By Burton Jay Rubin June 12
For some 20 months, the Fairfax
County police officer who shot and killed John Geer has been on “paid
administrative duty,” despite the $2.95 million settlement the county agreed to
pay Geer’s family. The commonwealth’s attorney is also seeking to empanel a
grand jury to consider criminal charges.
Officer Adam Torres’s tenure
with the Fairfax County police continues, thanks to the Police Officers’ Bill
of Rights, which provides job security protections unavailable to other
workers. Similar laws are on the books in Maryland and many other places.
Most employees are subject to
the employment-at-will legal doctrine, under which they may be fired for any
reason or no reason at all, except for limited discriminatory reasons. Under
Virginia’s police officers’ bill of rights, an officer cannot be discharged,
even if he or she hurt someone, disobeyed orders or broke the law, without
being notified in writing of the basis for the dismissal, given an opportunity
to respond orally and in writing, with the assistance of a lawyer, and given
the right to file a grievance under state or local procedures.
Police officers’ bill of rights
laws sprung up in the early 1970s. Before that, police generally were held to a
higher standard of conduct than other citizens.
In New York City, for example,
police officers were required to cooperate fully with criminal investig-ations
to the point of waiving their constitutional privilege against
self-incrimination or lose their jobs. That requirement was found
unconstitutional by the Supreme Court in the 1968 decision in Gardner v.
Broderick. Even though the officer in that case won, police organizations
pressed the issue, resulting in what might be regarded as a “second helping” of
employment rights, reflected in officers’ bill of rights laws today.
It is sometimes said that the
extraordinary job security afforded to police officers is justified by the
dangerous nature of their work. But that premise is false. Most police officers
never fire their weapons in defense.
Law enforcement is not even
among the 10 most dangerous jobs in the United States. Loggers and roofers have
the most dangerous jobs, and we don’t provide them with special job security.
The FBI reports that the number
of officers killed by criminals is at its lowest in 50 years . Unfortunately,
the number of citizens killed by police has increased and now stands at its
highest point.
Another argument for special
job protection rights for police officers is that officers are the targets for
unjustified charges of wrongdoing. That police officers may be falsely accused
of misconduct is undoubtedly the case, as it was for a University of Virginia
fraternity, Duke University lacrosse
players and child-care workers, yet none of these groups is accorded special
legal protections unavailable to the general public.
We are not talking about
punishing someone or short-circuiting the legal process to which everyone is
entitled. We are talking only about how long a community must keep a police
officer on the job and pay him, after that community has lost confidence in him
and he has lost his ability to serve in the position for which he was hired.
No one has the right to be
employed as a police officer. It is a privilege conferred by the community upon
those who meet the requirements and who are worthy of the public’s confidence
and trust. A finding of criminal liability is far too low a standard by which
to decide if someone should remain a police officer. When an officer has lost
his community’s confidence and trust, the community should be able to ask that
individual to find employment elsewhere.
We need to rethink our police
officers’ bill of rights laws.
The writer is a lawyer and
civic activist in Northern Virginia.
No comments:
Post a Comment