another insane cop.....we need federal mental health testing of all police candidates
New
Haven police chief resigns after two public outbursts where he
berated a waitress and threatened to shut down a football game
• Police
chief, Dean Esserman, visited the White House twice in the past year
• He
resigned after launching a tirade against waiting staff at a restaurant
• Esserman's
outburst was so severe it caused other diners to move tables
• He
threatened to cancel a Yale football game during his tenure as chief
By SIMON HOLMES FOR MAILONLINE
A Connecticut police chief who
was invited to the White House twice in the past year to discuss law
enforcement issues has resigned after being disciplined twice for berating people
in public.
New Haven Mayor Toni Harp
announced Tuesday that Police Chief Dean Esserman resigned by 'mutual
agreement' effective September 2. She also praised him for the city's declining
crime and violence.
'I'm grateful for the chief's
successful legacy,' Harp said in a statement.
'Public safety in New Haven is
improved after a return to grass roots community policing, productive
partnerships with other law enforcement agencies, and positive interaction with
community organizations.'
Esserman has apologized in the
past for public outbursts but it seems the last straw was a July confrontation
with a member of staff at Archie Moore’s bar and restaurant in New Haven.
Harp investigated the matter
after a witness said the chief's yelling prompted other diners to be asked to
move further away from his table.
Esserman is said have been
infuriated by poor service at the restaurant.
He faced a packed room at police
headquarters Tuesday afternoon, speaking briefly about his time as chief and
the dedication of officers in the city.
He said it was 'very important'
that he give those in attendance the 'respect they deserve,' and to let them
know in person that he was moving on.
'It has been a privilege to serve
Mayor Harp and work alongside the remarkable men and women of the New Haven
Department of Police Service, who no doubt have earned the title, 'New Haven's
Finest,'' Esserman said.
'Last and certainly not least, it
has been my privilege to serve the wonderful people of New Haven.'
Esserman agreed in July to go on
three weeks of paid leave and then went on temporary sick leave amid the latest
allegations from the local restaurant.
This is not the first time the
police chief has been caught up in controversy. Two years ago, Harp reprimanded
Esserman for his angry confrontation with a Yale Bowl usher.
When he was police chief in
Providence, Rhode Island, in 2011, Esserman was suspended without pay for one
day for what media reports said was a threat to throw coffee in the face of a
sergeant who was coughing during a speech by Esserman.
Officers in both New Haven and
Providence voted no confidence in Esserman, accusing him of publicly berating
officers, intimidation, favoritism and retaliation, among other things.
Esserman, a Dartmouth College
graduate who never served as a rank-and-file officer, is a protege of New York
City Police Commissioner William Bratton, former chief of the Los Angeles
police and former Boston police commissioner.
He previously served as an
assistant prosecutor in Brooklyn, New York, assistant police chief in New Haven
from 1991 to 1993, police chief for the Metro-North Railroad and police chief
in Stamford, Connecticut.
He became New Haven chief in 2011.
Esserman was among 30 law
enforcement officials, civil rights activists and other people invited to a
White House discussion in July on improving police-community relations. He also
attended a White House discussion on reducing incarceration across the country
in October.
Assistant Chief Anthony Campbell
will continue to serve as Interim police chief in New Haven.
Yet more cops arrested for child rape: This is a national police-molest kid epidemic
7
Current and Former Bay Area Officers to Be Charged in Sexual Misconduct Case
(OAKLAND, Calif.) — Prosecutors said
Friday they will charge seven current and former San Francisco Bay Area
officers in a sexual misconduct scandal involving a teenager.
The wide-ranging scandal surfaced
when a teenage girl who described herself as a prostitute said she had sex with
about 30 law enforcement officials in Oakland and elsewhere in the region.
Alameda County District Attorney
Nancy O’Malley said she was waiting to formally file charges until the teen
could be returned to California from Florida, where she has been jailed in an
assault case.
The prosecutor said she needs the
teen to provide testimony in the case.
O’Malley said the officers who
will be charged are former Contra Costa sheriff’s Deputy Ricardo Perez; former
Livermore police Officer Dan Black; Oakland police Officers Brian Bunton,
Giovani LoVerde and Warit Utappa; and former Oakland police Officers Tyrell
Smith and Leroy Johnson.
The officers will be charged with
a range of felonies and misdemeanors, O’Malley said.
The teen, now 19, said she had
sex with four officers before she turned 18 and sometimes traded sex for
protection from arrest or tips about planned prostitution stings.
The Associated Press generally
doesn’t identify people who say they are victims of sex crimes.
O’Malley said she found much of
the conduct “morally reprehensible” but noted the actions of the officers on
social media did not violate criminal statutes.
Oakland Mayor Libby Schaaf
previously said disciplinary action has begun against a dozen officers,
including dismissal proceedings against four.
Seven will serve a range of
unpaid suspensions before being allowed to return to duty and another will be
required to attend training classes.
The Oakland department previously
said two officers implicated in the scandal had resigned and another killed
himself last year.
The department cycled through
three chiefs in 10 days in June after the allegations were first reported in
the media.
Six Richmond police officers and
personnel at other law enforcement agencies have also been implicated.
A Livermore officer who had been
on administrative leave resigned Thursday after seeing the results of his
department’s investigation.
Letters to the Editor (Washington Post)
We cannot ignore the need for
serious reform of law enforcement
Another police shooting in
Fairfax County, this time of a mentally disturbed man who had told a police
officer earlier on the day he was shot that he was suicidal [“Family of man
shot by Fairfax deputy says he had sought help,” Metro, Aug 25]. Is this going
to be the tipping point where we actually make changes so that citizens in
crisis don’t get killed and our law enforcement officers don’t kill them?
The fatal shooting of Giovanny
Martinez was outrageous. So were the deaths of Natasha McKenna, a mentally ill
inmate who died in the Fairfax County jail last year, andJohn B. Geer, who was
shot in the doorway of his Springfield home in 2013. Shoot-to-kill is not an
acceptable way to defuse a crisis, and the police in Fairfax County (and
elsewhere) need better tools and training to serve and protect the community.
Non-lethal technology exists, so
why isn’t it being used in these types of situations? There is no good excuse
when the alternative is the death of someone’s loved one. The Martinez family
is mourning this time, but it easily could be any of us. After the requisite
investigation, let’s have the courage to make some real changes this time.
Benjamin W. Glass III, Fairfax
Station
Why? Because they can get away with murder and they know, that's why
Fairfax County Deputy Who Shot
Hospital Patient Also Linked to 2015 Death
A Virginia deputy who fatally
shot a hospital patient wielding a metal sign post was also involved in the
death of an inmate last year shot multiple times with a stun gun.
Police on Thursday identified
Patrick McPartlin, an 18-year veteran of the Fairfax County Sheriff's Office,
as the deputy who shot and killed Jovany Martinez outside Inova Fairfax
Hospital last month.
McPartlin is on administrative
leave while the shooting is investigated. Police say Martinez was having a
mental episode and had already injured one person when he charged McPartlin
with the post.
McPartlin was also part of a team
that restrained Natasha McKenna last year as she was removed from a jail cell.
McKenna, who also suffered from mental illness, died after receiving four Taser
shots during a 15-miunte struggle.
"Deputy McPartlin pulled her
legs out from under her and took her to the ground," according to a report
released by the Office of the Commonwealth's Attorney after McKenna's death.
McPartlin is mentioned a total of
nine times in the report.
Atlanta officer James Burns indicted for murder of Deravis Caine Rogers
Rogers, 22, was unarmed and
sitting in his car when Burns shot him in the head and killed him, and dashcam
video showed ‘no provocation’ for the shooting
Former Atlanta police officer
James Burns was indicted by a grand jury Wednesday for the murder of Deravis
Caine Rogers.
Rogers, 22, was sitting in his
car when Burns shot him in the head and killed him, and dashcam video showed
“no provocation” for the shooting, according to the police investigation.
Despite the overwhelming evidence
in his case, the indictment marks a shift in prosecutions of police killings,
both nationally and in Georgia.
A 2014 Wall Street Journal
analysis found that over a seven-year period ending in 2011, just 41 people
were charged nationwide. For Georgia, Burns is now the second law enforcement
officer in over five years to be indicted for killing a civilian while on duty.
The previous indictment took place earlier this year, when former Dekalb County
police officer Robert Olsen was charged with the murder of Anthony Hill, also
young, unarmed and black.
“Though nothing can bring our son back, we
know this is a powerful first step,” Rogers’ parents said in a statement after
the indictment.
Georgia’s grand jury
investigations in officer-involved shootings like have been the subject of
significant backlash: until a new law passed this year, officers in Georgia
were allowed to sit in on the entire hearing, including the prosecution’s
evidence against them, and had the opportunity to make a statement at the end
without being challenged or questioned – privileges granted to officers only in
Georgia.
The law was cited as one symptom
of a justice system that did not hold one officer responsible for police
shootings over a more than five-year period. Of 184 Georgians shot and killed
by police officers since 2010 – nearly half of whom were unarmed or shot in the
back – none of the officers involved were indicted, according to an Atlanta
Journal-Constitution investigation last year.
The new law curtailing these
privileges took effect on 1 July this year, but because Rogers was killed prior
to that it did not affect this hearing.
In the hours before the
indictment was announced, roughly 200 people gathered for a vigil that lasted
24 hours before and during James Burns’ hearing. Supporters stayed outside the
Fulton County courthouse overnight, and held signs listing the names of people
killed at the hands of cops. The list included Jamarion Robinson, a 26-year-old
shot and killed by US marshals last month while being served arrest warrants.
“We know that we’ve got to continue
fighting to make sure that he is sent to jail,” said Dre Norman, who stayed
outside the courthouse overnight, referring to Burns.
Burns was charged with two
violations of oath of office, aggravated assault, felony murder, and making a
false statement.
Shean Williams, a partner at the
Cochran Law Firm, placed blame on the police department for failing “to provide
adequate training and discipline to officer Burns” such that it is “ultimately
responsible for the death of Caine Rogers through the actions of officer
Burns”.
After Rogers’ death, Xochitl
Bervera, director of the Racial Justice Action Center, called on Atlanta police
chief George Turner to take responsibility for his department’s role in the
incident.
“Chief Turner needs to
acknowledge that killings happen when officers are trained to see community
members as enemies and neighborhoods as combat zones to occupy,” she said.
“Until we get rid of broken window policing and policing for profit, we will
continue to see officers violating the rights of – and sometimes ending the
lives of – our friends, neighbors and fellow residents.”
When asked about changes to
training protocol since Rogers death, Atlanta police spokesperson Sgt Warren
Pickard answered:
“The actions that Burns took in
this incident were the result of his decision-making, not as a result of
training.”
Why are so many cops involved with kiddie porn?
...including the spokesman for the Fairfax County police?
Department of Justice
U.S. Attorney’s Office
Western District of Tennessee
________________________________________
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
Monday, August 29, 2016
Former Millington Reserve Officer
Receives 26 Years for Producing Child Pornography
Memphis, TN – A former Millington
reserve police officer has been sentenced to serve more than a quarter century
in federal prison for producing child pornography of three female minors. The
defendant also transported a minor across state lines with intent to engage in
unlawful sexual activity. Edward L. Stanton III, U.S. Attorney for the Western
District of Tennessee, announced the sentence today.
"Anyone who chooses to prey
on the most vulnerable members of our society deserves to be behind bars,"
said U.S. Attorney Stanton. "As a former reserve police officer, Friar was
sworn to serve and protect the citizens of our community from crime. But he
broke that oath to satisfy his own abhorrent fetishes, and will spend the next
26 years in federal prison because of his egregious acts."
According to information
presented in court, on July 13, 2015, a Shelby County Sheriff’s Office Deputy
responded to a call at the Millington residence of Rickie Friar, 67. The call
was made by Friar’s housekeeper, who had stopped by the defendant’s residence
to do some chores. Friar was out of town at the time. While there, a female
minor who accompanied the housekeeper opened Friar’s iPad and showed the
housekeeper sexually explicit images of children who regularly spent time with
Friar.
A forensic examination of Friar’s
iPad, along with other electronic devices seized during a search of his
residence revealed additional videos and images of female minors engaged in
sexually explicit conduct. Friar is visible in some of the images and videos,
and his voice can be heard in others. The videos and images were produced
between July 2013 and May 2015. Two of the victims were under 12 years old at
the time; one was under the age of 18 years old.
Hours after his housekeeper
notified law enforcement of what had been seen on Friar’s iPad, Friar was
located in Arkansas, returning from a trip to Oklahoma. He had a female minor
with him. Law enforcement agents found receipts, dated a day or two earlier,
for sex toys and lubricant in Friar’s vehicle.
In May 2016, Friar pleaded guilty
before U.S. District Judge John T. Fowlkes Jr. to:
• one count of knowingly
transporting a minor under the age of 18 years old between the states of
Tennessee and Oklahoma for the purpose of engaging in sexual activity;
• tw0 counts of attempting to and
knowingly using a female minor under 12 years old to engage in sexually
explicit conduct for the purpose of producing a visual depiction of such
conduct;
• one count of attempting to and
knowingly using a female minor under the age of 18 years old to engage in
sexually explicit conduct.
On Monday, August 29, 2016, Judge
Fowlkes sentenced Friar to 312 months in federal prison.
This case was investigated by the
Memphis Child Exploitation Task Force. The collective is comprised of the
Federal Bureau of Investigation; Homeland Security Investigations; Shelby
County Sheriff's Department; Memphis Police Department; U.S. Postal
Investigation Service; U.S. Marshals Service; and the U.S. Secret Service.
Assistant U.S. Attorney Debra
Ireland prosecuted this case on the government’s behalf.
Anyone who believes they may have
information about this case or related activities is asked to contact the
Memphis Child Exploitation Task Force at 901.747.4300.
This case was brought as part of Project
Safe Childhood (PSC), a nationwide initiative launched in May 2006 by the
Department of Justice to combat the growing epidemic of child sexual
exploitation and abuse. Led by the United States Attorneys' Offices and the
Criminal Division's Child Exploitation and Obscenity Section, PSC marshals
federal, state, and local resources to locate, apprehend, and prosecute
individuals who sexually exploit children, and to identify and rescue victims.
For more information about PSC, please visit http://www.justice.gov/psc/. For
more information about internet safety education, please visit
http://www.justice.gov/psc/resources.html and click on the tab
"resources."
Joseph Patrick Gamerl of the Fairfax County PoliceAccused of Soliciting Minors for Sex
Former Police Captain Accused of Soliciting Minors for Sex
The former captain was arrested in June on charges he
inappropriately touched a 10-year-old girl
By Jackie Bensen
A former police captain is behind bars for a second time this
summer after police believe he solicited minors for sex online.
Fairfax County Police said 53-year-old Joseph Patrick Gamerl, of
Fairfax, Virginia, had been arrested in June on charges he inappropriately
touched a 10-year-old girl and exposed himself.
According to search warrants obtained by News4, Gamerl was then
fired from his contractor job for the Department of Justice Office of Diversion
Control.
In a routine screening of his work laptop, the Office of
Professional Responsibility found a child pornography image, according to
documents.
"Our detectives were able to obtain more evidence, especially
electronic evidence that showed that there's more victims out there, possibly
with ties to the Loudoun County or Prince William County areas," said
Fairfax County Police Officer Monica Meeks.
Gamerl used to be a police captain in North Miami Beach before
moving to Fairfax, Virginia.
Authorities said anyone who may have information about Gamerl's
contact with any children should call police.
In Police Misconduct Lawsuits, Potent Incentives Point to a Payout
By ALAN FEUERAUG. 16, 2016
When lawsuits against the police
are settled, like the one announced this week in which New York City agreed to
pay $4 million to the family of Akai Gurley, people tend to focus on the amount
of money changing hands. Sometimes overlooked are the institutional reforms
embedded in the deals, and the difficult decisions made by plaintiffs and their
lawyers in trading a full public airing of the facts for the recovery of
damages.
In many police misconduct cases,
the victims and their families are people of limited means for whom a
six-figure check could be life-changing. At the same time, lawyers said, those
who file, and settle, such suits belong to what might be called a community of
the wronged, and often have a strong desire to tell their stories or force the
system to change.
“Frequently, plaintiffs in these
cases are badly damaged and want or even need compensation,” said Barry Scheck,
a lawyer who helped negotiate the $9 million settlement for Abner Louima, a
Haitian immigrant who was sexually assaulted by the police with a broomstick
inside a Brooklyn station house in 1997. “But you have to trade that off
sometimes with their aspirations to expose what happened, and to find
solutions.”
Mr. Louima’s suit, which was
filed against the city and its main police union, was a rare example of
litigation that produced enormous monetary damages and real alterations to
policing policy. When the settlement was reached in 2001, Mr. Louima said that
he had dropped his three-year battle because he was convinced that the city and
the union had started to improve the ways the Police Department trained,
monitored and disciplined its officers.
Ultimately, the decision of
whether to settle a suit or to air the facts of the case, hoping to both win a
judgment and secure reform, is up to the client, said Scott Rynecki, who
handled the suit involving Mr. Gurley, an unarmed man killed two years ago by
an officer on patrol in a Brooklyn public housing project.
“Our primary job is to get our
clients” — in this case, it was Mr. Gurley’s domestic partner, Kimberly
Ballinger, and their daughter — “a decent recovery,” Mr. Rynecki said. “If the
recovery is fair, we have an obligation not to go forward just to ‘go
forward.’”
Mr. Rynecki said it was also
important to create a public record and push for structural change. As part of
his negotiations with the city, he said, he urged officials to improve training
at the Police Academy in areas like firearms handling and emergency medical
care. “I have made repeated calls for this, both in public and in private, with
politicians and on TV,” he said. “It’s a constant mantra. We have the greatest
police force in country, but that doesn’t mean it can’t be improved.”
In Mr. Gurley’s case, as in some
others, litigation was preceded by an extensive criminal trial which produced a
detailed narrative about everything that had happened. Sometimes, the
revelatory nature of a criminal proceeding can persuade a plaintiff, like Ms.
Ballinger, that she does not need her day in civil court. But sometimes, even a
long criminal trial can leave the record incomplete.
Howard Hershenhorn, a lawyer who
represented the family of Amadou Diallo, a Guinean immigrant who was shot 41
times by the police in 1999, said he “had no choice but to fully litigate the
civil case” because the officers who had killed Mr. Diallo were acquitted and
the story of his client’s death was never fully told. Working with his
partners, Mr. Hershenhorn took numerous depositions during the case’s discovery
phase, unearthing information that never emerged fully at the criminal trial.
Much of it concerned the Street Crimes Unit, a plainclothes patrol in the
Police Department that employed the officers who shot Mr. Diallo and was eventually
disbanded.
“We never would have settled the
case without assurances from the right people that that would happen,” Mr.
Hershenhorn said. “The unit was on its way to being disbanded because of
information that we produced in discovery and that, frankly, the city didn’t
know.”
Since by definition plaintiffs in
these cases have suffered the apparent trauma of personal injury or the death
of a loved one, there are powerful incentives to take a settled payout and not
relive it all at trial.
“These cases aren’t easy for the
plaintiffs; they’re very difficult and emotional,” said Jonathan Moore, a
lawyer who won a $5.9 million settlement in a lawsuit by the family of Eric
Garner, who died after an officer placed him in a chokehold while arresting him
for selling untaxed cigarettes on Staten Island. “It may not be exactly what
they want, but settling a case at least puts an end to it.”
Then there is the question of the
money, which can be a godsend for plaintiffs.
“More often than not, when we
first meet our clients they tell us in all sincerity that ‘it’s not about the
money,’ but in the end, even a jury verdict is a dollar figure,” said Andrew
Stoll, who has represented several plaintiffs in police misconduct cases. “It’s
the rare victim that has the luxury of refusing that money to make a bigger
point.”
Racial bias isn't the problem...the quality of cops and the lack of mental wellness in cops is the problem
U.S. Justice Department to Release
Blistering Report of Racial Bias by Baltimore Police
By RICHARD A. OPPEL Jr., SHERYL
GAY STOLBERG and MATT APUZZOAUG. 9, 2016
The Justice Department has found
that the Baltimore Police Department for years has hounded black residents who
make up most of the city’s population, systematically stopping, searching and
arresting them, often with little provocation or rationale.
In a blistering report, coming
more than a year after Baltimore erupted into riots over the police-involved
death of a 25-year-old black man, Freddie Gray, the Justice Department is
sharply critical of policies that encouraged police officers to charge black
residents with minor crimes. A copy of the report was obtained by The New York
Times.
The critique is the latest
example of the Obama administration’s aggressive push for police reforms in
cities where young African-American men have died at the hands of law
enforcement.
The findings, to be released
Wednesday, are the first formal step toward the Justice Department’s reaching a
settlement with Baltimore — known as a “consent decree” — in which police
practices would be overhauled under the oversight of a federal judge. The
department started the inquiry at the invitation of Mayor Stephanie
Rawlings-Blake.
To show how officers disproportionately
stopped black pedestrians, the report cited the example of a black man in his
mid-50s who was stopped 30 times in less than four years. None of the stops led
to a citation or criminal charge. Black residents, the report said, accounted
for 95 percent of the 410 individuals stopped at least 10 times in the five and
a half years of data reviewed.
The most pronounced racial
disparities were in arrests for the most discretionary offenses: For example,
91 percent of those arrested solely for “failure to obey” or “trespassing” were
African-American, even though the city is 63 percent black, the report found.
In one telling anecdote from the
report, a shift commander provided officers with boilerplate language on how to
write up trespassing arrest reports of people found near housing projects. The
template contained an automatic description of the arrestee: “A BLACK MALE.”
“The supervisor’s template thus
presumes that individuals arrested for trespassing will be African-American,”
the report stated, describing the sort of detentions the language was intended
to facilitate as “facially unconstitutional.”
The report indicated that the
frequency of arrests without probable cause was reflected in the fact that
booking supervisors and prosecutors had declined to file charges, after arrests
by their own officers, more than 11,000 times since 2010.
Two weeks ago, Maryland
prosecutors dropped charges against the last of six officers charged in the
April 2015 death of Mr. Gray, who sustained a fatal spinal cord injury while in
custody. With that, Baltimore joined a growing list of cities where
police-involved deaths sparked outrage, and even riots, yet no one was held
accountable in court.
While no consent decree has been
reached, the report states that the city and the Justice Department have agreed
in principle to identify “categories of reforms the parties agree must be taken
to remedy the violations of the Constitution and federal law described in this
report.”
FINDINGS OF THE JUSTICE
DEPARTMENT REPORT
In its report, the Justice
Department concluded that the Baltimore Police Department “engaged in a pattern
or practice of conduct” that was unconstitutional or violated federal law,
including:
• Making
unconstitutional stops, searches, and arrests.
• Using
enforcement strategies of stops, searches and arrests that unfairly target
African-Americans.
• Using
excessive force.
• Retaliating
against people engaging in constitutionally-protected expression.
“I don’t think at this point,
it’s about justice for Freddie Gray anymore,” said Ray Kelly, a director of the
No Boundaries Coalition, a West Baltimore group that provided its own report on
police abuses to the Justice Department. “Now it’s about justice for our
community, for our people.”
City Councilman Brandon
Scott,vice chairman of the council committee that oversees the department, said
the next fight could be over how to pay for the police overhaul.
Baltimore is among nearly two
dozen cities that the Obama administration has investigated after they were
accused of widespread unconstitutional policing. Using its broad latitude to
enforce civil rights laws, the Justice Department has demanded wholesale change
in how cities conduct policing. In several cities, including Seattle;
Cleveland; and Ferguson, Mo., those investigations began in the aftermath of a
high-profile death that sparked protests and in some cases riots.
Police chiefs, prosecutors and
experts say the investigations have forced cities to address longstanding,
entrenched issues far beyond the targeted cities.
“Chiefs are constantly looking at
these reports, not just to learn lessons and best practices from each other,
but also what pitfalls we can avoid,” said Scott Thomson, the police chief in
Camden, N.J., who is also the president of the Police Executive Research Forum.
But court-ordered reform can take
years, which does little to ease the frustration of activists who say that
police officers too often go unpunished for deadly encounters with unarmed
people.
Sheriff Raids House to Find Anonymous Blogger Who Called Him Corrupt
Naomi
LaChance
AFTER
A WATCHDOG BLOG repeatedly linked him and other local officials to corruption and fraud, the Sheriff of
Terrebone Parish in Louisiana on Tuesday sent six deputies to raid a police
officer’s home to seize computers and other electronic devices.
Sheriff
Jerry Larpenter’s deputies submitted affidavits alleging criminal defamation
against the anonymous author of the ExposeDAT blog, and obtained search
warrants to seize evidence in the officer’s house and from Facebook.
The
officer, Wayne Anderson, works for the police department of Houma, the county
seat of Terrebone Parish — and according to New Orleans’ WWL-TV, formerly
worked as a Terrebone Sheriff’s deputy.
Anderson
was placed on paid leave about an hour and a half after the raid on his house,
Jerri Smitko, one of his attorneys, told The Intercept. She said that he has
not yet been officially notified about why.
Smitko
said Anderson denies that he is the author of ExposeDat.
But
free speech advocates say the blogger — whoever he or she is — is protected by
the First Amendment.
“The
law is very clear that somebody in their private capacity, on private time, on
their own equipment, has a First Amendment right to post about things of public
concern,” Marjorie Esman, director of the ACLU of Louisiana, told The
Intercept.
Larpenter
told WWL: “If you’re gonna lie about me and make it under a fictitious name,
I’m gonna come after you.”
Esman
said the Sheriff and his deputies were forgetting something. “The laws that they’re sworn to uphold
include the right to criticize and protest. Somehow there’s a piece in the
training that leads to them missing that.”
ExposeDAT
calls itself a “watchdog group,” posting articles that use public records to
identify institutional corruption in the Parish. Since it launched in late
June, it has accused various public officials and business owners of nepotism,
tax evasion, polluting and misuse of government funds.
It
promises to “introduce articles that explore the relationship between certain
Public Officials and the flow of money in South Louisiana.”
The
Sheriff’s office, in order to obtain the warrants, said the blog had criminally
defamed the Parish’s new insurance agent, Tony Alford, WWL reported.
One
ExposeDAT blog post titled “Gordon Dove and Tony Alford’s Radioactive Waste
Dumping,” briefly describes the relationship between Alford and the parish’s
president, who jointly own a Montana trucking company that has been cited for
dumping radioactive waste in Montana. That citation was originally reported in
the Missoula, Mont., newspaper The Missoulian.
In
a post titled “You Scratch Mine and I’ll Scratch Yours,” the blog uses public
records to call attention to the fact that Sheriff Larpenter gave Alford a
parish contract despite that fact that his wife manages Alford’s office.
“When
decent, law abiding citizens try to speak out on matters of public importance,
they’re treated like criminals,” Smitko said. “If this is what happens to a
police officer with 12 year of impeccable service what the hell kind of justice
do criminals get?”
The
Sheriff’s office, the police department and the district attorney’s office did
not return requests for comment.
This
isn’t the first time that Louisiana law enforcement officers have challenged
those who criticize them. In 2012, Bobby Simmons, a former police officer, was
arrested and jailed on a charge of criminal defamation for a letter he wrote to
a newspaper regarding another police officer. The charge was later dropped, and
Simmons filed a civil suit alleging that his civil rights were violated.
California Deputies Shoot Man Recording Them with Phone

Fearing for their lives, California deputiesopened fire on a man who wasrecording them with a cell phone from the garage of his home, claiming they thought it was a gun.
Sacramento County sheriff’s deputies then searched the man’s home, finding no guns, before they apologized and went on their way.
Fortunately, Danny Sanchez survived the shooting, ending up with only bullet fragments in his legs. And although deputies apologized to Sanchez,
they are pretty much unapologetic for their actions because, you know, officer safety.
The incident took place in Rancho Cordova as Sacramento County deputies were arresting Sanchez’s next-door neighbor after a two-hour standoff.
Let’s not forget that the only person accused of a crime in that situation was Ledford, whom they were already taking into custody when they shot Sanchez.
Gosh, is there anything that the cops AREN’T afraid of? I mean, rly, they only saw a damn CELL PHONE and started shooting… How are they meant to protect, if they’re getting feared so easily?
The problem is that cops aren’t held accountable for their actions, and they know it. These officers violate rights with impunity. They know there’s a different criminal justice system for civilians and police. Even when officers get caught, they know they’ll be investigated by their friends, and put on paid leave. My colleagues would laughingly refer to this as a free vacation. It isn’t a punishment. And excessive force is almost always deemed acceptable in our courts and among our grand juries.— former cop Redditt Hudson, “ The Washington Post
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)









































