on sale now at amazon

on sale now at amazon
"I don't like this book because it don't got know pictures" Chief Rhorerer

“It’s becoming a disturbingly familiar scene in America - mentally unstable cops”

“It’s becoming a disturbingly familiar scene in America - mentally unstable cops”
“It’s becoming a disturbingly familiar scene in America - mentally unstable cops”

Dellwood Police Department Under Fire



Serious crimes, including rape cases and child abuse cases, in Dellwood, Missouri, have gone unprosecuted and the mayor says it`s because of police misconduct. Officers allegedly mishandled critical evidence and never turned over investigations to prosecutors. But not everyone believes the allegations.

The city of Dellwood put its chief on leave in November and St. Louis County loaned the city an administrative officer to fill the position. When he came in, Dellwood Mayor Loretta Johnson says he discovered trouble.

The department`s handling of evidence was in disarray. Officers had taken weapons confiscated in crimes for their own personal use, and sold copper that was evidence in another case to a scrap yard.




Those revelations sparked an audit, which uncovered disturbing details. In more than 120 crimes, Dellwood officers did not present the case to the St. Louis County prosecutor`s office to apply for warrants. And in dozens of cases, they never sent evidence to a lab for analysis.

"There are rape cases. You try explaining that to somebody`s daughter who was a rape victim and thought evidence was being taken seriously, and taken to St. Louis County for processing and it never made it," said Johnson.

But some of Johnson`s critics say this is politics at work. Johnson is in favor of dissolving Dellwood`s police department and allowing St. Louis County to take over. Four aldermen are on her side. But four others are not. They have been boycotting Board of Aldermen meetings since December to prevent a quorum from being present, so the board cannot vote on the takeover.

James Lovings is one of the aldermen boycotting the meetings. And he says the entire audit is biased and skewed, because the mayor supports the county takeover, and the county did the audit. 'You should be able to read between the lines on this,' he said.

"A lot of officers are not applying for warrants because they have already tried. The cases go there, sit in a lab for two or three months before you get results back, and then the end result, it`s denied."

"The problem is not just Dellwood. I`m sure other municipalities are experiencing this issue, where officers go and apply for different applications and it gets denied," he said. "And some of these cases are still being worked."

But the statute of limitations is up on some of the cases involved.

Based on the audit findings, Mayor Johnson is recommending three officers be terminated, but the firings need board approval. Until a board meeting happens, the officers are on unpaid leave.

Other officers will be disciplined, said City Administrator Frank Myers. "Part of the discipline will be training so these officers know how to properly do their jobs," he said. Some officers knew what to do, others had completed the process for a small number of cases, but "then totally neglected the process for a large percentage of others," he said.

Dellwood`s department is dwindling in numbers. Only seven full time officers remain, and two are taking jobs with St. Louis County in early February. Dellwood typically has 15 to 16 officers, but several have left due to the uncertain future. Some are applying for jobs with the county in anticipation of a takeover.

"This is not a witch hunt. The proof is there. It`s up to me to react to it," said Johnson. "I think the citizens that did not get justice deserve an answer and it`s up to me to ask the questions what happened"

Vow to Fight Police Misconduct Faces Skepticism

After a year that saw a steady drumbeat of police corruption cases and increased scrutiny of several New York Police Department practices, Mayor Michael R. Bloomberg pledged on Thursday to add four lawyers to the two-person legal staff at the agency responsible for monitoring the department’s Internal Affairs Bureau.       
“We don’t tolerate misconduct or corruption anywhere,” the mayor said in his annual State of the City address. “And we have the very highest standards for those we entrust to enforce the law.”
But Mr. Bloomberg’s plans were met by skepticism among those who view the entity, the Mayor’s Commission to Combat Police Corruption, as a flawed watchdog. Tiny, with a modest budget, it has no subpoena power and relies on the department’s good will for relevant information. Even its chairman, Michael F. Armstrong, who was the counsel to the Knapp Commission on police corruption in the 1970s, has acknowledged the commission’s limitations.
Richard Aborn, the president of the Citizens Crime Commission, said, “If we were to have effective oversight of the N.Y.P.D., it would have two elements, independence and transparency, and you only achieve independence if you have subpoena power and funding that cannot be eliminated.”
Mr. Armstrong has taken the position that the department, under Police Commissioner Raymond W. Kelly, does not need outside oversight.
One former law enforcement official who closely tracked the commission’s work for many years said the department’s refusal in some instances to cooperate with the commission and the agency’s lack of subpoena power made the addition of the new lawyers “form over substance — window dressing.”
“Without the department’s cooperation and full subpoena power, it means absolutely nothing,” the former official said.
Following a year in which the police force suffered a series of black eyes from scandals, the mayor used his speech to hail Mr. Kelly for ensuring that the department is “the most upstanding.”
Still, corruption accusations reached all parts of the city in 2011. In the Bronx, 16 police officers were indicted, and hundreds more ensnared, in a long-running inquiry into ticket-fixing.
Separately, an elaborate F.B.I. sting operation led to several current and former New York City officers, many of whom worked at the same Brooklyn police precinct, being charged with taking payments to drive guns into the city. Prosecutors in Queens saw seven narcotics investigators convicted of planting drugs on people to meet arrest quotas.
The mayor’s proposal would most likely include an increase of more than $400,000 to the commission’s current $560,000 annual budget.
Some analysts pointed out that as the mayor spoke of adding staff at one agency, he was silent on the problems faced by another, the Civilian Complaint Review Board. A hiring freeze imposed by City Hall leaves unfilled the position of prosecutor for a two-year-old review board program meant to prosecute city officers in certain internal disciplinary matters. Thus, the authority to prosecute substantiated misconduct complaints — as the program envisioned — is delayed.
The program, known as the Administrative Prosecution Unit, has handled a total of three cases since September 2010, when Laura Edidin, a former assistant United States attorney, was hired at an annual $105,000 salary, officials said. She moved in early November to another position at the board.
The situation is frustrating for the board, particularly since its chairman, Daniel D. Chu, said this week that overall financing for the new program would continue to flow. Last summer, Mr. Chu issued a sober warning that financing to keep the program running was set to run out by the end of December.
That a policing oversight program announced in February 2010, with much fanfare, has survived a threat to its dedicated financing stream, only to be paralyzed by a hiring freeze, struck many analysts as nonsensical.
“It is a perfect Catch-22,” said Christopher T. Dunn, the associate legal director of the New York Civil Liberties Union. “It is bureaucratic perfection; they have a line, it’s funded, but they cannot spend the money because of the hiring freeze.”
“They can’t do any prosecutions because they don’t have any staff,” Mr. Dunn added.
A spokesman for the mayor said the board’s staffing needs were under review.

William K. Rashbaum contributed reporting.

Atlanta police investigate allegation of misconduct at Blake's

by Dyana Bagby

The Atlanta Police Department is conducting an official investigation into allegations of police misconduct during the arrest of two men at Blake's on the Park. Management of the popular Midtown gay bar, however, is praising the APD's handling of the incident.

APD Deputy Chief Renee Propes, who is openly gay, said during Monday's Atlanta Police LGBT Advisory Board meeting that an Office of Professional Standard investigation was opened this week after an allegation a police officer ordered a patron at the popular Midtown gay bar to delete video off his cellphone during the arrest of two unruly patrons.

The alleged misconduct occurred late Friday, Jan. 20, when APD was called to the bar for backup after a fight broke out, including one of the patrons arrested allegedly throwing a drink in the face of an off-duty officer working security and then allegedly knocking his glasses off his face. The patron also allegedly punched Blake's manager Doug Edmisten in the head.

The lone allegation of misconduct is made by an anonymous male. The APD contacted him to ask about the allegations he made and he has yet to make an official statement with OPS and is asking to remain anonymous, according to Propes and the city's law department. At least seven other witnesses gave statements to the APD the night of the incident and none said any misconduct occurred, according to Major Chris Leighty, commander of Zone 5 that includes Blake's.

The manager and senior bartender at Blake's disputed the claims made by the individual and said the APD acted professionally and with respect toward its customers after two customers became "belligerent" and a "scuffle" broke out between them and employees of the bar including an off-duty officer. Lynn Barfield, known as "Mama Lynn" to many of Blake's customers and a 2011 Atlanta Pride Grand Marshal, also said there was no misconduct by the APD.

Edmisten described what happened Friday night and said there were two "belligerent" customers who he asked to leave the bar. When they refused, Edmisten asked for assistance from the off-duty officer who also asked the men to leave.

Edmisten said at that point one of the two patrons threw a drink in the off-duty officer's face and attempted to hit him and then punched Edmisten in the head.

As Edmisten and the off-duty officer were escorting the men out the back door and into the parking lot, one of the patrons started fighting with the off-duty officer. The patron was handcuffed and APD backup was called, Edmisten said.

By the time the backup officers arrived, the two patrons were outside in the parking lot. At no time did the backup officers enter the bar, he said.

The first responding officer then handcuffed the second patron.

"I did not hear an officer at any time to ask anyone to stop videotaping the incident," Edmisten said. "The backup APD did not call anyone names such as 'princess' as stated in the media as I had moved everyone back into the bar.

"The backup APD arrived quickly and were totally professional. I think this is an embarrassment for anyone to try to link this incident to the Atlanta Eagle," he said.

Oakland Police ordered to take extra steps to comply with reforms from Riders misconduct case

By Cecily Burt
Oakland Tribune

Posted: 01/24/2012 08:18:38 PM PST

Updated: 01/24/2012 08:24:30 PM PST


U.S. District Court Judge Thelton Henderson has canceled a Thursday hearing to review Oakland Police department's progress on reforms ordered nine years ago to settle the Riders police misconduct case and instead ordered the department to work more closely with the monitor overseeing the agreement.

According to the Independent Monitor, the department is no closer to complying with the Negotiated Settlement Agreement than it was three months ago, despite Henderson's threats to appoint a federal receiver to oversee the department.

Attorneys representing 119 plaintiffs who filed the lawsuit requested Henderson set a date to appoint a receiver, but also said they would work with OPD to exhaust all other remedies before that happens.



On Tuesday, Henderson ordered Interim Police Chief Howard Jordan to consult with the monitor before carrying out any disciplinary actions or personnel changes; changing policy or the manual of rules; using tactical initiatives that have a direct bearing on the NSA; and procuring equipment used for compliance with the reforms.

"The Court hopes that these intermediate measures will be sufficient to move (the Oakland police department) into full compliance, but it also shares Plaintiffs' concerns that Defendants are taking far too long to achieve what they should have achieved at least four years ago," Henderson wrote in Tuesday's decision.

Henderson said the court will take action to place the department in receivership if compliance is not achieved soon


San Francisco Police Probed

One of Many Law-Enforcement Corruption Cases Opened By Justice Department

SAN FRANCISCO—A videotape found more than a year ago by a defense lawyer in a routine drug case has helped spark this city's biggest police-misconduct probe in years—one of numerous investigations into law-enforcement practices being conducted nationwide by the U.S. Department of Justice.

The tape, attorney Scott Sugarman says, showed his client dressed in a black jacket as police arrested him. But officers wrote in statements that the defendant was wearing a white jacket that contained drugs. The drug-possession case was dismissed by prosecutors.

Dozens of other instances have since surfaced where officers' written statements allegedly conflicted with surveillance videos or other evidence. San Francisco's district attorney dismissed dozens of such cases, and asked the Federal Bureau of Investigation to investigate.

Now federal prosecutors are moving forward with a probe that examines, in part, whether San Francisco police made arrests under false pretenses while conducting investigations, many of them concerning the poor people who live in the Henry and other residential hotels, say people briefed on the investigation.

The prosecutors have already brought at least three city police officers in front of a grand jury, say officials with the city's police union, and have issued subpoenas to witnesses of alleged misconduct, says a person familiar with the matter.

Prosecutors questioned the officers on a series of cases in which evidence, including videotapes, appears to show officers entering the hotels without warrants, taking items from residents, and filing false paperwork, say three people familiar with the probe. The police who have testified before the grand jury are likely witnesses, rather than targets, say people briefed on the matter. It's not clear how many officers are being investigated, these people say, though it could be more than a dozen.

A police department spokesman declined to comment. A police union official says members believe local politics has played a role in the investigation.

The San Francisco investigation comes as the Justice Department is scrutinizing potential civil-rights violations in at least 20 police departments across the U.S., Deputy Assistant Attorney General Roy Austin said in a speech last month. A Justice Department spokeswoman says the department's police-abuse probes are the most in its history, and that curbing civil-rights violations is a priority for the department now.

As a result of one of these investigations, the Justice department said it found that Seattle police used too much force when arresting mentally ill people for minor offenses. The department is also investigating whether police in Portland, Ore., and Miami, Fla., engaged in civil-rights abuses in a series of shootings in recent years.

A Miami police spokesman said the police are cooperating with the Justice Department. A Portland police spokesman said the department was notified about the probe last year. A Seattle police spokesman said the department is discussing the findings with Justice.

The criminal investigation in San Francisco is different from those civil probes because officers could go to prison.

San Francisco U.S. Attorney Melinda Haag declined to comment on the investigation.

A year ago, Ms. Haag created a special division in her office to probe priority areas including law-enforcement corruption. Now they're handled by a small group of senior prosecutors.

In recent months they have charged the head of a state drug task force east of San Francisco with stealing drug evidence and shaking down prostitutes, and indicted a San Francisco crime lab worker on charges connected to allegedly snorting evidence.

A lawyer for the crime lab worker said his client is fighting the charges. The former drug task force chief has pleaded not guilty, though his lawyer says he admits to some wrongdoing.

The circumstances leading to the grand jury probe developed last year, as San Francisco Public Defender Jeff Adachi, who is elected, began searching for instances where officers' documentation from arrests conflicted with other evidence.

In July Mr. Adachi hired a former American Civil Liberties Union lawyer who specializes in police-misconduct cases to see whether there were more examples. The attorney, Jay Rorty, says his office identified dozens of questionable cases and he worked to get some dismissed.

In response to the allegations, the police department has placed "a number" of officers on administrative leave, a police spokesman said, while San Francisco District Attorney George Gascon had prosecutors in his office review cases for possible misconduct, including some of those identified by Mr. Adachi.

As a result of the review, Mr. Gascon's office has dismissed 137 cases over the past year, a spokeswoman said.

Normally, said Omid Talai, a felony prosecutor in the DA's office, "it's very rare" to dismiss a case because an officer is under criminal investigation. Many of these were dismissed, he says, because police who made the arrests were suspended from active duty due to the probe and weren't available to testify. In a hearing last fall in a dismissed drug cases, lawyers for two officers said that if called to testify, their clients would invoke their Fifth Amendment right against self incrimination.

Kevin Martin, the vice president of the San Francisco Police Officers Association, says his union members are worried that Mr. Adachi—who ran unsuccessfully for mayor last year—has pushed the cases out of a desire to advance politically. Mr. Adachi "got a lot of mileage out of going after cops," Mr. Martin says.

But Mr. Adachi says: "This is not about politics, it's about preserving and protecting the public trust."

Write to Justin Scheck at justin.scheck@wsj.com

Copyright 2011 Dow Jones & Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved


EDITORIAL: Another take on police

EDITORIAL: Another take on police

Protester wins a judgment against a Eugene sergeant

Published: (Saturday, Jan 28, 2012 05:00AM) Midnight, Jan. 28


A federal jury’s ruling Monday that a Eugene police sergeant used excessive force to arrest an environmental activist in 2009 should serve as a reminder to law enforcement officials that people in the community they serve often see allegations of police misconduct through a different prism than the one police use to view those same allegations.
After a four-day trial, the jury awarded Josh Schlossberg $5,583 in damages after deciding unanimously that the environmental activist’s constitutional rights were violated by Sgt. Bill Solesbee during a March 13, 2009, encounter in front of an Umpqua Bank branch at Seventh Avenue and Oak Street.
Schlossberg had set up a table there to hand out leaflets. He was videotaping his interactions with police when Solesbee arrested him for allegedly violating a state law that prohibits people from secretly recording conversations. Schlossberg was released shortly after his arrest, and no formal charges were filed.
In his lawsuit, Schlossberg said he complied with the law by informing Solesbee that he planned to record their interaction and did not conceal his camera. A YouTube clip of the incident shows Solesbee saying that police had received a complaint that activists were “harassing people” and blocking pedestrians. After Schlossberg denied those allegations, the sergeant told Schlossberg that he needed a permit to set up a table on the sidewalk, and should “keep moving.”
Solesbee then took issue with Schlossberg videotaping their conversation. When the activist said he had previously informed Solesbee that he planned to tape their exchange, the sergeant denied that was the case and demanded the camera.
The YouTube tape shows Solesbee saying, “Give me that; that’s evidence.” That’s where the tape ends, and Schlossberg claimed that Solsebee injured him by forcing his arms behind his back, throwing him to the ground and placing his knee on his neck.
Schlossberg initially filed a formal misconduct complaint with the police department, alleging that his constitutional rights were violated when Solesbee seized his camera and viewed its contents. Schlossberg also said the sergeant had used excessive force and arrested him without justifiable cause.
After an internal review, Chief Pete Kerns determined that Solesbee did not violate Schlossberg’s rights, and that both the arrest and the sergeant’s force were “objectively reasonable” and in compliance with department policy. The city’s police auditor also investigated the complaint and came to a similar conclusion.
Schlossberg then filed a lawsuit in federal court, where a jury reviewed the allegations and came to a different conclusion. So did U.S. Magistrate Thomas Coffin, who before the trial began took the unusual step of ruling that Solesbee violated Schlossberg’s rights by viewing contents of his video camera without a search warrant.
The jury’s ruling pleased department critics who contend that the city’s police officers rarely are held accountable for misconduct. But it’s unwise to make too much out of an incident that occurred nearly three years ago. The ruling should not be regarded as an indictment of the police department’s internal complaint system — or of the current conduct of the city’s police officers.
Yes, Eugene police have had some noteworthy problems over the years dealing with protesters, but its recent performance has been professional, and at times exemplary.
The department’s recent handling of the Occupy Eugene protest was marked by restraint, judgment and cooperation; it should be viewed as a model by other communities dealing with similar situations. Behind the scenes, the department has made a significant investment in training officers on protecting the rights of suspects and on the proper use of force. As for the police’s internal review system, the department says its overall rate of sustained allegations was 27 percent in 2010 and 26 percent in 2011, significantly higher than in most communities.
The federal jury’s ruling in the Schlossberg case should serve as a reminder to police that both real and perceived mistakes and misjudgments by officers carry a price — and that juries made up of ordinary people often have a different perspective on police misconduct than that of law enforcement.
But it should not be seen as a measuring stick for a department that has made marked improvement in recent years.

A mother has accused three Houston police officers of brutality

by Larry Seward / KHOU 11 News

khou.com

Posted on January 28, 2012 at 5:48 PM

Updated today at 7:01 PM

HOUSTON—A mother has accused three Houston police officers of brutality. She said they bruised and punched her in the face over a cell phone video.

Her face is bruised, left arm swollen, lips are busted in two places and her back is scarred. Annika Lewis claims all of those injuries came at the hands of three Houston police officers.

“I am very stunned,” Lewis said. “I always thought, you know, people got beat by police because they were resisting arrest.”

Lewis’ husband, Sebastian Prevot, was taken into custody Friday morning and charged with resisting arrest. Houston police declined to comment on his case and said the incident report would not be available until Monday.

On the phone, Prevot said he did not stop far enough behind a stop sign. Prevot said he was pulled over then beaten in front of his northeast Houston home. Lewis, who was inside, came out armed with her cell phone. She said she recorded video until officers took her memory card.

“What they did is violate her first amendment rights,” said Deric Muhammad, a community activist.

Last Thursday, Muhammad and others organized a community town hall meeting for northeast patrol officers to hear personal stories of alleged police abuse and profiling. However, after what happened to Lewis, Muhammad is calling for more.

“This is just another example of what it is we discussed with the citizens on Thursday,” Muhammad said. “We want to send a strong message to HPD that this is not going to fly.”

To ensure that it does not, Lewis is filing a two-page complaint letter with internal affairs and the FBI.

Houston police, through a spokesperson, declined comment on Lewis’ claims. A spokesperson said if she files a complaint, it will be taken very seriously.

Police brutality: Reinstated cop still faces lawsuit in Denver Diner case

By Michael RobertsMon., Jan. 23 2012 at 10:59 AM
Denver's Civil Service Commission has reinstated officers Ricky Nixon and Kevin Devine, who'd been fired for their actions in an alleged brutality incident at the Denver Diner in 2009.
But a lawsuit over the matter is still alive, and the attorney representing the plaintiffs expresses shock and dismay that Nixon and Devine are back on the job.
"There's no excuse to reinstate these officers," says Siddhartha Rathod, who is representing victims Kelly Boren, Sharelle Thomas, Ana Ortega and Kristal Carrillo in conjunction with fellow lawyer Qusair Mohamedbhai. "They endangered the lives of our clients, and by reinstating them, Denver is endangering the lives of all Coloradans."

Feds crack down on police brutality nationwide

Police brutality cases on rise since 9/11

By Kevin Johnson, USA TODAY

WASHINGTON — Federal prosecutors are targeting a rising number of law enforcement officers for alleged brutality, Justice Department statistics show. The heightened prosecutions come as the nation's largest police union fears that agencies are dropping standards to fill thousands of vacancies and "scrimping" on training.

Cases in which police, prison guards and other law enforcement authorities have used excessive force or other tactics to violate victims' civil rights have increased 25% (281 vs. 224) from fiscal years 2001 to 2007 over the previous seven years, the department says.

During the same period, the department says it won 53% more convictions (391 vs. 256). Some cases result in multiple convictions.

Federal records show the vast majority of police brutality cases referred by investigators are not prosecuted.


University of Toledo law professor David Harris, who analyzes police conduct issues, says it will take time to determine whether the cases represent a sustained period of more aggressive prosecutions or the beginnings of a surge in misconduct.

The cases involve only a fraction of the estimated 800,000 police in the USA, says James Pasco, executive director of the National Fraternal Order of Police (FOP), the nation's largest police union.

Even so, he says, the FOP is concerned that reduced standards, training and promotion of less experienced officers into the higher police ranks could undermine more rigid supervision.

"These are things we are worried about," Pasco says.

For the past few years, dozens of police departments across the country have scrambled to fill vacancies. The recruiting effort, which often features cash bonuses, has intensified since 9/11, because many police recruits have been drawn to military service.

In its post-Sept. 11 reorganization, the FBI listed police misconduct as one of its highest civil rights priorities to keep pace with an anticipated increase in police hiring through 2009.

The increasing Justice numbers generally correspond to a USA TODAY analysis of federal law enforcement prosecutions using data compiled by the Transactional Records Access Clearinghouse at Syracuse University.

Those data show 42 law enforcement prosecutions during the first 10 months of fiscal year 2007, a 66% increase from all of fiscal 2002 and a 61% rise from a decade ago.

David Burnham, the co-founder of the TRAC database, says prosecutions appear to be increasing, but "more important" are the numbers of cases prosecutors decline.

Last year, 96% of cases referred for prosecution by investigative agencies were declined.

In 2005, 98% were declined, a rate that has remained "extremely high" under every administration dating to President Carter, according to a TRAC report.

The high refusal rates, say Burnham and law enforcement analysts, result in part from the extraordinary difficulty in prosecuting abuse cases. Juries are conditioned to believe cops, and victims' credibility is often challenged.

"When police are accused of wrongdoing, the world is turned upside down," Harris says. "In some cases, it may be impossible for (juries) to make the adjustment."


Police Brutality in America

by Stephen Lendman
Tuesday, 13 July 2010

Despite Congress passing the 1994 Violent Crime Control and Law Enforcement Act, Congress has consistently failed to fund it. Further, the legislation doesn't require local police agencies to keep records, nor does it criminalize police violence and excessive force as human rights violations.
Across America, daily incidents occur, one of many the cold-blooded January 1, 2009 murder of Oscar Grant - unarmed, offering no resistance, thrust face-down on the ground, shot in the back, and killed, videotaped on at least four cameras for irrefutable proof. USA Today said five bystanders taped it.
His killer: Oakland, CA transit officer, Johannes Mehserle, tried for the killing, the jury told to consider four possible verdicts - innocent, second-degree murder, voluntary manslaughter, or involuntary manslaughter, jurors deciding the latter.
The Legal Dictionary defines it as "The act of unlawfully killing another human being unintentionally," the absence of intent distinguishing it from voluntary manslaughter. Many states don't define it or do it vaguely. Wallin & Klarich Violent Crime Attorneys say in California it carries a two - four year sentence. However, since a gun was used, Judge Robert Perry can add three to 10 additional years.
Because minority victims seldom get justice, especially against police, Mehserle may serve minimal time, then be paroled quietly when the current furor subsides.
After the verdict, it erupted on Oakland streets, hundreds turning out to protest, Bay Area indymedia.org saying:
"The actions of the Police in Oakland tonight (including dozens of arrests) show their disrespect for justice in General. Their heavy handed violence towards protestors just reinforces their total disconnect with the people of Oakland." It's as true everywhere across America, police acting like Gestapo, usually unaccountably.
Grant's family will appeal the verdict and is suing the Bay Area Rapid Transit (BART) for $25 million, his mother Wanda Johnson saying "My son was murdered (and) the law has not held the officer accountable." It rarely does for Black, Latino, or other minorities, no matter the injustice, civil rights lawyer John Burris, representing Grant's family in the civil suit, saying:
"The system is rarely fair when a police officer shoots an African-American male." Police brutality against them and other minorites is systemic, including beatings, torture, and cold-blooded murder, usually with impunity, justice nearly always denied.
While far from certain, the Obama administration may charge Mehserle with civil rights or hate crime violations, DOJ spokesman Alejandro Miyar saying:
"The Justice Department has been closely monitoring the state's investigation and prosecution. The Civil Rights Division, the US Attorney's Office, and the FBI have an open investigation into the fatal shooting and, at the conclusion of the state prosecution, will conduct an independent review of the facts and circumstances to determine whether the evidence warrants federal prosecution."
Systemic Police Brutality
An earlier Jones Report.com text and video account headlined, "Epidemic of Police Brutality Sweeps America," showing footage of police repeatedly tasering a student with 50,000 volts of electricity for questioning the 2004 election results at a campus meeting.
Other videotaped incidents showed:
• a man victimized by police violence;
• a former sheriff's deputy acquitted of voluntary manslaughter for shooting an unarmed man;
• police repeatedly beating an old man on the head, "for the crime of intoxication;"
• officers violently using assault rifles, tear gas, dogs, and at least one helicopter in an alleged narcotics sweep;
• a woman tasered to death by police; and
• a man in shock, bleeding and burned over much of his body, ordered to lie on the pavement, then tasered and shot to death while he sat dazed, the Report highlighting systemic police violence "repeated almost every day in (America), the police (getting) away with murder," beatings, and other lawless acts - poor Blacks, Latinos, and Muslims for their faith and ethnicity their usual victims.
Amnesty International (AI) on American Police Brutality
On its web site, AI says "Police brutality and use of excessive force has been one of the central themes of (AI's) campaign on human rights violations in the USA," launched in October 1998. In its "United States of America: Rights for All Index," it documented systematic patterns of abuse across America, including "police beatings, unjustified shootings and the use of dangerous restraint techniques to subdue suspects."
Yet little is done to monitor or constrain it, evidence showing that "racial and ethnic minorities were disproportionately" harmed by harassment, verbal and physical abuse, false arrests, and in the case of West African immigrant, Amadou Diallo, shot at 41 times by four New York policemen, struck 19 times and killed while he stood in the vestibule of his apartment building, unarmed and nonviolent, victimized by police brutality.
Nationwide, driving while black has been criminalized, racial profiling used for traffic stops and searches for suspected drugs or other reasons, the practice especially common in California, Colorado, Florida, Illinois, Indiana, Maryland, Massachusetts, Pennsylvania, Oklahoma, Rhode Island, and Texas.
AI cited numerous incidents, including beatings and "questionable" shootings, usually found to be unjustified, yet cops most often absolved. Although most US police departments stipulate that officers should only use deadly force when their lives, or others, are endangered, dozens of cases show they do it indiscriminately, at most being "mildly disciplined" even if guilty of serious misconduct.
"Police shooting(s) resulting in death or injury are routinely reviewed (internally or) by local prosecutors....to see whether criminal laws (were) violated. However, few officers are criminally charged and little public information is given out if a case does not go to trial." As a result, systemic abuse stays hidden, police brutality allowed to persist with impunity.
Despite Congress passing the 1994 Police Accountability Act, incorporated into the 1994 Violent Crime Control and Law Enforcement Act to require the Attorney General to compile national data on excessive police force, Congress has consistently failed to fund it. Further, the legislation doesn't require local police agencies to keep records or submit data to the Justice Department. Nor does it criminalize police violence and excessive force as human rights violations.
ACLU Report on Racial and Ethnic Profiling
In August 2009, the report titled, "The Persistence of Racial Profiling in the United States" [  Download full report] quoted Rep. John Conyers (D. MI) saying "Since (9/11), our nation has engaged in a policy of institutionalized racial and ethnic profiling," although, as an African-American, he knows the problem goes back generations, most recently in the "war on terrorism" against Blacks, Latinos, and Muslims for their faith, ethnicity, activism, prominence, and at times charity, a topic this writer addresses often - arrests, some violently, bogus charges, prosecutions, and imprisonments often compounding the injustice.
Post-9/11 under Bush and Obama, federal, state and local law enforcement agencies have engaged in virulent racial/ethnic profiling, what the ACLU calls "a widespread and pervasive problem throughout the United States, impacting the lives of millions of people in African American, Asian, Latino, South Asian, and Arab communities."
Evidence shows that racial minorities are systematically victimized, without cause, in public, when driving, at work, at home, in places of worship, and traveling, often violently.
Evidence shows that racial minorities are systematically victimized, without cause, in public, when driving, at work, at home, in places of worship, and traveling, often violently.
A "major impediment to (prohibiting it) remains the continued unwillingness or inability of the US government to pass federal legislation (banning the practice) with binding effect on federal, state or local law enforcement."
Nor do authorities comply with the provisions of the 1994 Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination (ICERD) that obligates all levels of government.
In addition, the Justice Department's 2003 Guidance Regarding the Use of Race by Federal Law Enforcement Agencies designed to ban federal officers from engaging in racial profiling is, in fact, flawed and does little to end it, because it doesn't cover "profiling based on religion, religious appearance, or national origin."
Nor does it apply to state and local law enforcement where police brutality is systemic. In addition, it specifies no enforcement mechanisms or punishments for violators, and contains a "blanket exception for national security and border integrity cases," besides being advisory and not legally binding.
As a result, it actually promotes profiling and abuse, including false arrests, beatings and killings. It's not surprising how minorities have been systematically mistreated by federal, state and local authorities, or that congressional legislation introduced to stop it never passed.
On December 13, 2007, the House and Senate introduced their versions of the End Racial Profiling Act (HR 4611 and S. 2481). Both bills were referred to committee and never enacted - making it extremely hard to nearly impossible for victims to successfully challenge abuses against them.
As a candidate, Obama promised a "Blueprint for Change" to ban racial profiling and related mistreatment, criminalizing them, but so far, no measures have been introduced or passed, showing another promise made, another broken, a systematic pattern under his leadership, across the board against the constituencies that elected him. Hopefully they'll remember next election and choose another way, a third way, both parties equally corrupted in deference to big money and systemic police brutality that serves it.
National Police Misconduct Statistics
The Injustice Everywhere.com (IE) web site compiles them, publishing them in regular reports, some for individual cities, including daily accounts. One on July 10 covers King County, WA deputy Paul Schene, captured on videotape assaulting a 15-year old girl in jail. He was tried twice, hung juries resulting each time.
On July 9, the County Prosecutor's Office dropped the charges, and won't pursue a third trial. As a result, the sheriff's department may rehire Schene, though he still faces possible disciplinary action. It's currently in arbitration, IE saying decisions nearly always favor officers, in which case he'll likely be reinstated to abuse other detainees, off camera to avoid being charged.
In early 2010, IE published an April - mid-December 2009 (8.5 months) Police Misconduct Report, from figures compiled in its National Police Misconduct Statistics Reporting Project (NPMSRP), begun earlier in March 2009, analyzing data:
"by utilizing news media reports of police misconduct to generate statistical information (to) approximate how prevalent (it) may be in the United States."
Police departments don't usually provide them, nor do courts, except for successful prosecutions, omitting confidential settlements and cases resulting in disciplinary action only, not trials. Media reports, though imperfect, are more complete because laws limit or filter information released. As a result, IE's data "should be considered as a low-end estimate of the current rate of police misconduct," as well as in individual cities covered.
Statistics compiled follow the same DOJ/FBI Uniform Crime Reporting (UCR) methodology, recording only the most serious allegation (not conviction) when multiple ones are associated with a particular incident. The findings were as follows:
• 3,445 police misconduct reports;
• 4,012 officers charged;
• 261 law enforcement officials (police chiefs or sheriffs) cited;
• 4,778 alleged victims;
• 258 fatalities reported;
• an average of 15.05 daily incidents or one every 96 minutes;
• nearly $200 million in related civil litigation expense, excluding legal fees and court costs;
• 980.64 per 100,000 officers charged;
• one of every 266 officers accused of a violent crime;
• one of every 1,875 charged with homocide;
• one of every 947 accused of sexual assault;
• 33% of police officers charged were convicted, not necessarily justly for the offense committed;
• 64% of officers convicted were imprisoned, not necessarily as long as justified;
• those sentenced served an average 14 months, far less than citizens for the same crime;
• misconduct by category included 18.1% for non-firearm related excessive force; 11.9% for sexual misconduct; and 8.9% for fraud or theft;
• analyzing reports by last reported status showed 45.9% affected officers adversely, including 14% internally disciplined and 31.9% criminally charged; of the latter, 32.5% were convicted "for a 10.4% total criminal conviction rate for alleged misconduct incidents; and
• 27% resulted in civil lawsuits, 34.3% favoring victims.
In addition, data were compiled for states, cities and counties, excluding unavailable federal statistics as well as local omissions, especially in some states. Various offenses included:
• accountability: evidence of coverups, lax discipline, and other failures to adhere to official policies or processes;
• animal cruelty, harming them by unnecessary shooting, inappropriate KP unit training, or other mistreatment;
• assault: "unwarranted violence" off-duty, excluding murder;
• auto incidents involving recklessness, negligence, and other violations of official policies;
• brutality, involving excessive physical force on-duty, excluding firearms or tasers;
• civil rights, including unconstitutional civil liberties violations such as lawless peaceful protest disruptions;
• sexual misconduct, including rape, sexual assault, sexual battery, wrongfully eliciting sex, harassment, coercion, prostitution, sex on duty, incest, and molestation;
• theft or fraud, including robbery, shoplifting, extortion or bribery;
• shooting: gun-related incidents both on and off-duty, including self-harm;
• taser: excessive force, including usage not according to guidelines, resulting in excessive injury or death; also, improper taser use may be recorded as "brutality;"
• color of law, including incidents involving misuse of authority such as bribery, soliciting favors, extortion by threat of arrest, or using badges to avoid arrest;
• perjury, including false testimony, dishonesty during investigations, and falsifying charging papers or warrants; and
• raids, including misconduct during warranted or warrantless operations or searches, wrong address raids, mistaken ones, use of no-knock ones when warrants require notification, or mistreatment during executions.
Misconduct status stages go from allegations to investigations, lawsuits, charges, trials, judgments, disciplinary measures, terminations, convictions, and sentences.
IE compiles data regularly, prepares daily and quarterly reports, and henceforth an annual one each January the following year. It explains that its statistics:
"should only be used (as) a very basic and general view of the extent of police misconduct. It is by no means an accurate gauge that truly represents the exact extent (of its extensiveness) since it relies on the information voluntarily gathered and/or released to the media, not (first-hand) by independent monitors who investigate complaints.....because no such agency exists for any law enforcement agency...."
Detailed quarterly and annual reports are produced, not monthly ones considered a less accurate "depiction of the overall extent of police misconduct...." Daily reports cover a sampling of individual incidents. Overall, IE provides a valuable reading of systemic police misconduct, though capturing only a snapshot of the full problem - widespread, abusive, violent, often with impunity, and when officers are held accountable, imposed discipline is usually mild, prison sentences rare and short-term, victims cheated by a criminally unjust system, favoring power over people, no matter the offense.
Final Comments
In December 2007, the UN Committee on the Elimination of Racial Discrimination published a report titled, "  In the Shadows of the War on Terror: Persistent Police Brutality and Abuse of People of Color in the United States," saying:
"Since this Committee's 2001 review of the US, during which it expressed concern regarding incidents of police brutality and deaths in custody at the hands of US law enforcement officers, there have been dramatic increases in law enforcement powers in the name of waging the "war on terror (resulting in) the use of excessive force against people of color....(It's not only continued post-9/11), but has worsened in both practice and severity" - a NAACP representative saying it's "the worst I've seen in 50 years."
On April 4, 2007, Ryan Gallagher, writing for Medill Reports, produced by Northwestern University's Medill School of Journalism, headlined, "Study: Police abuse goes unpunished," saying:
From 2002 - 2004, over "10,000 complaints of police abuse were filed with Chicago police....but only 19 resulted in meaningful disciplinary action, a new study asserts." According to Gerald Frazier, president of Citizens Alert, it reflects "not only the appearance of influence and cover-up," but clear evidence that city residents are being abused, not protected, despite the department's official motto being "We Serve and Protect."
Most disturbing is that the Chicago pattern reflects what's happening across America, people of color like Oscar Grant systematically abused, in his case murdered in cold blood, what no criminal or civil actions can undo.

Feds crack down on police brutality nationwide

August 10, 2011 6:54 PM


By Armen Keteyian

 CBS News

PORTLAND, Ore. - "They treated him like he was a piece of dirt," Jim Chasse said. "Just absolute from the get go."

Chasse's 42-year-old son James was out for a walk in downtown Portland, Oregon, in September 2006 when three police officers spotted what they later described as a "peculiar...dirty" young man.

Eyewitnesses say Chasse, who suffered from schizophrenia, appeared "frightened." And when he ran, they say, he was chased, knocked down and beaten by police.

Chasse told CBS News chief investigative correspondent Armen Keteyian that his son wouldn't hurt anyone. "This is a guy who couldn't lift 35 pounds," Chasse said. "And they say he was struggling."

Video shows Chasse being carried through the jail on his way to the hospital. He never made it. He died from "blunt force trauma to the chest." An autopsy found Chasse was tasered. His ribs were broken in 27 places.

Two officers involved received two week suspensions for failing to ensure Chasse received medical attention after being tasered. None of the officers involved was fired.

"These people are supposed to be peacekeepers when in fact they are raising all kinds of hell," Chasse said.

The Chasse family sued and received a $1.6 million settlement from the city, which admitted no wrongdoing.

But this father wasn't finished. He hired a lawyer to present evidence to the Justice Department that his son's death was part of a pattern of excessive force by the Portland Police Bureau.

A federal law enforcement source says the Chasse case is one of a significant number of incidents that has prompted the Justice Department to investigate police here in Portland for civil rights violations.

Roy Austin, Deputy Assistant Attorney General for Civil Rights, said "The good officers know who the bad officers are. Everybody knows who the bad officers are."

CBS News has learned that Portland is just one of 20 police departments nationwide that the Justice Department has investigated for civil rights violations in the last year - more than any time in history. Among the allegations: In Newark, a rape. In Seattle, the fatal shooting of a homeless man. In New Orleans, another deadly shooting.

"What we have is a number of departments where the officers are not given the tools that they need to succeed," Austin said. "Meaning they don't have the training. They don't have the supervision. They're not held accountable."

Portland's current political leader, Mayor Sam Adams, told us he welcomed the federal oversight, calling the Chasse case "awful and tragic." He says the city has added new training for officers.

In a statement, Portland's Police Association said "We handle...often explosive situations fraught with risk, with professionalism and compassion."

Still, in the last 20 months there have been two more controversial police shootings - both fatal. Leaving Chasse with little faith in a force created to serve and protect.

"There is nothing I can do," Chasse said. "My son is dead."

CBS News has also learned there were 52 criminal civil right cases brought against law enforcement officers by the Department of Justice last year. That's the highest number of cases in a single year since they started keeping track back in 2000.




Deputy Lets a Female Prisoner Escape in Exchange For Sex





Dale L. Tompkins, a 41-year-old former Sheriff’s Department deputy of Tuscola County, was sentenced to 185 days in jail for having sex with a female prisoner on the hood of his police cruiser. He accepted the prisoner’s offer to have sex with her in exchange for letting her go, which are felonies of accepting a bribe and voluntarily letting a prisoner escape punishable with up to 15 years in prison, so getting away with just 6 months behind bars was a pretty good deal for Tompkins.

The event occurred when the woman was arrested in Genessee County on account of a probation violation in Tuscola County, and was handed over to Tompkins to be transported to a jail in Caro. Thanks to the bribe loving cop, she never made it there.

During the ride, the woman offered Tompkins to have sex with him if he lets her escape, and he agreed, receiving oral sex and having intercourse with her on the hood of the car. Tompkins kept his part of the deal and let the woman run away.

While his sentence seems pretty short for a crime of this sort, it’s comforting to know that after being a convicted felon Tompkins won’t be able to work as a police officer in Michigan ever again.

No Immunity for Cops on Vicious Dog Attack

(CN) - Police officers may be liable on claims that they let a police dog attack an unresisting suspecting for five to seven minutes, a federal judge ruled.
In December 2008, Colin Edwards ran a stop sign while driving his wife's car with a suspended license. When Orlando Police Officer Justin Lovett pulled him over, he got out of his car and ran.
As Edwards jumped a fence into a wooded area, Lovett chased Edwards on foot and called for backup.
Officer Brayn Shanley and his K-9 partner, Rosco, responded to the call. The officers announced that they would release the dog if Edwards did not surrender.
Edwards had made it less than half a mile into a thick brush by the time he gave up and

laid down on his stomach with his hands visible.
As the officers approached Edwards, they asked him to show his hands, but since his hands were already exposed, he did not move. Edwards told the officers that he was surrendering, and he only ran because of his license.
He claims then Rosco then began to bite his leg. Despite shouting that he was not resisting, and pleading with the officers to call off Rosco, the officers allegedly let the dog bite him for five to seven minutes. Finally one of the officers kneeled on Edwards' back, handcuffed him and called off the dog, according to the complaint.
Edwards says the officers joked about Edwards' leg looking like filet mignon and said that is why police dogs are not fed.
At a six-day hospital stay, Edwards needed surgery to treat the loss of a large portion of flesh and severe damage to muscles and tendons. He claims he also underwent extensive follow-up care.
After pleading no-contest to charges of fleeing law enforcement, Edwards sued the officers for excessive force in violation of the Fourth Amendment.
A federal judge granted the officers summary judgment on qualified immunity, but the 11th Circuit reversed.
"Here, the force necessarily caused by using a dog to track a fleeing suspect is reasonably tailored to the risk that a fleeing suspect presents," Judge Beverly Martin wrote for a three-judge panel. "We defer to Officer Shanley's judgment that it was appropriate to employ extraordinary but non-deadly force in this instance. That Officer Shanley reasonably decided to use the dog in the first instance does not mean, however, that the use of the dog was reasonable for the duration of the attack."
"Indeed, evaluating Officer Shanley's conduct at the time of the prolonged attack makes its unreasonableness plain," she added. "Because Edwards was begging to surrender, and because Officer Shanley could safely give effect to that surrender, the further infliction of pain was gratuitous and sadistic. This the Constitution does not tolerate."
Shanley's fellow officer, Lovett, did not fare better.
"There is no dispute that Officer Lovett was present for the entire attack, and taking Edwards's account as true, he made no effort to intervene and stop the ongoing constitutional violation," Martin wrote. "As such, Officer Lovett is no more entitled to qualified immunity than Officer Shanley."