Police officer’s child pornography case pushed to September
Longtime
PIO ‘held visible position of public trust’
by Gregg
MacDonald
The child
pornography case of a 15-year veteran and public spokesman for the Fairfax
County Police Department has been continued until Sept. 8.
On June
17 before Fairfax County District Judge Thomas Gallahue, PFC and former public
information officer William “Bud” Walker, 50, entered the courtroom dressed in
a dark suit and sat quietly as his attorney, Ed Nuttall, asked for and was
granted a continuance of the case until September. Nuttall declined to comment
on the case.
Detectives
in the Major Crimes Division’s Child Exploitation Unit arrested Walker on April
15, at police headquarters. Police said detectives were contacted by the
National Center for Missing and Exploited Children last July and were provided
a CyberTip, originally received through photo networking site Tumblr. The tip
alleged that child pornography had been uploaded through Tumblr’s servers and
police later determined that the location of the upload came from a residence within
Fairfax County.
Detectives
began their investigation on April 6, and on April 8, determined the residence
was owned by Walker. He was relieved of duty on April 9 and was charged on
April 15 with two counts of possession of child pornography.
Walker was
originally hired by the agency in December 1999. He worked in a patrol capacity
at the West Springfield District Station until 2004. He then took a position in
the Public Information Office until 2006. Walker returned to patrol at the West
Springfield District Station in March 2006 before being assigned to South
County High School as a School Resource Officer, where he worked from November
2006 until August 2009. He returned to the Public Information Office, where he
worked until being relieved of duty on April 9.
Walker
has posted a $15,000 bond and currently remains on paid administrative leave,
according to police.
In April,
Fairfax County General District Court Judge Richard E. Gardiner ordered Walker
not to use computers and to not have any unsupervised contact with minors until
his case is concluded.
Colonel
Edwin C. Roessler Jr., Fairfax County chief of police, said that based on the
fact that Walker held a visible position of public trust, Roessler felt it was
imperative to place the safety of the public at the forefront of the
investigation and was appreciative of the diligent work of the numerous
detectives assigned to the case.
gmacdonald@fairfaxtimes.com
These companies sponsor the Fairfax County Police game, boycott them
Did Performance Measurement Cause America's Police Problem?
Some argue it can be traced
back to how departments evaluate their officers.
BY KATHERINE BARRETT &
RICHARD GREENE |
You’ve doubtless heard the
maxim “what gets measured, gets managed.” Sometimes it’s attributed to
management guru Peter Drucker, though others also get credit for it. But
whoever actually coined the phrase, we remember the first time we became aware
of it, about a quarter of a century ago.
It seemed like a purely
positive sentiment to us back in the days when we naively believed that
performance measurement could cure most governmental ills. If gathering data
about inputs, outputs and outcomes could solve all management problems, then
cities and states had access to a golden key to a more effective and efficient
future. Then reality intervened and we recognized that even good measurements
don’t necessarily result in the right policy or practice changes.
But, somewhat more ominously,
we’ve become aware of a troubling question that lurks in the field of
performance measurement: What happens if we’re not measuring the right things
in the first place? If Drucker -- or whoever -- was right, doesn’t that mean
that we may manage government programs in a way that leads to more problems?
Sometimes, for example, states and localities focus their measurements on the
speed with which a service is delivered. Faster always seems better. But often
delivering a service quickly means doing so less effectively.
For fire departments, response
times are a commonly used measure of service quality. But "the requirement for low response
times may incentivize firefighters to drive fast," said Amy Donahue,
professor and vice-provost for academic operations at the University of
Connecticut. "And it has been shown that while speeding saves very little
in terms of total driving time, it is much more dangerous -- both to those in
the emergency vehicle and other innocents who might get in their way. The
potential for accidents is high, and when they happen, the consequences can be
very tragic."
As the field has become aware
of these dangers, many agencies are trying to mitigate them by improving
education, prohibiting responders from exceeding speed limits, and requiring
responders to participate in emergency vehicle operators programs.
Examples like this one are
everywhere. But we just came across something in the March 2015 edition of New
Perspectives in Policing that had never occurred to us before and that seems to
be widely ignored by public safety organizations around the country. It was
written by Malcolm K. Sparrow, professor of practice of public management at
the John F. Kennedy School of Government at Harvard University.
As violent incidents in several
of America’s cities show the underlying tensions between police and the public
they serve, Sparrow argues that some of this dissonance has actually been
encouraged by the fact that most police departments are pushed to measure crime
clearance and enforcement. These are important factors, but they have little to
do with community satisfaction. Meanwhile, he points out that “a few
departments now use citizen satisfaction surveys on a regular basis, but most
do not.”
The measures currently used do
little to demonstrate the success of police departments in detecting problems
at an early stage and preventing them from becoming harmful to a community’s
well-being. As he writes, success at these critical goals “would not produce
substantial year-to-year reductions in crime figures because genuine and
substantial reductions are available only when crime problems have first grown
out of control.”
Sparrow points out that the two
most commonly used measures of police work -- crime reduction and enforcement
productivity “fail to reflect the very best performance in crime control.”
Clearly superior performance in
crime control results from the citizens’ sense that the police are on their
side and use force in a fair and effective way. But the commonly used measures
don’t get to any of these things. As a result, according to a comment from the
commissioner of the New South Wales Police Force in Australia, quoted by
Sparrow: Sticking to the usual measures is unhealthy if it “causes police on
the streets to set aside sound judgment and the public good in the pursuit of
arrest quotas, lest they attract management criticism or compromise their
chances of promotion.”
Katherine Barrett & Richard
Greene
THESE ARE THE COMPANIES SUPPORTING THE COPS GAME BOYCOTT THEM
We don’t need police. Here’s how we can do without them.
By Joël Valenzuela on
January 2, 2014
The cops are out of
control. So much so that some of us are dreaming of a post-police world. Well,
there’s no more need to dream. Wake up. It’s happening right before our eyes.
And it’s about time. The police have gotten so far away from their purported
role of protecting the people that more often than not they have ended up doing
the exact opposite.
The tragic case of Marlene
Tapia provides a perfect deconstruction of everything that’s wrong with today’s
police state. First, Tapia was detained on suspicion of possessing narcotics.
Never mind that she wasn’t hurting anyone, or that said narcotics were intended
to make her, or someone someone else, happy, even if only temporarily. The
officer involved was protecting or helping absolutely no one. Next, Tapia was
strip-searched, a gross and forceful violation of her privacy and person.
Again, such a procedure protects no one and only comes into play because of the
aforementioned substance restriction. Finally, upon noticing evidence of a
concealed substance protruding from Tapia’s body, the officer sprayed her
genitals with mace, serving absolutely no purpose other than to cause her pain
and humiliation.
What’s the worst part of
this story? That everything the officer did except for the macing was standard
procedure? That the officer had been “disciplined” for her torturous action,
yet remained on staff? Or that millions of us involuntarily pay for an armed force
to visit violence and aggression upon us?
How can we get the police
to start working for us again? By making them private. Now I know you’re
thinking this is just another libertarian fantasy. It isn’t. It’s real. And
where is it happening? In the land of government failure: Detroit.
Yes, we’re talking about
private citizens picking up the slack left by police incompetence. But we’re
also talking about something even better: the Threat Management Center. This
Detroit-based business has effectively filled the protection void left by law
enforcement. But it gets even better. The Threat Management Center’s sole
priorities are the protection of the people under their charge. They have
specific incentives to focus exclusively on safety, and find non-violent ways
of defusing tense situations before resorting to force. Since they’re privately
funded, they have a direct incentive to make their customers happy. Any form of
misconduct can instantly result in a loss of funding.
Fmr. Fairfax Co officer child porn case continued
Booking photo
of Ofc William “Bud” Walker(Photo: Fairfax County Police)
FAIRFAX, Va.
(WUSA9) -- A former Fairfax County Police Department spokesperson's child
pornography case has been continued until September 8, WUSA9's Peggy Fox
reported Wednesday.
William
"Bud" Walker, a well-known, 15-year member of the department was
scheduled to appear in court Wednesday afternoon.
Walker was
relieved of his duties back in April after being charged with two counts of
possession of child pornography, according to officials.
These companies are sponsoring the cop games sponsored by the Fairfax County Police
Cop Shooting into a Car Full of Unarmed Teens and….. surprise surprise…. gets away with it
Chicago, IL — A deeply
troubling police dash cam video has been kept from the public by the city of
Chicago which showed CPD officer Marco Proano, fire into a car occupied by six
unarmed teenagers. Police did not want the public to see this video.
City lawyers successfully
convinced a federal judge to put the video under the protective order, which
prevented parties to the lawsuit from releasing it publicly. However, after
watching the video, Retired Cook County Judge Andrew Berman was so disturbed
that he leaked it to The Chicago Reporter. Neither Berman nor the Reporter are
subject to the order.
“I’ve seen lots of gruesome,
grisly crimes,” said. Berman. “But this is disturbing on a whole different
level.”
In March, the teens won a
federal lawsuit against the city and three police officers, using the video as
the center of their case. The city has yet to pay out the $360,000.
According to The Chicago
Reporter, The city’s Independent Police Review Authority, known as IPRA, has
not completed its investigation of the incident 18 months later. FBI officials
would neither confirm nor deny a Chicago Sun-Times report that the agency is
investigating the shooting.
In the video, Proano shoots
into a moving car of six unarmed teenagers. Two of the teenagers were shot –
one in the shoulder and the other in the left hip and right heel, according to
court documents.
CPD’s policy prohibits officers
from firing at moving vehicles that are not a threat. The teens in the car
posed zero threat to the Proano, who jumped out of his cruiser and immediately
unloaded his weapon into multiple unarmed teenagers.
After the shooting police
discovered that the car was stolen. However, the teen was found not guilty
after the prosecutors were unable to prove he knew the car was stolen. Even if
they had stolen this vehicle, the actions by OfficerProano would not have been
justified.
Proano has yet to face even
a slap on the wrist. He was never disciplined and remains an active member of
the Chicago Police DepartmentTHESE COMPANIES ARE SUPPORTING THE POLICE GAMES SPONSORED BY THE FAIRFAX COUNTY POLICE
Cops who lie, the erosion of trust, and despair
By RationalThoughtProcess
I’m a middle-aged white guy. I
was born lucky (i.e., white male American, with loving, affluent, involved
parents) and just kept getting luckier, so I have had very little interaction
with the police in my life.
But let me tell you a little
story. It will seem incredibly trivial — perhaps even offensively so — compared
to the brutality and murder meted out by cops against black folks (and other
folks too), but there is a point to it.
Last year, I was pulled over by
a police officer.
I was driving my grandmother to
a doctor’s appointment. I didn’t know where I was going, and she only
intermittently knows where she is :-), so she was giving me directions,
turn-by-turn. We came to a 4-way stop. Since I didn’t know whether I was
supposed to go straight or turn left or turn right, I came to a complete dead
stop and waited for my grandmother to tell me which way to go. As I looked up
the road to my left, I noticed a police cruiser parked on the shoulder. Gramma
eventually said to take a right, so I did. Moments later I saw flashing lights
in my mirror.
I had no idea why I might be
getting pulled and I was extremely surprised when the officer told me it was
for not stopping at the stop sign.
I said, “I absolutely did
stop.”
He said, “Sir, you didn’t even
slow down.”
Simply put, that was a
bald-faced lie. (And also utterly ridiculous — the cop
was claiming that I approached an intersection, going 20 or 30 miles per hour,
and executed a 90-degree turnwithout braking, in an SUV.)
I exclaimed, "What?!"
and emitted a few demure sounds of disbelief, while my grandmother piped up and
said, “That’s not true at all.” The officer made it clear he wasn't in the mood
for a debate, so I shut up and gave him my license and paperwork, and he
returned to his cruiser.
Turns out we were within sight
of Gramma’s doctor’s building, so after a minute or two she started to get out
of the car, saying she’d just walk. However, the minor bit of arguing I’d done
was apparently enough to spur the cop to call for backup (!) because there were
now threesquad
cars present (in case this highly dangerous situation went south, I guess), so
I jokingly told her, “I don’t want you to do that Gramma, they might
taser you.” Gramma’s too old to give a crap, so she got out
and walked, and nothing happened, but I’m willing to bet the cops wouldn’t have
been so easy going if it hadn’t been an elderly white lady hobbling away.
Anyway, to wrap the story up, I
got a ticket and it cost me $265 (including the cost of an online remedial
driver’s course to avoid getting points), and that’s the end of it.
But here’s the thing: that wasn’t the end
of it, not really, because that cop flat out lied,
and I will never, ever forget it. It has permanently damaged
my trust in the police.
I mean, I already knew that
cops often falsify police reports, especially to cover up their own brutality
and protect their peers, but that was abstract and those cases are severe and,
in a perverse way, understandable, insofar as cops who have done something
really wrong have a motive to take extraordinary measures to cover it up.
In a weird way, the fact that
this cop’s lying was so trivial, so unnecessary,
so unmotivated by anything other than a desire to write a ticket (it was the
30th of the month, maybe it’s true
they have to fill a quota) —
somehow that’s even more damaging to
my trust than knowing that cops lie about super-serious matters.
As a result of this incident, I
am now inclined to disbelieve any police statement on any matter whatsoever, no
matter how trivial or serious. I can’t imagine anything that would ever make me
trust a police officer again. Not fully anyway. There will always be doubt and
wariness. And there will always be a kernel of anger and resentment.
I’m sure there are millions of
people who, if they were to read this diary, would laugh ruefully and say,
“Welcome to our world,” or “Welcome to the real world.” I get that. But there
are millions more who are just like me — they've never personally experienced
stark dishonesty by the police, and they don’t
appreciate how it feels.
I am trying to imagine what it
must be like to live in Ferguson, where the police issue an unfathomable number
of citations — far more than are issued in other cities, far more than could
possibly be justifiable — and a large percentage of them are obviously bullshit,
either because the infractions are so trivial that police in a normal city
would let them slide, or because there aren’t any actual crimes, it’s just
Ferguson cops making shit up, or both. How can there be anytrust
between police and citizens in that town? Then layer on top of it the
empirically documented racial discrimination. Then layer brutality on top of
that. If I lived in Ferguson, and I was black, I would be seething,
all the time. God bless the people of Ferguson for having the decency to bear
all that, year after year, and god damn the people who practice and promote
systemic injustice (including me).
Aren’t there lots of police
officers who are decent human beings? Surely. Aren’t there plenty of dedicated
detectives going above and beyond to bring justice to victims? There must be; I
see them every week on 48 Hours and Dateline. I’m not so jaded that I’m not
going to call 911 if the need arises. And chances are, if that happens, I will
end up being grateful for the police.
But my immediate reaction
when I hear the police account of an alleged crime is skepticism. I
instinctively doubt that the police account is true. For
me, that’s new. For others, it’s been that way for a long time. For still
others, it’s not that way yet, but
it will be, sooner or later.
What kind of society will we
have when nobody trusts
the police? Because that’s where
we’re headed
“Shoot a Cop” Bumper Sticker Sparks Fear Among Police and Debate Over Free Speech
"Kevin Carroll, president of the Virginia chapter of the Fraternal Order of Police, called the bumper-sticker “very dangerous.”
.....and the cop's aren't dangerous?
By Eva Decesare on June 16,
2015
Richmond, VA — Virginia police
are expressing concern and outrage about a BMW bearing a hand-written bumper sticker
that reads “shoot a cop.” The image has been circulating around on social media.
Kevin Carroll, president of the Virginia chapter of the Fraternal Order of
Police, called the bumper-sticker “very dangerous.”
However offensive some may find
the message, legal experts agree that it constitutes “protected speech” under
the First Amendment, making it illegal for police to stop, harass, or otherwise
retaliate against someone for displaying such a bumper-sticker.
Carroll predicted that officers
would take the message in stride and would not infringe on anyone’s free speech
rights in response, saying, “You can’t let all these things get to you.”
However, given how often police have shown ignorance or disregard for the laws
they claim to enforce, retaliation by police would hardly be surprising.
The bumper-sticker is just
another illustration of the growing resentment and hostility many feel towards
those in law enforcement. But when it comes to explaining that phenomenon, some
police and police supporters are eager to blame criminals, protests,
bumper-stickers—everything except the police.
For example, Virginia FOP
president Kevin Carroll stated, “Officers make mistakes, I understand that, but
I did not know that it now has become fashionable to hate the police.” Such a
dismissive statement basically amounts to characterizing cold-blooded murder
and sadistic brutality committed by police as “making mistakes.” He also
stated, in reference to the bumper-sticker, “We already have enough trouble as
it is getting good recruits and training people. This just makes it harder.”
HERE'S THE COMPANIES SPONSORING THE COPS GAMES IN FAIRFAX COUNTY. BOYCOTT THEM
New Study: Cops With College Degrees Are Less Likely to Use Force Against Citizens
By Matt Agorist on February 6,
2015
A new study out of Michigan
State University proposes an eye-opening correlation between college educated
police officers and their actions as cops.
The study suggests that
college-educated police experience higher rates of job dissatisfaction. The
study also suggests that police officers with college degrees are more likely
to have adverse views of their supervisors and don’t necessarily favor
community policing.
But perhaps the most compelling
facet of this MSU study is the evidence that college-educated officers are less
likely to use force on citizens.
The study analyzed data from
2,109 police officers in seven metropolitan police departments. Although none
of the departments required a degree, 45 percent of the officers surveyed,
possessed one.
Interestingly, the study showed
that the type of degree the officer received made no difference in the level of
job dissatisfaction.
“Our latest results on police
views might lead one to question whether a college education is beneficial for
officers,” said William Terrill, professor at MSU’s School of Criminal Justice
and co-author of the study. “But our research is a mixed bag, and you have to
take into account the behavioral effect as well. If you use less force on
individuals, your police department is going to be viewed as more legitimate
and trustworthy and you’re not going to have all the protests we’re having
across the country.”
Today’s policing, Terrill said,
“is much more about social work than it is law enforcement. It’s about
resolving low-level disputes, dealing with loiterers and so on.” Officers with
experience in psychology, sociology and other college-taught disciplines might
be more adept at addressing these issues, according to the study.
This study from MSU tends to
corroborate the reasoning behind the US Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
condoning the ability of police departments to discriminate against smart
people.
The main argument cited by the
court for the decision to allow police departments the ability to discriminate
is that smart people experienced more job dissatisfaction.
However, knowing that educated
cops tend to be less violent and to know that departments can legally refuse to
hire officers with higher intelligence, one can now have a better understanding
of the police state in which we currently find ourselves.
A smart person does not create
a domestic standing army and call it freedom.
A smart person does not
deliberately tear gas journalists. A smart person does not point a rifle an
innocent person and tell them that they are going to kill him. A smart person
does not severely beat a person with down syndrome because he sees a bulge in
his pants, which is actually a colostomy bag. A smart person does not
continuously shoot at an unarmed man who posed no threat and whose arms are in
the air.
Another study should be
conducted that takes a look at departments who have a majority of
college-educated officers and compare the level of force used to another
department with a majority of officers who are not college-educated.
Perhaps the level of job
satisfaction would increase if the departments were made up of intelligent
people who are less likely to use force. Maybe, just maybe, the act of policing
a society could be done with acumen and compassion instead of ignorance and
brute force. One can certainly dream.
HERE'S THE COMPANIES SPONSORING THE COPS GAMES IN FAIRFAX COUNTY. BOYCOTT THEM
HERE'S THE COMPANIES SPONSORING THE COPS GAMES IN FAIRFAX COUNTY. BOYCOTT THEM
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)