Get ready to read A LOT of stories like this after the federal government forces the Fairfax County Occupation police force to wear body cameras
4
drunk driving cases dismissed after officer failed to record sobriety tests
By
Justin Jouvenal
A
judge has dismissed four drunk-driving cases initiated by the same Fairfax
County police officer after he failed to record sobriety tests using his
cruiser’s audio and video systems, according to attorneys and court filings.
Attorneys
argued that the failure violated police orders and deprived their clients of
potentially exculpatory evidence in each case. In some cases, attorneys said
defendants’ accounts of the stops varied from those provided by Officer L.F.
Martinez.
“When
you’ve got this type of equipment, it’s there for everyone’s protection,” said
Eric Clingan, a lawyer who handled one of the cases. “It protects the police as
much as the citizen.”
Dashcam
video of Martinez’s stop of Clingan’s client Dec. 8 shows the officer standing
next to the man’s car in the Fair Lakes area. The officer opens the man’s door,
and the man follows the officer across the camera frame and then off-screen,
where the sobriety test was to be performed. Court filings say the audio
recording system was also turned off.
Later,
the man was charged with refusing to take a sobriety test and with his second
DWI within 10 years. The Washington Post is not naming the man because charges
against him have been dismissed.
Under
Fairfax County police general orders, officers are required to test their audio
and video recording equipment before a shift and utilize both during traffic
stops. Officers are also encouraged to film sobriety tests.
Martinez
could not immediately be reached for comment. Fairfax police declined to
discuss the specific cases that were dismissed or the judge’s ruling. But
county police spokesman Don Gotthardt noted that “there is no specific
requirement that the officer conducting a sobriety stop keep the subject within
view of the camera.”
Clingan
said the officer testified that he moved suspects off camera to perform
sobriety tests in some instances to find level ground. He also testified he was
reluctant to leave the suspects alone to swivel the camera in the proper
direction to film the tests.
Attorneys
said there were disagreements between the defendants and Martinez about factual
matters, but there was no evidence that the officer intentionally conducted the
tests out of view of the camera.
“The
fact that the client’s versions differed so much from officer’s versions was
probably a deciding factor for the court,” attorney Justin J. Weiss said.
“However, it was clear that the court found a pattern of inadvertent failure to
follow proper procedures with the audio and dashcam.”
Why won’t Fairfax give answers in 2009 police shooting?
Letters
to the Editor
My
son, David Alan Masters, was killed by Fairfax County police on Nov. 13, 2009,
while at a traffic light in Fairfax County. Officer David A. Ziants, who had
been following my son for about a mile, reached into the rear window and fired;
one shot killed David almost instantly. David was unarmed. Mr. Ziants told
investigators he thought he was chasing a car thief.
Last
week, Fairfax County released a dashboard-camera video of the incident. Two
officers in another police cruiser were present at the shooting. They reacted
with shock at Mr. Ziants’s actions: “The [expletive] you doing, dude?”
The
video, released almost six years after the shooting, is the first information
released by Fairfax County authorities. Countless requests for investigative
reports under the Freedom of Information Act have been rejected by the police
and the county. What are they afraid of six years after the event?
Mr.
Ziants was fired for improper use of deadly force. But why has he not been
prosecuted? Why have the reports not been released? I am calling for an end to
this conspiracy of silence concerning the death of my son. I am calling for
justice.
Barrie
Masters, Sanford, Fla.
Philadelphia's Osage Avenue police bombing, 30 years on: 'This story is a parable'
On
13 May 1985, Philadelphia police moved in to arrest four members of a radical
black liberation group called Move – but a bungled raid left 11 people dead.
Alan Yuhas revisits the only aerial bombing carried out by police on US soil
Six
adults and five children were killed in the raid.
By
Alan Yuhas
Alan
Yuhas @alanyuhas
Sodden
from the spray of fire hoses, terrified by the thousands of bullets fired above
and the teargas floating into the cellar below, 13-year-old Michael Ward was
hiding under a blanket when a police helicopter dropped a bomb on the roof of
his west Philadelphia home.
The
raid killed six adults and five children, destroyed more than 60 homes and left
more than 250 people homeless. It stands as the only aerial bombing carried out
by police on US soil.
The
30-year anniversary of the bombing of Osage Avenue will be commemorated without
Ward, who was one of only two survivors of the disastrous assault. Instead
professor Cornel West, author Alice Walker and others will give speeches and
protesters will march down the crumbling, mostly abandoned block where the
bombing took place, drawing ties between police brutality and institutional
racism then and now.
On
13 May 1985, police moved in to arrest four members of a group called Move, a
mostly black, radical organization that believed in shedding technology and
“manmade law” in favor of “natural law”. After years of antagonism with police,
Move had fortified a rowhome on Osage Avenue as their headquarters. They
boarded up walls, built a bunker on the roof, and broadcast their anti-police
ethos through a bullhorn, night and day.
Neighbors
in the predominantly black, middle-class neighborhood complained about the
profane tirades and how Move’s children rifled alongside rats through the
house’s compost and garbage. Then district attorney Ed Rendell authorized
arrest warrants and mayor Wilson Goode sent in police.
“Were
we wanted for rape, robbery, murder? No, nothing,” Ramona Africa, the only
living Move survivor of that day, told the Guardian. Africa linked the bombing
to the recent police killings of Michael Brown, Eric Garner and Freddie Gray:
“These people that take an oath that swear to protect, save lives – the cops
don’t defend poor people, poor white, black, Latino people. They don’t defend
us, they kill us.
Advertisement
“All
you have to do is look at the rash of police murders and the cops not being
held accountable,” she added. “That should really alarm and outrage people, but
the thing is that it’s happening today because it wasn’t stopped in ‘85. The
only justice that can be done is people seeing this system for what it is.”
Hundreds
of officers, several fire trucks and a bomb squad arrived that day, with
military-grade weapons in tow. They first tried to flush out the house with
firehoses. A team then blew holes in the walls to funnel in teargas, but no one
budged.
“Then
they just began insanely shooting, over 10,000 rounds of bullets, according to
their own estimates,” Africa said. “That didn’t work, and that’s when they
dropped the bomb on us, a rowhouse in an urban neighborhood.”
“The
story is a parable of sorts; it’s a parable of how the unthinkable comes to
happen,” said Jason Osder, the director of the documentary Let the Fire Burn.
“It’s a tragedy. In my opinion everyone who was an adult in the city failed
that day. Move failed, the police failed, the neighbors failed those children
in some ways. Collectively, the whole city failed.”
Osder
noted that police still remembered an officer killed in an altercation with
Move seven years earlier, and that leadership was unwilling to risk any
officer’s life. “Fear is real regardless of how illegitimate it is, and police
felt that they are the wounded party.
“And
on the other side people have been beaten and arrested, who fear that the
justice system is rigged – not an unreasonable thing to think in 1985 or 2015.”
Eventually
police tried to break the siege by bombing the bunker, which they feared would
allow Move to fire on them with impunity.
“There
was a real opportunity there for cooler heads to prevail,” Osder said. “But
they decided it needed to be over.”
The
bomb missed and started a fire. Africa and Ward – then called Birdie Africa –
only fled the cellar an hour or so later when the fire had spread downstairs.
“That’s
when we tried to get our children, ourselves, our animals out of that inferno,”
she said, “but every time we tried to come out and we were hollering to come
out the police opened fire.”
Much
of what happened during the assault is disputed, including whether police shot
at people who were trying to flee the house, despite the review commission that
later investigated the disaster.
Officers
have since described the scene as one of surreal chaos. “There’s so much fire
and smoke,” former officer Jim Berghaier told Philadelphia Magazine. “We can’t
tell what’s gunshots and what’s windows popping.
“It
was like fantasy. Like he came out of fire,” Berghaier said, referring to Ward
stepping out through the flames barefoot.
Firefighters
refrained from dousing the blaze even as it spread to neighbors’ homes, a point
that outrages Africa still: “How is it they could pour 40,000lbs of water per
minute on us when there was no fire, but when there is fire all of a sudden
they can’t use it?”
Since
1985 it’s changed, absolutely. But progress? I don’t know. Keep on it
Taking
responsibility for the episode but declining to dole out specific blame, Goode
only said “there was a decision to let the fire burn”.
The
commission’s final report denounced the city from top to bottom. Police tactics
were “grossly negligent” at best, the report found, and outrageous at worst:
“Dropping a bomb on an occupied row house was unconscionable.” Police would not
have done so, the commission noted with only one dissenter, “had the Move house
and its occupants been situated in a comparable white neighborhood.”
Africa
was convicted on riot charges and served seven years in prison; in 1996 she and
other plaintiffs won a total $1.5m settlement from the city. Ward was placed to
his father’s custody and died in 2013 after years of therapy for the bombing
and his experiences with Move.
The
commission recommended grand jury investigations, but no one was ever
prosecuted. Goode was re-elected in 1987 and Rendell eventually became mayor.
Berghaier quit the force shortly after the raid.
Race,
class and the status of police and officials all came into play, Osder said,
noting the relatively high proportion of black officers in the force and that
Move’s black neighbors despised the group. “It’s absolutely about race every
single day of the week,” he said. “But there are other dynamics too. The
details matter, and you have to get into them.
“We
have echoes of Ferguson and Baltimore and haven’t solved these problems, but
every incident is unique. This country is very complicated. It’s certainly
better than it was 200 years ago, and than it was 100 years ago. Since 1985
it’s changed, absolutely. But progress? I don’t know. Keep on it.”
A
recent Justice Department review of Philadelphia’s use of force – requested by
current police commissioner Charles Ramsey in 2013 – found systemic, unresolved
deficiencies similar to those analyzed by the Move commission in 1986, said
Greg McDonald, the attorney who was deputy director and legal counsel for the
commission.
“I
was struck how many DoJ recommendations were right out of the assessments from
the commission, and not just the police but the city government and services,”
McDonald said, listing some shared findings: “Federal authorities supplying
military equipment to urban police departments, the lack of preparation and
training.
“We’ve
got a lot of real tinderboxes in large cities now. Move was certainly not a
normal neighborhood problem, but the police reaction to it was so overdone that
it reminded me of the way that police actions taking place at a much smaller
scale are also overreactions.”
Getting away with murder...again
(CNN)
The
killer cop, Matt Kenny has had “use of force” issues since 2011. He was
exonerated in the fatal shooting of a 48-year-old man in 2007, in what the
records said was a "suicide by cop" incident. Kenny, now 45, kneed a
domestic violence suspect in the torso during a 2011 arrest, and kneed another
man and pinned him to the ground in 2013.
Police officials say that on
the night of the shooting, Kenny was called to an apartment over reports that
Robinson had been jumping in front of cars and assaulting people.
After hearing some commotion,
Kenny forced his way into the apartment and was attacked by Robinson, according
to police. Kenny responded by pulling out his gun and shooting Robinson, police
officials say.
According to the Wisconsin
State Journal, Robinson’s friends and family members have said he took
hallucinogenic mushrooms and was behaving erratically the day he was killed.
They reject the idea that Robinson was a threat to Kenny when he was shot, the newspaper
reports.
Officer Matt Kenny of the Madison Police
Department will not face charges over the shooting of 19-year-old Tony
Robinson, District Attorney Ismael Ozanne said today.
"I conclude that this
tragic and unfortunate death was the result of a lawful use of deadly police
force and that no charges should be brought against Officer Kenny in the death
of Tony Robinson Jr.," Ozanne said.
"My decision will not
bring Tony Robinson Jr. back," Ozanne told reporters. "My decision
will not end the racial disparities that exist in the justice system, in our justice
system. My decision is not based on emotion. Rather, this decision is based on
the facts as they have been investigated and reported to me."
Robinson, an unarmed biracial
man, was fatally shot by Kenny on March 6 in Madison, Wisconsin, setting off
days of protests in the city. His death came amid lingering tensions over the
killings by police elsewhere of other unarmed African-Americans that seized
national attention
Deputy gave less than two seconds before firing...and the punk will get away with it too...watch and see.
Dashcam Video Shows Police
Responding to 9-1-1 Call, Show Up and Immediately Shoot the Victim
By Cassandra Fairbanks on May
12, 2015
Hollywood, SC– Newly released
dashcam footage captured a disturbing scene as Deputies Keith Tyner and Richard
Powell of the Charleston County Sheriff’s Department arrived at the home of
26-year-old Bryant Heyward, who had just been the victim of a home
invasion. Heyward had fended off the two
intruders who were threatening his home and his life, only to be critically
shot and paralyzed by those who he had desperately called for help.
On May 7, Heyward frantically
called the police to report two men attempting to break into his home. After calling the police, he called his
brother, who informed him that there was a gun in his bedroom. The suspects shot at Heyward twice, and he
returned fire, nobody was harmed, but the intruders were successfully chased
off.
“I didn’t want to shoot but I
had to,” he said.
After arriving on the scene,
the officers saw Heyward, who was still holding the weapon, and screamed “show
me your hands, show me your hands.” Immediately following the demand, one of
the officers began shooting at the innocent man- less than 2 seconds after
initiating contact.
Heyward is still hospitalized,
unable to speak or move his legs, his family told ABC that he is now paralyzed.
Heyward’s shooting was the 17th officer-involved shooting in South
Carolina this year. Last year, there were 42 officer-involved shootings in the state.
In April, a woman successfully
defended herself after her estranged husband broke into her mother’s home and
attempted to kill her. When the police
that her mother called arrived at the home, they shot her.
In February, a mother of two
called 9-1-1 to report intruders and the police showed up and killed her.
In October, a black teen with
white parents was assaulted by police in his own home because they believed he
was a robber.
In September, a man called
9-1-1 to report vandals in his home. The
police showed up and killed him.
Only in the Washington DC area would local government decide that the best way to solve a government created problem is to bring in more government.
Only in the Washington DC area would local government decide that the best way to solve a government created problem is to bring in more government.
That’s exactly what Sharon Bulova is doing in creating a toothless tiger-publicity stunt called the Police Commission which Bulova and the Board of Supervisors slapped together after the John Geer killing became yet another international black eye for Fairfax County. (Yep…the Geer killing made the news in Europe, Asia and Australia)
Sadly, the investigation into the killing began only after a United States Senator from a different state forced the Board of Supervisors County to investigate the killing…..and they did……they leaped into action by ASKING the cops if they would consider investigating themselves and then, essentially, apologized for asking.
In the real world when you don’t do your job you get fired. In the real world when you kill people, there’s an investigation. In the real world when a man dies, somebody pays hell….but not in Fairfax County where the politicians elected to serve and protect the people instead fear, protect and serve the cops and the cops kill innocent every twenty to twenty five months….and get away with it.
We need to start firing people and should start with the Board of Supervisors because we elect and pay the Supervisors to keep things in check and they haven’t done
that….repeatedly. Instead of governing correctly, when the arrogant occupation force that is the Fairfax County Police kills unarmed citizens, the Supervisors write a massive seven figure check from public and no one is fired and no one goes to jail. And now as the election grows closer and the bodies pile up, we suddenly have a massive police committee we don’t need that is empowered to do nothing.
To justify their needless committee the Supervisors claim they’re using the committee to examine use of force. Creating a panel on use-of-force by the Fairfax County Police isn’t needed largely because, although the problem exists, it just barely exists. The Fairfax County Police killing innocent and unarmed citizens is an anomaly and always will be. The department handles thousands of calls a year and rarely gets involved in gun play and when they do, it’s almost always the bad guys who start shooting first.
Factually, the Fairfax County Police are, comparative to other forces of the same size, a sparkling example of what urban policing should be. (To see a bad example of urban policing look at San Diego, San Jose, Baltimore, Cleveland and Chicago which will pay out HALF- BILLION this year in police brutality suits.
The Fairfax Police department seems to oversee itself well enough and when it doesn’t, it gets in trouble. (See the Polsi killings, the Sean Lanigan frame up, the Geer killing and the guy they shot to death for stealing a fake tree……yeah, that actually happened)
As for transparency, what freedom of information doesn’t get released, the courts will order released. The Geer case has proven that. And again, the Geer case is an abnormal occurrence in the day to day activity of the Fairfax County Police, which, for the most part, does a better than average job of staying in touch with citizenry.
The cop’s near artistic stonewalling is generally done in high profile court cases under the advice of legal counsel because it’s an ugly but legitimate legal tactic used regularly in the justice system and especially helpful when dealing with a department instead of an individual. We can’t take that ploy from the cops because I want the right to stonewall in court. I don’t want that taken away from me. We can’t have one set of laws for the cops and one for the rest of us. ……although, if you think about it, it’s sorta what we have now anyway isn’t it?
But overall, the cops don’t get away with much. It’s a fact in some part due to the power of the press. Most of the local media has done an admirable job reporting the recent abuses by the Fairfax County Police.
On that subject, there are also several members of the media on the Bulova’s idiotic committee ….well, one of them is an television news representative which is sort of like a news organization but with attention-deficit issues,….but anyway, is it ethical for members of the media to be part of a board like this?
If it isn’t ethical it’s certainly uncomfortable and a little dangerious too. Nobody wants the press having coffee and donuts with the cops on a committee formed to keep anything bad from happening to the cops…the only ones who benefit from stuff like that are the cops. Look, America doesn’t expect a damn thing out of the press except this; when the reporters show up, the politicians and bureaucrats should get nervous. As long as that happens, the free press is doing its job and right now, that doesn’t look like what’s happening here in Fairfax County.
There are 12 cops and/or retired cops on this useless committee. In fact, half of the committee, fifteen members, are presently employed by the Fairfax County government or retired from the Fairfax County government ……do really you think they’re going bite the hand that feeds them or change anything at all?
And look where this thing is going…..….I mean putting Hairy Raorererer-er-er on the committee? Wasn’t he one of the primary architects of the insular arrogance that has brought the Fairfax County Police to the wrong kind of international attention?
Come on people…..a vampire IS NOT going to solve a robbery at the blood bank.
Look, we DO have solvable problems within the Fairfax County Police Department but we DON’T have systematic problems within the Fairfax County Police Department. Corruption within the ranks is virtually none existent and always has been. Brutality against citizens, entrapment and theft…… although they no doubt happen…..are rare.
So why do we need….God help us…yet another powerless window dressing committee?
In a way it doesn’t really matter. This committee, whose true purpose is to save Sharon Bulova’s career, will rubber a stamp a lot of things, take photos, eat a lot of donuts at our expense and eventually disappear. A few months later a cop will gun down another unarmed citizen, the Board of Supervisors will cut another massive check to the family, we’ll make international news again and then the citizens will demand Police oversight. And while police oversight is a grand idea, factually it doesn’t work. Check the national stats. There are about 200 civilian oversight committees around the US. Most are a joke and many others have been disbanded because they are ineffective and highly politicized like this monster incubating in Fairfax County.
Police oversight simply hasn’t worked nor does helicopter-intrusive committee work either.
You know what does work?
Body cameras work.
They are the kryptonite of punk cops everywhere.
Put cameras on them and be done with it.
We need to do this….we need to force every hood on the force to wear a camera. It’s a simple choice that boils down to this; keep on dolling out multi-million dollar checks to the dead guys family or spend a hell of a lot less the money on body cameras.
The concept of body cameras is simple. Stop the cops from saying or doing something stupid BEFORE they do it.
Forming a committee to talk about what stupid things the cops did AFTER they did it is just dumb, well it’s government worker-think ,which I suppose is basically the same thing.
Body cameras will put a quick end to the arrogance killing by the Fairfax County cops and it will put even a quicker end to the common perception that the FCP is staffed by a bunch of lazy punks with an attitude problem.
As I said before, the other way to solve this issue is to fire the people who hire the cops, the “I wasn’t aware there was a police problem” members of the board of supervisors….like Sharon Bulova. The fact is that had the Board of Supervisors acted on the issue of the cops shooting unarmed citizens several years ago, this wouldn’t be a problem today.
Fire the people who hire the cops and watch how quickly things change.
Bring in competent leaders FROM OUTSIDE THE DC AREA to run the department.
We predicted several years ago that under chief what’s-his-face…the bald guy who loves wearing that ridicules hat, that nothing would change but we were wrong.
Things did change.
They got worse.
Bring in a new police chief and new public safety director from outside the Fairfax County government Lifers club.
Bring in a police chief from the outside who is honest and relentless in seeking true attitude change. Create an office of internal affairs whose goal is not to protect the police department at all costs…that’s what we have now…..but one that will protect both the police department from unreasonable complaints and protect the citizens from unreasonable policing practices.
When a complaint is filed against a cop the complaint should not be removed from the cops file after 60 days as it is now. Rather the complaint should stay there for the length of the cop’s employment with the county.
Do we really need the expense of a Royal Fairfax County Police Navy for the Potomac? How about the Royal Fairfax County Police Air Force? Which is better for the county…..more roads, less traffic, smaller class room sizes and more teachers or the cops having a fleet of helicopters and boats to toy around with?
Disempower. Do the cops really have to go around scanning thousands license plates? Cut back the cop’s remarkably generous budget of $217 million dollars. If we’re going to pay the cops that kind of money at least require them to get an AA degree in criminal Justice.
Transform the cops from an occupation force…….87% of the cops live outside the county, hence the punk attitude….and turn them into a local police force by forcing them to live in Fairfax County. It’s a good idea because when there’s a chance one of these punk cops could run into the civilians they smart-mouthed at the local Safeway, the transformation from thug to police officer will be swift. The excuse that cops can’t afford to live in Fairfax County is a bald faced lie.
Back to Bulova’s pointless committee.
Who are these civilians on the committee? Are they qualified to judge whether a cop followed a department's rules governing use of force? Do civilians have any training to understand what the cop faces? Do they have any real world insights into an Officers split-second decision involving life or death?
The answer is no. Only cops have that ability and there comes a time when we simply have to trust the police to police themselves. So let the cops watch over the cops and allow the judicial system, a free press and the unflinching eye of a body camera watch over everyone else. That will work. That will correct the problem.

Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)















































