on sale now at amazon

on sale now at amazon
"I don't like this book because it don't got know pictures" Chief Rhorerer

“It’s becoming a disturbingly familiar scene in America - mentally unstable cops”

“It’s becoming a disturbingly familiar scene in America - mentally unstable cops”
“It’s becoming a disturbingly familiar scene in America - mentally unstable cops”

Murderous Arrogance: Six years later the Fairfax County Police Release tape of questionable killing…



Once again Sharon Bulova and John Faust said nothing and did nothing about it and now they want you to reelect them.






  
Fairfax County police release video in 2009 officer involved shooting

By Tom Jackman May 6 at 5:33 PM

Fairfax County police Officer David S. Ziants, left, and an unidentified Fairfax officer approach a green Chevrolet Blazer, right, seconds before Ziants shot and killed the unarmed driver, David Masters. (Fairfax County Police Department dashboard video)
Note: This post has been updated to edit the video and add the comments of Masters’ father and ex-wife.
David Masters of Fredericksburg was shot and killed by Fairfax County police Officer David Scott Ziants on Nov. 13, 2009, as Masters drove on Route 1 in the Alexandria area of Fairfax County. Masters was unarmed and had ripped some flowers out of a planter in front of a business, which led to the police pursuit.
On Wednesday, the Fairfax police released the dash cam video from Ziants’s car. The actual shooting is not visible, but the sounds of the shots can be heard (at 1:49), followed by another officer apparently telling Ziants, “What are you doing? Hold up! Whoa! Hold up! The —- you doing dude? Come on.”
Fairfax County police release 2009 video of officer involved shooting(3:00)
On Wednesday, Fairfax County police released dash cam footage of the 2009 chase of David Masters, which ended in him being fatally shot by police. (YouTube/Fairfax County Government)
Fairfax police did not explain why they chose today, more than five years later, to release the video. In March, the police rejected a freedom of information act request from The Washington Post to allow a review of the investigative file in the case, also without explanation. In Virginia, law enforcement agencies may release, or withhold, any investigative information under state public information law, indefinitely.
[The circumstances leading up to the death of David Masters on Route 1.]
In a statement accompanying the release, Fairfax police Chief Edwin C. Roessler said: “In an effort to continue with increasing our transparency and the public trust, I have exercised my discretion under the Virginia Freedom of Information Act by authorizing the release of the in-car video from the criminal investigation into the officer-involved shooting of David Masters that occurred in the Mount Vernon District on Friday, November 13, 2009. Based on several requests, the video was provided to the Ad Hoc Police Practices Review Commission and is posted here. In reaching my decision to release the in-car video, I considered the following factors:  the local criminal investigation has been completed; the U.S. Department of Justice criminal investigation has been completed; and there is no pending or threatened civil litigation.”
Fairfax Commonwealth’s Attorney Raymond F. Morrogh ruled in January 2010 that Ziants had not committed a crime, because Ziants believed that Masters was driving a stolen car, was reaching for a gun and had run over another officer, none of which was true. Ziants was allowed to remain on the force until May 2011, when then-Chief David M. Rohrer fired Ziants.
Barrie Masters, 83, said the Fairfax police sent him a link to watch the video, and “I am really distraught. It’s totally wiped me out.” He asked, “How can we live in a world where a cop can just come up behind somebody, no matter what he thinks has been going on, and just shoot him in the back?”
Barrie Masters, a former Army colonel now living in Florida, said, “The fact is, if David committed a crime, the most it was was a misdemeanor for five dollars worth of flowers. The [police] regulations specifically prohibit the use of deadly force.” Masters said he was still hopeful that a special prosecutor might be empaneled to investigate and charge Ziants.
Gail Masters, who was David Masters’s ex-wife and remained his best friend and caretaker, was devastated again Wednesday after seeing the video. Fairfax police did not contact her, though she is the executor of his estate.
“I’m still miserable,” she said. “I’ve been praying that they would charge him [Ziants]. It’s not fair that he’s out there having a good time and Dave’s gone. I haven’t been myself since it happened. It’s just like they say, a part of you leaves and doesn’t come back.”
David Masters was 52, a former Army Green Beret and carpenter living on disability payments after a work accident, and had bipolar disorder, his ex-wife said. He was driving a blue-green Chevrolet Blazer with the license plate “F001″ up Route 1 from Fredericksburg when he apparently pulled over outside a landscaping business and ripped some flowers out of some planters. An employee confronted him, but Masters hopped in the Blazer, with several of his ex-wife’s puppies inside, and continued north.
The landscaping employee called police. As Masters headed north on Route 1, Ziants spotted him. Ziants, then 26 and a former Army soldier, told police that he confused Ziants’ vehicle with another vehicle wanted in a stolen car case, Morrogh said in 2010. The video shows Ziants turning on his lights and siren and pursuing Masters for about a mile up the highway, with Masters at one point running a red light, then squeezing through stopped cars at another intersection, refusing to stop for the officer.
Finally at Fort Hunt Road, another Fairfax cruiser blocks Masters’ Blazer in. Ziants and two other officers approach the car. But the light turns green and the Blazer starts to pull away. Ziants yells for the Blazer to stop, while another officer appears to tell him, “No no no no.” Then, two shots, while the other officer loudly implores him to stop firing.


Wait until this Klan rally is over and then boycott the businesses that supported it



Police Violence Casts Shadow on Sporting Event

by MARK HAND

In late June and early July, thousands of police officers and fire service workers from around the world will converge on Fairfax County, Va., a suburb of Washington, D.C., to participate in an Olympic-style competition known as the World Police & Fire Games.
The 10-day-long games will feature traditional athletic events such as track and field and boxing. Police officers also will be eligible to compete in police pistol combat events and service dog competitions that include narcotics detection and subduing suspects.
The games’ organizers, the California Police Athletic Federation, tout the biennial event as one of the world’s largest multi-sport events, second only to the Olympics in terms of the number of participants. First held in 1985 in San Jose, Calif., the games are open to active and retired law enforcement officers and fire service personnel. About 12,000 athletes from more than 70 countries are expected to compete in 61 events in 53 different venues in Fairfax County and other parts of the D.C. metropolitan area from June 26 to July 5.
The previous World Police & Fire Games, held in Belfast, Northern Ireland, were deemed “the best and friendliest ever” games by its organizers. The organizers estimated the cost of the event at about 13 million pounds, or $18 million. The Fairfax County games are expected to cost about $20 million.
After hosting the event in 2013, organizers of the Belfast games expressed disappointment with the number of participants from outside Northern Ireland. “The consequence of lower out of state numbers has a knock-on impact on subsequent monetary targets: commercial bed nights; registration and event entry fees; and economic benefit,” the organizers of the Belfast games said in an event post-mortem released in February 2014.
Following the lead of previous host cities, the Fairfax County government will be lavishing the private event with at least $3 million of taxpayer money. Public funds will be going to the games as the county’s public schools are facing a financial crisis and as the county’s library system is dealing with budget cuts of almost 30% over the past 10 years on a real spending basis.
Despite budget problems with the county’s core services, government officials are excited about the millions they agreed to spend on the games. “Fairfax County has pledged $3 million to host and sponsor the games. With several more million in staffing and public safety to come,” Fairfax County Chairwoman Sharon Bulova, the county’s top elected official, boasted at a 2014 event to promote the games. Bulova declined a request to comment on the World Police & Fire Games for this article.
In 2009, Fairfax County officials highlighted the economic benefit of hosting the World Police & Fire Games when they were competing with their counterparts in Toronto and Winnipeg, Canada, to win the games for 2015. Organizers estimated a regional economic impact of $60 million to $80 million in revenue from the event. Drawing on the Olympics parallel, the Fairfax County games organizers also hired a former Olympic organizer, Bill Knight, to serve as chief executive of its effort.
Some experts aren’t convinced these types of sporting events are big revenue-producers. When it comes to the Olympics, for example, Philip Porter, an economist at the University of South Florida who has studied the impact of sporting events, told The New York Times that the evidence is unequivocal on cities that host the Olympics. “The bottom line is, every time we’ve looked — dozens of scholars, dozens of times — we find no real change in economic activity,” he said.
Whether the World Police & Fire Games gives Fairfax County a big financial boost remains to be seen. What is certain is the event’s athletic competitions will give police officers and fire service personnel an opportunity to show off their athletic prowess.
A contingent from the Baltimore Police Department is likely to make the 40-mile trek south to participate in the games. The World Police & Fire Games will provide an intriguing juxtaposition for the city’s police department: Baltimore’s finest will be hailed as heroes in Fairfax County at the same time that six of their colleagues face criminal charges in the death of city resident Freddie Gray.
Fairfax County itself is under scrutiny for extreme police violence. Earlier this year, the Fairfax County government paid almost $3 million to settle a wrongful death lawsuit brought by the family of a man, John Geer, who was killed by a county police officer while standing in the doorway of his home. On top of the Geer settlement, the county could face another multi-million-dollar lawsuit after members of the Fairfax County Sheriff’s Office recently used a Taser against a woman who was fully restrained in the county jail. The woman died from the delivery of four 50,000 volt shocks from the Taser.
The organizers of the World Police & Fire Games likely are hoping the ongoing focus on police violence in Ferguson, Mo., New York City, North Charleston, S.C., Baltimore and many other cities does not overshadow the games. And Fairfax County residents should not be surprised if the county agrees to spend additional public funds on security due to concerns about protesters showing up at the various events.


Mark Hand covers political action. You can reach him at markhand13@gmail.com



Where was John Faust when the cops were pulling this stunt? Throw the bum out of office




Hi! 

I'm John Faust. I'm on the Board of Supervisors and I'm terrified of the cops, I've never done anything to bring them under control and here's an example of something else I didn't do. I didn't stop them or even speak out against the cops collecting hundreds of thousands of license plates of innocent citizens for no reason the cops can explain. 

So remember Vote Faust, if you dumb enough to elect me once I'll probably get away with it again! 



ACLU Sues Fairfax County Police Over License-Plate Data
FAIRFAX, Va. — The American Civil Liberties Union of Virginia is suing Fairfax County police over a policy in which they store data collected on thousands of drivers through the use of license-plate readers.
The civil-liberties group filed the suit Tuesday in Fairfax County Circuit Court. The ACLU alleges that keeping a database of information collected through license-plate readers amounts to an illegal invasion of privacy.
In 2013, Virginia’s attorney general advised state police that data collected by plate readers is personal information under state law and can’t be kept unless it’s part of a specific criminal investigation.
The ruling prompted state police to stop collecting data, but local police agencies, including Fairfax, still collect and share the data.
A county spokesman did not immediately respond to an email seeking comment Tuesday evening.
Follow WNEW on Twitter



VIRGINIA MAN SUES POLICE OVER LICENSE PLATE DATABASE
In what appears to be a legal first, a Virginia man has sued the Fairfax County Police Department for collecting images of his license plate in a massive database.
Harrison Neal, a Fairfax resident, filed the suit after learning that his license plate had been scanned by an automatic license plate reader twice last year and stored in a police database, even though he was not a suspect in a criminal investigation. The American Civil Liberties Union of Virginia filed the lawsuit on Tuesday on behalf of Neal.
Although individuals have filed suits to obtain records stored in such databases, this is the first case known to target a law enforcement agency over an alleged illegal use of a database.
The database, the complaint (.pdf) asserts, violates a Virginia statute—the Government Data Collection and Dissemination Practices Act—which prohibits government agencies from collecting, storing, or disseminating the personal information of individuals unnecessarily.
Automatic license plate readers have become a hot topic in recent years, akin to the government’s warrantless use of GPS trackers on vehicles and stingrays or IMSI catchers that are used to track the location of cell phones and other mobile devices.
The readers, often mounted on a vehicle or in a fixed location, use cameras and optical character recognition technology to take images of license plates and store them in searchable databases. Insurance agencies and impounders use them to locate stolen vehicles or vehicles belonging to people who are behind on their payments. But law enforcement agencies also use them.
Civil liberties groups consider the readers and databases a violation of privacy because it’s possible to discover a lot about a person simply by recording the location of their car over a period of time. The readers can also capture much more than license plates. In California, a computer security consultant named Michael Katz-Lacabe discovered that authorities in his San Francisco Bay Area town had collected images of his two cars 112 times in a database, including one image taken in 2009 that showed him and his two daughters exiting one of the cars while it was parked in their driveway.
But proponents of the technology argue that the data collected is innocuous compared to other data like cell-phone location information.
“We’re not insensitive to people’s right to privacy,” Terry Jungel, executive director of the Michigan Sheriffs’ Association said in 2013 over a battle in his state about license plate databases. “If Big Brother is going to abuse information, there’s better information to abuse than this.”
Neal discovered images of his car in the database maintained by the Fairfax Police Department after filing a public records request recently. In response, he received two sheets of paper containing an image of his car, along with a chart indicating the times and dates the images were taken and a map showing a street location, believed to be the location of the reader when it snapped the images.
But Virginia’s state law should have prevented his images from being stored. In February 2013, the state’s attorney general issued an opinion advising the State Police that automatic license plate readers do collect personal information, as defined by the Act, and therefore agencies cannot legally collect and store that data unless it’s related to a specific criminal investigation. The pronouncement came in part after it was discovered that Virginia State Police had used license plate readers in 2008 to collect information about people who had attended rallies for Sarah Palin and Barack Obama during the presidential election that year.
Subsequent to the attorney general’s pronouncement, the Virginia State Police stopped storing license plate records and established a policy for purging such information within 24 hours after being collected by a reader, unless the information is relevant to a criminal investigation.
But, according to the ACLU of Virginia, other government agencies in the state have failed to follow suit. The Fairfax Police Department, for example, stores license plate images for up to a year, regardless of their relevance to an investigation.
The department also has an agreement with law enforcement agencies in Maryland and the District of Columbia to share information collected in its database.
“Like many other technologies, ALPRs have legitimate law enforcement uses,” Rebecca Glenberg, legal director of the ACLU of Virginia said in a statement. “We do not object to the real-time use of ALPRs to compare license plate numbers to a current ‘hot list’ of vehicles involved in current investigations. The danger to privacy comes when the government collects tens of thousands of license plate records so it can later find out where people were and when. The intrusion is magnified in the Washington, D.C. area, where multiple law enforcement agencies may access each other’s information.”



ELECTRONIC FRONTIER FOUNDATION
May 6, 2015 | By Dave Maass
Virginia Governor Signs Warrant Requirement for Drones, Rejects License Plate Reader Limits
With broad and near-unanimous bipartisan support, the Virginia General Assembly passed a series of bills this year to defend the public’s right to privacy from new mass surveillance technologies.
To his credit, Gov. Terry McAuliffe almost immediately signed a bill to require law enforcement to obtain a warrant before tracking people’s mobile phones with cell tower emulators, often called “stingrays.” But he initially balked at two other bills: one that would have also required police to get a warrant before using drones and another that would’ve placed strict limitations on other mass surveillance technologies, including a seven-day limit on the retention of locational data collected through automatic license plate readers (ALPR).
McAuliffe sent these two measures back to the legislature with suggested amendments, who sent them right back to his desk with only the slightest changes. The message was clear: these protections are what Virginians want and what they deserve.
The second time around, McAuliffe signed the drone bill, but he vetoed the ALPR bill, parroting the flawed talking points of the device manufacturers and law enforcement lobby groups:
Many localities in Virginia retain this data for 60 days to two years. Seven days is a substantial reduction. Additionally, law enforcement agencies demonstrate that crimes are often not reported until several weeks later. Under this bill, essential data would not be available at the time of those reports. This is particularly concerning when considering implications for the National Capitol Region, where cross-state collaboration and information-sharing are essential to responding to potential criminal or terrorist activity occurring near Virginia’s borders.
What McAuliffe fails to mention is those law enforcement agencies are already breaking Virginia’s Data Act by storing ALPR data, as the Virginia Attorney General determined in a 2013 legal opinion [PDF]. He also pays little attention to the threat to personal privacy that ALPRs represent: by collecting information on every driver, police are treating the entire population as if they’re suspects in a criminal investigation. Even more worrisome is how these cameras, which are capable of collecting thousands of locational data points a day, can potentially reveal the intimate details of a person’s life, including religious preferences, political affiliations, medical conditions, and romantic relationships.  Indeed, as the ACLU of Virginia notes:
In 2013, public records revealed that during the 2008 election, Virginia State Police used ALPRs to collect information about people attending rallies for candidates Sarah Palin and Barack Obama, and later targeted vehicles crossing from Virginia to Washington for Obama’s inauguration.
McAuliffe also failed to address some of the more questionable techniques used by ALPR companies to shield their products from public scrutiny, such as contracts that forbid agencies from talking candidly publicly about the technology. In Lansing, Michigan, police have given up on ALPRs because they were unreliable and drained the batteries of their cars. In San Francisco, police have been sued after a false positive resulted in a confrontation between officers and an innocent government employee.
The ACLU of Virginia isn’t giving up. Five days after McAuliffe signed the bills, the organization filed a lawsuit [PDF] against the Fairfax County Police Department, which, despite the Attorney General’s guidance, has been storing ALPR data for up to a year and sharing that data with other law enforcement agencies in the region. If successful, the lawsuit could potentially have an even stronger impact on ALPR limits than what the bill would have provided.

We're very proud of the hundreds of EFF supporters in Virginia who sent letters to their lawmakers and tweeted at the governor about these measures. And, again, we commend McAuliffe for signing bills to limit the use of stingrays and drones, but we’ll be rooting for the ACLU as they pursue other means to challenge invasive technologies such as ALPRs.


THE COPS AND THE PROSECUTOR GET AWAY WITH THIS BEHAVIOR IT IS BECAUSE WE LET THEM GET AWAY WITH THIS BEHAVIOR




The Fairfax County Police shot and killed an unarmed citizen in public.

It’s been 22 months; almost two years AND NO ONE HAS BEEN ARRESTED…….

What would happen to you if you shot and killed a cop?

Think the cops would nothing about it for 22 months?

You think the state prosecutor, Morrogh, the best friend the Fairfax County Police ever had, would call in a grand jury to decide if you should be arrested?

This is how it works….bear in mind the Fairfax County Police have already settled the Geer case out of court…. when a prosecutor has a case he needs drag out to buy someone time or that that the prosecutor wants to lose, (or in this case not indict) the prosecutor calls in a grand jury and spoon feeds with the information HE wants the grand jury to hear.

When the case goes into the crapper, the prosecutor blames it on the grand jury.

IT’S OUR GOVERNMENT, NOT THEIRS. ALMOST 90% OF THE FAIRFAX COUNTY COPS LIVE OUTSIDE FAIRFAX COUNTY. TAKE BACK YOUR COUNTY FROM THE COPS AND FIRE THE PEOPLE WHO HIRE THE COPS





Fairfax prosecutor to convene special grand jury in John Geer police slaying

By Tom Jackman April 22

The Fairfax County prosecutor said Wednesday that he will convene a special grand jury to hear evidence, and possibly return an indictment, in the police killing of an unarmed Springfield man in August 2013.
Commonwealth’s Attorney Raymond F. Morrogh said he had asked the Fairfax Circuit Court to impanel the grand jury with the hope of reaching a decision by the end of the summer in the shooting of John Geer.
Geer, 46, was unarmed when he was shot once in the doorway of his Springfield home by Officer Adam D. Torres, police records show. Torres told investigators that Geer, who had shown police a holstered handgun earlier and placed it at his feet, had made a quick movement to his waist as though he might be reaching for another gun. But three officers nearby, as well as another officer and two civilians a short distance away, all said Geer had his hands near his head and wasn’t reaching toward his waist when he was shot.
On Tuesday, the county agreed to resolve the Geer family’s ¬wrongful-death civil suit and pay Geer’s two teenage daughters $2.95 million. But no ruling has been made, by state or federal prosecutors, on whether Torres should be charged with a crime.
Morrogh said that the timing of his announcement was unrelated to the civil settlement and that he requested the grand jury last week.
“We’ve developed evidence sufficient to lead me to believe that it’s appropriate for the citizens of the county to hear the evidence and decide where the case goes from here,” Morrogh said Wednesday. Unlike standard Fairfax grand juries, which meet monthly and review numerous cases, special grand juries are convened to hear only one case.
Torres, 32, and his attorney, John Carroll, did not return messages seeking comment Wednesday.
Michael Lieberman, the attorney for the Geer family, said: “I believe it is appropriate that the shooting death of John is finally being brought before a grand jury, where citizens of Fairfax County can make a decision regarding Officer Torres’s actions.”
Fairfax Police Chief Edwin C. Roessler Jr. issued a statement that his department “is supportive of the decision by the Fairfax County Commonwealth’s Attorney, and this step to bring the case to a resolution.” Sharon Bulova, chairman of the Fairfax Board of Supervisors, said it was “a very welcome development on the part of the Commonwealth Attorney’s office that will, hopefully, bring this case closer to a resolution.”
The Geer case has been marked by the unusually long time prosecutors are taking to decide whether to charge Torres. After Fairfax homicide detectives investigated the Aug. 29, 2013, shooting and presented the case to Morrogh, the prosecutor asked to see Torres’s prior internal-affairs files. Roessler refused the request, so Morrogh referred the case to the Justice Department in January 2014. The Justice Department has not made a decision on whether to file charges, records show, and a spokesman with the agency declined to comment Wednesday.
In February, Justice officials said in a letter to Sen. Charles E. Grassley (R-Iowa) that they did not object to Morrogh pursuing a parallel investigation. By then, Morrogh had obtained the internal-affairs files after they were ordered released to Geer’s family in the civil suit.
“Given the tortured history of the case,” Morrogh said, “I want to put witnesses under oath and get their testimony, and I want that done in front of citizens and have citizens ask their own questions. And at the end of the day, we’ll get to the right outcome. ... I feel bad for the [Geer] family because it’s taken so long.”
Morrogh said he had only recently begun to review the Torres internal-affairs files, after first sending them to another prosecutor, Fauquier County Commonwealth’s Attorney James P. Fisher, to remove any statements that Torres was required to make to his employer which violated his right against self-incrimination.
After an initial review of Fisher’s work, Morrogh said, he received more records from Fisher on Wednesday that “contained information which should have been turned over to me long ago.” He said that the information would require more investigation.
Fairfax prosecutors typically do not use special grand juries, but one was convened in 2013 when a road-rage incident ended with a man dead after a confrontation in a mall parking lot in Fairfax City.
Morrogh said he expected that the Geer grand jury would hear evidence for about a week.




John Geer’s family still reeling, waiting for decision 20 months after shooting

By Tom Jackman May 1
Though one stage of the John Geer case ended last week, with the settlement of the family’s civil suit against the Fairfax County police for an officer’s fatal shooting of Geer in 2013, the family still suffers as it waits for a decision on whether the officer will be charged, 20 months later.
Geer, 46, was shot by Officer Adam D. Torres as he stood unarmed in the doorway of the Springfield townhouse he lived in for 24 years with his longtime girlfriend, Maura Harrington, and where the couple raised their two daughters. Geer and Harrington were breaking up, and when Geer began throwing Harrington’s belongings onto the front yard, she summoned police. Torres arrived first, after an argument with his own wife, police reports show, and fired one shot into Geer’s chest after claiming that Geer quickly lowered his hands as if going for a weapon. Four other officers disagreed, the reports show.
It took 17 months for those facts to emerge, in the civil suit Harrington filed on behalf of their daughters, now 18 and 14.  The facts evidently were enough to persuade Fairfax County to pay the girls $2.95 million for the death of their father. But criminal charges, under consideration by the Justice Department since January 2014 and now being reviewed again by the Fairfax County prosecutor, are still nowhere in sight.
Meanwhile, Harrington said, her daughters are still struggling with the sudden loss of Geer.  Geer was a self-employed kitchen remodeling contractor, which gave him the freedom to attend all the softball functions  of his older daughter, Haylea, who played both travel and high school softball. In 2014, ten months after her father’s death, Haylea helped lead South County to the school’s first state championship in any sport. In the fall, she enrolled at West Chester University in Pennsylvania and joined the varsity softball team there.
But softball remains a family affair for the other girls, Maura Harrington said, with West Chester parents attending team parties and games. It hurt too much for Haylea, her mother said. “It was something she and her dad had, he would’ve gone to every scrimmage,” Harrington said. “It wasn’t fun anymore. The other girls all had family.” And so Haylea has quit her college team.
Geer and Harrington’s other daughter, Morgan, is now 14. “She hasn’t talked to anybody yet,” Harrington said. “She doesn’t want to talk about it.” One of the factors in settling the case was that Harrington did not want to put her daughters through the legal process of depositions and court filings and years of legal battles with Fairfax County.
“Looking back at what happened with Sal Culosi’s family,” Harrington said, referring to the five years it took to resolve the civil suit filed after a Fairfax officer shot and killed Culosi in 2006, “and the pain of that litigation, I just couldn’t do that to my girls.”
Harrington said she didn’t file the suit for money, though “we didn’t have the means to pay for college without John.” She said she was pleased that Fairfax had formed a commission to review police policies after the shooting, and grateful that a “Justice for John Geer” group was formed by people who didn’t know her or Geer.
But “I don’t understand what the delay is” in deciding whether or not to charge Torres, who remains on the police force, on administrative duty, while waiting for a ruling. “From everything I’ve read, good grief,” Harrington said, “it looks cut and dried to me, and to everybody else. Even the other police officers say he didn’t deserve to die.” She also didn’t understand why Geer’s case had flown under the radar for so long. “With everything going on today” concerning police-related deaths, “it should be national news.”
The settlement of the civil case, before a criminal ruling has even been made, was highly unusual and seemed spurred by two developments: the orders by Fairfax Circuit Court Judge Randy I. Bellows that the county first release its criminal investigative file to Harrington’s lawyers, which happened in January, and then the order that the county release its internal affairs files, which happened in February. The contents of the internal affairs files, now also provided to Fairfax Commonwealth’s Attorney Raymond F. Morrogh, have not been made public. But within two months of that release, and with a new amended lawsuit scheduled to be filed naming Torres, the county settled.
In the past, in Culosi and many other police-related cases, Fairfax’s county attorneys have played hardball. Why not this time? Board Chairman Sharon Bulova (D) explained this week, “I supported settling the Geer case because it was the right thing to do. The Geer family wished to settle so that the daughters will be able to go to college.  Our board was glad to be able to put to rest the pending civil lawsuit.  It was a mutually agreeable outcome.”
Supervisor Pat Herrity (R-Springfield), who has been the most vocal supervisor on pushing the case forward, said settling the case was “the only responsible decision to make.” Why? “The public can read the 11,000 pages and come to their own conclusion as to whether we should have settled.”
Herrity also noted that “what bothers me is that we as a board haven’t had a public discussion on this,” meaning the government’s response to high-profile public safety cases. The Fairfax board’s public safety committee has not met in two years. “We just raised our salaries but we can’t find time on the calendar to talk about public safety,” Herrity said. “That’s a sad state of affairs.” He said there may be a public safety committee meeting in June.
Morrogh said last week that he would seek to present the case to a special grand jury, but probably not until this summer. U.S. Attorney Dana Boente in Alexandria has given no indication when or if the Justice Department will ever rule on federal charges. Geer’s family, including his parents, who have like Harrington remained mostly quiet publicly since August 2013, are still watching and waiting.
“As far as I’m concerned, until charges are pressed with Torres, it won’t be a closure,” Geer’s father, Don Geer, told the Connection Newspapers on the day of the settlement. “Fairfax has still done nothing as far as he’s concerned. He’s still on the daggone payroll. I’m paying his salary. That’s really quite disgusting.”




Only in the Washington DC area would local government decide that the best way to solve a government created problem is to bring in more government.

Only in the Washington DC area would local government decide that the  best way to solve a government created problem is to bring in more government.

That’s exactly what Sharon Bulova is doing in creating a toothless tiger-publicity stunt called the Police Commission which Bulova and the Board of Supervisors slapped together after the John Geer killing became yet another international black eye for Fairfax County.  (Yep…the Geer killing made the news in Europe, Asia and Australia)


Sadly, the investigation into the killing began only after a United States Senator from a different state forced the Board of Supervisors County to investigate the killing…..and they did……they leaped into action by ASKING the cops if they would consider investigating themselves and then, essentially, apologized for asking.

In the real world when you don’t do your job you get fired. In the real world when you kill people, there’s an investigation. In the real world when a man dies, somebody pays hell….but not in Fairfax County where the politicians elected to serve and protect the people instead  fear, protect and serve the cops and the cops kill innocent every twenty to twenty five months….and get away with it.


We need to start firing people and should start with the Board of Supervisors because we elect and pay the Supervisors to keep things in check and they haven’t done 
that….repeatedly. Instead of governing correctly, when the arrogant occupation force that is the Fairfax County Police kills unarmed citizens, the Supervisors write a massive seven figure check from public and no one is fired and no one goes to jail.  And now as the election grows closer and the bodies pile up, we suddenly have a massive police committee we don’t need that is empowered to do nothing.

To justify their needless committee the Supervisors claim they’re using the committee to examine use of force.  Creating a panel on use-of-force by the Fairfax County Police isn’t needed largely because, although the problem exists, it just barely exists. The Fairfax County Police killing innocent and unarmed citizens is an anomaly and always will be. The department handles thousands of calls a year and rarely gets involved in gun play and when they do, it’s almost always the bad guys who start shooting first.


Factually, the Fairfax County Police are, comparative to other forces of the same size, a sparkling example of what urban policing should be.  (To see a bad example of urban policing look at San Diego, San Jose, Baltimore, Cleveland and Chicago which will pay out HALF- BILLION this year in police brutality suits.

 The Fairfax Police department seems to oversee itself well enough and when it doesn’t, it gets in trouble. (See the Polsi killings, the Sean Lanigan frame up, the Geer killing and the guy they shot to death for stealing a fake tree……yeah, that actually happened)  
As for transparency, what freedom of information doesn’t get released, the courts will order released. The Geer case has proven that. And again, the Geer case is an abnormal occurrence in the day to day activity of the Fairfax County Police, which, for the most part, does a better than average job of staying in touch with citizenry. 


The cop’s near artistic stonewalling is generally done in high profile court cases under the advice of legal counsel because it’s an ugly but legitimate legal tactic used regularly in the justice system and especially helpful when dealing with a department instead of an individual. We can’t take that ploy from the cops because I want the right to stonewall in court. I don’t want that taken away from me. We can’t have one set of laws for the cops and one for the rest of us. ……although, if you think about it, it’s sorta what we have now anyway isn’t it?

But overall, the cops don’t get away with much. It’s a fact in some part due to the power of the press. Most of the local media has done an admirable job reporting the recent abuses by the Fairfax County Police. 

On that subject, there are also several members of the media on the Bulova’s idiotic committee ….well, one of them is an television news representative which is sort of like a news organization but with attention-deficit issues,….but anyway, is it ethical for members of the media to be part of a board like this? 
 If it isn’t ethical it’s certainly uncomfortable and a little dangerious too. Nobody wants the press having coffee and donuts with the cops on a committee formed to keep anything bad from happening to the cops…the only ones who benefit from stuff like that are the cops.  Look, America doesn’t expect a damn thing out of the press except this; when the reporters show up, the politicians and bureaucrats should get nervous. As long as that happens, the free press is doing its job and right now, that doesn’t look like what’s happening here in Fairfax County.   

(Body camera)

There are 12 cops and/or retired cops on this useless committee. In fact, half of the committee, fifteen members, are presently employed by the Fairfax County government or retired from the Fairfax County government ……do really you think they’re going bite the hand that feeds them or change anything at all?

And look where this thing is going…..….I mean putting Hairy Raorererer-er-er on the committee?  Wasn’t he one of the primary architects of the insular arrogance that has brought the Fairfax County Police to the wrong kind of international attention? 
Come on people…..a vampire IS NOT going to solve a robbery at the blood bank.

Look, we DO have solvable problems within the Fairfax County Police Department but we DON’T have systematic problems within the Fairfax County Police Department. Corruption within the ranks is virtually none existent and always has been. Brutality against citizens, entrapment and theft…… although they no doubt happen…..are rare. 


So why do we need….God help us…yet another powerless window dressing committee?
In a way it doesn’t really matter. This committee, whose true purpose is to save Sharon Bulova’s career, will rubber a stamp a lot of things, take photos, eat a lot of donuts at our expense  and eventually disappear. A few months later a cop will gun down another unarmed citizen, the Board of Supervisors will cut another massive check to the family, we’ll make international news again and then the citizens will demand Police oversight. And while police oversight is a grand idea, factually it doesn’t work. Check the national stats. There are about 200 civilian oversight committees around the US. Most are a joke and many others have been disbanded because they are ineffective and highly politicized like this monster incubating in Fairfax County.

Police oversight simply hasn’t worked nor does helicopter-intrusive committee work either.   
You know what does work?
Body cameras work.
They are the kryptonite of punk cops everywhere.
Put cameras on them and be done with it.
We need to do this….we need to force every hood on the force to wear a camera. It’s a simple choice that boils down to this; keep on dolling out multi-million dollar checks to the dead guys family or spend a hell of a lot less the money on body cameras.



The concept of body cameras is simple. Stop the cops from saying or doing something stupid BEFORE they do it.
Forming a committee to talk about what stupid things the cops did AFTER they did it is just dumb, well it’s government worker-think ,which I suppose is basically the same thing.
Body cameras will put a quick end to the arrogance killing by the Fairfax County cops and it will put even a quicker end to the common perception that the FCP is staffed by a bunch of lazy punks with an attitude problem.

As I said before, the other way to solve this issue is to fire the people who hire the cops, the “I wasn’t aware there was a police problem” members of the board of supervisors….like Sharon Bulova. The fact is that had the Board of Supervisors acted on the issue of the cops shooting unarmed citizens several years ago, this wouldn’t be a problem today. 
Fire the people who hire the cops and watch how quickly things change.

Bring in competent leaders FROM OUTSIDE THE DC AREA to run the department. 
We predicted several years ago that under chief what’s-his-face…the bald guy who loves wearing that ridicules hat, that nothing would change but we were wrong.
Things did change.
They got worse.

Bring in a new police chief and new public safety director from outside the Fairfax County government Lifers club.

Bring in a police chief from the outside who is honest and relentless in seeking true attitude change. Create an office of internal affairs whose goal is not to protect the police department at all costs…that’s what we have now…..but one that will protect both the police department from unreasonable complaints and protect the citizens from unreasonable policing practices. 

When a complaint is filed against a cop the complaint should not be removed from the cops file after 60 days as it is now. Rather the complaint should stay there for the length of the cop’s employment with the county.

Do we really need the expense of a Royal Fairfax County Police Navy for the Potomac?  How about the Royal Fairfax County Police Air Force?  Which is better for the county…..more roads, less traffic, smaller class room sizes and more teachers or the cops having a fleet of helicopters and boats to toy around with?



Disempower. Do the cops really have to go around scanning thousands license plates? Cut back the cop’s remarkably generous budget of $217 million dollars. If we’re going to pay the cops that kind of money at least require them to get an AA degree in criminal Justice.
Transform the cops from an occupation force…….87% of the cops live outside the county, hence the punk attitude….and turn them into a local police force by forcing them to live in Fairfax County.  It’s a good idea because when there’s a chance one of these punk cops could run into the civilians they smart-mouthed at the local Safeway, the transformation from thug to police officer will be swift.  The excuse that cops can’t afford to live in Fairfax County is a bald faced lie.

Back to Bulova’s pointless committee.

Who are these civilians on the committee?  Are they qualified to judge whether a cop followed a department's rules governing use of force? Do civilians have any training to understand what the cop faces? Do they have any real world insights into an Officers split-second decision involving life or death?

The answer is no. Only cops have that ability and there comes a time when we simply have to trust the police to police themselves. So let the cops watch over the cops and allow the judicial system, a free press and the unflinching eye of a body camera watch over everyone else. That will work. That will correct the problem.


What won’t work, what won’t correct the problem, are a group of publicity seeking panjandrums in need of an ego boast and well-meaning citizens poking around in complex area they don’t fully understand.  Policing IS NOT a part time gig and while we need to keep an eye on the Fairfax County Police that doesn’t mean we need to  create a pointless babysitting committee so Sharon Bulova can keep her job.