on sale now at amazon

on sale now at amazon
"I don't like this book because it don't got know pictures" Chief Rhorerer

“It’s becoming a disturbingly familiar scene in America - mentally unstable cops”

“It’s becoming a disturbingly familiar scene in America - mentally unstable cops”
“It’s becoming a disturbingly familiar scene in America - mentally unstable cops”

Police officer’s child pornography case pushed to September


Longtime PIO ‘held visible position of public trust’

by Gregg MacDonald

The child pornography case of a 15-year veteran and public spokesman for the Fairfax County Police Department has been continued until Sept. 8.
On June 17 before Fairfax County District Judge Thomas Gallahue, PFC and former public information officer William “Bud” Walker, 50, entered the courtroom dressed in a dark suit and sat quietly as his attorney, Ed Nuttall, asked for and was granted a continuance of the case until September. Nuttall declined to comment on the case.
Detectives in the Major Crimes Division’s Child Exploitation Unit arrested Walker on April 15, at police headquarters. Police said detectives were contacted by the National Center for Missing and Exploited Children last July and were provided a CyberTip, originally received through photo networking site Tumblr. The tip alleged that child pornography had been uploaded through Tumblr’s servers and police later determined that the location of the upload came from a residence within Fairfax County.
Detectives began their investigation on April 6, and on April 8, determined the residence was owned by Walker. He was relieved of duty on April 9 and was charged on April 15 with two counts of possession of child pornography.
Walker was originally hired by the agency in December 1999. He worked in a patrol capacity at the West Springfield District Station until 2004. He then took a position in the Public Information Office until 2006. Walker returned to patrol at the West Springfield District Station in March 2006 before being assigned to South County High School as a School Resource Officer, where he worked from November 2006 until August 2009. He returned to the Public Information Office, where he worked until being relieved of duty on April 9.
Walker has posted a $15,000 bond and currently remains on paid administrative leave, according to police.
In April, Fairfax County General District Court Judge Richard E. Gardiner ordered Walker not to use computers and to not have any unsupervised contact with minors until his case is concluded.
Colonel Edwin C. Roessler Jr., Fairfax County chief of police, said that based on the fact that Walker held a visible position of public trust, Roessler felt it was imperative to place the safety of the public at the forefront of the investigation and was appreciative of the diligent work of the numerous detectives assigned to the case.

gmacdonald@fairfaxtimes.com



These companies sponsor the Fairfax County Police game, boycott them














Did Performance Measurement Cause America's Police Problem?



Some argue it can be traced back to how departments evaluate their officers.
BY KATHERINE BARRETT & RICHARD GREENE |

You’ve doubtless heard the maxim “what gets measured, gets managed.” Sometimes it’s attributed to management guru Peter Drucker, though others also get credit for it. But whoever actually coined the phrase, we remember the first time we became aware of it, about a quarter of a century ago.
It seemed like a purely positive sentiment to us back in the days when we naively believed that performance measurement could cure most governmental ills. If gathering data about inputs, outputs and outcomes could solve all management problems, then cities and states had access to a golden key to a more effective and efficient future. Then reality intervened and we recognized that even good measurements don’t necessarily result in the right policy or practice changes.
But, somewhat more ominously, we’ve become aware of a troubling question that lurks in the field of performance measurement: What happens if we’re not measuring the right things in the first place? If Drucker -- or whoever -- was right, doesn’t that mean that we may manage government programs in a way that leads to more problems? Sometimes, for example, states and localities focus their measurements on the speed with which a service is delivered. Faster always seems better. But often delivering a service quickly means doing so less effectively.
For fire departments, response times are a commonly used measure of service quality.  But "the requirement for low response times may incentivize firefighters to drive fast," said Amy Donahue, professor and vice-provost for academic operations at the University of Connecticut. "And it has been shown that while speeding saves very little in terms of total driving time, it is much more dangerous -- both to those in the emergency vehicle and other innocents who might get in their way. The potential for accidents is high, and when they happen, the consequences can be very tragic."
As the field has become aware of these dangers, many agencies are trying to mitigate them by improving education, prohibiting responders from exceeding speed limits, and requiring responders to participate in emergency vehicle operators programs.
Examples like this one are everywhere. But we just came across something in the March 2015 edition of New Perspectives in Policing that had never occurred to us before and that seems to be widely ignored by public safety organizations around the country. It was written by Malcolm K. Sparrow, professor of practice of public management at the John F. Kennedy School of Government at Harvard University.
As violent incidents in several of America’s cities show the underlying tensions between police and the public they serve, Sparrow argues that some of this dissonance has actually been encouraged by the fact that most police departments are pushed to measure crime clearance and enforcement. These are important factors, but they have little to do with community satisfaction. Meanwhile, he points out that “a few departments now use citizen satisfaction surveys on a regular basis, but most do not.”
The measures currently used do little to demonstrate the success of police departments in detecting problems at an early stage and preventing them from becoming harmful to a community’s well-being. As he writes, success at these critical goals “would not produce substantial year-to-year reductions in crime figures because genuine and substantial reductions are available only when crime problems have first grown out of control.”
Sparrow points out that the two most commonly used measures of police work -- crime reduction and enforcement productivity “fail to reflect the very best performance in crime control.”
Clearly superior performance in crime control results from the citizens’ sense that the police are on their side and use force in a fair and effective way. But the commonly used measures don’t get to any of these things. As a result, according to a comment from the commissioner of the New South Wales Police Force in Australia, quoted by Sparrow: Sticking to the usual measures is unhealthy if it “causes police on the streets to set aside sound judgment and the public good in the pursuit of arrest quotas, lest they attract management criticism or compromise their chances of promotion.”


Katherine Barrett & Richard Greene   

THESE ARE THE COMPANIES SUPPORTING THE COPS GAME    BOYCOTT THEM












We don’t need police. Here’s how we can do without them.


By Joël Valenzuela on January 2, 2014

The cops are out of control. So much so that some of us are dreaming of a post-police world. Well, there’s no more need to dream. Wake up. It’s happening right before our eyes. And it’s about time. The police have gotten so far away from their purported role of protecting the people that more often than not they have ended up doing the exact opposite.
The tragic case of Marlene Tapia provides a perfect deconstruction of everything that’s wrong with today’s police state. First, Tapia was detained on suspicion of possessing narcotics. Never mind that she wasn’t hurting anyone, or that said narcotics were intended to make her, or someone someone else, happy, even if only temporarily. The officer involved was protecting or helping absolutely no one. Next, Tapia was strip-searched, a gross and forceful violation of her privacy and person. Again, such a procedure protects no one and only comes into play because of the aforementioned substance restriction. Finally, upon noticing evidence of a concealed substance protruding from Tapia’s body, the officer sprayed her genitals with mace, serving absolutely no purpose other than to cause her pain and humiliation.
What’s the worst part of this story? That everything the officer did except for the macing was standard procedure? That the officer had been “disciplined” for her torturous action, yet remained on staff? Or that millions of us involuntarily pay for an armed force to visit violence and aggression upon us?
How can we get the police to start working for us again? By making them private. Now I know you’re thinking this is just another libertarian fantasy. It isn’t. It’s real. And where is it happening? In the land of government failure: Detroit.

Yes, we’re talking about private citizens picking up the slack left by police incompetence. But we’re also talking about something even better: the Threat Management Center. This Detroit-based business has effectively filled the protection void left by law enforcement. But it gets even better. The Threat Management Center’s sole priorities are the protection of the people under their charge. They have specific incentives to focus exclusively on safety, and find non-violent ways of defusing tense situations before resorting to force. Since they’re privately funded, they have a direct incentive to make their customers happy. Any form of misconduct can instantly result in a loss of funding.

Fmr. Fairfax Co officer child porn case continued



Booking photo of Ofc William “Bud” Walker(Photo: Fairfax County Police)

FAIRFAX, Va. (WUSA9) -- A former Fairfax County Police Department spokesperson's child pornography case has been continued until September 8, WUSA9's Peggy Fox reported Wednesday.
William "Bud" Walker, a well-known, 15-year member of the department was scheduled to appear in court Wednesday afternoon.

Walker was relieved of his duties back in April after being charged with two counts of possession of child pornography, according to officials.

These companies are sponsoring the cop games sponsored by the Fairfax County Police





Cop Shooting into a Car Full of Unarmed Teens and….. surprise surprise…. gets away with it



Chicago, IL — A deeply troubling police dash cam video has been kept from the public by the city of Chicago which showed CPD officer Marco Proano, fire into a car occupied by six unarmed teenagers. Police did not want the public to see this video.
City lawyers successfully convinced a federal judge to put the video under the protective order, which prevented parties to the lawsuit from releasing it publicly. However, after watching the video, Retired Cook County Judge Andrew Berman was so disturbed that he leaked it to The Chicago Reporter. Neither Berman nor the Reporter are subject to the order.
“I’ve seen lots of gruesome, grisly crimes,” said. Berman. “But this is disturbing on a whole different level.”
In March, the teens won a federal lawsuit against the city and three police officers, using the video as the center of their case. The city has yet to pay out the $360,000.
According to The Chicago Reporter, The city’s Independent Police Review Authority, known as IPRA, has not completed its investigation of the incident 18 months later. FBI officials would neither confirm nor deny a Chicago Sun-Times report that the agency is investigating the shooting.
In the video, Proano shoots into a moving car of six unarmed teenagers. Two of the teenagers were shot – one in the shoulder and the other in the left hip and right heel, according to court documents.
CPD’s policy prohibits officers from firing at moving vehicles that are not a threat. The teens in the car posed zero threat to the Proano, who jumped out of his cruiser and immediately unloaded his weapon into multiple unarmed teenagers.
After the shooting police discovered that the car was stolen. However, the teen was found not guilty after the prosecutors were unable to prove he knew the car was stolen. Even if they had stolen this vehicle, the actions by OfficerProano would not have been justified.
Proano has yet to face even a slap on the wrist. He was never disciplined and remains an active member of the Chicago Police Department

THESE COMPANIES ARE SUPPORTING THE POLICE GAMES SPONSORED BY THE FAIRFAX COUNTY POLICE











Cops who lie, the erosion of trust, and despair



By RationalThoughtProcess

I’m a middle-aged white guy. I was born lucky (i.e., white male American, with loving, affluent, involved parents) and just kept getting luckier, so I have had very little interaction with the police in my life.

But let me tell you a little story. It will seem incredibly trivial — perhaps even offensively so —compared to the brutality and murder meted out by cops against black folks (and other folks too), but there is a point to it.

Last year, I was pulled over by a police officer.

I was driving my grandmother to a doctor’s appointment. I didn’t know where I was going, and she only intermittently knows where she is :-), so she was giving me directions, turn-by-turn. We came to a 4-way stop. Since I didn’t know whether I was supposed to go straight or turn left or turn right, I came to a complete dead stop and waited for my grandmother to tell me which way to go. As I looked up the road to my left, I noticed a police cruiser parked on the shoulder. Gramma eventually said to take a right, so I did. Moments later I saw flashing lights in my mirror.

I had no idea why I might be getting pulled and I was extremely surprised when the officer told me it was for not stopping at the stop sign.

I said, “I absolutely did stop.”

He said, “Sir, you didn’t even slow down.”

Simply put, that was a bald-faced lie. (And also utterly ridiculous —the cop was claiming that I approached an intersection, going 20 or 30 miles per hour, and executed a 90-degree turnwithout braking, in an SUV.)

I exclaimed, "What?!" and emitted a few demure sounds of disbelief, while my grandmother piped up and said, “That’s not true at all.” The officer made it clear he wasn't in the mood for a debate, so I shut up and gave him my license and paperwork, and he returned to his cruiser.

Turns out we were within sight of Gramma’s doctor’s building, so after a minute or two she started to get out of the car, saying she’d just walk. However, the minor bit of arguing I’d done was apparently enough to spur the cop to call for backup (!) because there were nowthreesquad cars present (in case this highly dangerous situation went south, I guess), so I jokingly told her, I dont want you to do that Gramma, they might taser you. Grammas too old to give a crap, so she got out and walked, and nothing happened, but I’m willing to bet the cops wouldn’t have been so easy going if it hadn’t been an elderly white lady hobbling away.

Anyway, to wrap the story up, I got a ticket and it cost me $265 (including the cost of an online remedial driver’s course to avoid getting points), and that’s the end of it.

But here’s the thing: thatwasntthe end of it, not really, becausethat cop flat out lied, and I will never, ever forget it. It haspermanentlydamaged my trust in the police.

I mean, I already knew that cops often falsify police reports, especially to cover up their own brutality and protect their peers, but that was abstract and those cases are severe and, in a perverse way, understandable, insofar as cops who have done something really wrong have a motive to take extraordinary measures to cover it up.

In a weird way, the fact that this cop’s lying was so trivial, sounnecessary, so unmotivated by anything other than a desire to write a ticket (it was the 30th of the month, maybe its true they have to fill a quota) somehow thats even more damaging to my trust than knowing that cops lie about super-serious matters.

As a result of this incident, I am now inclined to disbelieve any police statement on any matter whatsoever, no matter how trivial or serious. I can’t imagine anything that would ever make me trust a police officer again. Not fully anyway. There will always be doubt and wariness. And there will always be a kernel of anger and resentment.

I’m sure there are millions of people who, if they were to read this diary, would laugh ruefully and say, “Welcome to our world,” or “Welcome to the real world.” I get that. But there are millions more who are just like me — they've neverpersonallyexperienced stark dishonesty by the police, and they dont appreciate how it feels.

I am trying to imagine what it must be like to live in Ferguson, where the police issue an unfathomable number of citations — far more than are issued in other cities, far more than could possibly be justifiable — and a large percentage of them are obviously bullshit, either because the infractions are so trivial that police in a normal city would let them slide, or because there aren’t any actual crimes, it’s just Ferguson cops making shit up, or both. How can there beanytrust between police and citizens in that town? Then layer on top of it the empirically documented racial discrimination. Then layer brutality on top of that. If I lived in Ferguson, and I was black, I would beseething, all the time. God bless the people of Ferguson for having the decency to bear all that, year after year, and god damn the people who practice and promote systemic injustice (including me).

Aren’t there lots of police officers who are decent human beings? Surely. Aren’t there plenty of dedicated detectives going above and beyond to bring justice to victims? There must be; I see them every week on 48 Hours and Dateline. I’m not so jaded that I’m not going to call 911 if the need arises. And chances are, if that happens, I will end up being grateful for the police.

But myimmediatereaction when I hear the police account of an alleged crime is skepticism. I instinctivelydoubt that the police account is true. For me, thats new. For others, its been that way for a long time. For still others, its not that way yet, but it will be, sooner or later.

What kind of society will we have whennobodytrusts the police? Because thats where were headed




“Shoot a Cop” Bumper Sticker Sparks Fear Among Police and Debate Over Free Speech


"Kevin Carroll, president of the Virginia chapter of the Fraternal Order of Police, called the bumper-sticker “very dangerous.”

.....and the cop's aren't dangerous?  


By Eva Decesare on June 16, 2015

Richmond, VA — Virginia police are expressing concern and outrage about a BMW bearing a hand-written bumper sticker that reads “shoot a cop.” The image has been circulating around on social media. Kevin Carroll, president of the Virginia chapter of the Fraternal Order of Police, called the bumper-sticker “very dangerous.”
However offensive some may find the message, legal experts agree that it constitutes “protected speech” under the First Amendment, making it illegal for police to stop, harass, or otherwise retaliate against someone for displaying such a bumper-sticker.
Carroll predicted that officers would take the message in stride and would not infringe on anyone’s free speech rights in response, saying, “You can’t let all these things get to you.” However, given how often police have shown ignorance or disregard for the laws they claim to enforce, retaliation by police would hardly be surprising.
The bumper-sticker is just another illustration of the growing resentment and hostility many feel towards those in law enforcement. But when it comes to explaining that phenomenon, some police and police supporters are eager to blame criminals, protests, bumper-stickers—everything except the police.
For example, Virginia FOP president Kevin Carroll stated, “Officers make mistakes, I understand that, but I did not know that it now has become fashionable to hate the police.” Such a dismissive statement basically amounts to characterizing cold-blooded murder and sadistic brutality committed by police as “making mistakes.” He also stated, in reference to the bumper-sticker, “We already have enough trouble as it is getting good recruits and training people. This just makes it harder.”

HERE'S THE COMPANIES SPONSORING THE COPS GAMES IN FAIRFAX COUNTY. BOYCOTT THEM












New Study: Cops With College Degrees Are Less Likely to Use Force Against Citizens


By Matt Agorist on February 6, 2015

A new study out of Michigan State University proposes an eye-opening correlation between college educated police officers and their actions as cops.
The study suggests that college-educated police experience higher rates of job dissatisfaction. The study also suggests that police officers with college degrees are more likely to have adverse views of their supervisors and don’t necessarily favor community policing.
But perhaps the most compelling facet of this MSU study is the evidence that college-educated officers are less likely to use force on citizens.
The study analyzed data from 2,109 police officers in seven metropolitan police departments. Although none of the departments required a degree, 45 percent of the officers surveyed, possessed one.
Interestingly, the study showed that the type of degree the officer received made no difference in the level of job dissatisfaction.
“Our latest results on police views might lead one to question whether a college education is beneficial for officers,” said William Terrill, professor at MSU’s School of Criminal Justice and co-author of the study. “But our research is a mixed bag, and you have to take into account the behavioral effect as well. If you use less force on individuals, your police department is going to be viewed as more legitimate and trustworthy and you’re not going to have all the protests we’re having across the country.”
Today’s policing, Terrill said, “is much more about social work than it is law enforcement. It’s about resolving low-level disputes, dealing with loiterers and so on.” Officers with experience in psychology, sociology and other college-taught disciplines might be more adept at addressing these issues, according to the study.
This study from MSU tends to corroborate the reasoning behind the US Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit condoning the ability of police departments to discriminate against smart people.
The main argument cited by the court for the decision to allow police departments the ability to discriminate is that smart people experienced more job dissatisfaction.
However, knowing that educated cops tend to be less violent and to know that departments can legally refuse to hire officers with higher intelligence, one can now have a better understanding of the police state in which we currently find ourselves.
A smart person does not create a domestic standing army and call it freedom.
A smart person does not deliberately tear gas journalists. A smart person does not point a rifle an innocent person and tell them that they are going to kill him. A smart person does not severely beat a person with down syndrome because he sees a bulge in his pants, which is actually a colostomy bag. A smart person does not continuously shoot at an unarmed man who posed no threat and whose arms are in the air.
Another study should be conducted that takes a look at departments who have a majority of college-educated officers and compare the level of force used to another department with a majority of officers who are not college-educated.
Perhaps the level of job satisfaction would increase if the departments were made up of intelligent people who are less likely to use force. Maybe, just maybe, the act of policing a society could be done with acumen and compassion instead of ignorance and brute force. One can certainly dream.

 HERE'S THE COMPANIES SPONSORING THE COPS GAMES IN FAIRFAX COUNTY. BOYCOTT THEM