The tip comes from
a confidential informer: Someone has a gun. Ten or more minutes later, police
officers find a man matching the informer’s detailed description at the
reported location. A gun is discovered; an arrest is made.
That narrative
describes how Jeffrey Herring was arrested last year by police officers in the
67th Precinct in East Flatbush, Brooklyn. It also describes the arrests of at
least two other men, Eugene Moore and John Hooper, by some of the same
officers.
The suspects said
the guns were planted by the police.
There were other
similarities: Each gun was found in a plastic bag or a handkerchief, with no
traces of the suspect’s fingerprints. Prosecutors and the police did not
mention a confidential informer until months after the arrests. None of the
informers have come forward, even when defense lawyers and judges have
requested they appear in court.
Taken
individually, the cases seem to be routine examples of differences between the
police account of an arrest and that of the person arrested. But taken
together, the cases — along with other gun arrests made in the precinct by
these officers — suggest a pattern of questionable police conduct and tactics.
Mr. Moore’s case
has already been dismissed; a judge questioned the credibility of one of the
officers, Detective Gregory Jean-Baptiste, saying he was “extremely evasive” on
the witness stand.
Mr. Hooper spent a
year in jail awaiting trial, eventually pleading guilty and agreeing to a
sentence of time served after the judge in his case called the police version
of events “incredible.”
In another
example, Lt. Edward Babington, one of the four officers in Mr. Herring’s case,
was involved in a federal gun case that was later dismissed and led to a
$115,000 settlement. In that case, a federal judge said she believed that the
“officers perjured themselves.”
Debora Silberman,
a public defender at Brooklyn Defender Services, has been fighting Mr.
Herring’s arrest, filing a two-inch-thick motion detailing the problems with
his case and the similarities to others.
On Thursday, after
inquiries from The New York Times, prosecutors said that they were
re-evaluating the case.
Ms. Silberman said
she had always believed Mr. Herring. “Nothing in his story has ever changed,”
she said.
Claims of
Fabrication
She and another
defense lawyer, Scott Hechinger, have suggested in court papers that a group of
officers invents criminal informers, and may be motivated to make false arrests
to help satisfy department goals or quotas. They also question whether the police
are collecting the $1,000 rewards offered to informers from Operation Gun Stop,
especially in cases where the informers never materialize.
Deputy Chief Kim
Y. Royster, a spokeswoman for the Police Department, said investigators from
the Internal Affairs Bureau were looking at the officers’ conduct in these
cases. “Any allegations that are made in regards to the credibility” of the
officers “are taken very seriously,” she said, adding that programs like Gun
Stop protected the anonymity of informers, and that there were layers of
oversight “to ensure that the integrity of the program is solid.”
While the
individual officers declined to comment or did not respond to requests for
comment, spokesmen for their unions noted that this group had removed more than
300 guns from the streets and the cases were solid.
Mr. Herring was
standing outside his apartment on the afternoon of June 4, 2013, next to his
bike, when, the police said, he reached into a white plastic bag and removed a
gun, putting it in a black plastic bag. He tossed that bag in the bushes — the
entire sequence witnessed by a plainclothes officer, the police said.
Mr. Herring said
he had been running errands, making stops at C-Town, Bargain Land and a dollar
store. When the police told him he was being arrested for gun possession, he
said, he was shocked.
Mr. Herring, 52,
had been arrested three other times, twice for drugs and once for burglary; he
had not been arrested again until this gun case, records show. He said that he
had not used drugs since 1997, and that he most certainly did not have a gun
when he was arrested in 2013.
“I’m in front of
the building,” he said, questioning the police’s account, “waving a gun like
some maniac?”
Ms. Silberman
first learned of potential problems with the officers’ credibility when
prosecutors in Mr. Herring’s case disclosed that testimony by Detective
Jean-Baptiste had been challenged by a judge in an evidence-suppression hearing
on a gun case in 2013.
Ms. Silberman
called the defense lawyer in that case, Jeffrey Chabrowe, and was surprised to
hear how similar the cases were.
Mr. Chabrowe’s
client, Eugene Moore, had been arrested on a gun possession charge by Detective
Jean-Baptiste, who is now retired, and Sgt. Vassilios Aidiniou. Those officers,
along with Lieutenant Babington and Officer Jean Gaillard, participated in Mr.
Herring’s arrest.
Like Mr. Herring,
Mr. Moore had been standing next to a bike in the afternoon, the police said,
and had stored a gun in a white plastic bag underneath containers of takeout
food. There was also a criminal informer involved, the police said.
Mr. Moore, who
could not afford bail, spent a year in jail before an October 2013 hearing on
the case. At that hearing, Detective Jean-Baptiste said the informer had told
the police that “they were with someone” with a gun in a white plastic bag, on
bikes, heading toward Rutland Road and Rockaway Parkway.
Police officers
arrived about 20 minutes later, and — even though the suspected gunman was
supposed to be bicycling — they found Mr. Moore standing at the same
intersection, next to a bicycle with a white bag on the handlebars.
Detective
Jean-Baptiste went on to give conflicting testimony about the informer and the
circumstances of the arrest. Justice William Harrington of State Supreme Court
in Brooklyn called the detective “extremely evasive” and said he did not find
him “to be credible.” The judge suppressed the gun evidence, and Mr. Moore’s
case was dismissed and sealed.
The Same Officers
Ms. Silberman then
found another case involving Lieutenant Babington, Detective Jean-Baptiste and
Sergeant Aidiniou, handled by a colleague at Brooklyn Defender Services, Renee
Seman.
In that case, Mr.
Hooper was standing on the street when Detective Jean-Baptiste, in
plainclothes, approached from behind, tipped off, the police said, by an
informer. At that very moment, the police said, Mr. Hooper reached into his
pocket, took out a gun wrapped in a red bandanna and threw it in the trash.
Prosecutors
declined to bring the confidential informer in that case to court, so a hearing
was held to determine if the officer’s observations sufficed as probable cause
for the arrest. In that hearing, in State Supreme Court in Brooklyn, Detective
Jean-Baptiste described how he had first seen a bulge in the shape of a gun in
the defendant’s pocket, even as he acknowledged that he was a car-length away
and that the defendant was wearing a long shirt and baggy pants.
“Supposedly this
defendant doesn’t see the police coming, but elects out of nowhere to take the
object out of his pants pocket and dump it in a garbage can?” Justice Guy J.
Mangano said. “I find it incredible that they thought it was a gun.”
Before Justice
Mangano made a decision in the case, the district attorney offered Mr. Hooper a
plea deal for time served — he had spent almost a year in jail — and Mr. Hooper
agreed.
Other questionable
cases arose.
In 2007, federal
prosecutors brought a case against Terry Cross, who was arrested after the
police saw him in the backyard of a house where drug dealing was suspected.
Officers found a gun in a gray plastic bag near where Mr. Cross was standing,
as well as marijuana, the police said. Gun and drug charges were filed.
In that case, too,
there was a confidential informer, the police said, and the defendant asked
prosecutors to bring that person to court. Prosecutors opposed the motion, and
later said the informer had died
.jpg)
