ANYONE DOUBT SHE'LL GET WHAT SHE WANTS? WELCOME TO FAIRFAX COUNTY.
Fairfax wants attorney documents
in John Geer case kept under seal
By Tom Jackman August 6
A top Fairfax County government
attorney, who faced termination for her handling of a case involving the fatal
police shooting of an unarmed man,wants to pursue a grievance against the
county, which is seeking to keep key documents in the case hidden from public
view.
Deputy County Attorney Cynthia L.
Tianti was nearly fired in March after Sharon Bulova (D), the chairman of the
Fairfax County Board of Supervisors, said Tianti had not informed the board
that the county prosecutor wanted to meet to discuss the case of John B. Geer,
who was killed by a county police officer. Tianti headed the legal team that
advised Fairfax Police Chief Edwin C. Roessler Jr. to withhold documents from
the prosecutor in his investigation of Geer’s 2013 killing, previously released
e-mails show.
County Attorney David Bobzien
said in March that he was eliminating Tianti’s position as deputy in charge of
operations and reorganizing the office while Tianti was placed on leave as the
first step in a termination process. But in June, the county restored Tianti to
her job as deputy county attorney, although she was assigned to work only on
matters involving the Community Services Board, which provides help for people
with mental illness and substance abuse problems.
Tianti sought to file a grievance
over how she was treated, court records show. Fairfax has well-defined rules on
what may be heard by the county’s Civil Service Commission, and the county
executive decides whether a grievance can proceed to the commission, an
impartial hearing body for county employee grievances and appeals. Court
filings show that after a series of e-mails and meetings, Fairfax Deputy County
Executive David Rohrer, the former Fairfax police chief, denied Tianti the
opportunity to take her case to the commission.
Tianti is appealing Rohrer’s
decision to Fairfax County Circuit Court. In that case are documents that apparently
involve Tianti’s communications with the Board of Supervisors, according to the
county’s filing. The county wants to keep those documents sealed, saying they
fall under attorney-client privilege or attorney work product, according to a
letter by attorney Sharon Pandak, who is representing Rohrer.
Two people familiar with the case
said the communications could support a claim by Tianti that she did nothing
improper and possibly contradict the board’s claims that Tianti did not keep
them informed about the case. Tianti declined to comment on the case or the
content of the communications. She has worked for the county for 25 years and
received a top employee award for her work on another case.
Circuit Court Judge Daniel Ortiz
will hear arguments Friday on whether to keep the communications between Tianti
and the board sealed. The judge has 30 days to rule on whether Tianti should be
allowed to proceed with her grievance.
Bulova said of Tianti in an
e-mail, “It is interesting that the county attorney who advised the police and
Board of Supervisors to not share or release any information is now prepared to
release privileged attorney-client information that she believes might be to
her advantage. This is a personnel matter regarding an employee who is not happy
about being transferred (which was an alternative to being terminated). The
Board of Supervisors does not participate in the grievance process and I don’t
know what material or documents she wants to have released.”
Asked whether the supervisors
would waive their attorney-client privilege to withhold the underlying
documents in the case, Bulova said the board is not scheduled to meet again
until Sept. 22 and could discuss a waiver then.
After Geer, 46, was shot and
killed by Officer Adam D. Torres on Aug. 29, 2013, Fairfax police began a
criminal investigation and provided the results to Commonwealth’s Attorney
Raymond F. Morrogh. Morrogh asked the police that November for prior internal
affairs involving Torres as part of his deliberations on whether to charge
Torres with a crime.
But after consulting county
attorneys Tianti and Karen L. Gibbons, Roessler refused to provide the prior
Torres files, e-mails between Gibbons and Morrogh show. Morrogh referred the
case to the Justice Department in January 2014 to seek the files in federal
court. It is not clear whether Tianti advised the Board of Supervisors of those
developments.
In September 2014, with no
movement from the Justice Department, Morrogh sought to arrange a meeting with
Bulova to discuss the lack of cooperation from police in the Geer case,
seemingly at the behest of the county attorney’s office. “When one section of
the police department is instructed to withhold information from the
investigating officers and the prosecutor, the integrity of the investigation
is called into question,” Morrogh wrote.
Tianti responded that she was
Bulova’s attorney and would need to be present. Morrogh inquired about speaking
to the board at a public meeting. Tianti answered, “I did not know of a way for
you to do so,” the e-mails show.
When the e-mail exchange was made
public in February, Bulova said she had never been told that Morrogh wanted a
meeting and that she would have met with the prosecutor.
Various supervisors expressed
frustration with the county attorney’s office, and Tianti was placed on leave
in March.
Antonio Olivo contributed to this
report.
No comments:
Post a Comment