We called the Fairfax County police for help....the punks they sent threatened to arrest us. One cop tells my wife that if she keeps crying he'll arrest her and the other cop, La Forge or something, says to me "You call the police this what you get" I said that was wrong and he said "Go ahead, say more fuck'n thing prick" and I thought "Well if you insist".
Only in the Washington DC area would local government decide that the best way to solve a government created problem is to bring in more government.
That’s exactly what Sharon Bulova is doing in creating a toothless tiger-publicity stunt called the Police Commission which Bulova and the Board of Supervisors slapped together after the John Geer killing became yet another international black eye for Fairfax County. (Yep…the Geer killing made the news in Europe, Asia and Australia)
Sadly, the investigation into the killing began only after a United States Senator from a different state forced the Board of Supervisors County to investigate the killing…..and they did……they leaped into action by ASKING the cops if they would consider investigating themselves and then, essentially, apologized for asking.
In the real world when you don’t do your job you get fired. In the real world when you kill people, there’s an investigation. In the real world when a man dies, somebody pays hell….but not in Fairfax County where the politicians elected to serve and protect the people instead fear, protect and serve the cops and the cops kill innocent every twenty to twenty five months….and get away with it.
We need to start firing people and should start with the Board of Supervisors because we elect and pay the Supervisors to keep things in check and they haven’t done
that….repeatedly. Instead of governing correctly, when the arrogant occupation force that is the Fairfax County Police kills unarmed citizens, the Supervisors write a massive seven figure check from public and no one is fired and no one goes to jail. And now as the election grows closer and the bodies pile up, we suddenly have a massive police committee we don’t need that is empowered to do nothing.
To justify their needless committee the Supervisors claim they’re using the committee to examine use of force. Creating a panel on use-of-force by the Fairfax County Police isn’t needed largely because, although the problem exists, it just barely exists. The Fairfax County Police killing innocent and unarmed citizens is an anomaly and always will be. The department handles thousands of calls a year and rarely gets involved in gun play and when they do, it’s almost always the bad guys who start shooting first.
Factually, the Fairfax County Police are, comparative to other forces of the same size, a sparkling example of what urban policing should be. (To see a bad example of urban policing look at San Diego, San Jose, Baltimore, Cleveland and Chicago which will pay out HALF- BILLION this year in police brutality suits.
The Fairfax Police department seems to oversee itself well enough and when it doesn’t, it gets in trouble. (See the Polsi killings, the Sean Lanigan frame up, the Geer killing and the guy they shot to death for stealing a fake tree……yeah, that actually happened)
As for transparency, what freedom of information doesn’t get released, the courts will order released. The Geer case has proven that. And again, the Geer case is an abnormal occurrence in the day to day activity of the Fairfax County Police, which, for the most part, does a better than average job of staying in touch with citizenry.
The cop’s near artistic stonewalling is generally done in high profile court cases under the advice of legal counsel because it’s an ugly but legitimate legal tactic used regularly in the justice system and especially helpful when dealing with a department instead of an individual. We can’t take that ploy from the cops because I want the right to stonewall in court. I don’t want that taken away from me. We can’t have one set of laws for the cops and one for the rest of us. ……although, if you think about it, it’s sorta what we have now anyway isn’t it?
But overall, the cops don’t get away with much. It’s a fact in some part due to the power of the press. Most of the local media has done an admirable job reporting the recent abuses by the Fairfax County Police.
On that subject, there are also several members of the media on the Bulova’s idiotic committee ….well, one of them is an television news representative which is sort of like a news organization but with attention-deficit issues,….but anyway, is it ethical for members of the media to be part of a board like this?
If it isn’t ethical it’s certainly uncomfortable and a little dangerious too. Nobody wants the press having coffee and donuts with the cops on a committee formed to keep anything bad from happening to the cops…the only ones who benefit from stuff like that are the cops. Look, America doesn’t expect a damn thing out of the press except this; when the reporters show up, the politicians and bureaucrats should get nervous. As long as that happens, the free press is doing its job and right now, that doesn’t look like what’s happening here in Fairfax County.
There are 12 cops and/or retired cops on this useless committee. In fact, half of the committee, fifteen members, are presently employed by the Fairfax County government or retired from the Fairfax County government ……do really you think they’re going bite the hand that feeds them or change anything at all?
And look where this thing is going…..….I mean putting Hairy Raorererer-er-er on the committee? Wasn’t he one of the primary architects of the insular arrogance that has brought the Fairfax County Police to the wrong kind of international attention?
Come on people…..a vampire IS NOT going to solve a robbery at the blood bank.
Look, we DO have solvable problems within the Fairfax County Police Department but we DON’T have systematic problems within the Fairfax County Police Department. Corruption within the ranks is virtually none existent and always has been. Brutality against citizens, entrapment and theft…… although they no doubt happen…..are rare.
So why do we need….God help us…yet another powerless window dressing committee?
In a way it doesn’t really matter. This committee, whose true purpose is to save Sharon Bulova’s career, will rubber a stamp a lot of things, take photos, eat a lot of donuts at our expense and eventually disappear. A few months later a cop will gun down another unarmed citizen, the Board of Supervisors will cut another massive check to the family, we’ll make international news again and then the citizens will demand Police oversight. And while police oversight is a grand idea, factually it doesn’t work. Check the national stats. There are about 200 civilian oversight committees around the US. Most are a joke and many others have been disbanded because they are ineffective and highly politicized like this monster incubating in Fairfax County.
Police oversight simply hasn’t worked nor does helicopter-intrusive committee work either.
You know what does work?
Body cameras work.
They are the kryptonite of punk cops everywhere.
Put cameras on them and be done with it.
We need to do this….we need to force every hood on the force to wear a camera. It’s a simple choice that boils down to this; keep on dolling out multi-million dollar checks to the dead guys family or spend a hell of a lot less the money on body cameras.
The concept of body cameras is simple. Stop the cops from saying or doing something stupid BEFORE they do it.
Forming a committee to talk about what stupid things the cops did AFTER they did it is just dumb, well it’s government worker-think ,which I suppose is basically the same thing.
Body cameras will put a quick end to the arrogance killing by the Fairfax County cops and it will put even a quicker end to the common perception that the FCP is staffed by a bunch of lazy punks with an attitude problem.
As I said before, the other way to solve this issue is to fire the people who hire the cops, the “I wasn’t aware there was a police problem” members of the board of supervisors….like Sharon Bulova. The fact is that had the Board of Supervisors acted on the issue of the cops shooting unarmed citizens several years ago, this wouldn’t be a problem today.
Fire the people who hire the cops and watch how quickly things change.
Bring in competent leaders FROM OUTSIDE THE DC AREA to run the department.
We predicted several years ago that under chief what’s-his-face…the bald guy who loves wearing that ridicules hat, that nothing would change but we were wrong.
Things did change.
They got worse.
Bring in a new police chief and new public safety director from outside the Fairfax County government Lifers club.
Bring in a police chief from the outside who is honest and relentless in seeking true attitude change. Create an office of internal affairs whose goal is not to protect the police department at all costs…that’s what we have now…..but one that will protect both the police department from unreasonable complaints and protect the citizens from unreasonable policing practices.
When a complaint is filed against a cop the complaint should not be removed from the cops file after 60 days as it is now. Rather the complaint should stay there for the length of the cop’s employment with the county.
Do we really need the expense of a Royal Fairfax County Police Navy for the Potomac? How about the Royal Fairfax County Police Air Force? Which is better for the county…..more roads, less traffic, smaller class room sizes and more teachers or the cops having a fleet of helicopters and boats to toy around with?
Disempower. Do the cops really have to go around scanning thousands license plates? Cut back the cop’s remarkably generous budget of $217 million dollars. If we’re going to pay the cops that kind of money at least require them to get an AA degree in criminal Justice.
Transform the cops from an occupation force…….87% of the cops live outside the county, hence the punk attitude….and turn them into a local police force by forcing them to live in Fairfax County. It’s a good idea because when there’s a chance one of these punk cops could run into the civilians they smart-mouthed at the local Safeway, the transformation from thug to police officer will be swift. The excuse that cops can’t afford to live in Fairfax County is a bald faced lie.
Back to Bulova’s pointless committee.
Who are these civilians on the committee? Are they qualified to judge whether a cop followed a department's rules governing use of force? Do civilians have any training to understand what the cop faces? Do they have any real world insights into an Officers split-second decision involving life or death?
The answer is no. Only cops have that ability and there comes a time when we simply have to trust the police to police themselves. So let the cops watch over the cops and allow the judicial system, a free press and the unflinching eye of a body camera watch over everyone else. That will work. That will correct the problem.
What won’t work, what won’t correct the problem, are a group of publicity seeking panjandrums in need of an ego boast and well-meaning citizens poking around in complex area they don’t fully understand. Policing IS NOT a part time gig and while we need to keep an eye on the Fairfax County Police that doesn’t mean we need to create a pointless babysitting committee so Sharon Bulova can keep her job.
Fairfax County Police
“When the ax came into the woods, many of the trees
said, “At least the handle is one of us.”
Only in the Washington DC area
would local government decide that the best way to solve a government created problem
is to bring in more government.
That’s exactly what Sharon
Bulova is doing in creating a toothless tiger-publicity stunt called the Police
Commission which Bulova and the Board of Supervisors slapped together after the
John Geer killing became yet another
international black eye for Fairfax County. (Yep…the Geer killing made the news in Europe,
Asia and Australia)
Sadly, the investigation into
the killing began only after a United States Senator from a different state forced
the Board of Supervisors County to investigate the killing…..and they did……they
leaped into action by ASKING the cops if they would
consider investigating themselves and then, essentially, apologized for asking.
In the real world when you
don’t do your job you get fired. In the real world when you kill people,
there’s an investigation. In the real world when a man dies, somebody pays
hell….but not in Fairfax County where the politicians elected to serve and
protect the people instead fear, protect
and serve the cops and the cops kill innocent every twenty to twenty five
months….and get away with it.
We need to start firing people
and should start with the Board of Supervisors because we elect and pay the
Supervisors to keep things in check and they haven’t done
that….repeatedly. Instead
of governing correctly, when the arrogant occupation force that is the Fairfax
County Police kills unarmed citizens, the Supervisors write a massive seven
figure check from public and no one is fired and no one goes to jail. And now as the election grows closer and the
bodies pile up, we suddenly have a massive police committee we don’t need that
is empowered to do nothing.
To justify their needless
committee the Supervisors claim they’re using the committee to examine use of
force. Creating a panel on use-of-force
by the Fairfax County Police isn’t needed largely because, although the problem
exists, it just barely exists. The Fairfax County Police killing innocent and
unarmed citizens is an anomaly and always will be. The department handles
thousands of calls a year and rarely gets involved in gun play and when they
do, it’s almost always the bad guys who start shooting first.
Factually, the Fairfax County
Police are, comparative to other forces of the same size, a sparkling example
of what urban policing should be. (To see
a bad example of urban policing look at San Diego, San Jose, Baltimore,
Cleveland and Chicago which will pay out HALF- BILLION this year in
police brutality suits.
The Fairfax Police department seems to oversee
itself well enough and when it doesn’t, it gets in trouble. (See the Polsi
killings, the Sean Lanigan frame up, the Geer killing and the guy they shot to
death for stealing a fake tree……yeah, that actually happened)
As for transparency, what
freedom of information doesn’t get released, the courts will order released.
The Geer case has proven that. And again, the Geer case is an abnormal
occurrence in the day to day activity of the Fairfax County Police, which, for
the most part, does a better than average job of staying in touch with
citizenry.
The cop’s near artistic
stonewalling is generally done in high profile court cases under the advice of
legal counsel because it’s an ugly but legitimate legal tactic used regularly
in the justice system and especially helpful when dealing with a department
instead of an individual. We can’t take that ploy from the cops because I want
the right to stonewall in court. I don’t want that taken away from me. We can’t
have one set of laws for the cops and one for the rest of us. ……although, if
you think about it, it’s sorta what we have now anyway isn’t it?
But overall, the cops don’t get
away with much. It’s a fact in some part due to the power of the press. Most of
the local media has done an admirable job reporting the recent abuses by the
Fairfax County Police.
On that subject, there are also several members of the media on the Bulova’s
idiotic committee ….well, one of them is an television news representative
which is sort of like a news organization but with attention-deficit issues,….but
anyway, is it ethical for members of the media to be part of a board
like this?
If it isn’t ethical it’s certainly
uncomfortable and a little dangerious too. Nobody wants the press having coffee
and donuts with the cops on a committee formed to keep anything bad from
happening to the cops…the only ones who benefit from stuff like that are the cops.
Look, America doesn’t expect a damn
thing out of the press except this; when the reporters show up, the politicians
and bureaucrats should get nervous. As long as that happens, the free press is
doing its job and right now, that doesn’t look like what’s happening here in
Fairfax County.
There are 12 cops
and/or retired cops on this useless committee. In fact, half of the committee,
fifteen members, are presently employed by the Fairfax County government or
retired from the Fairfax County government ……do really you think they’re going
bite the hand that feeds them or change anything at all?
And look where this thing is
going…..….I mean putting Hairy Raorererer-er-er on the committee? Wasn’t he one of the primary architects of
the insular arrogance that has brought the Fairfax County Police to the wrong
kind of international attention?
Come on people…..a vampire IS NOT going to solve a robbery
at the blood bank.
Look, we DO have solvable
problems within the Fairfax County Police Department but we DON’T
have systematic problems within the Fairfax County Police Department. Corruption
within the ranks is virtually none existent and always has been. Brutality
against citizens, entrapment and theft…… although they no doubt happen…..are rare.
So why do we need….God help us…yet
another powerless window dressing committee?
In a way it doesn’t really
matter. This committee, whose true purpose is to save Sharon Bulova’s career,
will rubber a stamp a lot of things, take photos, eat a lot of donuts at our
expense and eventually disappear. A few
months later a cop will gun down another unarmed citizen, the Board of
Supervisors will cut another massive check to the family, we’ll make
international news again and then the citizens will demand Police oversight.
And while police oversight is a
grand idea, factually it doesn’t work. Check the national stats. There are
about 200 civilian oversight committees around the US. Most are a joke and many others have been disbanded because they are
ineffective and highly politicized like this monster incubating in Fairfax
County.
Police
oversight simply hasn’t worked nor does helicopter-intrusive committee work
either.
You know what does work?
Body cameras work.
They are the kryptonite of punk
cops everywhere.
Put cameras on them and be done
with it.
We need to do this….we need to
force every hood on the force to wear a camera. It’s a simple choice that boils
down to this; keep on dolling out multi-million dollar checks to the dead guys
family or spend a hell of a lot less the money on body cameras.
The concept of body cameras is
simple. Stop the cops from saying or doing something stupid BEFORE
they do it.
Forming a committee to talk
about what stupid things the cops did AFTER they did it is just
dumb, well it’s government worker-think ,which I suppose is basically the same
thing.
Body cameras will put a quick
end to the arrogance killing by the Fairfax County cops and it will put even a
quicker end to the common perception that the FCP is staffed by a bunch of lazy
punks with an attitude problem.
As I said before, the other way
to solve this issue is to fire the people who hire the cops, the “I wasn’t
aware there was a police problem” members of the board of supervisors….like
Sharon Bulova. The fact is that had the Board of Supervisors acted on the issue
of the cops shooting unarmed citizens several years ago, this wouldn’t be a
problem today.
Fire the people who hire the
cops and watch how quickly things change.
Bring in competent leaders FROM OUTSIDE THE DC AREA to run the
department.
We predicted several years ago
that under chief what’s-his-face…the bald guy who loves wearing that ridicules
hat, that nothing would change but we were wrong.
Things did change.
They got worse.
Bring in a new police chief and
new public safety director from outside the Fairfax County government Lifers
club.
Bring in a police chief from
the outside who is honest and relentless in seeking true attitude change. Create
an office of internal affairs whose goal is not to protect the police
department at all costs…that’s what we have now…..but one that will protect
both the police department from unreasonable complaints and protect the
citizens from unreasonable policing practices.
When a complaint is filed
against a cop the complaint should not be removed from the cops file after 60
days as it is now. Rather the complaint should stay there for the length of the
cop’s employment with the county.
Do we really need the expense
of a Royal Fairfax County Police Navy for the Potomac? How about the Royal Fairfax County Police Air
Force? Which is better for the
county…..more roads, less traffic, smaller class room sizes and more teachers
or the cops having a fleet of helicopters and boats to toy around with?
Disempower. Do the cops really
have to go around scanning thousands license plates? Cut back the cop’s
remarkably generous budget of $217 million dollars. If we’re going to pay the
cops that kind of money at least require them to get an AA degree in criminal
Justice.
Transform
the cops from an occupation force…….87% of the cops live outside
the county, hence the punk attitude….and turn them into a local police force by
forcing them to live in Fairfax County. It’s
a good idea because when there’s a chance one of these punk cops could run into
the civilians they smart-mouthed at the local Safeway, the transformation from
thug to police officer will be swift.
The excuse that cops can’t afford to live in Fairfax County is a bald
faced lie.
Back to Bulova’s pointless
committee.
Who are these civilians on the
committee? Are they qualified to judge whether a cop followed a
department's rules governing use of force? Do civilians have any training to
understand what the cop faces? Do they have any real world insights into an Officers
split-second decision involving life or death?
The
answer is no. Only cops have that ability and there comes a time when we
simply have to trust the police to police themselves. So let the cops watch over the cops and allow the judicial
system, a free press and the unflinching eye of a body camera watch over
everyone else. That will work. That will correct the problem.
What
won’t work, what won’t correct the problem, are a group of publicity seeking panjandrums
in need of an ego boast and well-meaning citizens poking around in complex area
they don’t fully understand. Policing IS
NOT a part time gig and while we need to keep an eye on the Fairfax
County Police that doesn’t mean we need to
create a pointless babysitting committee so Sharon Bulova can keep her
job.
These guys are an endless ball of laughs
Deputy ‘inadvertently’ shoots suspect with gun, believing he was using Taser
A Tulsa County reserve deputy is on
administrative leave after “inadvertently” shooting a suspect with his gun.
Police say Robert (Bob) Bates, 73,
thought he pulled out his Taser during an arrest, but instead shot the suspect,
who later died at a local hospital.
The shooting happened after an apparent
drug and gun selling operation by the Tulsa Violent Crimes task force Thursday.
Bates, a member of the task force, was part of a group of deputies trying to
arrest Eric Courtney Harris, 44, in the parking lot of a Dollar General store.
Police say Harris, a convicted felon,
sold undercover officers a pistol. When confronted by an arrest team, he fled
the scene on foot and police say they “observed him reaching for his waistband
area …causing concern for the deputies safety.”
After a brief pursuit, police say
Harris was forced to the ground, where he continued to resist arrest and
“refused to pull his left arm from underneath his body where his hand was near
his waistband.”
It was during this portion of the
arrest that police say “the reserve deputy was attempting to use less lethal
force, believing he was utilizing a Taser, when he inadvertently discharged his
service weapon, firing one round which struck Harris.”
Harris died at a local hospital and his
cause of death is under investigation. Police say Harris admitted to medics at
the scene that he may have been under the influence of Phencyclidine, a street
drug commonly known as PCP.
My father used to say "Well that will come back to bite you in ass"
Virginia bans asking job applicants
about criminal history
Governor Terry McAuliffe on Friday
signed an executive order making Virginia the latest U.S. state to prohibit
government employers from asking job applicants about their criminal history.
Virginia joins more than a dozen other
states in its decision to “ban the box” on job applications that prospective
employees are asked to check if they have been convicted of a crime.
An individual’s rap sheet may be
considered only if it “bears specific relation to the job for which they are
being considered,” such as child care workers, state troopers, court officers
and jail guards, said gubernatorial spokesman Brian Coy.
"In a new Virginia economy, people
who make mistakes and pay the price should be welcomed back into society and
given the opportunity to succeed,” McAuliffe said in a statement.
"This executive order will remove
unnecessary obstacles to economic success for Virginians who deserve a second
chance," the Democratic governor said.
While the restriction applies to state
hiring practices, McAuliffe said he hoped it would encourage private employers
to follow suit.
The National Employment Law Project
estimates that almost one in three adults in the United States has a criminal
record that will show up on a routine criminal background check.
The move was applauded by Virginia
Attorney General Mark Herring, who aims to improve job re-entry programs for
inmates released from jail.
"This is a responsible approach
that keeps initial background checks for sensitive jobs in state government
while ensuring that a youthful mistake or wrong decision doesn’t close the
doors of opportunity for a lifetime," Herring said.
Other states that have banned the box,
Coy said, include California, Colorado, Connecticut, Delaware, Georgia, Hawaii,
Illinois, Maryland, Massachusetts, Minnesota, Nebraska, New Jersey, New Mexico
and Rhode Island.
A tale of two killings: what happened when Idaho police shot a dog and a pregnant woman in one day
A tale of two killings: what
happened when Idaho police shot a dog and a pregnant woman in one day
By Paul Lewis/ The Guardian
Fourteen hours and 45 miles
apart in rural Idaho, two stories began. A community campaign led to ‘justice
for Arfee’ after a pet’s killing outside a coffee shop. But there is no justice
yet for the family of Jeanetta Riley
Two fatal police shootings
unfolded within 14 hours, both in lakeside towns in the same corner of
north-west Idaho.
The first victim was Jeanetta
Riley, a troubled 35-year-old pregnant woman, shot dead by police as she
brandished a knife outside a hospital in the town of Sandpoint. Her death
barely ruffled the tight-knit rural community, which mostly backed the
officers, who were cleared of wrongdoing before the case was closed.
The second shooting, in nearby
Coeur d’Alene, sparked uproar. There were rallies, protests, sinister threats
against the officer responsible, and a viral campaign that spread well beyond
the town and drew an apology from the mayor. The killing was ruled unjustified,
and the police chief introduced new training for his officers.
The victim of the second shooting: a dog named
Arfee.
Two weeks ago, the dog’s owner
received a payout of $80,000. Jeanetta Riley’s husband and three daughters have
not, so far, received as much as an apology.
Both shootings occurred within
a 50-mile radius of remote woodlands and lakes not far from the Canadian
border. Each raised complex but different questions over the decision by
officers to use their weapons.
The divergent reactions to the
police killings of Riley, a mother of three, and Arfee, a Labrador-hound mix,
speaks to a disturbing indifference to some human lives lost during encounters
with police.
A dramatic spike in awareness
of US police killings over the past year has put a spotlight on the use of
lethal force by police and brought into sharp focus the actions of officers
when confronting unarmed black men, such as Michael Brown in Ferguson,
Missouri, and Eric Garner in New York City.
Yet each month there are dozens
of police killings of disturbed individuals like Jeanetta Riley that barely
register outside of the local news. A recent US government study concluded
there are close to 1,000 people killed by police on average each year. Another
piece of research estimated at least half of those shot and killed by
police in America have mental health problems.
Animal rights activists say
there is also an epidemic of needless police shootings of pet dogs: last year,
according to figures compiled by campaigner Kristin Hoffman, 672 dogs were shot
by police across the United States.
‘I decided to pull the trigger’
Jeanetta Riley was never going
to be the kind of victim to elicit sympathy in a small, conservative town like
Sandpoint. A Native American who was addicted to methamphetamine and alcohol,
her life seemed in a downward spiral in the months leading up to her death on 8
July 2014.
Riley was tiny – five feet tall
and weighing less than 100lb – and while she could be a caring, considerate
mother, she was also prone to snap, sometimes violently, when drunk.
Her family said her troubles
began as a young girl. Ray Foster, her first husband and the father of her
first child, said Jeanetta once told him that she was forced to drink alcohol
from the age of five on a reservation in neighbouring Washington. “They were
doing it for fun, to watch the girl kind of clowning around,” he said.
jeanetta riley daughters idaho
shooting Jeanetta Riley with her three daughters; Dayna, top, Dolly, left, and
Hannah Photograph: Riley family
She had two more daughters, now
aged eight and nine, with her second husband, Dana Maddox. In 2008, Riley was
jailed for stabbing Maddox in the back.
In the summer of 2012, she
married Shane Riley, a 44-year-old carpenter, and took his surname. Two years
later the couple, who were injecting meth, gave up their newborn infant for
adoption.
A few months later, the couple
was homeless, living out of a 1996 Chevrolet parked beside a lake just south of
Sandpoint. They were talking about divorce and quarrelling constantly.
Jeanetta and Shane were
snapping at each other on the day she died, and doing so in front of her 13-year-old,
Hannah, who had joined them camping for her vacation. The trio went fishing,
panhandled beside a gas station and ate dinner at a shelter for the homeless.
But by late afternoon, the
arguments were intensifying and Jeanetta was talking about harming herself. The
couple dropped off Hannah at her stepfather’s house and returned to their camp
beside the lake, picking up a bottle of vodka along the way.
After drinking half the bottle,
Shane said, Jeanetta began threatening to kill herself. When Shane heard
Jeanetta toying with blades, he decided to drive her to Bonner General
hospital. He said Jeanetta sounded delirious, ranting about stabbing people and
killing herself.
“This isn’t a joke,” Shane told his wife.
“It’s not a game.”
Shane parked the van on the
road outside the emergency room. Jeanetta took a fillet knife with a
three-and-a-half-inch blade from beneath the car seat. Shane ran inside,
pleading for help.
Rose Brinkmeier, who was behind
the desk, later told police how a man in a white shirt came rushing in and
said: “I need to you to call the police. My wife’s outside. She has a knife and
she wants to kill people.”
Brinkmeier asked a nurse to hit
a panic button, putting the hospital in lockdown, and then dialled 911 to pass
the message onto Sandpoint police.
“Boom. They showed up pretty
fast,” Shane recalled. Jeanetta was dead within 15 seconds.
Two body cameras and a third
attached to a police dashboard leave no ambiguity over what happened when
officers Michael Valenzuela, 27, and Garrett Johnson, 23, arrived in one car,
and officer Skyler Ziegler, 29, in a second.
It was 9.16pm, the sky a dusky
cyan. Jeanetta was in the van, holding the half-empty bottle of vodka and the
knife, the passenger door open. Shane was next to the vehicle, trying to calm
his wife. When the police arrived, Shane crossed the road, gesturing over his
shoulder to point to his wife.
All three officers immediately
took their weapons out and moved toward Jeanetta, who was 40ft away. She walked
briskly toward them, the knife at her side.
“Walk over here,” Ziegler shouted. “Show me
your hands.”
“Fuck you,” Jeanetta shouted. “No.”
Johnson, who had taken out his
Glock 22 pistol, was stood slightly to the side.
Valenzuela had both hands
clasping an AR-15 semi-automatic rifle. He would later tell investigators he
picked up the firearm because it happened to have been dislodged from his
vehicle’s weapons rack en route to the hospital.
Ziegler, who was beside him,
seemed unsure which weapon to use; in the space of seven seconds he returned
his handgun to its holster, replaced it with a Taser-style stun gun that cast a
red laser dot on Jeanetta’s torso, only to put it away and switch back to his
handgun.
Repeatedly, Valenzuela and
Ziegler shouted at Jeanetta to drop the knife. She refused: “Bring it on! No!”
Jeanetta was stepping off the
curb, into the road and toward the two officers, when it happened. In 0.8
seconds, five bullets were discharged from both firearms. Three hit Jeanetta in
the torso; one penetrated her heart.
She was 10ft from Valenzuela,
who later told detectives he believed she was “absolutely gonna thrust at me”.
“I decided at that point to pull the trigger,” he said. Ziegler recalled how
the knife looked “huge in her hands”. He said he saw Valenzuela’s muzzle flash and
felt himself “like following through with my trigger”.
Jeanetta was slumped on the
road, face-down, when Ziegler handcuffed her hands behind her back and asked in
a panicked voice: “Ma’am, are you still with us?”
‘Justice for Arfee’
News of Jeanetta’s death was a
passing item on the local radio news as Craig Jones, a 49-year-old jet-ski
instructor, pulled his van into the Java on Sherman coffee shop in downtown
Coeur d’Alene.
He had just taken Arfee for his
daily swim in the lake, and was headed for breakfast. Jones left his white Ford
van in the parking lot, making sure to leave down the window enough to keep the
two-year-old dog cool.
It was 11am, 45 miles south of
the Sandpoint hospital where Jeanetta had been killed the previous night. Jones
didn’t hear the gunshot; he only realised something was wrong when he came out
of the coffee shop.
“This girl comes running across
the street and says: ‘You didn’t see that? They shot your dog and they took
him.’”
It took Jones a few seconds to
make sense of the scene. Police had left a business card in his vehicle, with a
telephone number scribbled on the back. “There was a blood trail through my
van. It wasn’t a kill shot,” he recalled. “He went to the back and bucked
around and squirted blood all over my van.”
Jones was devastated. He had
raised Arfee since the dog was a puppy. The Lab mix had accompanied him
everywhere he went and slept beside him in bed.
“I got one of my friends on Facebook,” he
said. “I was like, ‘Get media here, ’cause crazy shit is happening here.’ KREM
TV news was there pretty instantly.”
The “Justice for Arfee”
campaign was under way within hours. Fuelled by anger over a Coeur d’Alene
police press release that described Arfee as a “vicious pit bull”, the outrage
intensified when the circumstances of the shooting were made public.
Dave Kelley, the officer who
shot the dog, had been responding to reports of a suspicious white van
following children in the area.
His partner, officer Jason
Weidebush, saw no reason to draw his gun as the pair approached the van. Kelley
did, creeping up on the van from behind to maintain the element of surprise on
the occupant.
Unable to see through the
dark-tinted window, Kelley made his way to the front, the handgun by his side,
when he said a barking dog’s head suddenly lunged out of the window.
“I had the split-second thought that this dog
is going to bite me,” Kelley said in a statement explaining his decision to
fire a bullet through the window.
Arfee’s death instantly struck
a chord. Paw-shaped bumper stickers began appearing on cars in northern Idaho,
and pet owners hung “Don’t Shoot Me” signs on their dogs’ necks. There were
calls for a boycott of the Java coffee shop and repeated demands for Kelley to
be fired. There was a protest rally one day, and a vigil in a dog park the
next.
Three days after the shooting,
the first video purporting to contain a message from the hacking collective
Anonymous appeared on YouTube. “Yet another innocent, beloved pet has been shot
and killed by a police officer,” a character in the trademark Guy Fawkes mask
said, warning of retribution against Coeur d’Alene police. “We are Anonymous.
You can expect us.”
There were profanity-laced
calls to the police department and threats against Kelley, who was labelled a
“murderer”. Fearing for the officer’s safety, Coeur d’Alene police arranged
patrols outside his house.
Arfee’s death was turning into
a national story, with complaints lodged with the city’s mayor from as far
afield as Alabama, Florida and New Hampshire.
A week later, Coeur d’Alene
police chief Ron Clark announced he had reassigned Kelley to desk duty and
promised an immediate, thorough investigation, vowing to do everything in his
power to avoid a repeat of the tragedy. The sentiment was echoed by mayor Steve
Widmyer. “We, as a city, are truly sorry,” he said.
By September, less than two
months after Arfee’s shooting, a “use of deadly force” review board concluded
the shooting was unjustified, a finding echoed by two external reviews.
Kelley’s pay was cut, and mandatory training on how to treat dogs was
introduced for every Coeur d’Alene police officer.
The program, created by the
Justice Department, teaches officers to remain calm and assess their
surroundings, reading a dog’s body language to distinguish between a scared and
dangerous animal.
“This event has shaken the community’s
confidence in our police department,” Coeur d’Alene’s new police chief, Lee
White, said at a press conference announcing a slew of internal reforms
prompted by Arfee’s death.
That, seemingly, was not
enough. The regional Spokesman-Review newspaper ran an editorial warning that
Arfee’s death had left “a festering wound of public mistrust”.
‘She got what she deserved’
Back in Sandpoint, Jeanetta Riley’s
death had faded from public view as quickly as Arfee’s death had become a
national story. She was one of the roughly 500 mentally unstable people shot
dead by police each year; few ever remember the names of the victims.
The US supreme court last week
heard arguments in the case of Teresa Sheehan, a mentally ill 56-year-old woman
who was shot by San Francisco police in 2008 and survived. She, too, had
threatened officers with a knife, but her attorneys contend police escalated an
already-volatile situation when they forced their way into her room with guns
drawn.
In November, two months after
Arfee’s death was ruled unjustifiable, the officers who killed Jeanetta were
cleared of wrongdoing by a local prosecutor who reviewed the investigation
conducted by the Bonner County sheriff’s office.
But not everyone agreed. Peter
Reedy, an FBI-trained hostage negotiator and former sergeant, argues officers
were wrong to rush into a tense stand-off with their guns drawn and ended up
aggravating a situation they should have diffused.
“First of all, do nothing,” he said after
reviewing the footage. “Keep your distance, try to talk to her, don’t even take
your gun out of your holster, try to calm things down and work out what you’re
up against.”
A retired expert witness who
lives in northern Idaho, Reedy has testified in dozens of cases. “If they had
not responded to the call they way she did, I truly believe she would be alive
right now,” he said.
Another critic of police was
Dan Mimmack, a Sandpoint businessman who had never met Jeanetta but felt her
death raised disturbing questions about the treatment of people with mental
health issues. The Sandpoint police department provides officers with Crisis
Intervention Training (CIT), which teaches police how to handle individuals
with mental illness. Yet neither Valenzuela nor Ziegler had been on the course.
Mimmack said he organised the
vigil to push back against others in town who felt “she got what she deserved”
and call for improved training for Sandpoint officers.
Those demands went unheeded.
Unlike in Coeur d’Alene, there have been no changes to policing practices in
Sandpoint, although three more officers, including Valenzuela, did receive CIT
training last month. And in contrast to Jones, who received an $80,000 payout
for Arfee’s death without having to even lodge a lawsuit in court, there has
been no payout to Jeanetta’s surviving relatives.
Scott Campbell, the city
attorney for Sandpoint, said their insurers were considering legal notices of
claims from both Shane and Jeanetta’s second husband, Dana Maddox. He declined
to speculate on the prospect of compensation, but insisted it was unfair to
judge the officers with the benefit of hindsight.
Valenzuela and Ziegler made a
split-second decision, confronted by a dangerous person, with limited
information about why the hospital had been placed in lockdown. Campbell also
disputed the characterisation of Jeanetta as mentally disturbed, saying there
were no psychiatric reports to verify that.
“What you had was a drug addict high on meth
and alcohol,” he said, speculating that Jeanetta may have been seeking out a
fatal encounter with police – or trying to commit “suicide by cop”.
Shane Riley appeared to lend
weight to that theory when he was interviewed later that night by detectives.
“I did not think she would go at the cops like that,” he told them. “It was
like she was walking into her own grave.”
Shane’s attorney, Drew Dalton,
said his client no longer believes his wife was actively trying to kill herself
in the encounter with police. But even if Jeanetta had wanted the police to
kill at that moment, he added, “doesn’t mean they had to oblige”.
A death at Spirit Lake
Three weeks ago, there was
another woman wielding a fillet knife in a confrontation with police, in
another lakeside town in northern Idaho.
The 55-year-old woman appeared
to have swallowed several pills and drunk alcohol when officers arrived at her
home in Spirit Lake, which is just off the road that links Sandpoint to Coeur
d’Alene.
Local police chief Keith
Hutcheson told the press that the woman was yelling “kill me, kill me” and
lunging at officers with her knife – and that she later confessed she had been
trying to provoke them into shooting her dead.
Instead, they subdued her with
a stun gun. “A family member told us that she recently lost a daughter due to
overdose and she’s had a history of depression,” Hutcheson said. “But, of
course, we didn’t know that until afterward.”
For information and support in
the US, visit the National Suicide Prevention Lifeline or call 1-800-273-8255.
For more information, contact the Samaritans.