Winter Haven police community service officer arrested on stalking charges
Shanika Dukes charged with stalking, criminal misuse of
personal information
WINTER HAVEN, Fla. —A Winter Haven police community service
officer is out on bond Monday night.
Shanika Dukes was arrested Friday and charged with stalking
and criminal misuse of personal information, police said.
Investigators said that in November, Dukes allegedly used
police databases to find out where her ex-boyfriend and his current girlfriend
live.
Authorities said Dukes allegedly drove over there while on
duty, banging on the door and repeatedly ringing the doorbell.
The couple reported her to police.
Dukes was suspended without pay.
The Winter Haven Police Department and the Polk County
Sheriff's Office investigated Dukes after the couple reported her.
It cost you $75 K ...BUT IT DIDN’T COST THE COPS A PENNY
Jury awards $75K to woman who sued PBSO over excessive force
By Kate Jacobson Sun Sentinelcontact the reporter
Jury rules in favor of woman who sued Palm Beach Sheriff's
Office and former deputy over excessive force
The jury, which reached its verdict Friday, sided with Maria
Paul, awarding her $75,000 on claims that former deputy Michael Woodside
intentionally used excessive force, violated her civil rights and unlawfully
caused her injury.
According to a lawsuit, Paul was pulled over twice by
Woodside on Dec. 25, 2008 in Belle Glade. The first time she was cited for
having a loud stereo system and no registration. She drove away from the
traffic stop and Woodside followed her, the suit said, then he pulled her over
again and said she peeled out.
Paul was removed from her car and was put in a choke hold,
and then she was slammed into the ground. Once in the back of Woodside's
vehicle, she was punched in the face, according to the lawsuit, which also
named Sheriff Ric Bradshaw in his official capacity as the head of the agency.
"For my client, [the ruling] is a vindication that what
she said was true," said Paul's lawyer, Ken Swartz. "It was a
vindication on her part for a nightmare that she went through."
Woodside and his lawyer could not be reached for comment
despite phone calls. Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office spokeswoman Teri
Barbera deferred questions to the agency's legal department.
After her arrest, Paul was charged with resisting arrest
with violence, aggravated assault on a law enforcement officer and resisting
arrest with violence. In August 2009, all of those charges were dropped,
records show.
Woodside was hired as a deputy in 2008 after serving as an
officer in Jupiter. According to the lawsuit, Woodside was sued in federal
court in 2007 for a false arrest.
While working at the Sheriff's Office, he had three
use-of-force complaints in his file for his first year of work, according to
the lawsuit.
Shortly after Paul's arrest, an internal affairs
investigation began probing into whether Woodside and two other deputies who
worked in the Belle Glade area were beating up people accused of crimes and bragging
about it on the Internet, according to the lawsuit.
The investigation found Sgt. Brent Raban, Deputy Gregory
Lynch and Woodside had violated rules and regulations, records show. Raban was
demoted and Lynch and Woodside were fired in June 2009.
The internal affairs report showed Woodside made
inappropriate comments online about people he had arrested, including one post
where he bragged about roughing up a woman he arrested two weeks before he
arrested Paul, according to the lawsuiy
I rarely agree with the Post on anything but the paper should get a Pulitzer for their groundbreaking work on this issue years before the rest of the US caught up on it
Fairfax County officials plan to scrap a policy that enables
police stonewalling
By Editorial Board January 19
ANY DAY now, Fairfax County officials may drop their
stonewalling response to the death of John Geer, who was shot by a county
police officer in 2013 as he stood unarmed in the doorway of his home. Any day
now, the county police and county attorney’s office may produce the documents
they’ve been ordered by a judge to turn over in a civil suit brought by Mr.
Geer’s family. After nearly 17 months of foot-dragging and unwarranted
obstructions mounted by the county, it’s high time.
Even the county’s Board of Supervisors appears to have lost
patience with the arrogance of the police and the county attorney. Having
previously ordered these officials to fully comply with the judge’s order, the
board last week decided that the policies governing disclosure in police-involved
shootings — until now determined by the police themselves — should be rewritten
by an outside expert.
Supervisors adopted a motion by Chairman Sharon Bulova (D)
that said they are “sensitive” to concerns that the police chief “should not be
responsible for both establishing and implementing the policies for disclosures
related to police-involved shootings.”
That statement, better late than never, represents progress,
although the board should broaden it to include other sorts of police-involved
killings. (Eric Garner, the New York man who died at the hands of a police
officer in Staten Island who put him in a chokehold, was not shot.)
It also signals a clear reprimand. Although the supervisors
have been complicit in the delays and lack of disclosure until now, they are
right to have said that it should not “take a court order, entered 16 months
after the shooting, for information about an incident like this to be
released.”
The documents that will be released to Mr. Geer’s family in
compliance with the order should clear up a number of questions that still
surround the death.
First among them is why Officer Adam D. Torres shot Mr.
Geer, hitting him in the chest and killing him. Having maintained a virtual
information blackout since the incident, police recently said that Mr. Geer was
“displaying a firearm that he threatened to use against the police,” a
statement at odds with witness accounts and which, coming so long after the
fact, lacks credibility.
Mr. Geer was shot after speaking to police from behind his
storm door for some 45 minutes. He had had a noisy dispute that day with his
longtime girlfriend, who is also the mother of his children, but he had
committed no crime. It is outrageous that nearly a year and a half has passed
with no explanation for his death.
After a dispute between state prosecutors and county
officials over the release of information, the Geer case was transferred to the
Justice Department, where the civil rights division is investigating.
Meanwhile, county police have refused to budge from a policy of withholding
information until a decision on whether to bring charges against Mr. Torres is
made.
Such a policy makes no sense when it is used as a pretext,
month after month, to keep the public in the dark. In deciding to rewrite the
policy, the county board has taken the first step toward a more sensible stance
on disclosure.
New details about John Geer’s death further undermine police
department’s credibility
SIXTEEN MONTHS after a Fairfax County police officer shot
John Geer to death on the threshold of his home, the police department has
finally offered what it would like people to believe is a justification for the
shooting. Yet the “information” provided by the police is so skeletal, so late
and so jarringly at odds with other information that it serves only to further
undermine the department’s credibility.
Under pressure from federal prosecutors and a state court,
the police did — finally — divulge the name of the officer who shot Mr. Geer
once in the chest, killing him. It is Adam D. Torres, an eight-year veteran of
the force who is 31 years old.
Other information released by the department makes scant
sense.
The police say the officer fired because Mr. Geer was
“displaying a firearm that he threatened to use against the police.” Yet if, in
fact, Mr. Geer did brandish a weapon, why did Officer Torres alone fire his
weapon while several others on the scene did not? Why did Officer Torres fire
just one bullet, when police are trained to fire multiple shots in the event they
face a lethal threat?
And if Mr. Geer was shot because police saw him flash a
weapon, why in the world would it take them 16 months to say so — to provide so
basic a piece of information?
Moreover, the police said that they found a loaded gun
inside the house, a few feet from the doorway where Mr. Geer was shot — but
that the gun was holstered. Does that mean that the officer discharged his
weapon because he glimpsed a holstered weapon? Did he ever see the weapon
unholstered?
If Mr. Geer threatened police with a weapon, why did none of
the other witnesses, including neighbors who watched the standoff, see a gun?
Why would Mr. Geer’s father have said months ago that police told him Mr. Geer
was unarmed when he was shot, an assertion that the police never denied?
Police officials had to be dragged, kicking and screaming,
to release the most bare-bones information, which should have been released
within hours of Mr. Geer’s shooting. Now they offer dribs and drabs rather than
a credible and full narrative of an event at Mr. Geer’s home that lasted more
than a half-hour. Last month, Fairfax County Circuit Court Judge Randy I.
Bellows ordered police to release information about the shooting to Mr. Geer’s
family within 30 days. The information provided so far hardly counts as
compliance.
Will it take further court orders, further subpoenas from
the Justice Department and further pointed letters from Charles E. Grassley
(R-Iowa), the new head of the Senate Judiciary Committee, to pry a full
accounting from the police department? And will Fairfax’s elected officials
continue to stand by as the department re-brands the county as a bastion of
official arrogance?
SC police officer suspended after concert fight goes viral
Andrew
Shain and Mindy Lucas
The State
The State
Andrew Shain and Mindy Lucas The Herald
COLUMBIA, S.C. The Columbia Police officer suspended after a
video posted on social media showed him punching an man on the ground outside a
concert venue early Sunday morning has no previous disciplinary record with the
department, Columbia Police Chief Skip Holbrook said.
Investigator Tyrone Pugh was suspended Sunday without pay
pending the outcome of an internal and South Carolina Law Enforcement Division
investigation, Holbrook said Monday in revealing the name of the officer.
Columbia Mayor Steve Benjamin told The State on Monday that
he was "gravely concerned" about what he saw Pugh doing in the video.
A 15-second video of the incident outside the Columbia
Soundstage posted online shows Pugh in uniform kneeling on a man who was on the
ground and laying to their side. Pugh strikes the man around his head at least
five times in the video.
"Stay on the ground! Stay on the ground!" Pugh
shouts to the man while punching him.
"Why are you punching him?" the woman taking the
video screams at Pugh.
"Back the (expletive) up!" Pugh tells the video
shooter.
Robyn Fogg, who shot the video, said the man on the ground
was not involved in the fight. The man was standing near the scuffle when
police arrived.
Fogg said an officer grabbed the man, threw him to the
ground and started punching him.
"He said, 'I didn't do anything.' He wasn't
resisting," said Fogg, who will join the Army later this month. "I
think it was unnecessary. Two other cops there were aggressive but not like
that."
The man on the ground, whose name has not been released, was
not arrested, a Columbia police spokeswoman said. Two other 23-year-old men
were arrested and charged for fighting.
Fogg said the party of about 300 people celebrating her
upcoming 20th birthday was uneventful before the fight in the parking lot as
everyone was leaving.
Holbrook, who confirmed Monday that Fogg's video was the
same one that his department reviewed, told The State that Pugh and the person
on the ground were both African-American.
Pugh has worked with the Columbia Police Department since
May 2007, the chief said. He was promoted to the rank of Investigator with the
Criminal Investigations Division in 2013 and is assigned to the Property Crimes
Unit.
Additionally, Pugh is a first sergeant in the U.S. Army
Reserve with nearly 29 years of military service, Holbrook said.
Holbrook declined further comment about the case.
Benjamin said he learned Pugh was suspended without an hour
after speaking with Holbrook about the incident late Sunday afternoon.
"I know there are multiple sides to the story,"
Benjamin said. "(The video) left me gravely concerned as to what the
possible circumstances might have been, and I shared that with the chief and he
acted accordingly."
The incident involving the officer occurred after 2 a.m.
Sunday outside the Columbia Soundstage on Blanding Street, Holbrook said. The
venue is used to host concerts and other events.
Five uniformed off-duty police officers were working in the
venue's parking lot and responded to a large fight, Holbrook said.
The incident involving Pugh that is under investigation
occurred as officers attempted to control the crowd and investigate the
scuffle, Holbrook said.
Police Danbury ct, fired
DANBURY – A veteran police officer with a history of
excessive force complaints has been fired by the mayor after the officer was
accused of injuring a young man on Main Street while he was in handcuffs.
The officer, Daniel Sellner, was fired on Jan. 14 after an
internal investigation of the latest incident, which happened in August.
Sellner can also be seen in separate You Tube videos unrelated
to the most recent incident treating a young man in a holding cell roughly and
threatening a motorist at a city gas station.
“I expect that all police officers act professionally, treat
all persons with dignity and respect, (and) refrain from threatening persons
with arrest or use of force simply because they appear to disrespect an
officer,” Mayor Mark Bougton wrote to the officer in a letter of termination.
“Your actions and these violations indicate you are either unwilling or unable
to carry out the duties of a police officer in accordance with the high
standards expected of the Danbury Police Department.
Sellner, who plans to appeal, is the second police officer
in as many years to be fired by Boughton for violating the police department’s
professional standards.
In 2013, police officer Chris Belair was fired after a
threatening and profanity-laced tirade directed against an undocumented
immigrant.
Former Puerto Rico Police Officer Sentenced
Former Puerto Rico Police Officer Sentenced for
Obstructing Civil Rights Investigation
U.S. Department of Justice January
12, 2015
|
|
Former Police of Puerto Rico Officer
Angel Torres Quinones was sentenced today to serve 46 months in prison for
obstructing the civil rights investigation into the fatal beating of Jose Luis
Irizarry Perez, 19, announced Acting Assistant Attorney General Vanita Gupta
for the Civil Rights Division, U.S. Attorney Rosa Emilia Rodriguez-Velez for
the District of Puerto Rico and Special Agent in Charge Carlos Cases of the FBI
San Juan Field Office.
Torres Quinones pleaded guilty to
obstruction of justice for providing misleading information to the local Puerto
Rico prosecutor who initially investigated the police-involved beating of
Irizarry Perez. Five other former Puerto Rico police officers, who also pleaded
guilty, are currently awaiting sentencing for their roles in the beating of
Irizarry Perez and subsequent obstruction of the investigation. According to
documents filed in connection with the guilty pleas, two former Puerto Rico
police officers violated the constitutional rights of Irizarry Perez by striking
him with their police batons while another former police officer physically
restrained Irizarry Perez during an election evening celebration at the Las
Colinas housing development in Yauco, Puerto Rico, on Nov. 5, 2008.
U.S. District Court Judge Juan M. Perez
Gimenez issued the sentence, which will be followed by three years of
supervised release. During the three-year term, the defendant will be under
federal supervision, and risks additional prison time should he violate any
terms of his supervised release.
“The department will continue to
ensure that those who cover up civil rights violations are brought to justice,”
said Acting Assistant Attorney General Gupta. “Like an officer who
unnecessarily uses excessive force, a police officer who obstructs a civil
rights investigation violates his oath to the people he serves.”
“Today’s sentencing brings a measure
of justice to the family of Jose Luis Irizarry Perez,” said U.S. Attorney
Rodriguez-Vélez. “The U.S. Attorney’s Office and its law enforcement partners
will hold accountable those who abuse their power and official positions at the
expense of constitutionally guaranteed civil rights.”
This case was investigated by the
FBI’s San Juan Division and is being prosecuted by Senior Litigation Counsel
Gerard Hogan and Trial Attorneys Shan Patel and Olimpia E. Michel of the Civil
Rights Division and Assistant U.S. Attorney Jose A. Contreras for the District
of Puerto Rico.
In the end, nothing will change, the cops will get away with it, their budget will get bigger, and nothing change
Fairfax
County to hire expert to examine policies on information in police shootings
By Tom Jackman
The Fairfax County Board of
Supervisors, responding to criticism that the county has not released timely
information on the 2013 police killing of John Geer, voted Tuesday to hire an outside
expert to help it review and revise the rules on disclosure in officer-involved
shootings.
Fairfax officials have dealt
with fatal police shootings before, and rulings on whether a shooting is
justifiable are normally made by the Fairfax prosecutor within three or four
months. But in this case, 16 months have passed since the death of Geer without
a decision by local or federal prosecutors on whether the officer who shot him,
Adam D. Torres, should be charged. Fairfax police have stood by their policy of
not discussing a case before a charging decision is made.
Some police departments have
policies stating that an officer’s name shall be released within a certain
number of days or weeks after a shooting, while others do not have a policy.
Fairfax’s policy states that the police shall release an officer’s age, length
of service and assignment after a shooting, which Fairfax police refused to do
in the Geer case until last week. County policy also holds that the chief may
release an officer’s name only after a decision has been made on charging the
officer and after a review of the officer’s safety.
After a year had passed, Geer’s
family filed a civil lawsuit seeking the name of the officer and the
circumstances of the shooting. Geer was standing, unarmed, in the doorway of
his Springfield townhouse when Torres fired one shot into Geer’s chest,
witnesses and police said. The police released Torres’s name last week, and the
judge in the civil case ordered them to release far more information to the
Geer family’s lawyers, though that has not yet happened.
“Fairfax County residents
deserve a government that is open and transparent,” board chairman Sharon
Bulova (D) said, “and they deserve to know the facts relating to the incident
in a timely manner,” subject to the concerns of the investigation and the
officer’s safety. “The Board of Supervisors does not believe it should take a
court order, entered 16 months after the shooting, for information about an
incident like this to be released.”
John Geer was standing, unarmed, in the
doorway of his Springfield townhouse when he was shot by a Fairfax County
police officer, witnesses and police said. (Photo by Maura Harrington)
Bulova’s motion was not
universally welcomed. Supervisor Gerald W. Hyland (D-Mount Vernon) said there
was no need to seek outside assistance.
“I feel very strongly,” said
Hyland, head of the board’s public safety committee, “that the staff we have,
in our police chief, our former police chief and county attorney have the
capacity to look at the rules we have been following to come back to the board
to make recommendations as to how these rules or policies should be changed.”
Hyland was referring to Police
Chief Edwin C. Roessler Jr., who has refused to discuss the Geer shooting at
all; deputy county executive and former police chief David Rohrer; and County
Attorney David P. Bobzien, whose office has resisted investigative requests
from both local and federal prosecutors, both prosecutors have said.
Supervisor Pat Herrity
(R-Springfield) reluctantly supported the idea, saying it was “too little too
late.” He said it was the board’s “job to make policy, not hire an ‘outside
expert’ to do our job for us.”
Tom Jackman is a native of
Northern Virginia and has been covering the region for The Post since 1998.
County
board to review procedures in wake of police shooting
Lengthy investigation, lack of
transparency central issues in Geer case
by Kali Schumitz
Fairfax County will hire an
outside consultant to review its public disclosure rules, following a controversial
police shooting in 2013.
In a resolution Tuesday,
members of the Fairfax County Board of Supervisors said the unprecedented
length of the investigation into the officer-involved shooting death of John
Geer has led to a lack of closure for the family and a perceived lack of
transparency to the general public.
Geer was shot in the doorway of
his home by a Fairfax County police officer in August 2013 when police
responded to a domestic dispute. He was unarmed, although police have said they
believed he had weapons inside the home.
After completing their internal
investigation, county police turned the matter over to the county prosecutor’s
office for review. Commonwealth’s Attorney Ray Morrogh determined that his
office had a conflict of interest in the case and passed it on to the U.S.
Department of Justice for review.
The Justice Department has
provided little public information, even to county officials, about the status
of its review.
In the meantime, the Fairfax
County Board of Supervisors directed the police chief and county attorney to
comply with a court request for documents related to the case as part of a
civil suit. A lawsuit has been filed against the county on behalf of Geer’s
children.
“Although compliance with the
judge’s order in the Geer case should go a long way to meet the demands for
transparency relating to the shooting of Mr. Geer, the Board of Supervisors
does not believe it should take a court order, entered 16 months after the
shooting, for information about an incident like this to be released,” Board of
Supervisors Chairwoman Sharon Bulova (D-At large) said, reading the motion that
the board approved.
Bulova said she has reached out
to Virginia Attorney General Mark Herring for assistance on the process of
finding an independent expert to support the county’s policy review. The board
asked that the contract be issued by March.
The measure did not receive the
unanimous support of the board.
Supervisor Michael Frey
(R-Sully) disputed the notion that the county has done anything wrong. It has
been a year since the case was turned over to the Department of Justice, and it
sat with the county prosecutor’s office for several months before that, Frey
said.
“It is not the fault of any of
our actions that the U.S. Department of Justice has not completed its
investigation,” Frey said. “That is not anything that we did. There is no lack
of transparency on our part.”
Supervisor Gerry Hyland
(D-Mount Vernon) also voted against the motion because he believes the county
has the resources to do such a review in-house.
Supervisor John Foust
(D-Dranesville), who co-sponsored Bulova’s motion, said while he has faith in
the abilities of county staff, he believes an independent review is necessary
to alleviate the public’s concerns.
“There is a perception within
the public that police should not be advising us on police disclosure
procedures,” Foust said. “I think going outside for that expertise should go a
long way toward addressing anyone’s concern.”
kschumitz@fairfaxtimes.com
Fairfax
County Supervisors Seek Outside Help with Transparency
“Independent expertise” to
advise on information disclosure policies.
Fairfax County Board of Supervisors chairman
Sharon Bulova (center) reads her statement calling for outside input on
improving information disclosure policies. Photo by Tim Peterson.
By Tim Peterson
Eight days after offering the
public the first of any kind of official explanation for officer-involved
shooting of Springfield resident John Geer, the Board of Supervisors took
another step.
Though they didn’t share any
further information on the case, chairman Sharon Bulova and the panel returned
from an extended closed session on Jan. 13 with a motion with the potential to
affect government transparency.
“Until John Geer was shot on
August 2[9], 2013,” Bulova’s motion statement reads, “the procedures adopted by
the Police Chief for public disclosure regarding officer involved shootings
seemed to establish a reasonable balance between the county’s duty to make
timely disclosure and the concerns the police chief has expressed about
conducting a professional investigation and the safety of officers involved in
a shooting incident.”
The statement goes on to
explain that the police policies don’t account for the way this particular case
has been passed from the Fairfax County Police Department to the Commonwealth
Attorney to the Department of Justice, all over the course of the past 16
months and change.
THOSE 16 MONTHS included a $12
million civil case filed against the county. As part of that case, a Fairfax
Circuit Court judge has ordered more documents and records of the police action
the day of the shooting be produced within the month.
#“The board is also aware of
concerns expressed by some members of the public to the effect that the police
chief should not be responsible for both establishing and implementing the
policies for disclosures relating to police-involved shootings,” Bulova’s
statement reads.
#There are no more admissions
or revelations on the Geer case itself. Instead, Bulova claims to have “reached
out to Attorney General Mark Herring for his suggestions for a process for us
to identify professional organizations and/or resources that can work with us
to review our policies and recommend appropriate changes.”
The idea would be to prevent
such a delay from happening again, given a case with similar circumstances.
In addition to her attempt to
connect with Herring, Bulova moved to direct the County Executive to locate
“independent expertise in the field of Police Department operations and,
specifically, in the area of policies and procedures with respect to information
disclosures in the case of police involved shootings.”
The County Executive would also
be charged with figuring out funding source and procedure for the board to
retain such a resource.
Pat Herrity (R-Springfield) was
the first of all the supervisors to weigh in on the motion.
“I reluctantly support the
motion,” he said. “I think it’s too little too late. The actual motion gives no
policy direction on transparency, though I believe that’s the intent.
“There’s no provision to engage
our citizens in the process,” he continued. “This to me smells of outsourcing
policy-making. I hope that’s not the intent. I believe we need to engage our
citizens, engage our staff and have a transparency conversation on this topic.”
Supervisor John Foust
(D-Dranesville) didn’t read the motion as an attempt to exclude the public, nor
as too little too late. But, he conceded, “there is a perception in the public
that police should not be advising us on police disclosure procedures. I think
that’s legitimate.”
Supervisor Michael Frey
(R-Sully) voiced his lack of support for the motion, saying: “Our role in the
investigation was completed promptly. “It’s not any of our actions, or a result
of anything we did that the U.S. Department of Justice has not completed their
investigation over the course of a year. That’s not anything we did, there’s no
lack of transparency on our part or any fault of our process.”
SUPERVISORS Cook (R-Braddock),
Hyland (D-Mount Vernon), Hudgins (D-Hunter Mill), McKay (D-Lee) and Smyth
(D-Providence) all signed on with the motion, acknowledging the benefit of
looking at policy changes to speed up the information disclosure process.
“The community needs to know
where does the buck stop?” said Hudgins. “It actually does stop with us. This
gives us more than the opportunity to maintain the due diligence to the case
that it needs. It gives us also an opportunity to work with the community, I
hope.”
Bulova’s motion calls for
contracting with whatever organization the County Executive, in consultation with
the Attorney General’s office, comes up with by February or March.
The motion passed with only
supervisors Frey and Hyland dissenting.
Facebook-organized
Protesters in Fairfax Demand Justice for John Geer
Supervisors’ responsibility
also highlighted.
Jason McCormack of Centreville demonstrates
for increased police accountability at a Jan. 8 protest in Fairfax. Photo by
Tim Peterson.
By Tim Peterson
Mike Curtis of Manassas (left)
and Nathan Cox of Richmond (right) spoke to media and demonstrators demanding
an independent investigation of John Geer’s death.
Cars honked in acknowledgement
as Centreville resident Jason McCormack stood alongside Chain Bridge Road in
Fairfax, near the Fairfax County Courthouse, with a handmade sign that read
“Cops Are Bound By The Law, Too.”
McCormack had joined several
dozen protesters from around the state, braving freezing temperatures in the
late morning on Jan. 8, demanding Fairfax County police answer for the shooting
death of Springfield resident John Geer.
The protest was organized
through a Facebook group called “Justice for John Geer” that at the time had
nearly 700 members.
“I’m here for police
accountability all across the board,” McCormack said, his head almost
completely obscured by a Baltimore Ravens beanie and a grey and black scarf.
“I lived in the court across
from the Geer’s house and it could’ve been my kids out playing when the shot
was fired. It could’ve been a whole other story. We need to stop letting the
gun be the first thing you pull.”
Following a domestic dispute
with his longtime partner Maura Harrington, police had arrived at Geer’s home
and spoke with him for over half an hour while he stood in his doorway,
unarmed, with his hands raised and resting on the frame.
As he began to lower his hands,
he was shot in the chest and died in his house without receiving medical
attention.
By Tim Peterson
On the Monday before the
demonstration, Fairfax County Board of Supervisors chairman Sharon Bulova came
forward to release an explanation from the county for the first time in nearly
17 months since the Aug. 29, 2013 shooting.
Bulova’s statement came with a
brief official account from the county of the events surrounding the shooting,
that named the officer involved as PFC Adam Torres.
“I have been frustrated and
disappointed with how long this investigation has taken,” she said, citing the
case’s changing hands from the Commonwealth Attorney to the Department of
Justice as a reason for the delay in information being released.
Protest organizer Mike Curtis
of Manassas urged demonstrators and the public to demand more explanation from
their public leaders.
“Don't just let her have her
few minutes on the news and tell everybody she's for the same thing you are,”
he said. “She needs to be held accountable too.”
Curtis is also one of the
founders of the Justice for John Geer Facebook group.
He was joined in addressing the
media and demonstrators by Richmond resident Nathan Cox, who founded the public
interest Virginia Cop Block that seeks police accountability and transparency.
“If we don't hold our public
servants accountable, things will just continue to run on a tyrannical type of
basis,” Cox said. “We're out here today because of the lack of a legitimate
investigation. I personally am not cool with the police investigating
themselves. We're out here today to demand an independent investigation, no
conflict of interest.”
Geer’s friends Jeff Stewart and
Jerry Santos also attended the event.
“It’s encouraging that some
number of people are paying attention, encouraging that something organized is
taking place and encouraging we got the number out with the conditions
outdoors,” said Santos.
“It’s really discouraging that
the county continues to be tone-deaf and half-blind,” he continued. “They don’t
get it that they’re on the wrong side of history, the wrong side of the law,
the wrong side of decency.”
Curtis said the group plans to
continue its mission of seeking justice for Geer through email campaigns,
attending public meetings and organizing additional events.
“This is the first step in what
we're trying to do,” he said. “We need to keep going, keep thinking this isn't
the end, it's just the beginning.”
Gerry Hyland killed police oversight after the cops gunned down unarmed citizens...you elected now toss him out. he works in the cops best interest and not yours.,
Cops accused of murdering a homeless man say the legal system isn't fair
APD
officers want DA’s Office off case
By Mike Gallagher / Journal
Investigative Reporter
Lawyers for two Albuquerque
police officers facing murder charges in the shooting death of homeless camper
James Boyd say District Attorney Kari Brandenburg’s office should be
disqualified from prosecuting the men because she has “serious conflicts of
interest” – including the fact that Brandenburg herself is under investigation
by APD.
Brandenburg’s office charged
officer Dominique Perez and retired detective Keith Sandy with open counts of
murder this week. A judge will decide whether there is enough evidence to bind
Perez and Sandy over for trial, and if so, which charge or charges they should
face – first-degree murder, second-degree murder and/or manslaughter.
Defense attorneys Sam Bregman
and Luis Robles on Thursday filed documents asking District Judge Alisa
Hadfield to disqualify Brandenburg and her entire office from prosecuting the
case.
“The politically charged nature
of this case creates the impression of bias or impartiality that is imputed to
the District Attorney’s entire office in light of the potential charges against
District Attorney Brandenburg,” the motion states. “Recusal is appropriate,
especially in light of the District Attorney’s personal conflict of interest
with the Albuquerque Police Department.”
APD has investigated
Brandenburg for possible bribery and witness intimidation in connection with an
APD burglary and larceny investigation involving her 26-year-old son, Justin
Koch. The detective and his supervisor found probable cause to charge
Brandenburg but sent the case to the Attorney General’s Office for review in
November. That review is still pending.
Brandenburg has denied any
wrongdoing.
Her son has not been charged
with the burglary and larcenies outlined in the report forwarded to the
Attorney General’s Office, but he is awaiting trial on larceny charges in
Sandoval County.
District Attorney Kari
Brandenburg. (Dean Hanson/Albuquerque Journal) Kari Brandenburg has said her
son has a serious drug addiction problem, but that she has practiced “tough
love” and done nothing improper.
Koch was recently released from
the Metropolitan Detention Center on a shoplifting charge when someone posted
10 percent of his $2,500 bail. Kari Brandenburg has said she has refused to post
bail for him.
Boyd was shot after a four-hour
standoff with numerous officers in the Sandia Foothills last March. He was
armed with two small knives but in video of the shooting he appears to be
turning away when he was fatally wounded.
Bregman says his client feared
for the safety of a K-9 officer who was approaching Boyd with his dog and that
the decision to charge the officers was a “terrible”one.
Shooting reviews
The motion also cites other
alleged conflicts of interest including that the lead prosecutor in the case
against the officers, Deputy District Attorney Deborah DePalo, was also the
“on-scene” adviser from the District Attorney’s Office in the Boyd shooting.
“Debbie DePalo is going to be
called as a witness in our case,” Bregman said. “How can she prosecute it?”
DePalo’s involvement in the
prosecution was cited Wednesday in a letter from City Chief Administrative
Officer Rob Perry to Brandenburg as a reason for barring another assistant
district attorney from a fatal officer-involved shooting Tuesday night
involving a convicted felon firing a gun and wearing body armor.
The motion by Bregman and
Robles cites Perry’s letter as further evidence that there is a public
perception of bias on Brandenburg’s part in the Boyd case.
Perry in his letter requested
Brandenburg appoint a special prosecutor from outside her office to advise
police investigating officer-involved shootings.
“It doesn’t matter how strong
or weak the case is, it is public knowledge that she is under investigation for
very serious crimes by officers from the Albuquerque Police Department,”
Bregman said in a telephone interview Thursday. “The overarching issue here is
that the justice system is only as good as the public perception of the justice
system.”
Brandenburg’s spokeswoman said
in an email that the office was “reviewing the motion and will gladly provide
comment next week.”
She also said the district
attorney would comment on Perry’s letter next week.
At a press conference in
November, Brandenburg denied any wrongdoing in connection with the APD
investigation involving her son. She said at the press conference at the office
of Albuquerque attorney Peter Schoenburg that the first she knew of the APD
investigation was when it was published in the Journal and said she had never been
interviewed by APD.
The report, compiled by APD’s
Burglary Unit, includes interviews of burglary victims who said they had either
been reimbursed for thefts committed by their friend Jason Koch or promised
reimbursement by Brandenburg after the crimes were committed in 2013.
According to the APD report,
one couple said they had been promised reimbursement for their losses if they
didn’t tell police or pursue charges against her son.
Perry said the city and
district attorney should work together to avoid the conflict of having
prosecutors advising and interviewing officers at the scene of a shooting and
later prosecuting those same officers.
The motion also states that
Perez and Sandy have been witnesses for the District Attorney’s Office in
felony and misdemeanor cases as police officers, creating yet another conflict
that should lead to the disqualification of Brandenburg’s office from the case.
A spokeswoman for District
Attorney Kari Brandenburg on Wednesday evening said the office hadn’t received
a letter from City Chief Administrative Officer Rob Perry asking that a special
prosecutor be appointed to deal with fatal police shootings.
Therefore, the office couldn’t
comment.
Perry provided the Journal with
a receipt from the District Attorney’s Office showing the letter was delivered
and signed for on Wednesday at 4:16 p.m.
The Journal forwarded the
receipt Thursday morning to district attorney spokesman Kayla Anderson, who
replied by email that the office still had not received the letter.
About 10 minutes later, at
11:28 a.m. Thursday, Anderson said the letter was found at the front
receptionist desk. She said Brandenburg would comment on it next week.
The national shit storm that won't go away
Marchers in Annapolis echo nationwide call
Anti-police brutality protesters disrupt Seattle City Council meeting
Marchers
in Annapolis echo nationwide call
By Mark Puente, Justin George
and Colin Campbell
Hundreds of protesters
descended upon Annapolis Thursday
Hundreds of Marylanders joined
noisy demonstrations at the State House in Annapolis and on downtown Baltimore
streets Thursday to call for an end to police brutality and other misconduct.
They packed a hearing room on
the second day of the 2015 General Assembly session and vowed to monitor
legislative proposals aimed at police misconduct. Later, about 130
demonstrators gathered at the Inner Harbor and marched downtown, blocking
President and Pratt street intersections for hours.
"We have to take a stand
against police violence and police brutality," the Rev. Heber Brown III
shouted into a megaphone in Annapolis. "We're here today because other
people are getting away with murder."
A "March on
Annapolis" flier outlined the protesters' legislative demands, which
include changing a state law that provides procedural safeguards for officers
accused of misconduct. They called for strengthening Baltimore's civilian
review board and tapping independent prosecutors to handle police brutality
investigations.
Thursday's protests, part of a
nationwide effort to voice concerns about police, coincided with what would
have been the 86th birthday of the Rev. Martin Luther King Jr.
To energize the crowd, speakers
asked what the civil rights leader would do about the anger permeating the
country in the aftermath of police killing unarmed blacks.
The deaths of Michael Brown in
Ferguson, Mo., Eric Garner in New York and Tamir Rice in Cleveland at the hands
of officers have helped to focus national attention on police conduct.
Baltimore police have drawn
scrutiny in the death of Tyrone West. A Baltimore Sun investigation showed that
the city has paid nearly $6 million since 2011 in settlements and court
judgments for plaintiffs who alleged brutality and other misconduct.
Sixty demonstrators, a mix of
retirees, students and ministers, boarded a bus at the Alameda shopping center
in Baltimore early Thursday for Annapolis. They carried phones, coffee cups and
signs denouncing police violence against unarmed citizens.
Protesters gathered at Lawyers
Mall to demand that lawmakers change a state law so police face swifter justice
when they commit misconduct. Standing underneath a statute of Thurgood
Marshall, speakers led the crowd in chants of "We want justice,"
"Black lives matter" and "No justice, no peace."
"We want to make a stand
on this day!" yelled Baltimore's Farajii Muhammad, as several dozen police
officers and troopers watched the crowd. Officers made most people remove
wooden sticks from signs.
The Rev. Stephen Tillett,
pastor of Asbury Broadneck Methodist Church in Annapolis, told the crowd that
many Americans have knee-jerk reactions to the nationwide protests. He stressed
that nobody opposes police officers.
"It's an anti-brutality
protest," he bellowed. "We support the good cops."
The Rev. Donald Palmore of
Baltimore said he rode on one of two buses from Baltimore to show support for
the effort to equip police with body cameras.
"It would protect the
police as well as the public," he said.
After 30 minutes, the crowd
marched up the street to the Taylor House of Delegates Office Building.
"Everybody has the power
and influence to bring about change," said Baba Staton, a law student from
Baltimore.
Demonstrators stood
shoulder-to-shoulder at the entrance of the building, like soldiers in
formation. Their shouts vibrated down the block.
"The next funeral I go to
is where we bury injustice!" shouted Chinedu Nwokeafor of Baltimore.
It took about 30 minutes for
the obedient protesters to pass through metal detectors in the building.
The crowd gathered in front of
the hearing room of the House Judiciary Committee, where legislative proposals
supported by the group are likely to be heard. Any changes to Maryland's
decades-old law enforcement Bill of Rights, which provides procedural
safeguards when officers are accused of misconduct, could come before the
committee.
The demonstrators are not alone
in seeking changes to the police Bill of Rights. Baltimore Mayor Stephanie
Rawlings-Blake and Police Commissioner Anthony Batts have said that police
officials need more power to address misconduct quickly.
Protesters stood silently as
the committee read its roll call. Del. Jill P. Carter, one of several lawmakers
who wants to loosen protections in the Bill of Rights, thanked the crowd for
attending.
"Justice is our top
priority," the Baltimore Democrat said.
Brown, pastor of Pleasant Hope
Baptist Church in North Baltimore, vowed that people would pack that room to
keep a watchful eye on legislation.
"If you don't do the will
of the people, you will be in retirement after the next election," he said
about lawmakers.
Del. Curt Anderson, who chairs
Baltimore's House delegation, said the number of protesters shows other
lawmakers "that we in Baltimore City face unique challenges."
Two groups gathered in
Baltimore later Thursday. One group met at the Inner Harbor and the other
outside the U.S. attorney's office on South Charles Street.
Tre Murphy, a 19-year-old
activist who staged a sit-in at a Baltimore City School Board meeting last
month to protest the closure of several schools, said his group demands change
from lawmakers.
"They're used to folks
being there one time," he said. "This is not a one-time thing. We're
going back there. ... We're going to get our legislation passed by any means
necessary."
Garland Nixon, 53, a retired
Maryland Natural Resources Police major and a board member of the ACLU of
Maryland, said he saw first-hand the need for an amended officer Bill of Rights
and stronger Civilian Review Board.
"The Constitution gives
everybody all the rights they need," he said. "Law enforcement should
be held to a higher accountability, not a lower one."
At McKeldin Square, a large
group of mostly college-age and young adults formed a circle chanting loudly
and singing "We Shall Overcome."
Amenhotep "Cruz"
Omegasoul, 26, said he came to "show some solidarity for everyone
participating in the struggle" on King's birthday. "It's definitely
important today," Omegasoul said. "But more importantly it's
important to fight every day, to fight for justice, to fight for equality every
day."
Protesters decried the arrest
of activist Sara E. Benjamin, 23, earlier in the day, and her name became a
group rallying cry.
Police said she wasn't arrested
for demonstrating but for an unrelated matter. Court records show she had an
outstanding warrant for failing to appear at a court hearing stemming from a
second-degree assault charge in September 2013.
At about 5:30 p.m., as downtown
workers left parking garages for the commute home, demonstrators poured onto
Pratt Street and headed east toward President Street. Large groups of uniformed
police officers escorted them, and the demonstration became a rolling roadblock
for commuters.
"The police are blocking
off roads so the group can protest the police," one observer tweeted.
Intersections on President
Street and in Harbor East faced logjams until just before 7 p.m., when
protesters broke up.
Anti-police
brutality protesters disrupt Seattle City Council meeting
Posted by Daniel Beekman and
Steve Miletich
The Seattle City Council
temporarily suspended its weekly briefing Monday morning after people upset
with the Seattle Police Department’s handling of recent anti-police brutality
demonstrations began shouting and singing.
Several council members left
the council chambers after audience members broke up a presentation by
representatives from the ports of Seattle and Tacoma.
Many people who had shared
concerns during a public comment period at the beginning of the briefing raised
their fists in the air and sang the words, “Justice for Mike Brown,” a
reference to the fatal police shooting last year in Ferguson, Missouri, that
didn’t result in an indictment of the officer.
During the public comment
period, speakers chastised the police department for responding to mostly
peaceful demonstrations by dispatching officers armed with pepper spray and
dressed in riot gear.
Former state Senate candidate
Jess Spear, of the Socialist Alternative party, asked why officers had “used
their bikes as weapons” against demonstrators.
The briefing resumed after
Councilmember Bruce Harrell conferred with several demonstrators. Seattle
Police Chief Kathleen O’Toole and other Seattle Police Department officials
began answering questions as part of scheduled appearance to discuss their
handling of the local protests that followed the Ferguson, Mo., decision and
the subsequent one by a Staten Island-grand jury not to indict a white officer
in the choking death of a black man.
O’Toole said her department’s
goal is to facilitate peaceful protests while protecting all members of the
public and property, including demonstrators and officers.
She told the council the
department’s Office of Professional Accountability, which handles internal
investigations, was looking into one complaint against an officer stemming from
the protests. That case involves a use of force, OPA Director Pierce Murphy
said afterward.
O’Toole reiterated her message
during an impromptu sidewalk discussion with several protesters that occurred
outside of City Hall after the council meeting.
She told the group she was open
to suggestions for handling protests in the future and urged them to officially
report any complaints.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)