on sale now at amazon

on sale now at amazon
"I don't like this book because it don't got know pictures" Chief Rhorerer

“It’s becoming a disturbingly familiar scene in America - mentally unstable cops”

“It’s becoming a disturbingly familiar scene in America - mentally unstable cops”
“It’s becoming a disturbingly familiar scene in America - mentally unstable cops”

How very PC of you….once again, the Fairfax County Police play politics instead of working at policing

 


 

Fairfax County Police Remove Arrest Blotter Over ICE Data Sharing Concerns

 Colleen Grablick

 

Community advocates said the list violated a new law that limits local law enforcement’s interactions with immigration enforcement agencies.

Michael Pope / WAMU

Fairfax County’s police department will no longer publish the names and personal information of people arrested for crimes, heeding concerns from advocates that the list endangered immigrant residents.

Earlier this year, the county’s Board of Supervisors passed a Public Trust and Confidentiality Policy, cutting off all voluntary cooperation and information sharing between local agencies and federal immigration authorities. But advocates said the arrest blotter, which lived on the police department’s website and included information like names and last known addresses, continued to violate the law, commonly known as the Trust Policy, by allowing Immigration and Customs Enforcement officials to target immigrant residents.

“We believe that [the arrest blotter] violated the Trust Policy, because it’s not necessary to release that personal information,” says Diane Alejandro, a lead advocate with ACLU People Power Fairfax. “It just is, more than anything, a shaming list.”

According to Anthony Guglielmi, a spokesperson for Fairfax County police, the county originally began publishing that type of information online in 2016 in order to limit the amount of calls the department received from residents seeking information about arrests in their neighborhood.

The arrest blotter came down last Friday, after a review of the practice by ACLU People Power Fairfax found the blotter to be non-compliant with the Trust Policy, Guglielmi said. The Washington Post first reported the decision.

The county will still be running a weekly crime roundup on the department’s website, but will withhold names and any other information regarding the individuals arrested.

“Important information will continue to be shared with the community, and arrest data remains easily accessible via FOIA to residents and reporters,” County Supervisor Dalia Palchik, one of the nine supervisors that voted in favor of the Trust Policy policy, wrote in a statement to DCist/WAMU.

Alejandro, who advocated for the passage of the Trust Policy, say ACLU People Power Fairfax supports the continuation of a crime roundup, without the names and personal information of individuals arrested. If someone is truly interested in gathering that information, she says, there are plenty of ways to dig for it on the internet — instead of the police proactively offering it.

“It’s not like folks are being left in the dark,” Alejandro says, adding that arrest information will still be available to members of the public upon a FOIA request. “I think that honestly smacks of racism to suggest that the interests of people who just want to know the name of every person arrested to satisfy their curiosity should take precedence over the lives of immigrants.”

Unlike in D.C. or Maryland’s Montgomery and Prince George’s counties, where the police force is overseen by the top elected official, the Fairfax County Police Department is under the purview of the Board of Supervisors. The Trust Policy, which passed the Board of Supervisors by a 9-1 vote in January, applies to all agencies across Fairfax County’s government. While the provisions of the new law allow cooperation with ICE officials if it is required or requested, the policy bars willful or voluntary local information sharing that would help immigration enforcement track down individuals.

Alejandro says she does not know of any residents that were targeted directly as a result of the arrest blotter, but that she and other advocates “know it happens.”

“We don’t need to hand [the information] to them on a silver platter,” Alejandro says. “We’re not going to volunteer information to ICE, and this is what the police were doing.”

A spokesperson for ICE denied that the agency used the Fairfax County’s arrest information to locate or apprehend any residents.

“ICE Enforcement and Removal Operations does not use police blotter data to identify immigration enforcement targets in Fairfax County, Virginia,” the spokesperson wrote in an emailed statement to DCist/WAMU. “ICE ERO officers use intelligence-driven leads to identify specific individuals for arrest.”

The removal of the arrest list marks the latest step in Fairfax County’s efforts to limit the county’s interactions with federal immigration agencies. In 2020, the county codified a policy that prevents police officers from asking or disclosing a person’s immigration status, or using immigration status as a determining factor when considering to take a person into custody on a misdemeanor charge.

Regionally, Arlington County officials are also considering ways to decrease local law enforcement’s engagement with ICE — last week, the Arlington County Board released the draft of a framework to increase protection of immigrant residents, including proposals to decrease the local police’s contact with immigration agencies.

 

 

Fairfax County should get off its ass and do the same as Newsom.

 

 

California Gov. Newsom signs sweeping police reform bills

More than three dozen groups representing police officers opposed the legislation, according to a report

California Gov. Gavin Newsom signed a series of police reform bills Thursday to address law enforcement misconduct that would strip officers of their badges for a range of incidents, among other measures.

Surrounded by lawmakers and the family members of victims killed by police officers, Newsom signed four bills he touted would increase transparency. During his remarks, California Attorney General Rob Bonta said there is a "crisis of trust" when it comes to law enforcement.

"We're delivering concrete solutions from banning dangerous holds that lead to asphyxia to multiple other mechanisms that improve accountability and oversight and transparency," he said.

 But more than three dozen groups representing police officers opposed the legislation, claiming it subjects law enforcement officers to double jeopardy with vague definitions of wrongdoing and calls for the use of an oversight panel that would potentially be biased and lacking in expertise about law enforcement, The Los Angeles Times reported.

Senate Bill 2 "merely requires that the individual officer ‘engaged’ in serious misconduct – not that they were found guilty, terminated, or even disciplined," the California Police Chiefs Association wrote in a letter to state lawmakers, according to the Times.

Another bill, Assembly Bill 26, was opposed by the California Association of Highway Patrolmen, which said it participated two years ago in an effort to change the state's use-of-force policies, the Times reported.

The Assembly bill calls for officers to intervene if they suspect a fellow officer is using too much force against a suspect, but the police group argued that in fast-moving incidents, an officer arriving at the scene of an incident might not have enough information to determine if the force is excessive, according to the newspaper.

With Newsom's signings, California joins 46 other states that have laws on the books allowing officers to be fired for acting criminally and for incidents involving racial bias and excessive force. The reforms also raise the minimum age for police officers from 18 to 21, ban some restraining techniques and limit the use of rubber bullets during protests.

"I'm here as governor of California mindful that we're in a juxtaposition of being a leader on police reform and a lagger on police reform," Newsom said from a park gymnasium in the Los Angeles suburb of Gardena. "We have a lot to be proud of but there's areas where we have nothing to brag about."

 While signing the legislation, supporters chanted "Say his name," in reference to Kenneth Ross Jr., a 25-year-old Black man who was killed in 2018 when an officer shot him at the same Gardena park where the Thursday event occurred. An investigation determined the officer, Michael Robbins, acted lawfully when he shot Ross.

Ross' mother, Fouzia Almarou, said she hopes the bill prevents the loss of life, particularly for people of color.

"This bill means a lot because it's going to stop police from attacking and targeting and being racist towards Black and brown people," she said. 

Sandra Quinto Collins, the mother of Angelo Quinto, brushed back tears as she thanked lawmakers for passing the reforms. Quinto died when a San Francisco police officer pressed his knee against his neck during a mental health response call last year.

"To lose a son, to lose a brother, sister, dad — that pain, that intensity, that expression is reflected not just in the words of these two remarkable women and their families, but we hope reflected in this legislation," Newsom said.

The bill's signing came after failed negotiations in Congress halted a bipartisan police reform plan.

Good, go ahead and bleed.....we need new blood in the Police Department anyway..don't defund the police, reteain the police

 


'We've been bleeding officers': Fairfax police union says officers need to be paid better


by Nick Minock

Thursday, September 23rd 2021

FAIRFAX COUNTY, Va. (7News) — The President of the Virginia Police Benevolent Association’s Fairfax County Chapter is sounding the alarm.

“We’ve been bleeding officers left and right,” said Ali Soheilian.

Soheilian and the union’s board sent a letter to the Fairfax County Board of Supervisor’s this week warning the Fairfax County Police Department is more than 100 officers short and they are losing more by the week. They are calling this is a staffing crisis.

The union said the Fairfax County Board of Supervisors needs to take positive action.

In their letter, the Virginia PBA said patrol officers are pressed to more each day while they cover the workload of officers who have left. All of that while violent crime is rising rapidly in their jurisdiction, according to their letter.

The letter claims morale is down at the police department and officers in Fairfax County are leaving the department for better paying jobs at police departments in nearby Prince William and Loudoun Counties.

The PBA board is requesting the Fairfax County Board of Supervisors to take swift action by approving better pay for officers.

“When you tell these officers that they are not worth the money you are basically telling them what you value and what you don’t value as a county board of supervisors,” said Soheilian. “It’s a quick fix. They’ve skipped over us with cost of living adjustments and market rate adjustments raises in terms of 14 percent over the years.”

“If something doesn’t change eventually, they are going to have to stop staffing certain positions,” Soheilian added. “Your specialty units that investigates major crimes might be impacted. We might have to pull officers from different resources to staff the street because what’s happening is you’re going to get overwork, tired officers that are responding. It could impact your response times as we’ve seen it impact agencies across the nation.”

7News took these staffing concerns to the Fairfax County Board of Supervisors Chairman.

“I don’t see this as a Fairfax County problem. Clearly it’s a nationwide problem,” said Jeffrey McKay.

McKay acknowledged the staffing challenges at the police department and defended what the county currently pays its officers.

“I believe we are very competitive to our peer jurisdictions and that’s something we look at annually in our budget process,” he said. “We’ve been focused on recruitment efforts We never stop looking at pay. We want to recruit the best officers. Our board will continue to do what we always do which is look at this every year and make sure Fairfax County remains competitive in police pay.”

 

 

 

Analysis: Here’s how Chicago’s most powerful police union preserves tradition of problematic leadership

  

Analysis: Here’s how Chicago’s most powerful police union preserves tradition of problematic leadership

By Emanuella Evans and Adeshina Emmanuel | September 13, 2021

Timeline: Chicago FOP presidents’ turbulent relationship with race and police reform

Injustice Watch reviewed the tenures of past FOP presidents elected by Chicago police, from the civil rights movement to the Black Lives Matter era. We found a history of police union leaders making inflammatory statements, antagonizing racial justice and police reforms, and shielding allegedly brutal cops from accountability.

And then in the spring, Catanzara said the cop who killed 13-year-old Adam Toledo was “heroic” and described the killing of 22-year-old Anthony Alvarez, shot in the back by another Chicago cop, as “a 100% good shooting.”

A growing chorus — including dozens of community groups, Chicago city councilmembers, and state lawmakers — have demanded that Catanzara either resign or be fired. The police department, too, has attempted to remove Catanzara.

In February, Police Supt. David Brown suspended Catanzara and filed charges with the Chicago Police Board alleging that he violated nearly a dozen department rules. Some of the charges stem from inflammatory social media posts, including a 2017 Facebook post in which Catanzara referred to Muslims as “savages” who “all deserve a bullet.”

He made the comments in reference to a video of a woman being stoned, also adding that “this is the life many want to bring to this country,” though he later claimed in another post that his comments were not specifically targeting Muslims.

Still, Catanzara’s words are not surprising within the history of the FOP.

 Injustice Watch reviewed the tenures of each of the eight past FOP presidents elected by Chicago police and found a pattern of leadership defined by inflammatory public statements, resistance to accountability, and antagonism to racial justice and police reforms. Police union leaders also tend to stand by police officers who have killed civilians, from Fred Hampton and LaTanya Haggerty to Laquan McDonald and Toledo.

Illinois FOP President Chris Southwood said by defending officers’ actions in violent encounters, Catanzara, like his predecessors, is doing exactly what rank-and-file cops elected him to do.

“That’s his job as the president of Chicago Lodge 7,” Southwood said, “to stand up for his membership, especially in situations where they’re being portrayed as doing something wrong or terrible.”

“All I did was follow the lead of previous presidents”

 

The defining issues of Dean Angelo Sr.’s three-year tenure as FOP president was the police killing of 17-year-old Laquan McDonald and the subsequent calls for reform. Angelo staunchly opposed the demands emanating from a wave of protests, blaming the “anti-police movement” for cratering member morale and jeopardizing public safety. Nonetheless, Angelo was voted out of office in 2017 by members who found him too accommodating. (Illustration by Veronica Martinez for Injustice Watch)

Our research spanned six decades, from the civil rights movement to the Black Lives Matter era. We reviewed dozens of news clips, FOP newsletters, academic studies, and interviewed experts who shed light on FOP presidents’ problematic history. Retired Chicago Police Department Sgt. Shawn Kennedy, the information officer for the National Association of Black Law Enforcement Officers, said the problem has deep roots.

“When you look at modern-day policing, you have to look at the foundation in which law enforcement was built upon,” Kennedy said. “It was built upon systemic racism and white supremacy, so when you look at police unions, they are there to maintain the status quo.”

Why I’m terminating my membership with the Chicago police union

Chicago police officer Julius Givens pens an open letter to John Catanzara, president of the Fraternal Order of Police's Chicago chapter.

Many Black officers don’t feel represented by Chicago Lodge 7, Kennedy said. In addition to actions such as endorsing Donald Trump as president, the union has previously backed hiring policies that have helped prevent Black officers from joining the force and uphold a majority white union membership.

Dean Angelo Sr., the sixth president of the FOP, said many officers don’t feel represented because they don’t realize everything that is done by the union to secure their livelihood.

“The purpose of your job as the head of a union is to protect the greater number of membership,” Angelo said. “I’m not saying they didn’t experience racism, but I don’t know that it was 25 or 30 years of systemic racism that they faced. I tend to look at that with questionable eyes.”

 

Since the FOP opened its Chicago lodge in 1963, only white men have served as the labor organization’s president. While demographics alone do not determine how police unions function, or their impact, Craig Futterman, a longtime police critic and director of the Civil Rights and Police Accountability Project at the University of Chicago, argues that white police leadership has largely wielded its power in ways that uphold white supremacy and police impunity.

Read More

 

The Chicago police union is trying to put its members on the state’s torture inquiry commission

Two bills introduced by Republicans in the state legislature are "a smack in the face," says one torture survivor.

“There is no enlightened history of police unions and police union leadership,” Futterman said. You have a long history of an overtly racist police union and overtly racist union leadership that has been protected, served racist interests within the police force, [and] has not represented officers of color and particularly Black officers,” Futterman said.

He and other experts said the presidents’ leadership exemplifies the ways that police unions function as truth-denying bodies that perpetuate violence and act as barriers to police reform, racial reconciliation, and justice.

“The problem with police unions is that it all seems to be very narrow-minded thinking about the best way to protect police, which is essentially to close ranks, not share information, to deny systemic problems,” said Kim Ricardo, a law professor at the University of Illinois at Chicago’s law school who has represented plaintiffs in police brutality cases and published scholarly writing focused on reparations law and social movements.

Our timeline of Chicago FOP Lodge 7’s past presidents, which you can read here, takes a deeper look at their tenures, focusing on their words and leadership during tenuous times and examining how their actions have strained the relationship between police and Chicago communities, specifically overpoliced Black neighborhoods that have suffered the brunt of state violence and police misconduct.

 

Chicago’s first police union president started his tenure during the height of the civil rights movement. As organizers like Martin Luther King Jr. put the spotlight on the vicious segregation and police brutality in northern cities, including Chicago, Joseph J. LeFevour aggressively defended officer misconduct and attacked prominent movement leaders. After nine years as president, LeFevour ended his term in 1972. He died in 1984.

The first president of the FOP, Joseph Lefevour, accused Martin Luther King Jr. of inciting violence in the city. When King’s assassination sparked riots in Chicago’s Black communities, Lefevour applauded then-Mayor Richard M. Daley’s shoot-to-kill order to police responding to the chaos.

 

In Mount Prospect, a village divided over the ‘thin blue line’

Mount Prospect, Ill. is the latest of dozens of U.S. cities and towns to take steps toward restricting use of the 'thin blue line' by police and other government agencies. The controversial symbol has become a focal point for community tensions over race and policing in recent years — especially in the wake of the nationwide protests against police violence last summer.

In the post-civil rights era, the second and longest-tenured FOP president, John Dineen, opposed efforts to diversify the police department. He was one of several union leaders over the years to express support for disgraced former police Cmdr. Jon Burge. And their support has continued, despite mounting evidence that Burge tortured scores of mostly Black men from the early 1970s to the early 1990s.

After former police officer Jason Van Dyke shot and killed McDonald in 2014, Angelo remained one of Van Dyke’s most vocal supporters, even offering him a job as a janitor at the lodge after he was suspended from the force.

“All I did was follow the lead of previous presidents, where we brought in people that were found in circumstances that were headlines and that did not put the officers in the best light,” Angelo said. “Did it turn off the community? The community was already turned off.”

Angelo is the only past FOP president interviewed for this story. Injustice Watch reached out to all living FOP presidents by phone, email, and certified mail.

In a response sent by mail to Injustice Watch, Kevin Graham, FOP president from 2017 to 2020, wrote, “The fraternal order of police works hard for its members and the public. It is essential that workers are treated fairly by their employers.”

Other past presidents either did not respond to requests, were unreachable, or had passed away.

A political playbook

FOP presidents wield considerable power as the leaders of a labor organization that elected officials have to reckon with from city hall in Chicago to Illinois’ statehouse in Springfield. The union represents a formidable political bloc that includes current and retired cops, their families, and others who support police or align with FOP stances.

Peter Pihos, an assistant history professor at the Western Washington University with research in policing, race, and politics in Chicago, said police union leaders’ largest political impact is in helping to push a law-and-order approach to public safety. This makes it harder for politicians to address the root causes of crime in social, economic, and political systems for fear of being called “soft on crime.”

“They really set the marker for others to also use this kind of often dehumanizing, very racist language and frameworks,” Pihos said.

The FOP has a history of endorsing and financially backing political candidates who will protect their membership while opposing those who run on criminal justice reform platforms. The union helped get former State’s Attorney Anita Alvarez elected in 2008 and 2012 before Kim Foxx defeated her in a landslide victory in 2016. Alvarez’s critics alleged she was beholden to police and lenient toward cops accused of wrongdoing. She infamously waited more than a year to charge Van Dyke after he shot McDonald 16 times.

The union also has a history of negotiating contracts that organizers and police accountability experts say make it harder to hold cops accountable, and lobbying lawmakers about policies that govern how the city handles police misconduct complaints, investigations, and records.

“Any type of policy, procedure, [or] law that’s going to strengthen the accountability and transparency of police officers, the unions are going to fight it,” Kennedy said.

However, Angelo said politicians are to blame for the relationship between the police and communities because they choose police department leaders, vote on contracts, and create policy. “Laws are put into place and officers follow it. … You have inexperienced people with no knowledge of the job dictating how the job should be done,” he said.

New deals, same old FOP?

 

John Catanzara is the first FOP president to be elected while stripped of police powers, after having them stripped in 2018 for a report he filed against the former police superintendent. Since joining the police department in 1995, Catanzara has racked up at least 35 misconduct complaints and been suspended about half a dozen times. (Illustration by Veronica Martinez for Injustice Watch)

This summer has seen several major developments in city hall that will have a big impact on the FOP and its members. But even though the changes are seen as progress on several fronts, in many respects, the FOP president has sung a familiar tune.

In late July, the Chicago City Council voted to establish civilian oversight of the police department. On the eve of the vote, Catanzara complained during a public safety committee hearing that giving civilians more power to influence policy “is absolutely absurd and dangerous and reckless” and maintained that the city already has enough layers of police oversight.

Chicago has nearly tripled per capita police spending since 1964, data show

For activists and city leaders calling on Mayor Lori Lightfoot to cut the police budget, it’s clear that the money could be better spent elsewhere.

The tentative contract agreement between the FOP and the city also includes reforms that could enhance oversight and accountability. In late August, police officers voted in favor of a new eight-year contract with the city affording them a 20% pay hike over eight years. On Tuesday, the city council workforce committee gave the labor deal the green light, setting it up for a Sept. 14 vote before the whole council, in which at least 26 alderpeople must sign off.

During the committee meeting, the city’s legal team walked the council members through 10 key accountability reforms in the draft contract. The agreement would remove the ban on the investigation of anonymous misconduct complaints and allow disciplinary records older than five years to be preserved. It would also eliminate a requirement for people alleging misconduct to submit sworn affidavits and allow CPD to recognize officers who report misconduct.

 

Here’s what you should know about Chicago’s latest police accountability ‘compromise’

Injustice Watch reviewed the new civilian police oversight ordinance and the changes that it will bring to policing in Chicago.

Negotiators for the city and the FOP say these changes would bring the contract in line with federally mandated reforms spelled out in Chicago’s 2019 consent decree. But several key reforms pushed by advocates in recent years — including an end to the 24-hour delay that cops are afforded before speaking to investigators following a shooting and a requirement that they disclose any employment outside the police department — didn’t make it into the draft deal.

Ald. Mike Rodriguez (22nd Ward) questioned this omission.

“I am still concerned about a number of items here,” Rodriguez said. “I, for one, think it’s important  — particularly given the sensitive nature of police officers’ work — that they don’t come to work tired.”

The workforce development committee voted unanimously to endorse the deal, which would resolve most of the central issues between the city and the FOP. But the two sides could still continue negotiations over areas in which no agreement has yet been reached.

Ahead of the full city council vote, organizers are urging a careful review of the agreement.

“We need the community to scrutinize line by line,” said April Friendly, mass liberation organizer at The People’s Lobby. “Any little T-crossing, I-dotting, comma-adding inside of the existing system’s contracts is still not really going to save or mitigate harm for our communities.”

No one knows how many Chicago cops are vaccinated against Covid-19

How many cops have gotten their vaccine shots? The question has a definite answer. But no one in Mayor Lori Lightfoot's office or the police department seems able to put a number on it.

Meanwhile, a contentious debate is brewing around the mayor’s vaccine mandate for city workers, of which Catanzara has been one of the fiercest critics. In late August, after Mayor Lori Lightfoot announced a Covid-19 vaccine mandate for all city employees, Catanzara made comments to the Chicago Sun-Times that critics interpreted as comparing the mandate to the Holocaust.

Infectious disease experts interviewed by Injustice Watch said unvaccinated police officers put the public at risk because they’re constantly in contact with people, making them likely to contract the virus and likely to spread it. The city’s Black and Latinx communities, which tend to be the most policed, have suffered disproportionately amid the Covid-19 pandemic.

On Sept. 3, before Labor Day weekend, Catanzara gave members an update in a nearly seven-minute video, of which he spent almost three discussing the pending contract and the FOP’s plans to fight the vaccine mandate. He spent the remaining four minutes opining about a recent incident in which a Black woman found walking her dog on the lakefront after hours was violently accosted by a white police officer. She had allegedly failed to comply with his order to leave the area. The police union president called for the officer, who was put on desk duty pending an investigation, to be reinstated “effective immediately.”

“He didn’t throw her to the ground and arrest her like he would have been entitled to do. … I don’t care how bad it would have looked, he would have been justified in doing that,” Catanzara said.

He continued: “It is the recurring theme in police shooting after police shooting; any police incident across this country, [with] few exceptions, is all about a lack of compliance by the subject the police are encountering to start with.

“If that mindset changes, we will not have incidents like Mike Brown, like Laquan McDonald, you name it; there’s name after name after name, and the reoccurring issue is a lack of compliance.”

As the nation continues to envision solutions to racism and police violence, from reforming to defunding or abolishing police, the FOP and its presidents are likely to remain prominent fixtures in the conversation, for better or for worse.

Sarah Wild, an activist with the Chicago Alliance Against Racist and Political Repression, emphasized that issues with the police union are impossible to separate from broader problems with the department.

“The problem of the police and the issues with community control and abolition become the real issue,” Wild said, noting that organizers are continuing to push for more robust community control of the police, including democratic input into the department’s budget and the FOP’s contract. “The union is an expression of the bigger issue.”

Update: On Sept. 14, a group of community organizers and police accountability advocates held a rally in front of City Hall before the contract vote. They urged council members to reject the agreement, calling for the city to work more accountability measures into the deal before giving it the green light. But the city council ultimately approved the contract, with only eight council members rejecting the deal.

Olivia Louthen and Aviva Waldman contributed reporting and research.

Fairfax County polic investigate Fairfax County police and.....wait for it......find the Fairfax County Police innocent!!!!!!

  

 

 

.

 

EXCLUSIVE: Fairfax County police chief says no bias found in Herndon driver case

David TaubeAugust 18, 2021 at 9:30am

 

The Fairfax County Police Department has concluded for a second time that allegations of racial profiling by one of its officers during a 2019 incident in Herndon were unfounded.

The Fairfax County Board of Supervisors directed police to revisit the case in question in January after the county’s Police Civilian Review Panel recommended an additional review in its first-ever challenge of police findings.

According to a June 1 FCPD memo obtained by Reston Now, the second review — this time under a new police chief — found no evidence that a police officer who followed and questioned a Black driver was motivated by racial bias.

“I have reviewed the supplemental investigative findings and concur that no new evidence was revealed to support the allegation of bias-based policing,” Fairfax County Police Chief Kevin Davis said in the memo.

Davis took over as police chief on May 3 amid criticism of his past work in Baltimore and Prince George’s County. In the initial months of his tenure, he has emphasized his willingness to introduce reforms, including revisions to the department’s vehicle pursuit policy and the addition of a data director.

For its follow-up investigation of the Herndon incident, Fairfax County police asked eight employees in the Reston District Station’s Criminal Investigations Section the following question:

“Do you have any direct or indirect knowledge which would indicate [employee name] has engaged or is engaging in behavior that was or is motivated by bias toward a victim’s race, religious conviction, ethnic/national origin, disability, and/or sexual orientation?”

Police said no one indicated there was any evidence of bias exhibited by the detective.

Davis also suggested options for reviewing the case were limited, noting that FCPD started collecting data on officers’ interactions with civilians last October that it wasn’t measuring at the time of this particular incident.

The change aligns with new state requirements for police data collection that took effect on July 1.

“Due to recent updates in Virginia legislation, the Virginia Community Policing Act, the Department has updated our current record management system to capture additional details pertaining to the circumstances of community contacts,” the FCPD said in a statement. “The further details will allow our Department to better understand the contacts we have within our community.”

In his memo, Davis wrote that the department has “further enhanced our transparency by creating a Police Data Sharing Dashboard” that allows people to search information related to warnings, citations, and arrests.

The civilian review panel began reviewing the Herndon incident on May 23, 2019, when it got a citizen’s complaint about an officer who followed him into the parking lot of his apartment complex and repeatedly questioned whether he lived there.

According to the panel’s report, which was published on Oct. 23, 2020, the officer said he followed the individual after becoming suspicious and discovering that his vehicle was registered under two names.

A recording of the encounter shows the officer questioning the man about his residency, while the man sometimes asks whether he is required to respond. At one point, the man asks for the officer’s badge number.

According to the panel’s report, the officer asked the man about his residency 11 times, and the man answered at least nine times that he lived there. After telling the man he was free to go, the officer stayed in the lot “for several more minutes” before verifying his identity and residency.

Fairfax County police said in a statement that they have measures in place to address issues of bias:

FCPD has reaffirmed our well-established commitment to fair and impartial policing by recently adopting General Order 2. This policy focuses on human relations and procedural justice. Procedural justice requires Department members to ensure they are being fair in process, transparent in actions, providing opportunity for communication and being impartial in decision making. All well-established pillars of FCPD, but this policy reaffirms our commitment to these principles with the hopes of [increasing] police legitimacy.

The department says it conducts implicit bias training for all employees and supports the county’s One Fairfax policy in support of the chief’s vision of police being “the leading agency dedicated to fairness, trust, and respect.”

The FCPD also says supervisors are required to perform monthly reviews of officers’ body-worn cameras and in-car videos.

“When there is an allegation of misconduct, [Internal Affairs Bureau] investigations review the officer’s arrests and citations based on race and compare them to other officers at the assigned district station, which covers an 18-month time period,” police said.

In a December 2019 letter to the complainant, then-Police Chief Edwin Roessler wrote that the officer’s actions were improper and in violation of departmental regulations.

He also told the civilian review panel that the officer had no reason to initiate the stop, calling his actions unacceptable and the result of “poor, cascading assumptions and judgments that were wrongly based on his training,” according to the panel’s report.

However, when the panel voted 6-3 in March 2020 to request further investigation, Roessler responded that police would not interview the officer’s coworkers for evidence of racial bias, a stance that evidently changed after the panel voted 7-2 in September 2020 to advise the Board of Supervisors that it considered the investigation incomplete.

“It’s not clear to me under our bylaws that we have any additional move,” Civilian Review Panel Chair Jimmy Bierman told Reston Now yesterday (Tuesday). “We did what we were allowed under the bylaws, and we passed it to the Board of Supervisors.”

The panel released a four-year review on Feb. 26 that included recommendations for an expansion of its authority in light of recent changes in state law, including:

•           Limited investigatory powers, including the opportunity to interview a complainant and up to three key witnesses

•           Electronic access to redacted police investigation reports

•           The ability to monitor police investigations for racial bias or profiling without needing a complaint submitted first

•           More flexibility in how it presents its findings

The county board fulfilled one of the recommendations in agreeing earlier this month to give the panel a full-time executive director position.



Again, Fairfax County Police shoot first and get away with it.

 


Fairfax County Releases Bodycam Video of Police Shooting

Fairfax County police released body camera video and dispatch calls from a police-involved shooting that wounded a woman last month.

The woman who was shot appeared to be having a mental health crisis as she threatened residents and police. 

A caregiver at the group home for adults with intellectual disabilities called 911 and told the dispatcher, “She’s making noise, breaking things. She wants to fight … she wants to kill me.”

Women retreated to the basement. A third person locked themselves in their room.

Then the suspect said she was going to kill herself. 

K9 officers first responded to the 911 calls. With guns drawn, they entered the home and found a 30-year-old resident armed with a kitchen knife. The woman turned her threats toward them, moving in their direction. 

An officer shot the woman in the stomach, and she dropped the knife.

Officers immediately helped the woman, reassuring her she was going to be alright.

The woman is recovering from the gunshot wound. 

Fairfax County Police Chief Kevin Davis believes the video shows the veteran officers had little choice but to act to protect themselves and others in the home.

“That’s tough to watch, but they were doing the best they absolutely could under a very tough circumstance,” he said.

Though, neither officer had a taser, Davis doubts they would have had time to try less than lethal force. But it underscores a problem he plans to address: Not every officer is assigned a taser. 

“I want to go so far as to assign them individually to police officers so that they are immediately available,” he said. 

The investigation is ongoing. The officer who fired his gun is on restricted duty. The woman faces charges of assault on a law enforcement officer. 

This article tagged under:

 

could they possibly drag their feet on this any slower?

 

Fairfax County approves executive director position for police review panel

David TaubeAugust 3, 2021 at 2:00pm

The Fairfax County Police Civilian Review Panel, a citizen-led board intended to help with police accountability, is getting an executive director.

The Fairfax County Board of Supervisors approved the change on July 27 at the urging of the review panel, which is facing increasing caseloads and seeking to gain investigatory powers.

“We’re thrilled that this new position will help us maintain our independence,” Civilian Review Panel Chair Jimmy Bierman said, thanking Board of Supervisors Chairman Jeff McKay and Lee District Supervisor Rodney Lusk, who chairs the board’s public safety committee.

Established in December 2016, the civilian review panel reviews Fairfax County Police Department investigations into civilian complaints with allegations that a police officer abused their authority or engaged in misconduct.

While the panel can make recommendations regarding law enforcement policies and practices, it was not granted the authority to conduct its own investigations.

The review panel, which consists of nine volunteers, documented in February its need for an executive director in an annual report and a four-year review, a document that Bierman spent three months of 40-hour weeks to develop.

The executive director will help the panel document and summarize investigations. Currently, the panel reviews police investigations in person and writes lengthy, time-consuming reports, which means its efforts are heavily dependent on its chair’s schedule.

Bierman, an attorney, likens the change to a congressional committee relying on staff to help draft materials or a federal judge using legal staff to write bench memos.

“It adds to the professionalism of the panel,” he said. “We want to be fiercely independent.”

Since its creation, the review panel has also relied on staff in the office of the independent police auditor, which will now send one position to the panel for the executive director.

Bierman says the staffing switch will help the panel maintain a good working relationship with police by ensuring the independent police auditor’s resources are not overtaxed.

The change to the panel comes after the Virginia General Assembly adopted a law last year that officially permitted localities to create police oversight boards with the power to investigate incidents, make binding disciplinary determinations, and more.

Bierman says the law shows the Commonwealth is serious about supporting independent oversight bodies for police.

The new executive director won’t have independent investigatory powers, but the position could lay the groundwork for the Board of Supervisors to update the panel’s bylaws to give it more authority, as allowed by the new state law, according to Bierman.

The person hired for the new position will be paid $100,000 to $150,000 per year and report directly to the board of supervisors. Springfield District Supervisor Pat Herrity was the only supervisor to oppose the measure.

“I voted against this motion because I didn’t support the original motion to form the Civilian Review Panel as we had an Independent Police Auditor, which is where most significant reviews and recommendations for reforms have come from,” Herrity said in a statement.

On Sept. 28, the board of supervisors’ public safety committee is slated to hear a presentation about the review panel along with recommendations on further reforms in line with the panel’s four-year review.

Among other changes, the report recommended:

·        Authorizing an executive director to monitor police investigations of racial bias or profiling from the onset of an investigation, regardless of whether a complaint has been filed with the panel

·        Allowing the panel to conduct its own additional investigations, including interviewing the complainant and three witnesses

·        Permitting the panel to conduct a review of a completed police investigation of a complaint about racial bias or profiling without needing a person to request a review

Limited in its ability to gather independent information, the civilian review panel has consistently upheld Fairfax County police investigations into abuse of authority and misconduct complaints.

The one exception so far came in October 2020 when the panel determined that the FCPD’s internal review did not thoroughly investigate allegations of racial bias or profiling in a 2019 incident that involved an officer following and questioning a driver in Herndon.

Then-Police Chief Edwin Roessler determined the incident involved poor decision-making but wasn’t motivated by racial bias. The panel disagreed and referred the issue to the board of supervisors, which directed the department in January to take additional action regarding the panel’s request.

“This is part of why the four-year review requested that the panel mandate be changed from simply asking whether [an] investigation itself was ‘complete, thorough, accurate, objective, and impartial’ to determine whether the panel [believed] the conclusion of the investigation is ‘correct,'” Bierman said in a statement.