More Gay couples opt for marriage in Fairfax County

Photo above: Two Fairfax County cops doing nothing on the taxpayers dime

As for Sean Corcoran, the President of the police union, he is a clown

From letter sent to the Washington Post

I really thought the chief was getting it. He needs to be fired if this culture of public deceit is ever going to change.

 The chief declines consent???

His consent is not required!

As for Sean Corcoran, the President of the police union, he is a clown. He was a commissioner and was also on the subcommittee that wrote the proposal that included a civilian review panel. He voted FOR all the recommendations including the civilian panel. It should also be noted that Sean Corcoran was also the one that said he finds it "UNBELIEVABLE" that an officer could be charged with murder while in the commission of his duties. I wonder where the Geer case would be today if a detective like Corcoran was in charge of the Geer investigation. After all, he would have ruled out murder even before he arrived at the scene. 

Open Letter Calling For Fairfax Police Union To Respect Human Rights

October 15, 2015

Fairfax Fraternal Order of Police, Lodge 77

10513 Judicial Drive, Suite 102

Fairfax, VA 22030

Officer Bradley Carruthers

president@fairfaxlodge77.org

571-259-4219

Subject: Open Letter Calling for Fairfax Police Union to Respect Human Rights

Mr. Carruthers –

My name is Jeffrey Imm, with the volunteer human rights organization, Responsible for Equality And Liberty (R.E.A.L.).

I also have my own background working in law enforcement, and was a proud member of the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), when I was younger. I have great respect for law enforcement and the Constitution of the United States of America, which is the basis for all of our American law, as well as our universal human rights which are the fundamental building blocks for all law in America and around the world.

Those who respect the law should inherently respect the human rights that are the basis for such law – including respect for the lives of people of all genders, nationalities, religions, identity groups, and of course, all races. Especially in the United States of America, and certainly in former slave states, such as Virginia, this would certainly demand that anyone credible in the justice community would have a special respect for the rights and lives of African-Americans as well, who have been specifically and historically wronged by this nation, and who patriots in America have sought to rectify those wrongs over the years.

I find it necessary to speak out to those who would abuse our law and the Constitution of the United States. I have seen too much of such abuse defended by misguided police union leaders, and unfortunately by too many members of the Fairfax, Virginia law enforcement community over the past several months. I am not going to write on the details of these unfortunate incidents, as they are publicly well documented, including the sad cases of John Geer, Natasha McKenna, and others who lost their lives at the hands of officers of the law in Fairfax County. It is disturbing, and I would hope that those who respect the law would share such concerns.

I have been in direct contact with the U.S. Department of Justice on their investigation of the death of Natasha McKenna, and I have been assured there will be a thorough investigation into her rights. I know there is an ongoing criminal investigation into the death of John Geer and FCPD Officer Adam Torres has been charged with second degree murder. However, it was just two months ago that Fairfax County Police Union leader of the Fairfax Coalition of Police, Local 5000, International Union of Police Associations’ President Sean Corcoran defended FCPD Officer Adam Torres, charged with murder of John Geer, and provided such a defense by saying to all of the FCPD that “we could all be Adam Torres.” Given that Mr. Torres was charged with murder, the American people certainly should hope not.

Especially in these times and under these circumstances, responsible members of the law enforcement community should know that now is the time for circumspect and measured public statements.

But Mr. Carruthers, instead of such circumspect and measured focus on important matters, it seems that you and too many other leaders of police unions would rather go out and try to pick a fight with the Washington DC metropolitan and the American people.

I don’t see the merit and value in this, especially in your own efforts this week, to use your authority and your position within law enforcement to target (of all things) a Northern Virginia pumpkin patch, because a private residence nearby has a sign reading “Black Lives Matter” in the window. I would think that you might have more important things to do than harass a pumpkin patch farm.

However, in the charged environment that our nation finds itself today, where in a dozen states we have seen law enforcement members being denied service or access even to restaurants, you have decided it should be the business of the Fairfax County police union to petition the public to boycott to Cox Farm pumpkin patch, because some people seek to respect the lives of historically persecuted racial minorities. You seem to think this position is beneficial to the public relationship with law enforcement in our communities.

I am writing to tell you that your position is misguided and counterproductive to law enforcement, its relationship with the public, and a consistent and productive stance on the law and our shared human rights. In our support for our shared universal human rights and respect for the law, we offer an outstretched hand to all, including those with whom we disagree, to promote and defend these rights and responsibilities.

But such responsibilities also include the obligation to challenge words and actions, which we believe will have the result in undermining and denying such freedom. We have read your response, as well as the comments by Cox Farms. What R.E.A.L. truly finds “disturbing and disappointing” is the ongoing abuse of authority, and the politicization of our law enforcement.

Our law enforcement is better than this, and our law enforcement is more important than this. The idea that you believe a police authority can and should be seeking to lead a boycott of a pumpkin farm, because there is a sign which recognizes that “Black Lives Matter,” is deeply offensive to our American values of justice and freedom. It is something that the American people should not expect to see from the law enforcement whose judgment they MUST TRUST.

We don’t give the law enforcement authority to the brave men and women in our justice system to represent OUR SHARED LAW because we are weak, because we are cowards, or because we don’t care about justice. In fact, it is completely the opposite. It is because we care so passionately about all of these that we have sought to have mature, sober, responsible, and professional individuals in our justice system, who we give badges and authority to represent the American people to responsibly enforce our shared law and protect our shared rights.

Furthermore, in the Washington DC metropolitan area, we have one of the most unique bodies of constituents in America, with likely the single largest concentration of those who have sworn to preserve, protect, and defend the Constitution of the United States of America from all enemies foreign and domestic. Those who have sworn such a sacred oath are a very large portion of the constituency that the FCPD represents in Fairfax County in terms of law enforcement. Speaking as one who swore this oath myself, while employed with the F.B.I., I can tell you there are no caveats to this oath, and we don’t seek to defend the Constitution just for people of some races, some identity groups, and only in some circumstance. That is NOT what we swore to, Mr. Carruthers, and I urge you, the Fairfax County FOP, and the FCPD and law enforcement community to recognize exactly who you are dealing with here.

Let me perfectly clear and candid, sir. The people in Fairfax County and the Washington D.C. metropolitan area who swore to defend the Constitution of the United States of America have absolutely no intention of surrendering on that solemn vow to those who believe they can misuse their authority to bully and harass people in our community on issues of our shared rights and freedoms.

Of all the places in this great nation, the one place you don’t want to pick a fight against the rights and freedoms of the people is in the metropolitan area of our Nation’s Capital.

Our law and our Constitution are shared with the people in Fairfax County and the American people. It does not belong to simply one or two of us, and it certainly is not owned by the Fairfax County Police or their police union. If you want to pick a fight with Cox Farms’ pumpkin patch over the rights of African-Americans lives to have an equal measure with all other Americans, believe me, your fight is not with Cox Farms, your fight is not with African-Americans, and your fight is not with people in Fairfax County. If you want to fight with people on this issue, you need to understand you are picking a fight not just with them, but with the AMERICAN PEOPLE, including all of us who swore that OATH to defend the Constitution.

Those who want to attack those who seek equal justice and respect for the lives of African-Americans are not simply seeking a quarrel with certain groups, but are actually seeking to challenge all those who are RESPONSIBLE for equality and liberty.

Including me.

I don’t know what country you think you live in, Mr. Carruthers. But in case you have forgotten, let me remind you. This is not some totalitarian or fascist police state, where those in “authority” can use power like a whip to force their views on others and deny their fellow citizens’ fundamental freedoms.

You are in the UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, sir. In this great nation, when someone seeks to bully and attack the rights of equality for some, they attack the rights of equality for all. Because in this great nation, we hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men and women are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.

That, Mr. Carruthers, is why Black Lives Matter.

If you don’t understand those truths that we hold self-evident, sir, then you don’t understand the basis for this great nation, and I am sorry, you don’t understand the basis for OUR LAW. If you cannot understand our law, then sir, I am sorry, but you really do not belong in a position in LAW ENFORCEMENT.

I would urge you to reconsider your position on attacking Cox Farms, not simply to delete your inflammatory Twitter message seeking to abuse and politicize your authority within law enforcement to attack their business because someone there has the conscience of the truths we hold self-evident as a nation.

I am asking you to publicly retract and apologize regarding your statement on Cox Farms, and I am asking you to make peace with the community on this issue. We don’t want a fight with leaders in our law enforcement community. Trust me, sir, the leaders in our local law enforcement community don’t want a fight with those who have sworn an oath to defend the freedoms and laws of the United States of America.

Especially in the Washington DC metropolitan area, where so many have committed their lives to the freedoms our nation is based on, we take our vows to defend those freedoms and the LAW on which it is based very seriously and very personally. It is not simply some political idea or theory to many of us here; it is a fundamental definition as to who we are. The millions here who this is a core part of our identity are as unyielding on this, as the marble towers of the Lincoln Memorial overlooking the great statue of the defender of our Union, President Abraham Lincoln, and the marble statue of the defender of nation’s Conscience, Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr.

We are a solid ROCK on this issue, and we will not be moved.

Under the circumstances, Mr. Carruthers, it would be in the best interests of the FCPD and your union to clarify your position on this matter expeditiously.

Now would be a good time. It is always a good day to be responsible for equality and liberty.

Sincerely, with Fidelity – Bravery – Integrity

to our Nation, Law, and Shared Human Rights,

 Jeffrey Imm

Founder, Responsible for Equality And Liberty (R.E.A.L.)

usa@realcourage.org

301-613-8789

=============================

Fairfax Fraternal Order of Police, Lodge 77

Officer Bradley Carruthers, President

Comments Regarding “Black Lives Matter” Sign Near Cox Farms

 Fairfax FOP Lodge 77 Twitter Message Attacking Cox Farms for "Black Lives Matters" (Source: Twitter)

Fairfax FOP Lodge 77 Twitter Message Attacking Cox Farms for “Black Lives Matters” (Source: Twitter)

Clyde Hobbs - Jailed After Repeatedly Calling 911 For Phone Sex

Oklahoma City, Oklahoma - Clyde Dorian Hobbs, a 72-year-old Oklahoma City man was jailed Saturday after he allegedly called 911 numerous times to talk about sex.

 According to Oklahoma City Police, Hobbs called 911 operators 17 times, and in each instance attempted to initiated a conversation about sex.

 When officers went to Hobbs's residence to arrest him, his wife answered the door. During the ride to jail, Hobbs behaved in a belligerent manner, according to investigators.

Court records show Hobbs has been arrested on three prior occasions for misusing the 911 system.

 He was booked into jail and charged with making false reports. His bail was set at $34,000.

Idiot police chase

The Fairfax County Police kill citizens of Fairfax County on a regular basis. It’s what they do, that’s their thing. They murder unarmed citizens and then lie about.  And now they want us to allow them to have TV inspired high chase speeds across our roads without due cause.

Look, this ain’t Montana we’re living in. There are almost 3.5 million people living in the DC area, we can’t have this mouth breathers zipping through the streets at high speeds to chase low level law breakers.

Last week Fairfax County Killer cops saw a guy named Anders N. Kinsler, age, driving a motorcycle without displaying the registration. So they gave chase, FOR ONE HOUR THROUGH RUSH HOUR TRAFFIC all the way from Fairfax County to Loudoun County and managed to drag Loudoun deputies and the Virginia State Police into the insanity.

Our elected officials, who are terrified of the Fairfax County cops, of course said nothing. However WRC television spoke up and did a story on this stupidity.

Fairfax County Police refused to admit they had endangered the community by starting the chase saying that THE POLICIES THEY WROTE FOR THEMSELVES  allow them to chase when the need to apprehend a suspect, even for something minor, "outweighs the level of danger" created by the pursuit.

The local government is much frightened of the police to do anything about this so we need the state government to step in and force these idiots to abandon this idiot policy.

I scream, you scream

NYPD COP WHO KILLED DEBORAH DANNER HAS HISTORY OF VIOLENCE SAYS LAWYER WHO SUED HIM

OFFICER HUGH BARRY'S BRUTALITY WAS CAUGHT ON CAMERA AT A 2011 SMIF-N-WESSUN CONCERT IN NYC

BY KEEGAN STEPHAN

  The NYPD officer who shot and killed 66-year-old Deborah Danner in her Bronx apartment on Tuesday night — prompting the police commissioner to issue a statement admitting that proper procedures weren’t followed — has twice been sued for assault and civil rights violations, costing the city an undisclosed amount of money. In one incident, his actions were captured on video, but the NYPD failed to take any meaningful action against Officer Hugh Barry (pictured on the left next to the man he assaulted). Instead, they promoted him.

Mass Appeal spoke with Kenneth Montgomery, a criminal defense and civil rights attorney, who was given the opportunity to question Barry at trial on behalf of a client and he says he is “not surprised” that the officer ended up killing someone. At the 2011 album release party for Monumental, the collaboration between rappers Smif-N-Wessun and producer Peter Rock, Montgomery witnessed a melee involving Officer Barry in which multiple people were arrested.

According to Montgomery, there were several arrests on that June night at and outside the LES venue Tammany Hall. The police “came there to fight,” he says. “It wasn’t about diplomacy. They had a mob mentality. There wasn’t a riot going on or anything. It was a calm event. But the police didn’t even go inside to try to talk to anybody about whatever complaint they were there for. They stood outside, pulled on their black leather gloves – and it was hot, it was the middle of summer – and started grabbing people as they were leaving and shoving them.”

Montgomery says his client, Gabriel Diaz, was leaving the area as instructed by police when cops started shoving him from behind, then hitting him with a baton. The incident can be seen in the video below. Mongtomery says Officer Barry, can be seen jumping into the fray, repeatedly throwing overhead punches that landed on Diaz’s head:

The City was well aware of the incident at the time and apparently took no action. Initially, Diaz and the others arrested at the release party were charged with crimes ranging from resisting arrest to assault of a police officer, but as Montgomery began collecting video evidence, all the criminal charges were dropped.

Three of the men involved countersued and filed complaints with the Civilian Complaint Review Board, the NYC agency charged with investigating allegations of police misconduct. Despite the videos, the Civilian Complaint Review Board said the claims were “unsubstantiated.”

At trial, the videos were disclosed to the city and played back to the officers. The complaint points to Barry’s violent actions specifically:

 On the stand, Montgomery said Barry was “remorseless” and “didn’t seem to understand the magnitude of what he had done or what was going on,” explains the attorney. The officers were ultimately found not guilty. Montgomery suspects this was the result of the largely suburban jury, which couldn’t conceive of officers being the aggressors, especially against a group of young, black men.

Last month, the NYPD decided to stop releasing officer’s discipline records, ending a 40 year practice of doing so, making it hard to ascertain if Barry was disciplined internally. But since the 2014 lawsuit, he has been promoted from P.O. to Sergeant.

And this was the second lawsuit against the officer. The first, in 2012, accused him of assaulting and pepper-spraying a subdued suspect, also a young, black man. The following is an excerpt from the complaint in which the the sole officer named was Barry.

 Again, all charges were dropped, and the victim countersued. This case was settled out of court, another implied admission of guilt on the part of the city, costing taxpayers an undisclosed amount of money. For comparison, the three women pepper-sprayed by the NYPD during Occupy Wall Street received over $100,000 each. In 2014, it was reported that over $428 million was shelled out over a five year period in settlements against the NYPD and for the fiscal year 2016, $228.5 million was payed out for police misconduct.

While the NYPD said it “failed” by killing Deborah Danner, it appears to be trying to limit its culpability.  In reality, the NYPD had ample evidence of Barry’s propensity to violence and excessive force before he killed Danner and yet, despite two lawsuits for assault — one settled out of court, and another with video evidence — the NYPD promoted Barry to sergeant.

Promoting officers involved in violent incidents has become a standard practice for the nation’s largest police force. The NYPD recently promoted the cop who killed Amadou Diallo and increased the pay of the officers who killed Ramarley Graham and Eric Garner, long after their killings of black men sparked protests and made national headlines.

“The City defended these officers very aggressively,” says Montgomery. “People don’t understand how unqualified these officers are to have guns and be assessing danger.”

Surely the NYPD does not understand this, as it continues to defend officers against multiple charges of excessive force, and increases their presence in communities of color for non-criminal offenses under the banner of “community policing.”

Fairfax County: Autopsy Report Yet to Come for Deputy-Involved Shooting

Administrative investigation to follow.

By Tim Peterson

Law enforcement officials are still waiting to receive the final autopsy report for Yovani Amaya Gomez, 29, who was shot dead by Fairfax County Sheriff’s Deputy MDS Patrick McPartlin outside Inova Fairfax Hospital on Aug. 15 of this year.

Police had previously reported Gomez’s name as Jovany Martinez, but released an update on Nov. 1 that Homicide detectives confirmed his true legal name with help from the Honduran embassy and family members in Honduras.

Gomez first approached a Fairfax County Police cruiser and officer during the day on Aug. 15 in Annandale. The officer suspected he was having either a mental health episode or a heat-induced medical emergency, and called in Fairfax County Fire & Rescue and a team of medics.

Gomez was taken to Inova Fairfax to be further evaluated. The transport investigation finished around 4 p.m.; medical staff said he wasn’t in mental distress.

That evening, Gomez was discharged from the hospital and escorted to the bus stop by Inova security. An Inova spokesperson would not say why he had an escort or elaborate on any condition he may have had.

After he was left at the stop, security received reports of a man at the bus stop threatening people with an apparent weapon. When security responded to the scene, Gomez attacked a guard with a metal sign post, police reported.

Sheriff’s Deputy MDS Patrick McPartlin responded to a backup call from the guards and attempted to de-escalate the situation. But officials said Gomez ran at McPartlin and swung the sign post in an attempt to strike him.

Gomez allegedly didn’t respond to repeated attempts to stop advancing on the deputy, so McPartlin shot him several times while tactically retreating.

McPartlin was carrying neither a taser nor a beanbag gun, which are less-lethal options for deputies outside the Adult Detention Center but not mandatory for the Sheriff’s Office. He was put on administrative leave after the shooting.

Police report their criminal investigation is complete. Once they receive the autopsy report, the case file will go to the Commonwealth’s attorney for a decision on whether there was any criminal liability in the shooting.

FCPD spokesman MPO Don Gotthardt said there were no additional details of the criminal investigation to be released, and that there’s no expected timeline for receiving the medical examiner’s report.

Now that the criminal investigation is complete, the Sheriff’s Office will conduct its own administrative investigation of the shooting.

Justice Department to charge cop in death of Eric Garner

By Larry Celona and Jamie Schram

October 25, 2016

Washington-based federal prosecutors plan to aggressively pursue charges against NYPD cop Daniel Pantaleo for the chokehold death of Eric Garner on Staten Island, a law enforcement source told The Post on Tuesday.

“It’s going to happen sooner than later,” the source said of an indictment. “Washington wants to indict him.”

Federal investigators in Brooklyn were replaced by DC counterparts because of their reluctance to bring charges, the source said.

The New York feds are privately seething. They accused their Beltway colleagues of trying to “make an example out of Pantaleo” at any cost, said one source familiar with the case.

“We already … came to a conclusion which they didn’t like. It’s truly disgraceful what they’re doing,” the source said.

This is the sort of "clean our image"PR crap the Fairfax County Police spend YOUR money on

Bridging the gap in American policing

When it comes to police training in the US, there is little consistency across the country’s 18,000 law enforcement agencies. Romina Spina reports from Fairfax County on the challenges reformers face.

After the local community protested an officer-involved shooting that killed a man in Fairfax County, Virginia, the newly appointed chief of police, Edwin Roessler, decided to put his department on a different course. What was most needed from its 1,300 sworn officers, he realized, was a change of mindset. WHICH HAS NEVER HAPPENED BUT SELLS WELL WHEN YOU SELL IT TO THE PRESS.

That killing happened in 2013, only months before the death of Michael Brown, a black teenager who was shot by a white police officer in Ferguson, Missouri. Since then, repeated reports of officer-involved killings of African American males across the country exposed deep rifts between the police and the communities, leading to renewed calls for reform. Back then, in an unusually proactive approach within the law enforcement world, Fairfax County Police Department had already started considering alternatives to the excessive use of force that had jeopardized community relations. A turning point was an overhaul of its training practices, so that officers could learn how to restore trust and better serve the county's residents. DROP THE PUNK ATTITUDE THAT CAUSED THE COMMUNITY ALL OF THESE PROBLEM….THAT WOULD HELP.

Officer training is perhaps the most challenging aspect for police reformers in the United States. That's mainly because control over America's police forces is decentralized. Nationwide, there are about 18,000 different law enforcement agencies, and no unified training standards for them exist.

According to Seth Stoughton, a former veteran officer and now a professor at the University of South Carolina, there is limited research on the types of police training and their delivery. "We typically don't know how effective training is, and whether certain training is better than other," he told DW. In other words, nobody really knows what the best way is to train an officer.

Because there is so little consistency, officers working at two nearby departments might be trained in completely different ways. "Training quality can also vary tremendously," Stoughton added. For example, a common method of instructions consists in recounting war anecdotes. Some recruits learn through hands-on scenarios and role plays, others try to absorb the same information in lectures. Not every agency can provide training because of budget constraints. In those cases, they rely on free training sessions so that officers can keep their certifications.

De-escalation whenever possible

Recommendations for better training were included in the final report by the President's Task Force on 21st Century Policing, appointed in the aftermath of Ferguson. Other measures addressed the need for transparency and data sharing. But the response from police departments to President Obama's initiative has been underwhelming. Out of 18,000 agencies, only a few hundred showed an interest in the proposed changes.

Fairfax County was one them. Here, Maj. Richard Perez leads reform efforts. The emphasis is on transparency, which includes access to information and the release of footage related to officer-involved shootings. The other focus is on de-escalation, whenever possible. The goal is to use different techniques to defuse tense situations, preventing or limiting the use of force.

TRANSPARENCY? ARE YOU FUCKING KIDDING ME? A TOTAL LACK OF TRANSPARENCY HAS LED TO FORCED OVERSIGHT OF THE FAIRFAX COUNTY POLICE.

Perez looked at new training methods that would prepare its officers to do that. "Training is the gap in American policing," he told DW at the department's headquarters. He also believes that better training leads to cultural change.

Much of what his officers learn now stems from a program called T3 ("Tact, Tactics and Trust"), which is centered on the psychology of social interactions. It's the brainchild of Jonathan Wender, a sociologist and former police officer in Washington State.

Tact, tactics and trust

One of the first things Wender teaches is the need to understand and to never humiliate the person in front of them. "With policing, people on the street don't mind so much the force, they understand that that's part of it. But they resent the humiliation," he told DW. With officers, he talks about the experience of humiliationand the physical rage that comes from it.

De-escalation is just one of many tools that can be used in a difficult situation. The more trainers drew on science to build skills, the more effective the training would be, said Wender. That required not only abstract information, but also opportunities for officers to practise tactics. It's a big difference from the training he remembers receiving more than two decades ago, or from what is often taught in academies nowadays.

Wender believes that there is also an urgent need to teach officers to function well under stress. Many of them walked around in fear, he added. "Vigilance is important, but hyper-vigilance is dysfunctional, it leads people to do stupid things." Part of it has to do with the misconception about the risks of being shot dead in the line of duty, says Wender. More American cops were actually killed in traffic accidents.

Traditional training is focused on officer safety. This helps to explain why, on average, recruits spend nearly 60 training hours learning how to shoot firearms, and 10 hours or less learning about social interaction, psychology and communication skills. "But controlling the body is the least effective form of control," said Wender.

With personal safety being so paramount, many police unions are critical of the new emphasis on de-escalation. Stephen Bigelow, an officer and union leader in Washington, D.C., teaches de-escalation at the city's academy and is aware of its limits. In practice, these tactics were not always a viable option, he told DW. Like Wender, he believes that officers needed to learn how to make decisions under stress. Referring to recent police shootings, he said that "some of these instances were just two nervous people and misunderstandings, so we need to talk to each other."

Lack of money and will

Back in Fairfax County, when asked if their training model could be replicated elsewhere, Perez and his team said that core skills involved - social interaction, community outreach and trust-building - should be transferable. At the same time, they were aware that compared with many other places, their county had a low crime rate.

That difference matters. While most observers and officials recognize the need to reform, a lack of political will and insufficient funding prevent progress. "There is a huge dissonance between the cry for reform and the dollars put behind it. [Many] police departments won't spend the money to train people," Wender said.

In cities like Baltimore or Chicago, where problems were often concentrated in marginalized communities, it would be harder to implement new programs, as law enforcement agencies lacked the funding for quality training.

"The best police departments are in those communities who are affluent, who have resources to hire and train the best people. The people who need it most, tend to get it least," Wender said. 

Washington DC police officer is arrested for 'driving drunk on duty at 2am'

•           Officer Arthur Thompson, of the Metropolitan Police Department, was arrested because of a citizen's complaint early Sunday morning

•           The citizen discovered Thompson impaired and contacted cops, who sent a police supervisor to check on him

•           Cops say Thompson smelled  of booze and failed a sobriety test

•           Thompson's police powers have been revoked while he's investigated

By DAILYMAIL.COM REPORTER

A police officer in Washington, DC, was arrested Sunday morning for allegedly driving drunk while on duty.

Officer Arthur Thompson, of the Metropolitan Police Department, was arrested about 2:20am Sunday because of a citizen's complaint, the Washington Post reported.

The citizen discovered Thompson, a four-year-veteran on the force, impaired and contacted cops.

His colleagues sent a police supervisor to check on him, FOX 5 reported. 

'During the investigation, the supervisor detected the odor of alcohol,' police said in a statement.

'Field sobriety tests were conducted which confirmed the officer was under the influence.'

He was arrested on the 1400 block of 18th Street and charged with DUI, the Post reported.

Thompson had had been with the Metropolitan PD for four years.

He lost his police powers while the incident remains under investigation by internal affairs.

Training law enforcement to deal with autistic people

 by Chris Richard/California Health Report

CHRIS RICHARD/CALIFORNIA HEALTH REPORT

The quiz was really easy.

Who was the first president of the United States? What’s 39 plus 16? What does UFO stand for?

But test-taking conditions were less than ideal.

A group of sheriff’s deputies would have to read the 10 questions through 3D glasses as a loudspeaker blared disjointed music, speech and static. Right-handed people would be required to write their answers legibly with their left, and vice versa.

At the end of the 60 seconds allotted for the quiz, most people hadn’t finished. Some said they felt frustrated because they knew the answers and couldn’t write them down.

That was just a hint of what it’s like to be autistic, said Kate Movius of Autism Interaction Solutions, who included the quiz in a recent training session at a Los Angeles County Sheriff’s substation.

"Imagine you felt like that all the time. Imagine if somebody asked you, 'Where do you live?' and you know exactly where you live, and you can’t get the words out," she told the deputies.

"It’s very easy with those with autism to misunderstand them and think they’re either being stubborn, belligerent, rude or noncompliant," said Movius. "These are the four adjectives that often get applied."

Amid increased public scrutiny of law enforcement tactics, some Southern California agencies - including the LAPD, the Orange Police Department, the Los Angeles School Police Department and others - have started specialized training to help officers read the signs of autism and respond appropriately.

The Los Angeles County Sheriff’s City of Industry substation began offering such training in January at the request of City Councilwoman Cory Moss, whose eight-year-old son has autism.

"The deputies have been telling us they’re really learning," Moss said. "A lot of times, they’ll say, ‘I didn’t know what I didn’t know."

Knowing what to look for can be especially challenging because autism is a spectrum disorder. Autistic people share some degree of difficulty in social interaction, verbal and nonverbal communication. But while some people with autism have intellectual disability, others excel in visual skills, music, math and art, according to the advocacy group Autism Speaks.

Movius said law enforcement authorities can expect the number of interactions with the autistic to increase. Citing statistics from Autism Speaks, she said the autism rate is increasing, and noted that people with developmental disabilities are seven times more likely to have dealings with law enforcement than those without disabilities.

Some of those interactions have generated controversy. In July, for instance, a Burbank police officer used pepper spray and a Taser to subdue a 16-year-old autistic boy who allegedly was assaulting him after the officer stopped his mother’s car because the teen was not wearing a seatbelt, according to a police spokesperson.

In her training presentation, Movius described a series of scenarios where people might look like they were up to no good when in fact they were simply autistic.

For example, police might get a call about somebody walking down the street looking into car windows. While it might be a car burglar looking for things to steal, it might be an autistic person fascinated by something he’d glimpsed through a window, Movius said.

Autistic people often are literal minded, so they might answer affirmatively to a deputy’s question, "Are you on drugs?" because they’d taken aspirin recently, she said.

And sometimes, what looks like recalcitrance is simply an inability to speak. Movius suggested alternatives like handing a seemingly uncommunicative person a smart phone or tablet to type out answers.

An especially disconcerting event can be a "meltdown," a little-understood event in which an autistic person seems to fly into a tantrum for no reason, sometimes striking or biting himself. Movius said about two years ago in Glendale, police got a call about a kidnapping attempt – people had seen two men struggling to wrap a third man in a blanket. It turned out the two men were the third man’s caregivers, she said, noting that it’s sometimes necessary to gently try to restrain someone having a meltdown.

In such cases, the best thing a law enforcement officer can do is "empower the parent or the caregiver," said Bobbie Hendrickson, who attended the training session with her two autistic children.

"The parent or the caregiver knows what the person needs," she said. "For me, it would be just keeping people away from us and telling them, 'Everybody go about your business and let them through. It’s OK.'"

Deputy Christopher Abeyta said one of the principles he learned was the importance of giving himself time to interpret what he observes. It might take time to consider the possibility that somebody could be autistic.

"I think I would just slow things down," he said.

That’s the kind of lesson Sheriff’s Lt. John Gannon, who oversees the training program, wants to convey.

"People who come through this have that extra layer of knowledge in their minds," he said.  In a challenging situation, "Now maybe they’ll think, 'It could be ...' and they try something different."

Deputies have already used that new perspective to ease communication with several autistic people, Gannon said.

Interactions between people with autism and the police can result in miscommunication that leads to quick escalation.

Last September, police in Kodiak, Alaska responding to a report of a man breaking into a car restrained a 28-year-old autistic man who had been checking his family’s mailbox nearby. The man didn’t turn face down on the ground to be handcuffed as ordered. Officers pepper-sprayed him as he screamed, "I’m sorry! I want to go home!" A police investigation found that the use of force was appropriate, but the man’s family has sued.

In July, police in North Miami, Florida shot and wounded the caregiver of a severely autistic man who had wandered away from a group home and was playing with a silver toy truck. Someone reported the truck as a gun.

The shooting of caretaker Charles Kinsey provoked widespread outrage after the online release of a bystander’s video emerged showing him with his arms raised as officers confronted the unidentified autistic man, who was shouting loudly. The president of North Miami’s police union was quoted as saying the officer thought Kinsey was in danger and was aiming for the autistic man and hit the caretaker by mistake.

During the July stop in the Burbank incident, the teen began to argue with his mother and the officer, at one point saying he wanted to fight the officer "hand-to-hand," said Burbank Police Sgt. Claudio Losacco. He said the officer, a four-year veteran, tried to reduce tensions by issuing a warning instead of a traffic citation, but the youth remained agitated and aggressive.

Losacco said the boy kicked his car door open into the officer’s knees, peeled off his sweatshirt and approached the officer in a fighting stance, telling the officer to pepper spray him. The officer did, but without apparent effect, Losacco said. He said the teen punched the officer several times, knocking off his glasses, whereupon the officer shocked him with his Taser and handcuffed him. The boy has been arrested on suspicion of issuing a challenge to fight in a public place, resisting an officer by force and battery on a peace officer, Losacco said.

"That is the narrative that the police department is presenting, but the family disputes those facts and is prepared to challenge them," said Areva Martin, an attorney representing the boy’s family. She said she’s requested a copy of the officer’s body-camera video of the confrontation, and the family is weighing a lawsuit.

"What we see in so many of these cases is a resistance to patience, a resistance to how individuals with mental health issues respond," Martin said.

"Police are trained to give you an order, and their expectation is that you will follow that order immediately," she said. "And if you do not, they then ratchet it up. And they oftentimes go from zero to 100 very quickly."

"The reality is, said Martin, "if you give an order to a person with autism, they don’t have the cognitive ability to process that order and to respond to it in the way that police are trained someone should respond."

Losacco said that accusation doesn’t fit his department. He noted that Burbank officers undertook training on dealing with people with autism last year, and were featured on the trainer’s website.

Emily Iland, who led two days of training for Burbank in June 2015, said it was her understanding it included all of the police department’s sworn officers.

"But even when you’re trained and trained well," says Iland, "sometimes a situation takes a course of its own."

The state of policing in Fairfax County

HERNDON, Va. (AP) — A civilian employee with the Herndon Police Department has been arrested and charged with illegally videotaping women in a police department bathroom.

Herndon Police said Tuesday that 30-year-old Michael Richard Carr was arrested Oct. 1 at a hotel in Orlando, Florida, and faces five counts of videotaping a person without consent in a location where there is an expectation of privacy.

Police say Carr abruptly resigned from his post as a communications technician with the department late last month and that he cut off contact with his family.

Police began a missing-persons investigation and discovered information that Carr had illegally recorded two women in a bathroom at the police communications center.

Carr is being held at the Orange County jail in Florida pending extradition.

Think about this; is anyone actually so stupid they would do this? Do you know what the chances are these idiots will arrest you?

Reston Residents: Fairfax County Police Want You to Bring Them Your Drugs

Authorities are pushing county residents to get rid of their unused and expired prescription drugs.

By Dan Taylor

RESTON, VA — The Fairfax County Police Department wants you to hand your drugs over to them. Don't worry, it's OK.

Fairfax County Police are providing locals with an opportunity to dispose of their potentially dangerous expired, unused and unwanted prescription drugs for the 12th National Drug Take Back Day this Saturday, Oct. 22. You can drop them off at the Reston District Station located at 12000 Bowman Towne Drive between 10 a.m. and 2 p.m.

"DON'T flush unused medicines," Fairfax County says on its website. "Why? Because they can end up in our rivers and streams. To help protect our environment, throw unused, unwanted or expired over-the-counter and prescription medicines in the trash. Don’t flush medicines — except when specifically instructed by the label."

They'll drag this out for ever and never actually make it work...wait and see

By Antonio Olivo October 26

Virginia’s largest jurisdiction has moved closer to creating a civilian review panel for cases of alleged police abuse, part of an ongoing series of police reforms in Fairfax County being launched at a time when such cases have stirred concerns nationwide.

During a committee meeting Tuesday, the county’s Board of Supervisors hashed out details for what would be an independent body that would scrutinize cases involving police abuse or misconduct, joining the District and a handful of major cities across the country that have added civilian oversight of police.

The effort in Fairfax is part of about $35 million in proposed changes that officials are considering in response to a community backlash over how the county handled the investigation into the 2013 fatal shooting of John B. Geer, who was unarmed when he was gunned down by a county police officer outside his home.

[Panel recommends broad changes to police practices in Fairfax County]

Last month, the board also moved to hire an independent police auditor who will review investigations into cases where force is used by a police officer to apprehend a suspect.

Board chair Sharon Bulova (D) said both reforms will help restore trust in the county’s department of about 1,700 sworn officers.

“An independent panel will be extremely helpful in providing people with an independent portal through which they’re able to bring their grievances and issues,” said Bulova, who appointed a police advisory commission last year that recommended 202 total reforms. “I think that would be good for Fairfax County.”

A civilian review panel would consist of nine members, who would examine police department investigations into claims of abuse or misconduct — including harassment, sexual abuse, discrimination and recklessly endangering a person in custody.

The panel would be able to hold public meetings during its review and compel county police officials and members of the Internal Affairs Bureau to explain their findings during those sessions.

Amid a rash of police shootings that have generated protests across the country, Fairfax has tried to walk a fine line in implementing its own forms of police accountability.

That was apparent Tuesday, when county supervisors wrestled with how to implement a new form of oversight that rank-and-file police officers have largely opposed, arguing that a civilian review panel would be biased against them.

Board members debated whether the new panel should have investigative authority, such as taking in testimony from the person who alleged police abuse or misconduct.

Supervisor John C. Cook (R-Braddock), who chairs the board’s public safety committee, argued against it, saying that it would be unfair to the accused police officer — who is protected under state law from having to testify outside the Internal Affairs Bureau process in cases involving allegations of misconduct.

“You can’t have a hearing or a meeting where one side gets to give additional evidence and the other side doesn’t,” said Cook, who along with several other supervisors pushed for the panel to be restricted to reviewing investigative case files.

Given that the panel would have access to those files, the board also deliberated over whether panel members should undergo criminal background checks before they are appointed to two-year terms.

That question remained unresolved after several supervisors argued against excluding people with past felony convictions from participating in a process that is designed to give a voice to everyone in the community.

“The statement that we want is that this body will be independent and fair,” said Supervisor Linda Q. Smyth (D-Providence). “That’s the underlying basis of it.”

County police officers at the meeting were visibly frustrated by the likely creation of the panel, which they consider unnecessary oversight on top of internal controls designed to root out misconduct.

“Most police officers do feel that this is being rammed down their throats,” Officer Rich Barron, lodge secretary of the county’s chapter of the Fraternal Order of Police, told the board. “There are a host of citizens who aren’t going to satisfied by any investigation that’s conducted until they are able to see an entire case file, including information that shouldn’t be public.”

Supervisor Cathy Hudgins (D-Hunter Mill) said the panel is necessary to move Fairfax past the frustrations brought by the Geer controversy.

“I don't think we have an alternative,” she said. “Because we don’t want to go through another upsetting experience like we had in the past.”

#Fairfax County — By its Dec. 6 meeting, the Fairfax County Board of Supervisors should have the opportunity to vote on creating a Civilian Review Panel for police oversight, a first in Fairfax.

#That’s the goal of supervisor John Cook (R-Braddock), who chairs the board’s public safety committee. The committee met Tuesday, Oct. 25 to consider a draft of the action item that would establish the review panel.

#The independent panel was one of the more controversial of the 142 recommendations from the Ad Hoc Police Practices Review Commission created by board chairman Sharon Bulova in 2015.

#The commission, with representatives from law enforcement, the media and the community at large, was set up in response to a lack of transparency and accountability surrounding the 2013 shooting death of unarmed Springfield man John Geer by Fairfax County Police officer Adam Torres.

#Fairfax County Police and the supervisors didn’t release information about the case for more than a year after Geer’s death, even to his family. It took a wrongful death civil suit filed by the family and a court order to finally get investigation files and Torres’ name released.

#Torres was fired in July 2015 and indicted by a grand jury for murder in August 2015, a first charge of that kind for any officer in the history of Fairfax County Police.

#The former police officer pleaded guilty to involuntary manslaughter and was released in June, after receiving credit for time served for a 12-month sentence.

#On Sept. 20, the supervisors unanimously approved another recommendation from the commission: creating an office of the independent police auditor.

#The auditor will review all use of force incidents that result in serious injury or death, as well as other citizen complaints about police use of force not resulting in serious injury or death.

#In addition, the auditor could engage in policy and practice analysis, as suggested by the Board of Supervisors, County Executive or Chief of Police.

#BY CONTRAST, the civilian review panel would “review completed police internal administrative investigations of civilian complaints concerning allegations of abuse of authority and serious misconduct,” according to the draft action item.

#At the Oct. 25 meeting, Cook specified the civilian review panel would not conduct investigations. Rather, the panel would review investigation files and decide whether the police’s own review was “well done, not well done or needs more work,” Cook said.

#If they determine more work is required, the panel would be able to send the issue back to the police.

#Citizens could initiate that process in two ways, Cook explained: If they file a complaint with the police department but are unsatisfied with the results of an investigation, they can bring the matter to the civilian review panel. Or they could submit a complaint to the panel directly, which could request an investigation be conducted by police, that could then be reviewed by the panel.

#Review of the investigations would happen at public meetings held by the panel. Fairfax County Chief of Police Edwin Roessler and an officer from the Internal Affairs Bureau would attend these hearings to offer additional explanation, but involved officers can’t be required to come before the panel or answer questions, under the Code of Virginia.

#Adrian Steel, a member of the Ad Hoc Commission, said the goal of the meeting was to provide the public with a “full and fair presentation” of an investigation review.

#The meeting before the panel would provide a place for the complainant to appear “and have his or her day,” Steel said. But Cook raised questions about whether the complainant should speak at the meeting, and if so, what limits might be in place.

#Cook and Deputy County Executive Dave Rohrer said the complainant could state the reasons he or she asked for a review. Rohrer said that since police investigators will appear before the panel to answer questions, it would be fair to allow the complainant to speak as well.

#The board will also need to finalize criteria for who would be eligible to serve on the nine-person panel. All panel members would be appointed by the supervisors, but they would encourage communities and organizations to nominate candidates. Other potential criteria would exclude current and former Fairfax County employees, as well as current law enforcement officers and anyone holding public office.

#Panel access to sensitive documents that would be part of the investigation files created another area of controversy.

#Police Officer 1st Class Richard Barron said members of the department are “very concerned” with the fact that volunteer civilians would have that type of access.

#Det. Sean Corcoran, President of the Fairfax Coalition of Police Local 5000 and a member of the Ad Hoc Commission, said it’s about “who has access to what, and when, and why.”

#Corcoran echoed a suggestion made by supervisor Pat Herrity (R-Springfield) and separately by Kathy Smith (D-Sully) that the board could wait to establish the civilian review panel until after the independent auditor office is up and running.

#Barron challenged the need for a Civilian Review Panel and said the reviews the police conduct on themselves are adequate. “I don’t see a legitimate need for it,” he said.

#“I don’t think there’s any purpose” for another level of review, Barron said, adding that officers feel this panel is being “rammed down their throats.”

#Unlike Barron and Corcoran, Chief of Police for Fairfax County Edwin Roessler voiced support for the panel. He acknowledged “we have a great department,” but said he believes in moving forward with engaging in the community in this way, while protecting the rights of officers.

#BOARD CHAIRMAN Sharon Bulova asked Corcoran, who voted in favor of the Ad Hoc commission’s final list of recommendations, if he’d changed his mind since then. Corcoran responded he had lobbied against the panel prior to the final vote, but was outnumbered.

#Herrity said he supports independent oversight, but is concerned that the fiscal impact of the panel is unknown.

#“In the face of a $200 million shortfall,” he said, referring to budget projections, “we’re creating a huge workload for the police department with no gain.”

#The draft item states, the civilian review panel would be created “for the purpose of building and maintaining public trust and police legitimacy.”

#John Foust (D-Dranesville) asked that staff begin to develop a significant education and training program for panel members on topics including FOIA, handling of sensitive information and other topics.

#Supervisor Cathy Hudgins (D-Hunter Mill) spoke of the importance of forming the panel. “This is the best for you,” she told the police organization representatives, noting that the community must be able to see the process. “I don’t think we have an alternative.”

#The Board of Supervisors expects to vote on the proposal for Civilian Review Panel at its Dec. 6 regular meeting, with documents posted the week before. The next public safety committee meeting is scheduled for Dec. 13 at 1 p.m. at the Fairfax County Government Center, 12000 Government Center Parkway in Fairfax. More information is available