things you'll ever see in your life and should
inform how you feel about the true impact of police brutality.
Ultimately,
it's my strong belief that every video of police brutality and murder should be
released immediately—not after prosecutors decide not to do anything, not after
all charges are dropped, but as soon as it is humanly possible to load them to
YouTube. The videos are public property, paid for by tax dollars, and inform
the public far better than fictional press releases ever will.
Sadly,
the Taylor video was not the only video being concealed by police and
prosecutors. Below we will include a list of every police violence video that
we know exists that people in power refuse to release.
In
the comments section, please add more links and details and we will update this
post to include them.
Natasha McKenna was killed by police in
Fairfax County, Virginia, on February 3. The police have confirmed that a video
exists but refuse to release it.
Matthew
Ajibade was killed by law enforcement on January 1 in Savannah, Georgia. The
police have confirmed a video exists but refuse to release it.
Laquan
McDonald was shot 16 times and killed by Chicago police on October 20, 2014.
His family received $5 million in a settlement, but officials refuse to release
the video of his killing. It has since been reported that police deleted 100
minutes of video from a nearby Burger King.
Ernest
Satterwhite was shot and killed by police in South Carolina, but police refuse
to release the dashcam footage.
Jonathan
Ferrell was shot and killed by a police officer in Charlotte, North Carolina,
but police refuse to release the video.
Kashad
Ashford was killed by New Jersey police, but they refuse to release the video.
Lawrence
Graham III was shot—apprently three times in the back—and killed by police in
Fayetteville, North Carolina, but police refuse to release the video.
Ricardo
Diaz Zeferino was completely unarmed when police in Gardena, California, shot
and killed him, but they refuse to release the video. His family was given a
$4.5 million wrongful death settlement.
Brandon
Tate Brown was shot and killed by police in Philadelphia in December 2014, but
officials refuse to release several videos of the shooting.
If
you know of any additional cases in which police refuse to release videos,
please post them in the comments section below or email them to
shaun@dailykos.com and we will add them to the list.
ORIGINALLY
POSTED TO SHAUNKING ON THU JUN 04, 2015 AT 08:47 AM PDT.
ALSO
REPUBLISHED BY BARRIERS AND BRIDGES, POLICE ACCOUNTABILITY GROUP, AND DAILY
KOS.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)



























