on sale now at amazon

on sale now at amazon
"I don't like this book because it don't got know pictures" Chief Rhorerer

“It’s becoming a disturbingly familiar scene in America - mentally unstable cops”

“It’s becoming a disturbingly familiar scene in America - mentally unstable cops”
“It’s becoming a disturbingly familiar scene in America - mentally unstable cops”

We MUST get minimum IQ standards for cops

 Austin police officers suspended after firing weapons…total 6 cops in all suspended from the same department

 Two Austin police officers were suspended after they fired their guns accidentally last month, according to disciplinary memos made public Wednesday.
Officer Keston Campbell was suspended for three days after he unintentionally fired his patrol shotgun as he was preparing to begin his shift on Dec. 1, the memo says. His suspension started on Jan. 15.
Another memo states Officer Todd Galbraith discharged his patrol shotgun unintentionally on Dec. 16. He received a one-day suspension that started Friday.

In the past year, four other officers were suspended for accidentally firing weapons


Gerry Hyland killed police oversight after the cops gunned down unarmed citizens...you  elected now toss him out, 




Paid vacation for cop arrested for stealing


Palisades Park police officer charged in theft to be paid while suspended
BY MONSY ALVARADO
PALISADES PARK — A police sergeant who was charged with theft by deception and forgery earlier this month will be paid while on suspension, Mayor James Rotundo said Thursday.
Sgt. Marc Messing, an 11-year police veteran, was suspended on Jan. 6 after an internal affairs investigation was conducted that led to the charges. Messing’s base salary was $119,706 in 2014.
A day after Messing was suspended Police Chief Ben Ramos said it was up to the mayor and council to decide if Messing would be paid while suspended. But on Thursday, Rotundo said the initial decision to pay Messing was made by the chief, and that in the past under similar circumstances the borough has always initially suspended with pay. He said the mayor and council would decide later if a change was in order.
“Until we had a better handle on exactly what was going on and whether it was serious enough to then change it to suspension without pay,’’ he said. “And we haven’t been given any of that yet.’’
Rotundo said the case has been transferred over to the Bergen County Prosecutor’s Office. John Molinelli, the prosecutor, said the case was not transferred to his office for investigation, but he said the complaint was probably sent to the office like all other municipal arrests that must go through screening and prosecution.
Messing, the son of Councilwoman Cynthia Pirrera, is being represented by Hackensack attorney Robert Galantucci, who said earlier this week that his client has not had a court appearance. A court date had not been set as of Thursday, according to an employee at Bergen County Superior Court.
Messing is alleged to have altered a $1,000 check written to the municipality and deposited the funds into his personal account, according to a complaint summons. The summons stated that Messing altered a check paid to the municipality by High Point Utilities by adding a “slash and the name of Marc Messing” on the payer line. Messing, the complaint summons stated, then deposited the check in a personal account.
Messing was sworn as a police officer in 2003. He grew up in the borough and has served as an emergency medical technician on the ambulance corps, and previously as a special police officer and traffic officer.



Gerry Hyland killed police oversight after the cops gunned down unarmed citizens...you  elected him now toss him out., 


The epidemic of mentally ill cops in America


Woman says allegedly violent ex-cop claimed he's 'untouchable' - Is he?
STEPHANIE FARR, DAILY NEWS STAFF WRITER

IN JANUARY 2012, Candida Mulligan, a police dispatcher, wrote a letter to Philadelphia Police Commissioner Charles Ramsey about Lt. George Holcombe, her ex-boyfriend and the father of two of her children.
She outlined her fears that Holcombe might commit violence against her or her children. The last words were: "I have made my fears and concerns known to family and friends in the event that something tragic happens to any of us."
She also filed three protection-from-abuse petitions against Holcombe. But he continued to work as a police officer.
"He's 'untouchable,' as he likes to say. He's said that to me, he's said that to the kids," Mulligan, 41, told the Daily News recently. "So he knows that he's going to get away with everything - which he does."
That is, until Holcombe was arrested in November for allegedly threatening to kill Mulligan in front of one son during a custodial dispute and for allegedly assaulting a police officer who responded to the scene.
The incident was captured on camera by Mulligan's husband, John.
"I'm going to jail right now because I'm going to kill you," Holcombe can be heard on video saying to Candida Mulligan. "I'm going to f---ing kill you."
Holcombe, 42, was charged with aggravated assault, simple assault, resisting arrest, terroristic threats, endangering the welfare of children, harassment and disorderly conduct.
And he was fired by the Police Department.
Candida Mulligan thought her troubles might be over.
"I breathed a momentary sigh of relief," she said. "John kept saying, 'This should be it. We have it on video. You can't deny what's on video.'
"That's what everyone thought," she added.
But everyone was wrong.
On Jan. 5, in a move that shocked the Mulligans and the District Attorney's Office, Judge James Murray Lynn dismissed all charges against Holcombe at his preliminary hearing except disorderly conduct.
Now the Mulligans worry that Holcombe will get his job back in arbitration and that he'll regain custody of the kids. And they fear for their lives.
"I only got one favor to ask," John Mulligan told the People Paper. "If we die, please run the story."

'Hiding in the bedroom'
Holcombe and Candida Mulligan met at the Police Administration Building in 1998 and dated from then until 2010. Their two sons are 13 and 5 years old.
Mulligan said that Holcombe was verbally and physically abusive during their relationship and that he has a drinking problem. She vividly remembers one night when she says he threatened to burn the house down.
"Me and the kids were upstairs hiding in the bedroom and he was downstairs lighting papers on fire. He told us he was going to burn us," she said. "I just remember praying."
In 2010, she got the courage to leave. "I ran out of there like a bat out of hell," Mulligan said.
Following the breakup, Mulligan said, the two entered into a verbal custody agreement. But after she met her husband, "all hell broke loose," she said, and Holcombe insisted on getting a court order granting full joint custody. Mulligan said the threats and harassing behavior also became more intense.
"It's a lot of verbal, mental and emotional harassment," she said.
She filed several complaints with the local police district and Internal Affairs, none of which went anywhere, she said.
In January 2012, Mulligan filed her first of three protection-from-abuse orders against Holcombe for threats and harassment.
A temporary PFA was granted for a few months, but as with the two subsequent PFAs she filed, when she went back to court to make the order permanent, a judge - the same one each time - dismissed it.
A new judge even refused to grant Mulligan a permanent PFA against Holcombe after his recent arrest, although she has a temporary one against him now.
Mulligan said she believed that Holcombe received special treatment because he was a cop.
"Basically, every time we'd go to court I was getting reprimanded because I'm making all these complaints against him," she said. "That was his defense every time we'd go: 'She's trying to get me fired.' "

Police investigated
Lt. John Stanford, a police spokesman, confirmed that "a number of PFAs" were filed against Holcombe, but he declined to say how many.
He said that each was investigated by Internal Affairs but that when the courts threw out the temporary PFAs, Internal Affairs was "forced to conclude [its] investigation as not sustained."
Stanford said that whenever a cop is served with a temporary PFA, the officer's guns are reclaimed by the department, the cop is placed on desk duty and an Internal Affairs investigation is initiated.
But if a permanent PFA is granted, the officer is terminated from the force, he said.
The PFAs were not Internal Affairs' only dealings with Holcombe, who became a cop in 1991 and most recently worked in the Neighborhood Services Unit.
In 1997, the city settled a fatal shooting case against him for $750,000, and in 2009, a woman filed suit against him for allegedly kicking in her door and punching her in the head.
After numerous court hearings and investigations that went nowhere, Mulligan felt helpless. Cops told her to go to the press.
"I've had officers literally come up to me and hold my hand and say, 'You need to go public with this. It's the only way something is going to get done,' " she said.
A September 2014 Daily News study showed that in the previous five years, domestic-abuse complaints were filed against 164 cops, only 11 of whom were terminated and charged. Of those, only three were found guilty. Most of the others got their jobs back in arbitration.

'Erratic behavior'
In November, Mulligan was awarded primary physical and legal custody of the kids.
In her order, Judge Diane Thompson said the Department of Human Services had substantiated that the boys were left alone while in Holcombe's care and were often late for school. She also wrote that Holcombe failed to follow through on court-ordered counseling and that the children expressed concerns about his abuse of alcohol.
Holcombe attributed his "erratic behavior" to diabetes, the judge wrote.
The custodial exchange following the new custody agreement that week did not go well and ended in Holcombe's arrest.
The Mulligans showed up at Holcombe's house to pick up the boys at the scheduled 6 p.m. time. The older boy came outside but said Holcombe would not let the 5-year-old out of the house.
The couple sat in their car and as Candida Mulligan calmly called 9-1-1, John Mulligan, a suburban fire chief, began filming.
It was only when cops arrived that Holcombe came out of the house, shirtless, leaving the 5-year-old alone inside.
John Mulligan had gotten out of the vehicle to speak with the cops, but Holcombe went directly to the car for Candida.
"F--- you. Guess what, Candy? You're a piece of s---," Holcombe can be heard on the Mulligans' video yelling in front of the 13-year-old.
As the responding cops tried to calm Holcombe down, he went off even more on his ex-girlfriend.
"I'm going to jail right now because I'm going to kill you," he can be heard saying on the video. "I'm going to f---ing kill you. OK? How about that?"
At that point, according to the Mulligans, Holcombe tried to go after Candida and ended up allegedly assaulting one of the officers instead.
"It was like WrestleMania. He broke the mirror clean off my truck," John Mulligan said.
The video ends with Holcombe being handcuffed on the ground, Candida Mulligan sobbing and her son trying to comfort her.
"Everything just came back, it was a flood of emotions," she said.

Congrats from cops
After Holcombe's arrest, Candida Mulligan said, cops congratulated her.
"I received messages from officers saying. 'Thank God, they finally got him. Finally someone is listening. Finally, something is going to be done,' " she said.
But when the preliminary hearing was held before Judge James Murray Lynn on Jan. 5, Lynn dismissed all charges except for the summary disorderly conduct.
"The judge basically stated that it was sad and disgusting when a child dislikes the other parent and that's only caused because of the things I say and do," Candida said.
John Mulligan was stunned.
"Of course, it's not that the child hears from his father that 'I want to kill you, your mom and your stepfather,' " he said.
The reasons behind Lynn's ruling remain a mystery. He did not return several requests for comment for this story.
But the Mulligans weren't the only ones who thought the judge had made the wrong decision.
The District Attorney's Office has refiled all charges against Holcombe, and he's slated for a new preliminary hearing before a different judge Feb. 9, said John Delaney, deputy district attorney for the trial division.
"Let me say this: We believe the evidence was sufficient to prove our burden at the preliminary hearing," Delaney said. "We believe Judge Lynn was in error when he dismissed the charges."
Holcombe's attorney, Jeremy Alva, disagrees.
"I believe Judge Lynn made the correct ruling," Alva said. "The government has a right to try their case as they choose, and if they believe a refile is necessary, that's their decision."
Alva said he told his client not to comment for this story.
Fraternal Order of Police President John McNesby said the FOP is not covering Holcombe's costs on this case, but if he is acquitted the union might reimburse his court fees up to $9,000. He said the union is waiting to see what happens in the case.
Now, Candida and John Mulligan worry that if the system betrays them yet again, Holcombe will regain his job in arbitration, regain custody of his children and get the current PFA tossed.
"I have a 13-year-old son who doesn't trust cops because even though he sees great cops, his experience isn't that," Candida said. "We constantly have to remind him that not all cops are bad,but it's hard because he's living with one who thinks he can get away with anything."





Gerry Hyland killed police oversight after the cops gunned down unarmed citizens...you  elected him now toss him out. 

Poll reveals New Yorkers disapprove of NYPD’s disrespect of mayor


Special to the AmNews

A recent on-line poll revealed that an overwhelming number of New Yorkers disagree with the NYPD’s disrespectful actions toward Mayor Bill de Blasio during memorial services for two of their fallen comrades last month. Their actions were prompted after the mayor’s comments regarding the non-indictment of the NYPD’s Daniel Pantaleo for the killing of Eric Garner.
During the funerals of officers Rafael Ramos and Wenjian Liu, cops who were present pointedly turned their backs to the mayor as he spoke at the podium, expressing their anger over what they deem to be his lack of support for them.
According to the poll, on which the Huffington Post reported, voters of various ethnicities are upset with the NYPD for that action. The poll reports that voters disapprove of the action by a whopping 69 percent to 27 percent ratio. They also disapprove of Patrolmen’s Benevolent Association President Patrick Lynch’s comments after the shooting.
“That blood on the hands starts on the steps of City Hall in the office of the mayor,” Lynch declared. “When these funerals are over, those responsible will be called on the carpet and held accountable.”
Voters said those comments were too extreme, by a margin of 77 percent to 17 percent. The poll also showed that New Yorkers were more divided along racial lines on whether they feel de Blasio supports the NYPD. Black and Brown voters appeared more likely to believe the mayor supports the NYPD, whereas white voters were less likely.

A Pew Research poll, conducted in August 2014, found that Americans generally don’t believe that police departments do a good enough job of holding cops accountable. The poll shows that distrust of police is not limited to New York City.


Gerry Hyland killed police oversight after the cops gunned down unarmed citizens...you  elected now toss him out.

and the son of bitch got away with it


No charges against officer who struck, killed boy with car
WOODBURY, N.J. – New Jersey authorities said Friday that they will not file charges against a police officer who struck and killed a 10-year-old boy with his squad car last month.
The Gloucester County Prosecutor’s Office said Friday that Franklin Township Patrolman Nicholas Locilento’s action “was not criminal in nature.”
He was one of three officers speeding to a nonemergency call on a wet roadway at around 7 p.m. on Dec. 28. Authorities say three boys were running along the road heading to a sleepover.
Police say a 12-year-old boy ran across the road and yelled that a car was coming. Ten-year-old Matthew McCloskey ran into the road and was hit by the police car. The 12-year-old’s younger brother did not attempt to cross the road.
The prosecutor’s office says the officer had his headlights on but not his siren and flashing lights.
The office said he hit his brakes when he saw the children on the road but was still was traveling about 74 mph in a 50 mph zone at the time of the crash. Officers are allowed to speed to calls, the office said.
The prosecutor’s office said Locilento was not under the influence of drugs or alcohol and there is no evidence he was using his cellphone when he crashed.
The officer tried to give emergency aid to the boy, who was declared dead at the scene.
Locilento’s actions are still subject to an administrative review. The prosecutor’s office said it would also study whether police should be required to have emergency equipment on whenever they’re exceeding the speed limit.

Gerry Hyland killed police oversight after the cops gunned down unarmed citizens...you  elected now toss him out. 




Form a campaign force and fire the people who hire the cops

Form a campaign force and fire the people who hire the cops and watch how quickly things change. The cops and the board of supervisors will pay you no mind until you can threaten their paychecks and careers....when you can do that, watch how quickly things change.



In a time of deceit



“In a time of deceit telling the truth is a revolutionary act.” 
                                                   George Orwell



Former Lee police chief drowning in debt as he siphoned $120,000 from Christmas toy charity


By Stephanie Barry 

SPRINGFIELD — Former Lee Police Chief Joseph Buffis, accused of ripping off a police-sponsored Christmas gift fund for needy children, was drowning in debt as he siphoned money off the charity, according to prosecutors.
Buffis is facing a 12-count criminal indictment in U.S. District Court in connection with the alleged scheme. Federal investigators argue Buffis stole $120,000 from the Laliberte Toy Fund since 1999 to pay overdue credit card bills and other debts; they contend Buffis transferred cash from the charity to his personal bank accounts. Buffis has denied all the allegations.
"Mr. Buffis was in extreme debt," Assistant U.S. Attorney Deepika Shukla told a judge on Tuesday.
Buffis is scheduled to go on trial starting March 2. He is accused of extortion, wire fraud, money-laundering and other related charges. Lawyers in the case are currently wrangling over whether a single count in the indictment, alleging the defendant improperly passed on his family's cell phone bills to the town, belongs in the trial.
Defense lawyer Lori H. Levinson has argued the so-called "Verizon count" in the indictment should be severed from the remaining counts because it shares no common thread with the others beyond dishonesty.
"It would simply make Mr. Buffis look like 'a bad guy,'" Levinson argued to U.S. District Judge Mark G. Mastroianni, adding that the taint would unfairly prejudice her client at trial.
It would simply make Mr. Buffis look like 'a bad guy.'
The prosecution was first prompted by a revelation that Buffis allegedly steered a potential prostitution case away from two innkeepers in Lee in exchange for a $4,000 donation to the toy fund. When investigators began digging in, according to court records, they discovered Buffis had used virtually all of the donations the public intended to help poor families to assist his own.
A recent filing by the government states investigators found just two receipts for toys since 1999 - totaling just over $500 - and the fund otherwise showed balances near zero.
Shukla states in her motion that prosecutors intend to call former Buffis co-workers to tell jurors that he often complained of being "cash-strapped" and "broke," plus a neighbor who will testify that he loaned Buffis $20,000 to pay for his son's motocross school tuition.
Of the "iPhone fraud" allegations, a town official told federal investigators that Buffis first maintained the phone were for task force members, and he did not grant Buffis permission to pass along $5,000 in family cell phone bills to the Lee taxpayers.
Buffis was fired after being indicted in 2013, however, town officials attributed the firing to the cell phone allegations.
Mastroianni is considering the defense motion to sever that count from the rest.






Winter Haven police community service officer arrested on stalking charges


Shanika Dukes charged with stalking, criminal misuse of personal information


WINTER HAVEN, Fla. —A Winter Haven police community service officer is out on bond Monday night.
Shanika Dukes was arrested Friday and charged with stalking and criminal misuse of personal information, police said.
Investigators said that in November, Dukes allegedly used police databases to find out where her ex-boyfriend and his current girlfriend live.
Authorities said Dukes allegedly drove over there while on duty, banging on the door and repeatedly ringing the doorbell.
The couple reported her to police.
Dukes was suspended without pay.
The Winter Haven Police Department and the Polk County Sheriff's Office investigated Dukes after the couple reported her.



It cost you $75 K ...BUT IT DIDN’T COST THE COPS A PENNY


Jury awards $75K to woman who sued PBSO over excessive force

By Kate Jacobson Sun Sentinelcontact the reporter
Jury rules in favor of woman who sued Palm Beach Sheriff's Office and former deputy over excessive force
The jury, which reached its verdict Friday, sided with Maria Paul, awarding her $75,000 on claims that former deputy Michael Woodside intentionally used excessive force, violated her civil rights and unlawfully caused her injury.
According to a lawsuit, Paul was pulled over twice by Woodside on Dec. 25, 2008 in Belle Glade. The first time she was cited for having a loud stereo system and no registration. She drove away from the traffic stop and Woodside followed her, the suit said, then he pulled her over again and said she peeled out.
Paul was removed from her car and was put in a choke hold, and then she was slammed into the ground. Once in the back of Woodside's vehicle, she was punched in the face, according to the lawsuit, which also named Sheriff Ric Bradshaw in his official capacity as the head of the agency.
"For my client, [the ruling] is a vindication that what she said was true," said Paul's lawyer, Ken Swartz. "It was a vindication on her part for a nightmare that she went through."
Woodside and his lawyer could not be reached for comment despite phone calls. Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office spokeswoman Teri Barbera deferred questions to the agency's legal department.
After her arrest, Paul was charged with resisting arrest with violence, aggravated assault on a law enforcement officer and resisting arrest with violence. In August 2009, all of those charges were dropped, records show.
Woodside was hired as a deputy in 2008 after serving as an officer in Jupiter. According to the lawsuit, Woodside was sued in federal court in 2007 for a false arrest.
While working at the Sheriff's Office, he had three use-of-force complaints in his file for his first year of work, according to the lawsuit.
Shortly after Paul's arrest, an internal affairs investigation began probing into whether Woodside and two other deputies who worked in the Belle Glade area were beating up people accused of crimes and bragging about it on the Internet, according to the lawsuit.
The investigation found Sgt. Brent Raban, Deputy Gregory Lynch and Woodside had violated rules and regulations, records show. Raban was demoted and Lynch and Woodside were fired in June 2009.
The internal affairs report showed Woodside made inappropriate comments online about people he had arrested, including one post where he bragged about roughing up a woman he arrested two weeks before he arrested Paul, according to the lawsuiy



I rarely agree with the Post on anything but the paper should get a Pulitzer for their groundbreaking work on this issue years before the rest of the US caught up on it


Fairfax County officials plan to scrap a policy that enables police stonewalling
By Editorial Board January 19
ANY DAY now, Fairfax County officials may drop their stonewalling response to the death of John Geer, who was shot by a county police officer in 2013 as he stood unarmed in the doorway of his home. Any day now, the county police and county attorney’s office may produce the documents they’ve been ordered by a judge to turn over in a civil suit brought by Mr. Geer’s family. After nearly 17 months of foot-dragging and unwarranted obstructions mounted by the county, it’s high time.
Even the county’s Board of Supervisors appears to have lost patience with the arrogance of the police and the county attorney. Having previously ordered these officials to fully comply with the judge’s order, the board last week decided that the policies governing disclosure in police-involved shootings — until now determined by the police themselves — should be rewritten by an outside expert.
Supervisors adopted a motion by Chairman Sharon Bulova (D) that said they are “sensitive” to concerns that the police chief “should not be responsible for both establishing and implementing the policies for disclosures related to police-involved shootings.”
That statement, better late than never, represents progress, although the board should broaden it to include other sorts of police-involved killings. (Eric Garner, the New York man who died at the hands of a police officer in Staten Island who put him in a chokehold, was not shot.)
It also signals a clear reprimand. Although the supervisors have been complicit in the delays and lack of disclosure until now, they are right to have said that it should not “take a court order, entered 16 months after the shooting, for information about an incident like this to be released.”
The documents that will be released to Mr. Geer’s family in compliance with the order should clear up a number of questions that still surround the death.
First among them is why Officer Adam D. Torres shot Mr. Geer, hitting him in the chest and killing him. Having maintained a virtual information blackout since the incident, police recently said that Mr. Geer was “displaying a firearm that he threatened to use against the police,” a statement at odds with witness accounts and which, coming so long after the fact, lacks credibility.
Mr. Geer was shot after speaking to police from behind his storm door for some 45 minutes. He had had a noisy dispute that day with his longtime girlfriend, who is also the mother of his children, but he had committed no crime. It is outrageous that nearly a year and a half has passed with no explanation for his death.
After a dispute between state prosecutors and county officials over the release of information, the Geer case was transferred to the Justice Department, where the civil rights division is investigating. Meanwhile, county police have refused to budge from a policy of withholding information until a decision on whether to bring charges against Mr. Torres is made.
Such a policy makes no sense when it is used as a pretext, month after month, to keep the public in the dark. In deciding to rewrite the policy, the county board has taken the first step toward a more sensible stance on disclosure.

New details about John Geer’s death further undermine police department’s credibility
SIXTEEN MONTHS after a Fairfax County police officer shot John Geer to death on the threshold of his home, the police department has finally offered what it would like people to believe is a justification for the shooting. Yet the “information” provided by the police is so skeletal, so late and so jarringly at odds with other information that it serves only to further undermine the department’s credibility.
Under pressure from federal prosecutors and a state court, the police did — finally — divulge the name of the officer who shot Mr. Geer once in the chest, killing him. It is Adam D. Torres, an eight-year veteran of the force who is 31 years old.
Other information released by the department makes scant sense.
The police say the officer fired because Mr. Geer was “displaying a firearm that he threatened to use against the police.” Yet if, in fact, Mr. Geer did brandish a weapon, why did Officer Torres alone fire his weapon while several others on the scene did not? Why did Officer Torres fire just one bullet, when police are trained to fire multiple shots in the event they face a lethal threat?
And if Mr. Geer was shot because police saw him flash a weapon, why in the world would it take them 16 months to say so — to provide so basic a piece of information?
Moreover, the police said that they found a loaded gun inside the house, a few feet from the doorway where Mr. Geer was shot — but that the gun was holstered. Does that mean that the officer discharged his weapon because he glimpsed a holstered weapon? Did he ever see the weapon unholstered?
If Mr. Geer threatened police with a weapon, why did none of the other witnesses, including neighbors who watched the standoff, see a gun? Why would Mr. Geer’s father have said months ago that police told him Mr. Geer was unarmed when he was shot, an assertion that the police never denied?
Police officials had to be dragged, kicking and screaming, to release the most bare-bones information, which should have been released within hours of Mr. Geer’s shooting. Now they offer dribs and drabs rather than a credible and full narrative of an event at Mr. Geer’s home that lasted more than a half-hour. Last month, Fairfax County Circuit Court Judge Randy I. Bellows ordered police to release information about the shooting to Mr. Geer’s family within 30 days. The information provided so far hardly counts as compliance.
Will it take further court orders, further subpoenas from the Justice Department and further pointed letters from Charles E. Grassley (R-Iowa), the new head of the Senate Judiciary Committee, to pry a full accounting from the police department? And will Fairfax’s elected officials continue to stand by as the department re-brands the county as a bastion of official arrogance?











SC police officer suspended after concert fight goes viral




Andrew Shain and Mindy Lucas
The State
Andrew Shain and Mindy Lucas The Herald
COLUMBIA, S.C. The Columbia Police officer suspended after a video posted on social media showed him punching an man on the ground outside a concert venue early Sunday morning has no previous disciplinary record with the department, Columbia Police Chief Skip Holbrook said.
Investigator Tyrone Pugh was suspended Sunday without pay pending the outcome of an internal and South Carolina Law Enforcement Division investigation, Holbrook said Monday in revealing the name of the officer.
Columbia Mayor Steve Benjamin told The State on Monday that he was "gravely concerned" about what he saw Pugh doing in the video.
A 15-second video of the incident outside the Columbia Soundstage posted online shows Pugh in uniform kneeling on a man who was on the ground and laying to their side. Pugh strikes the man around his head at least five times in the video.
"Stay on the ground! Stay on the ground!" Pugh shouts to the man while punching him.
"Why are you punching him?" the woman taking the video screams at Pugh.
"Back the (expletive) up!" Pugh tells the video shooter.
Robyn Fogg, who shot the video, said the man on the ground was not involved in the fight. The man was standing near the scuffle when police arrived.
Fogg said an officer grabbed the man, threw him to the ground and started punching him.
"He said, 'I didn't do anything.' He wasn't resisting," said Fogg, who will join the Army later this month. "I think it was unnecessary. Two other cops there were aggressive but not like that."
The man on the ground, whose name has not been released, was not arrested, a Columbia police spokeswoman said. Two other 23-year-old men were arrested and charged for fighting.
Fogg said the party of about 300 people celebrating her upcoming 20th birthday was uneventful before the fight in the parking lot as everyone was leaving.
Holbrook, who confirmed Monday that Fogg's video was the same one that his department reviewed, told The State that Pugh and the person on the ground were both African-American.
Pugh has worked with the Columbia Police Department since May 2007, the chief said. He was promoted to the rank of Investigator with the Criminal Investigations Division in 2013 and is assigned to the Property Crimes Unit.
Additionally, Pugh is a first sergeant in the U.S. Army Reserve with nearly 29 years of military service, Holbrook said.
Holbrook declined further comment about the case.
Benjamin said he learned Pugh was suspended without an hour after speaking with Holbrook about the incident late Sunday afternoon.
"I know there are multiple sides to the story," Benjamin said. "(The video) left me gravely concerned as to what the possible circumstances might have been, and I shared that with the chief and he acted accordingly."
The incident involving the officer occurred after 2 a.m. Sunday outside the Columbia Soundstage on Blanding Street, Holbrook said. The venue is used to host concerts and other events.
Five uniformed off-duty police officers were working in the venue's parking lot and responded to a large fight, Holbrook said.

The incident involving Pugh that is under investigation occurred as officers attempted to control the crowd and investigate the scuffle, Holbrook said.

Cop supporter Fairfax Co. Supervisor Michael Frey to retire



                YOU WON'T BE MISSED

Police Danbury ct, fired





DANBURY – A veteran police officer with a history of excessive force complaints has been fired by the mayor after the officer was accused of injuring a young man on Main Street while he was in handcuffs.



The officer, Daniel Sellner, was fired on Jan. 14 after an internal investigation of the latest incident, which happened in August.
Sellner can also be seen in separate You Tube videos unrelated to the most recent incident treating a young man in a holding cell roughly and threatening a motorist at a city gas station.
“I expect that all police officers act professionally, treat all persons with dignity and respect, (and) refrain from threatening persons with arrest or use of force simply because they appear to disrespect an officer,” Mayor Mark Bougton wrote to the officer in a letter of termination. “Your actions and these violations indicate you are either unwilling or unable to carry out the duties of a police officer in accordance with the high standards expected of the Danbury Police Department.
Sellner, who plans to appeal, is the second police officer in as many years to be fired by Boughton for violating the police department’s professional standards.
In 2013, police officer Chris Belair was fired after a threatening and profanity-laced tirade directed against an undocumented immigrant.




Danbury, CT, Police Misconduct


NYPD officer beating a black unarmed person in broad daylight; ......here we go again..........

Former Puerto Rico Police Officer Sentenced

Former Puerto Rico Police Officer Sentenced for Obstructing Civil Rights Investigation

U.S. Department of Justice January 12, 2015
  • Office of Public Affairs (202) 514-2007/TDD (202) 514-1888
Former Police of Puerto Rico Officer Angel Torres Quinones was sentenced today to serve 46 months in prison for obstructing the civil rights investigation into the fatal beating of Jose Luis Irizarry Perez, 19, announced Acting Assistant Attorney General Vanita Gupta for the Civil Rights Division, U.S. Attorney Rosa Emilia Rodriguez-Velez for the District of Puerto Rico and Special Agent in Charge Carlos Cases of the FBI San Juan Field Office.
Torres Quinones pleaded guilty to obstruction of justice for providing misleading information to the local Puerto Rico prosecutor who initially investigated the police-involved beating of Irizarry Perez. Five other former Puerto Rico police officers, who also pleaded guilty, are currently awaiting sentencing for their roles in the beating of Irizarry Perez and subsequent obstruction of the investigation. According to documents filed in connection with the guilty pleas, two former Puerto Rico police officers violated the constitutional rights of Irizarry Perez by striking him with their police batons while another former police officer physically restrained Irizarry Perez during an election evening celebration at the Las Colinas housing development in Yauco, Puerto Rico, on Nov. 5, 2008.
U.S. District Court Judge Juan M. Perez Gimenez issued the sentence, which will be followed by three years of supervised release. During the three-year term, the defendant will be under federal supervision, and risks additional prison time should he violate any terms of his supervised release.
“The department will continue to ensure that those who cover up civil rights violations are brought to justice,” said Acting Assistant Attorney General Gupta. “Like an officer who unnecessarily uses excessive force, a police officer who obstructs a civil rights investigation violates his oath to the people he serves.”
“Today’s sentencing brings a measure of justice to the family of Jose Luis Irizarry Perez,” said U.S. Attorney Rodriguez-Vélez. “The U.S. Attorney’s Office and its law enforcement partners will hold accountable those who abuse their power and official positions at the expense of constitutionally guaranteed civil rights.”
This case was investigated by the FBI’s San Juan Division and is being prosecuted by Senior Litigation Counsel Gerard Hogan and Trial Attorneys Shan Patel and Olimpia E. Michel of the Civil Rights Division and Assistant U.S. Attorney Jose A. Contreras for the District of Puerto Rico.