on sale now at amazon

on sale now at amazon
"I don't like this book because it don't got know pictures" Chief Rhorerer

“It’s becoming a disturbingly familiar scene in America - mentally unstable cops”

“It’s becoming a disturbingly familiar scene in America - mentally unstable cops”
“It’s becoming a disturbingly familiar scene in America - mentally unstable cops”

Vt. bills aim to boost police oversight, training


By DAVE GRAM

MONTPELIER, Vt. (AP) — Vermont lawmakers are considering two bills that backers say will boost the professionalism of police officers, but some law enforcement officials see them as meddling in their affairs.
One would require part-time police officers, including deputy sheriffs, to undergo the same 16 weeks of training that full-time officers get at the Vermont Police Academy in Pittsford. The part-timers now spend one week — that will be increased next month to two — at the academy, with additional coursework and on-the-job training while serving.
The other would strengthen the authority of the Vermont Criminal Justice Training Council, which oversees the academy. The council would be able to hear allegations of professional misconduct by police officers and have the power to strip officers of their professional license.
The measures have the backing of key lawmakers, including the chairs of the House Judiciary Committee and the House Government Operations Committee. But they’re getting pushback from the Department of Public Safety, which oversees the Vermont State Police, and the Vermont Sheriffs’ Association, which represents the 14 county sheriffs’ departments.
Rep. Bill Lippert, D-Hinesburg, chairman of the Judiciary Committee, said the bills align with his committee’s longstanding effort to support law enforcement with increased training and resources.
‘‘We've tried to give them the resources they need, as well as the accountability and training,’’ he said. He called expanding the powers of the training council to discipline officers an effort to give law enforcement ‘‘better tools to self-monitor their own profession.’’
But Windham County Sheriff Keith Clark, president of the Vermont Sheriff’s Association, opposes the bills and says they will hurt police departments.
The professional discipline measure ‘‘steps on some of my authority to manage my own personnel,’’ he said. He said he knows his employees best and is better suited to come up with solutions when problems arise among his 10 full-time and roughly 20 part-time deputies.
Clark also took a dim view of the measure to increase training for part-time officers. Most of the part-timers have other jobs and would struggle to get time off for 16 weeks of Police Academy training, he said. He generally tries to assign the part-timers to less sensitive roles — directing traffic around construction sites, for example, versus the road patrols that might deal with drunken drivers and domestic violence, he said.
Rep. Linda Waite-Simpson, D-Essex, a member of the Judiciary Committee, said Clark’s practice for part-timers is not uniform across the state.
Other professionals, from architects to doctors, ‘‘do not have a different standard based on the number of hours a person works,’’ Waite-Simpson said. ‘‘People carrying firearms and carrying out the statutes we pass here, we expect them to be fully trained.’’
Clark called the training bill a solution in search of a problem.
‘‘If the legislators could say to me that of the last 50 shootings by police officers, 49 were by part-time officers, that’s a problem. But that’s not been the case,’’ he said.
Clark, Public Safety Commissioner Keith Flynn and others said top law enforcement officials are working together to come up with rewrite of the training bill that likely will call for specific training for the duties to which part-time officers are assigned. Rep. Donna Sweaney, chairwoman of the House Government Operations Committee, said her committee stands ready to review such a proposal.


Businessman files lawsuit against San Diego police, claims wrongful arrest


Matt Mendes  

SAN DIEGO - A businessman has filed a lawsuit against the San Diego Police Department, claiming he was wrongfully arrested because he refused to answer an officer's questions.
10News learned the incident happened in July at a 7-Eleven store in National City. David Levy filed the lawsuit alleging negligence, false imprisonment and that the officer searched his car without reason.
Levy's attorney, Chris Ramey, said his client was stopped by police for having expired car tags. According to Ramey, once Levy showed the officer he had paid his registration, the officer suspected Levy was high on drugs.
Levy was arrested for being under the influence and having a burglary tool, which was a pair of wire cutters used for work. Ramey said drug tests later came back negative and Levy has no criminal history.
"It's a big blow to Mr. Levy and it's unfortunate someone had to suffer at the hands of police that didn't do anything wrong," said Ramey.
Ramey believes the officer got upset when Levy refused to answer his questions. Levy felt the officer was being irrational so he refused to talk.
"When Mr. Levy said, 'I don't want to answer any more questions,' [the officer] became angry and began to teach Mr. Levy a lesson by making up stories so that he can put Mr. Levy in jail for not answering questions, and that's exactly what happened," said Ramey.
Levy is suing the city for $25,000 in damages. Ramey said his client has been embarrassed and humiliated by the incident and wants to make sure it doesn't happen to anybody else.
Ramey is hoping this case will go to trial and have a jury decide the outcome within a few months.
10News' calls to the City Attorney's Office were not returned, likely because they do not normally comment on pending litigation.


Jury continues deliberations in former West Sacramento cop's rape case


A jury ended the week without a verdict in the trial of a former West Sacramento police officer accused of raping multiple women while on duty.

WOODLAND, Calif. - A Yolo County jury ended the week without a verdict in the trial of a former West Sacramento police officer charged with raping multiple women while on duty.
The jury began deliberating last Friday in the case of Sergio Alvarez. They've had the case for five days (Presidents Day was a holiday), but experts say that isn't surprising for a trial this complex.
The jury spent several weeks listening to testimony from five alleged victims who accused Alvarez of rape, kidnapping, and related charges. Alvarez faces 27 counts. The jury has a lot of information to consider.
"The jury will be allowed to continue to deliberate as long as the foreperson of the jury reports to the judge that continued deliberations will be beneficial to the jury in reaching a verdict," former U.S. Attorney McGregor Scott said.
At this point in the deliberations, there could be a majority of votes on one side that just need a little more time to win over those in the minority.
"But then the other scenario would be that that one simply says, 'this is my verdict; I'm not changing my mind'. It's 11 to 1, and then at that point, you have a hung jury and an impasse, and the judge brings them in, and typically after this lengthy of deliberations would declare a mistrial," Scott said.
No one can be sure what the jury is thinking or how much longer they'll take. Antoinnette Borbon writes for the Davis Vanguard. She was in court for most of the Alvarez trial and studied the jury closely.
"During trial, some of them looked pretty convinced that they felt he was guilty, but you never know. Body language can be a tell-tale, but once they get behind there and having to look at everything, you got pages and pages of transcripts to look at," Borbon said.
With 27 different counts to weigh, the jury could convict on all, some, or none of them. Even if jurors reach a partial verdict, the prosecution would have the option of retrying anything that is left undecided.

Deliberations resume Monday.

Texas officer charged in reckless driving case


CORSICANA, Texas (AP) — An East Texas police officer has been charged in a reckless driving investigation prompted by the death of an Iowa motorist who witnesses say was run off the road.
Ernesto Fierro turned himself in at the Parker County jail Thursday and later was released on an $85,000 bond. He's charged with aggravated assault with a deadly weapon, official oppression and three counts of reckless driving.
The officer in the town of Malakoff, 70 miles southeast of Dallas, was off-duty riding his personal motorcycle when the December incident occurred in Navarro County.
Seventy-year-old William Livezey, along with witnesses, called 911 claiming Fierro was trying to force Livezey off the road. When deputies arrived, Livezey was in handcuffs and said he wasn't feeling well.
He was taken to a hospital where he died.


Unionville police officer charged with sexual misconduct with minor


  David Banks, 25, found, arrested in DeKalb County after termination from Unionville PD

DeKalb County

A former Unionville Police officer was charged with sexual misconduct involving a child after Kirksville Police received and investigated claims he was exchanging inappropriate text messages with a juvenile.
David Banks, 25, was arrested at a residence in Stewartsville after being terminated from the Unionville Police Department over allegations of sexual misconduct.
According to the Kirksville Police Department, the suspect had been exchanging sexual explicit text messages and had sent at least one image to a 14-year-old female in Unionville. KPD began its investigation Thursday.
Following his termination with the police department Thursday, Banks is alleged to have left Unionville and was located at a residence in DeKalb County, where a search warrant was executed for his arrest early Friday morning.
Banks was being held in the Daviess/Dekalb Regional Jail as of Friday morning on a $10,000 cash-only bond. He was charged with the class D felony of sexual misconduct involving a child.
The investigation is ongoing and other charges are pending, according to KPD.



Police: Airport Cop Who Hit Man was OWI


An Indianapolis Airport police officer was arrested Saturday morning in connection with a drunken driving accident that left an Indianapolis man in critical condition.
Around 4 a.m. Saturday morning, Indiana State Police responded to a crash on I-65 northbound at the 112.5 mile marker, near the I-65/I-70 split in downtown Indianapolis.
Officers arrived to find Paul Hines, 58, of Indianapolis, had been pinned between his car and a guardrail in the emergency shoulder. Hines had been changing the right front tire on his car when another vehicle, driven by Lindsay Standeford, 24, of Mooresville, collided with his vehicle.
Police said their preliminary investigation revealed that Standeford crossed the white fog line and struck the left rear of Hines' vehicle, shoving it forward and pinning him against the guard rail.
Hines was transported to Eskenazi Hospital in critical condition with injuries to his upper body.
Standeford, who is an Indianapolis Airport police officer, submitted to a blood test following the crash that showed her BAC at .14 percent. She was off-duty at the time of the crash, and was not injured.
Officials from the Indianapolis Airport Police Department said Standeford had been placed on paid administrative leave pending further investigation.
Standeford was taken to Marion County Jail on preliminary charges of operating a motor vehicle while intoxicated causing serious bodily injury, a class "D" felony.



Mayor addresses disciplinary action within Seattle Police Department


Seattle Mayor Ed Murray on Friday spoke out about disciplinary action within the Seattle Police Department.
Murray is defending Interim Police Chief Harry Bailey, who reduced the penalty of Seattle Police Officer John Marion. Marion originally got a one-day suspension for threatening to harass Dominic Holden, who is a reporter and news editor for The Stranger newspaper.  The punishment was changed to Marion being required to get more training.
"While this could be perceived as a lesser punishment under the current legal framework, Chief Bailey believes, and I support him, that the framework for this process is reflective of what is most constructive," said the mayor.  "Training.  Changing behavior."
The one-day suspension, Murray says, would not be as effective because Marion, or any other officer who is suspended, could use vacation pay to make up the hours and income he would've lost.
Holden says Marion was let off too easy, and argues that the officer could have been ordered to go through more training, in addition to the one-day suspension.
"Training is not a punishment," said Holden.  "Training is what we should be doing no matter what.  What police officers do is punish people who do wrong, and we need the same standards for them as they give us."
Holden also says the interim chief mis-led city officials, including the mayor, by trying to pretend he had not reduced the officer's punishment.
"The letter you sent to the mayor and city council says you concurred with the finding of misconduct," Holden challenged Bailey during Friday's press conference.
Then he turned his attention to the mayor.
"If you want to reform a police department, don't you want a chief who is honest with you?"  he asked.
Mayor Murray immediately responded.
"First of all, I disagree with you," said Murray.  "I believe we have a chief who is honest and taking action against individuals who need to have action taken against them."
Holden isn't so sure.
"The police chief has let him off the hook and that sends a message to all cops that you can commit acts of misconduct and you can simply wait it out and political forces will free you later," he said.
If was also disclosed Friday that Bailey changed the discipline of several more officers, in unrelated cases.
Mayor Ed Murray has asked for a review of the entire grievance process.  He hopes that re-evaluating the process will help both the public and the police department.


Walnut Ridge officer faces drug and fraud charges



By Jorge Quiquivix

Guilty verdict born of a dinner meeting

Former cop who plotted kidnapping, murder met the man who recorded plans at West Side restaurant
The story behind the bizarre trial of Steven Mandell and his plot to murder and dismember a businessman began at a quiet table at a popular restaurant on Chicago's Near West Side.
It was July 2012, and real estate mogul George Michael was lunching at La Scarola on West Grand Avenue. At the table was Albert Vena, a reputed Outfit boss, and several other alleged mobsters. A friend brought Mandell to the table and introduced him to Michael, and a relationship was born.
What unfolded over the next three months, culminating in Mandell's sensational arrest that October, was "so chilling, so grim ... it's almost stunningly hard to believe," as one federal prosecutor said in court.
Mandell, a former Chicago cop who was once on death row, was convicted Friday on charges he plotted to kidnap, torture, kill and dismember a suburban businessman. The jury acquitted him, however, in a separate plot to kill an associate of a reputedly mob-connected strip club. Mandell faces up to life in prison.
Michael secretly wore a wire for the feds and pretended to go along with the plan to kill Riverside landlord Steven Campbell. Michael found Mandell a suitable space to carry out Campbell's torture and murder — a Northwest Side storefront that Mandell referred to as "Club Med" — and had contractors outfit it with an industrial sink, butcher table and other equipment needed to drain the body of blood and chop it to pieces.
The undercover recordings made by Michael, as well as conversations caught on FBI cameras at Club Med, gave Mandell's trial the feeling of something out of a Quentin Tarantino movie. There was snappy dialogue, a cast of foul-mouthed underworld characters and moments of dark humor.
Jurors seemed to be stunned at times as they listened to Mandell and his alleged accomplice, Gary Engel, joke about mutilating Campbell before they killed him. Much of the action played out on a giant screen in U.S. District Judge Amy St. Eve's darkened courtroom as jurors watched hours of video of Mandell and Engel making final preparations for Campbell's kidnapping. They laid out saws, knives, a meat cleaver and Ambien pills in case they needed to put Campbell to sleep. A chessboard was set up to pass the time.
The jury heard the two quibble over the workmanship of their torture chamber, with Engel pointing to the plumbing and exclaiming in a clipped Chicago accent, "What the (expletive) is this (expletive) abortion?" Engel hanged himself in his jail cell soon after his arrest.
Also featured was a 30-minute video from an infrared camera mounted on an FBI spy plane. An agent in the plane circling high over Arlington Heights followed Mandell as he placed a tracking device on a girlfriend's car and tossed what amounted to a killer's "to-do" list inside a garbage can in a secluded suburban park.
On the last day of testimony, some jurors cracked smiles as they listened to a series of phone calls Mandell made to his 82-year-old wife from a Loop federal jail after his arrest. Mandell told her to find her Nissan that he'd left parked near Campbell's home, instructing her in a cooing voice several times to "throw away" the trash in the car, explaining, "You need all your space for your groceries."
A frustrated Mandell could be heard trying to give his wife directions to the car as she wrote them down. "Just go to Joliet Road!" Mandell shouted.
"Oh my God, I'm telling you," she replied. "Ah, slow down!"
The jury also convicted him of obstruction of justice.
The trial offered a short course on the current state of the Chicago Outfit and included names like "Little Guy" Vena and Robert Panozzo, the convicted burglar who Michael testified introduced him to Mandell during that lunch at La Scarola.
One part of Michael's testimony went barely noticed amid the lurid charges against Mandell, but it undoubtedly caught the attention of the people who dined with Michael that July day at La Scarola. The FBI recorded the meeting, though the tape was never played during Mandell's trial and his attorneys were barred from delving into how or why it was made.
After the verdict was handed down Friday evening, U.S. Attorney Zachary Fardon called the case "extraordinary" and praised the work of the FBI and federal prosecutors in taking a dangerous figure off the street.
Robert Holley, the special agent in charge of the Chicago FBI, acknowledged that Michael's role in the case was significant, but he stopped short of praising him for wearing a wire.

"Yes, there was a risk to him for his involvement in this case, but he did what he needed to do," Holley said.

Former Philadelphia officer pleads guilty to robbery plot; more arrests may follow


  By DAVID HENRY

PHILADELPHIA - February 24, 2014 (WPVI) -- A veteran Philadelphia police officer has entered a guilty plea in a far-reaching corruption probe.
Former narcotics officer Jeffrey Walker pled guilty to robbery and weapons charges in federal court today. But he is just one crooked cop who may be among many rounded up in an ongoing federal investigation.
Walker is cooperating and naming names.
Walker's defense attorney Thomas Fitzpatrick explains, "These are dangerous people who've engaged in significant criminal activity for quite some time."
Fitzpatrick says he has been talking to the FBI and a grand jury, and it appears to be a far-reaching investigation.
Walker was tripped up by a drug dealer who was cooperating with the FBI. Walker approached the dealer with a plan to set up and rob another drug dealer.
They went to a bar on West Girard Avenue last May where Walker was videotaped planting cocaine in the other dealer's car.
When that man left the bar, Walker had him pulled over and arrested. He then went to the man's house on Florence Avenue and stole $15,000 cash and five pounds of marijuana.
Walker was arrested by the FBI as he left the house.
Assistant United States Attorney Anthony Wzorek says, "It's outrageous behavior. It's a front to the citizens of the city and to the other honest members of the Philadelphia Police Department."
Since he was arrested Walker has been cooperating with the FBI. That cooperation led to a search of the Schuylkill River for a safe that was never found.
Walker has also been naming others.
His lawyer says the investigation involves too many cops and civilians to count, and he says there's a lot of money involved.
"At the end of the day it's going to result in a significant amount of indictments, we believe, and significant police corruption being uncovered in the city," Fitzpatrick said.
This corruption investigation has been ongoing for some time, and there's no indication of when it might be wrapped up. So far Walker is the only one arrested, although the police have recently removed six other narcotics officers from active duty.


Trumbull Cop Accused of Sex Assault of Police Explorers Member



State police have arrested a 20-year veteran of the Trumbull police department who is accused of sexual assaulting one member of the police department's explorer program and sharing inappropriate texts with another.
Trumbull police said William Ruscoe, 44, has been suspended from duty and there is an internal investigation to determine if he violated any department policies or regulations.
Ruscoe served as an advisor to the explorer program, which works with youth interested in possible law enforcement careers, for several years, according to a statement from Trumbull Police Chief Thomas Kiely.
The application for the arrest warrant says one victim is now 17 and he is accused of sharing inappropriate texts with her.
The other victim is now 18-year-old.
The investigation into Ruscoe started on Oct. 14, 2013, when a suspicious incident was reported at a high school in Tolland County.
The 17-year-old girl told police that she joined the police explorers program in 2011, when she was 14. Months later, her drill instructor, identified as Ruscoe, started sending inappropriate and flirty messages, the girl told police.
Then it escalated to Ruscoe asking the teen to send him photos of herself.
In all, the teen said she sent Ruscoe about 50 photos of herself, exposed and Ruscoe sent her inappropriate photos of himself.
During a cadet camp at the University of Hartford last year, the teen said she noticed Ruscoe paying attention to two Trumbull girls and told him that people were talking about him flirting with one of the teens in an effort to get him to stop flirting, police documents state.
After meeting with the teen, police searched her phone for the messages.
In January, police obtained a search warrant for Ruscoe's phone and met with him at the police station to retreive it.
Ruscoe handed over his phone but said he did not want to provide the password or provide a written statement, according to the warrant application. 
Ruscoe's attorney also told police that his client did not want to be interviewed.
On Sunday, troopers met with the second victim, who told police that she was "very intimidated" because of Ruscoe's position and she did not want him to get in trouble.
She told investigators she joined the explorers program in December 2012 and Ruscoe started sending her inappropriate messages in 2013. when she was 17.
She told police that she did communicate with Ruscoe but only after he was very persistent.
In the texts, Ruscoe wrote that he loved the girl and the texts progressively became more graphic and sexual in nature, according to police paperwork.
She told police that Ruscoe begged the her to send him photos of  her and she eventually did, according to police. She also provided police with information about three inappropriate incidents that occured in June.
Ruscoe took the teen to a beach in Stratford and gave her a silver bracelet with a heart-shaped charm that said "Made With Love," according to police. 
On another night in June, Ruscoe picked her up early in the morning after a "band gig."
He was drunk, she told police, became aggressive in a sexual manner and kissed her, but she tried to push him away.
At the end of the month, Ruscoe took the teen to a Trumbull home he had moved out of.
Once they were inside, he placed a gun on the counter and and was looking at her "in a threatening way that made her very uncomfortable," the warrant says. 
The girl told police that things became sexual and she kept telling him to stop. He also restrained her hands behind her back with handcuffs while in bed, police said. 
The girl told police she recalled one conversation in which Ruscoe said that if he ever got caught, he would go to jail and that he would kill himself if he went to jail.
She said this was intimidating and she did not want anything to happen to him because of anything he did.
The girl told police that Ruscoe had asked the teen to change his name in her phone to "Jack" because she liked the movie Titanic and told her he could get in trouble because of her age. 
Toward the end of January, Ruscoe reached out to the 18-year-old and told her that police had come to take his phone because "an older friend that was a girl he used to help out was going through a rough time and she dropped his name," court documents said.
Ruscoe told her he was nervous that police would contact her because her number was in his phone and advised her not to say anything because she is 18 and is not required, the teen told police.
Ruscoe was charged with second-degree sexual assault, third-degree sexual assault, fourth-degree sexual assault and tampering with a witness.
Police released a statement about Ruscoe's arrest.
"I am deeply troubled and concerned by the nature of the charges that have been presented. We will make every effort to ensure that the integrity of the department and its officers is preserved as this case is investigated, and that the case is handles in a fair and timely manner," a statement from Kiely says.
Ruscoe was arrested on Thursday and bond was set at $50,000. 
He posted bond and is due back in court on March 5.



Student Arrested for Crossing the Street by 6 cops who drag her to ground


House bill seeks to limit police use of cell phone spying device



Warrants should be issued before use, says human rights group
by Gregg MacDonald Staff writer

A bill that would prohibit police from using currently utilized mobile devices to spy on residents’ cellphone usage without first obtaining search warrants unanimously passed the Virginia House of Delegates and is on its way toward becoming law.
HB 17 passed 99-0 on Feb. 11 and is currently undergoing evaluation in the Virginia Senate’s Courts of Justice Committee.
If passed into law, the bill would, except under certain very narrow circumstances, prohibit the use of International Mobile Subscriber Identity catchers by police agencies such as the Fairfax County Police — who currently use them — without first obtaining a search warrant.
The devices, called “StingRays,” are manufactured by the Florida-based Harris Corporation, and are legally marketed to military and law enforcement as ways of “triangulating” the position of a cellphone user by mimicking a cellphone tower and tracking the location of that person’s cellphone signals.
But according to human rights groups such as the American Civil Liberties Union and the Electronic Privacy Information Center, the devices are capable of doing much more, such as intercepting phone calls and even text messages.
“That type of usage would be illegal,” said Alan Butler of EPIC. “But nonetheless, the capability is there.”
And that makes use of the devices without a search warrant a 4th Amendment issue, Butler says.
The Fourth Amendment precludes unreasonable searches and seizures of property and effects without a warrant defining a probable cause.
According to Fairfax County government documents, the Fairfax County Police Department has been using the devices for at least four years, but spokesperson Lucy Caldwell declined to comment on exactly how police use them, saying only that “the FCPD does not comment on our investigative tools, nor do we discuss investigative techniques or capabilities … however, our detectives and officers follow all state and federal legal requirements for the use of technologies that we do use.”
In a Fairfax County Board of Supervisors agenda dated Sept. 28, 2010, police state that use of the device is “used in conjunction with a court order, and the Fairfax County Police Department has been sponsored to use this tracking device through the U.S. Marshals Service.” In the same agenda, the department says it will use $126,661 of a federal grant to “enhance the StingRay cell phone tracking system,” which is “capable of locating and tracking cellular service whether or not a phone is transmitting. As long as the cellular phone is powered on, the StingRay is capable of locating it.”
In addition to tracking cellphone use for “crime victims, suspects of crimes, wanted persons, and those in need of emergency services,” police also state in the agenda that the StingRay device enhances “officer safety and allows the officers to stay in communication with each other during covert operations.”
Butler says not all uses of the device potentially conflict with the Fourth Amendment, but because the capability exists, warrants should first be issued.
“I am not saying they should never be used,” he said. “But at the same time, you should clearly be getting a warrant first.”
HB 17 lists four circumstances in which real-time location data could still be obtained by police without a warrant:
• To respond to a user’s call for emergency service;
• With the “informed affirmative consent” of the owner
• With the “informed affirmative consent” of the owner’s legal guardian or next of kin; and
• If there is an emergency involving danger to a person.
“It’s a powerful device and its use should be regulated,” Butler said. “With it in the wrong hands, a phone system can be hijacked without either the user or the phone company being aware.”





Cops hit my car, then arrested me: suit


By Josh Saul

Two Brooklyn cops sideswiped a parked SUV, then arrested a man sitting in the passenger seat of the vehicle, accusing him of damaging their car, a suit charges.
And the officers would have gotten away with their lie — had the whole bizarre drama not been caught by a security camera.
Robert Jackson, 31, told The Post his nightmare began when a police car heading the wrong way on one-way Watkins Street in Brownsville scraped against a parked Ford Explorer, which belongs to his girlfriend.
Jackson, a maintenance worker, said he was sitting in the legally parked car outside of his apartment when the accident happened. He got out of the vehicle and walked up to the officers.
“I was smiling, like, ‘How’d you run into me?’ he recalled. Then the cop said, Dude, you ran into me.
“I just wanted them to fix the damage and apologize, but it didn’t turn out that way,” Jackson said. “They were trying to cover it up.”
At that point, things got even more surreal.
The two cops checked the block for surveillance cameras before arresting him for destruction of city property, according to the lawsuit filed by Jackson in Brooklyn Supreme Court.
“When they thought no cameras were on. I saw their gloves go on, and that’s when I was arrested,” Jackson said.
But fortunately for Jackson, the officers, Christopher Oliver and Shazad Shigri, missed one camera on the home of one of his neighbors, Jackson said.
The video, reviewed by The Post, corroborates Jackson’s story.
It shows the police car going the wrong way down the street on April 17, 2013, and scraping the parked SUV as the officers try to make room for a truck to pass.
Though charges were eventually dropped, Jackson had to spend a night in a “filthy, overpopulated, rat- and rodent-infested cell,” his suit says.
“The officer who arrested me said if I took care of the expense on my vehicle, they would take care of their vehicle and I wouldn’t have gotten arrested,” Jackson recounted. “He knew he was wrong.”
The NYPD referred comment to the city Law Department.
The city Law Department said only, “We will review the complaint.”
The suit charges that the officers “falsely claimed that [Jackson] was operating the parked motor vehicle and that [Jackson] caused the parked motor vehicle to strike the NYPD vehicle.”
Jackson was arrested for destruction of city property, disorderly conduct and resisting arrest, the suit states.
But he was officially charged only with unlicensed operation of a motor vehicle because he had a suspended license.
The criminal complaint drafted against Jackson says he had the keys in the ignition — which could support the unlicensed-operator charge — when the crash happened, but Jackson said that’s not true.
“If he’s claiming that he was not in the driver’s seat and the car was not on — if either of those claims are truthful, then he wasn’t operating the car under the law,” said Todd Greenberg, a defense attorney and expert on traffic law who is not involved in the case.
The suit, which names the city and the two police officers, seeks unspecified monetary damages.


Yet Another Police Misconduct Claim Emerges


BY: RANDY DOTINGA

Late Wednesday, San Diego Police Chief William Lansdowne announced the department’s sexual misconduct scandal had grown to include another officer. This officer is under investigation for allegedly touching and exposing himself to an arrestee while transporting her to jail about a year ago.
Lansdowne said all transports of women arrestees now will be done by two officers. Christopher Hays, an officer who was charged earlier this week with on-duty sexual misconduct, resigned Wednesday.
Our Liam Dillon asked Lansdowne after the press conference why allegations of officer sexual misconduct keep happening.
“I can’t tell you about human behavior,” Lansdowne said. “But I can tell you we’ll root it out and we’ll take care of it.”
• The San Diego Police Department has had a very rough last few years amid multiple misconduct allegations. Lansdowne appears to remain popular, though, and it hasn’t hurt that he’s announced that he wants an external review of the department.

So how will this “audit” work? One way would be to bring the city’s own independent auditor into the picture. But he tells us he’s out of the loop. In a new story, we also look at how a similar process unfolded in Philadelphia and why the Justice Department could be brought into the mix.

Philly Black Officials Silent On Police Brutality



by LINN WASHINGTON JR.

hiladelphia – Back in 1978, a respected newspaper columnist in in this city blasted local black elected officials for their failure to criticize police brutality – the scourge that ravaged blacks for decades, often with the sanction of white elected officials like then Philadelphia Mayor Frank Rizzo, a former city police commissioner.
“Those black elected officials lack courage,” respected journalist Chuck Stone wrote three-decades ago, slamming Philadelphia’s four top black officials as servile, betraying their constituents.
During the weeks before publication of Stone’s July 18, 1978 news commentary, Philadelphia police had killed two unarmed black men and viciously beat scores of people including a group of black teens attending a party at the home of a Methodist minister.
Now, 36 years later in 2014, Philadelphia black elected officials again face harsh criticism for their failures both to publicly condemn continued police brutality and to utilize their electoral clout to end that festering scourge.
Once again, black officials are being disparaged as servile and and betraying the people who elected them. And once again, the trigger for this latest volley of criticism against Philadelphia’s black elected officials is their collective failure to publicly condemn a high-profile incident of alleged police abuse. That incident in question was a vicious January 7 police assault on a teenage honor-roll student [1] that left the 16-year-old needing emergency surgery for a damaged testicle.
“We are outraged by their silence,” activist Paula Peeples said as she castigated the muted criticism about police abuses like that recent teen assault on the part of too many of Philadelphia’s black elected officials.
Peeples is an official in the Philadelphia chapter of NAN – the National Action Network founded by civil rights leader, Rev. Al Sharpton. Since 2008, Philly NAN has unsuccessfully petitioned the White House three times for a federal probe into brutality by Philadelphia police – each time without support from Philadelphia’s top black elected officials.
Peeples was a part of efforts in the late 1970s to end abuses by Philadelphia Police that ironically helped energized a wave of political activism that elected many more blacks to pivotal posts in Philadelphia’s City Hall plus seats in the state legislature.
Black elected officials in Philadelphia now occupy the top posts of mayor, City Council president and district attorney plus the appointed position of police commissioner. Philadelphia’s 17-member City Council includes eight blacks on that governing body. Sixteen blacks from Philadelphia serve in the Pa state legislature, 12 in the state House and four in the state Senate. There are also many more blacks serving in the police department compared to in 1978, when they were a rarity.
Yet conditions for blacks on police abuses (and other social ills) have not improved appreciably, leaving many dubious about the efficacy of electoral politics in reducing misconduct by police. Philadelphia Blacks remain the prime targets of police abuses from beatings to false arrests and fatal shootings, according to reports from Philadelphia’s Police Advisory Commission – a city agency that monitors police misconduct.
“With all the political power in the hands of people of color in Philadelphia, nothing has changed with the violent and racist practices,” imprisoned radical Edward “Eddie” Africa said in a recent letter. Africa is one of nine MOVE members convicted for an August 1978 fatal shootout with Philadelphia police that culminated a five-year brutal onslaught by police against the MOVE organization who fought against police brutality–an assault that included the bombing of a house by police which resulted in 11 deaths, including five children,who were known to be in the building at the time that a helicopter dropped the weapon on the roof.
Like those black elected officials lashed in 1978 by columnist Stone for failure to “stand up for their community,” Philadelphia’s current crop of black officials are being blasted for their apparent reticence about assailing abusive, racially discriminatory practices by the city’s police, particularly the city’s controversial Stop-&-Frisk program.
Blacks, in 2012, comprised the overwhelming majority of the 215,000 Philadelphians ensnared by Stop-&-Frisk. Philadelphia’s controversial Stop-&-Frisk – currently under federal court review for alleged abuses – is the signature anti-crime program of black Philadelphia Mayor Michael Nutter and is implemented by Nutter’s handpicked black police commissioner, Charles Ramsey.
Nearly half of the 215,000 Stop-&-Frisks in 2012 were conducted without the ‘reasonable suspicion’ required by law, according to a detailed analysis of Nutter’s controversial program released last year by the Pennsylvania ACLU.
That ACLU analysis also undermined the key premise for Stop-&-Frisk advanced by Nutter, Police Commissioner Ramsey and DA Seth Williams, who all claim Stop-&-Frisk has reduced the number of illegal guns used in street crimes ranging from robberies to homicides.
The ACLU analysis examined 1,852 stops during 2012. That examination showed police recovered only three guns – an exceptionally small recovery rate compared to the exceedingly large numbers of intrusive encounters.
A Stop-&-Frisk encounter reportedly sparked that January 7, 2014 assault on Darrin Manning, an African-American and straight-A student, allegedly by two white Philadelphia police officers, where an improper and unnecessarily rough “pat-down” search by a policewoman allegedly damaged the 16-year-old’s testicle. Ire from black community leaders, including Sharpton’s NAN branch, to that assault on Manning forced Philadelphia’s Police Commissioner and District Attorney to belatedly launch an investigation into the alleged incident.Police and prosecutors initially downplayed that incident, but it has now, in the wake of media attention, morphed into a grand jury investigation.
Despite public outrage and protests, Mayor Nutter has still taken no public position on this incident of abuse, failing even to publicly request an investigation. A spokesman for Nutter said Manning and his family have recourse through legal actions like filing complaints or lawsuits.
None of Philadelphia’s eight black City Council members has taken a public position on the Manning incident either. City Council President Darrell Clark, whose district is where the assault occurred, has criticized Stop-&-Frisk, but has taken no legislative actions against the program that he contends is flawed.
Only one of those 16 blacks from Philadelphia serving in Pennsylvania’s state legislature has publicly condemned the alleged mistreatment of Manning, who is awaiting court action on charges that he assaulted a policeman and resisted arrest. (Police in abuse cases typically charge the person who is abused, often trumping up offenses.)
State Rep W. Curtis Thomas, who represents the district where the assault occurred, called for the suspension of the policewoman who caused damage to Manning’s testicle. Additionally, Thomas called on DA Williams to drop the charges against Manning. “I don’t understand why the District Attorney has charged Darrin with assault when he’s the one who’s been brutalized,” Thomas said.
Dr. Tony Monteiro, a professor of African-American Studies at Temple University in Philadelphia and a veteran of campaigns against police abuses, said too many black elected officials embrace the misbelief that reflexive support of police is a required posture for elected office.
Too many black politicians, Dr. Monteiro said, have become part of “the law-&-order establishment that used to be the exclusive territory of white politicians,” and thus have become “unwilling to protect the community against the police.”
One of America’s worst urban riots of the 1960s took place in Newark, NJ, triggered by a July 1967 police brutality incident. That riot, rooted in reactions to institutional racism, ushered the 1970 election of Kenneth Gibson, the first black mayor of any major city in the Northeast. Yet, in 2010, Newark’s then black mayor, Cory Booker, brushed off an ACLU report documenting police brutality in that city. That ACLU report led to a U.S. Justice Department probe, the kind of examination Philadelphia activists have sought, so far unsuccessfully.
Zayid Muhammad, an activist in Newark, NJ, finds the silence on police abuses from so many black elected officials in his city, in Philadelphia and nationwide “disgusting, especially with the long history of police brutality” in America.
Muhammad said blacks must back candidates for elected office who are “supportive of social justice and not just nice people selected by political machines. We need to change our conditions and need people who will stay on point.”