Reciprocation builds trust
More bad press for Fairfax County....thank you board of supervisors for fearing the police department
The
Gazette
There’s
much to like in a recent agreement between Montgomery and Howard counties to
investigate police-related deaths in each other’s jurisdictions.
If someone
dies in the custody of, or during an interaction with, a Montgomery County
police officer, the Howard County state’s attorney’s office will review the
evidence and decide whether criminal charges are appropriate. Montgomery
County’s prosecutor’s office will do the same for Howard County cases.
It’s a
promising sign that both counties are striving to be fair and accountable when
scrutiny is needed. This especially matters because police-related deaths
across the country — in Ferguson, Mo.; New York City; North Charleston, S.C.;
Baltimore city; and other areas — have sparked public outrage.
In some
cases, there have been strong feelings in the community that officers should
have been held criminally responsible for a death, but weren’t.
It’s
common practice for a police department, when faced with allegations against
one of its own employees, to have a neighboring agency investigate. However,
Montgomery and Howard prosecutors say their evidence-review agreement is the
first of its kind in Maryland.
Jaded
critics could write off this extra step as meaningless symbolism, convinced
that police and prosecutors work closely enough that they will watch out for
each other, no matter the jurisdiction.
Then we
see otherwise, such as when the state’s attorney in Baltimore filed criminal
charges against six officers for the death of Freddie Gray. The skepticism that
the fix is in isn’t universally justified.
Police
work can be remarkably difficult and fraught with grave life-and-death
decisions. Sometimes, killing one person to protect the lives of others is
understandable.
According
to a Washington Post report about a May 19 encounter in Arlington, Va., a man
with a metal pole threatened officers responding to a call about a disturbance.
An officer tried to use a Taser, but it didn’t work at first, and the man hit
the officer in the face with the pole. The officer tried again to use the Taser
and ended up hitting a second officer instead.
When the
man swung the metal pole again, the officer shot him three times in his upper
body, killing him, the Post wrote, based on the latest information from police.
If this account holds true, it’s an example of a split-second decision about
the use of deadly force.
If deadly
violence isn’t justified, a police officer should be held accountable, too,
just as anyone else would.
Montgomery
County already has a pending investigation that Howard County will review — the
May 12 death of Dajuan Graham, 40, of Burtonsville.
On May 10,
Graham was seen acting erratically in the Briggs Chaney area, according to
police. When a woman tried to get Graham to stop walking in the roadway of
Castle Boulevard, he punched the woman in the face, police said. Observers
suspected that Graham was under the influence of PCP.
Graham
reportedly ignored multiple orders by police to take his hands out of his
pockets. An officer then shocked Graham with a Taser. Graham fell down and was
taken to a hospital, where he later assaulted an officer and security staff,
according to police. Two days later, he died.
Montgomery
County police have been open with information about what happened and the
officers who were involved.
That’s a sharp contrast to inexcusable secrecy from
the police department in Fairfax County, Va., after an officer there shot and
killed a man who had his hands up during a call in 2013, according to police
records reported by The Washington Post. It took a court order to force the
police department to release details of the call, including the officer’s name,
17 months later. The county has settled a wrongful death suit with the victim’s
family, the Post reported.
Montgomery
County police and prosecutors have demonstrated that they can be transparent
and straightforward in handling cases of police-related deaths, giving the
community reason to have faith in their impartiality and professionalism. The
reciprocal agreement with Howard County enhances that reputation.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment