State Upholds Braintree Cop's Firing, Questions Failure to Report Misconduct


The terminated officer allegedly tried to interfere with drug arrests in Braintree.
The Civil Service Commission last week denied the appeal of a Braintree police officer who was fired for allegedly trying to interfere with drug and drunk driving arrests.
In a decision issued Thursday upholding the town's termination of Paul Venuto in April 2012, Commissioner Cynthia Ittleman said the firing was justified because of Venuto's "serious misconduct," but also criticized the Braintree Police Department for allowing the incidents to go unreported for nearly three years.
Two separate incidents in 2008 and 2009, involving Venuto placing himself in the middle of a drug arrest and an OUI and cocaine arrest, were not officially examined until August 2011, when an alleged domestic dispute between Venuto and his girlfriend prompted then Chief Paul Frazier to order an internal investigation into Venuto's conduct.
Venuto was subsequently placed on administrative leave until Mayor Joseph Sulivan notified him by letter on April 2, 2012 that he was being terminated for engaging in conduct unbecoming an officer, undue influence, and interfering with the Course of Justice.

Several officers were aware of Venuto's attempted interference in the two arrests, Ittleman wrote in the decision, but did not report it as required under the department's regulations.