Trial date set for officer accused of slitting dog's throat

 THE EPIDEMIC OF MENTALLY UNSTABLE COPS IN AMERICA CONTINUES

By David Collins
Officer Jeffrey Bolger pleads not guilty

BALTIMORE —A trial date is set for a Baltimore City police officer accused of slitting a dog's throat, killing it in June.
A Baltimore City police officer is charged with aggravated animal cruelty for cutting the throat of a dog, police officials announce.
Officer Jeffrey Bolger, 49, pleaded not guilty during an arraignment Thursday, seeking a jury trial. A trial date was set for Nov. 7. The judge will rule later on a defense motion to dismiss the case.
Bolger is charged with aggravated animal cruelty, animal mutilation and misconduct in office in the alleged killing of a 7-year-old shar-pei, Nala. According to charging documents, officers responded to the Canton area on June 14 regarding a pregnant woman who was bitten by Nala, who was off her leash.
According to charging documents, Bolger slit the dog's throat while Officer Thomas Schmidt held it. Schmidt faces three criminal counts of aggravated animal cruelty, animal abuse and misconduct in office.
New information emerged during arraignment as attorneys filed a motion to dismiss the charges, disputing witness accounts that Bolger set out to gut the dog. Court documents say the shar-pei fought for more than an hour to escape and that Bolger considered using his service revolver to euthanize the dog.
"It would have endangered the lives of those individuals because of a potential of a ricochet bullet," defense attorney Steve Levin said.
Defense attorneys said reports of Bolger yelling "I'm going to gut this dog" are untrue. Attorneys said, "Bolger stated in a frustrated manner that he was going to have to cut the dog."
"It is very convenient that now that's a story they are going to go with and that's a word that rhymes with gut," said Nala's owner, Sarah Gossard, who called the motion to dismiss ridiculous.
"We filed a motion to dismiss based on the fact the state's attorney brought charges without showing there was sufficient probable cause," Levin said.
Court papers say Bolger used his knife in the least painful way to euthanize the dog and that he acted according to the law. Attorneys said Bolger used his knife in a fashion that placed the public in the least amount of danger.
"The Baltimore City Police Department did not provide these officers with the proper equipment, and in a frustrated manner, Agent Bolger determined he would have to use his knife," Levin said.
"(I want them) to lose their jobs because I wouldn't want this to happen to someone else, and I would love to see them do jail time," Gossard said. "Both of these officers have dogs. It's disgusting to me. I think their dogs should be taken away from them."