Fairfax County Police Sgt. Weiss Rasool award for Terrorism Against the People…yeah, the Fairfax cops actually hired a terrorist


Court says Vermilion police brutality lawsuit can go forward

Had enough?  Write to the Speaker of the House, U.S. House of Representatives, Washington, DC 20515 and demand federal hearings into the police problem in America.  Demand mandatory body cameras for cops, one strike rule on abuse, and a permanent  DOJ office on Police Misconduct.



ELYRIA — An appeals court has upheld a county judge’s decision to allow a jury to decide a lawsuit accusing two Vermilion police officers of brutality.

The lawsuit centers on the Feb. 19, 2005, arrest of Jill Garvey on a charge of wrongful entrustment after she and her husband, Richard Garvey, were stopped by then-Vermilion police Officer Larry Miller, who knew Richard Garvey’s driver’s license was suspended.

The couple had been in a bar drinking and Miller smelled alcohol on Richard Garvey’s breath during the stop. Both Garveys were asked to step out of the vehicle, according to court documents.

Police said both of the Garveys were intoxicated.

Officer Craig Howell arrived after the initial stop and placed Jill Garvey in the back of his police cruiser. He reported that when she was told her vehicle would be towed from the scene, she became “agitated” and “defiant” and refused to sign the wrongful entrustment citation so she could be released.

Police then decided to arrest her and asked her to get out of the car so she could be handcuffed. Jill Garvey, who eventually pleaded the case down to disorderly conduct, refused, and Officer Richard Grassnig removed her from the vehicle, forcing her to the ground where she landed on her chest and face and was handcuffed, according to the decision from the 9th District Court of Appeals.

The impact broke the bone around her eye, fractured one of her sinuses, and caused bruising and other injuries, the appeals court wrote.

Both Howell and Grassnig have denied they used excessive force, and according to court documents, argued “they were reasonable in their actions to extract Garvey from the cruiser because she was resisting arrest.”

They contend that Garvey lunged forward as she was being taken out, something Garvey and her expert witnesses argue didn’t happen.

The officers and the city of Vermilion had argued that the case should be thrown out because Garvey’s version of events wasn’t backed up by the facts as the officers saw them, and even if the officers had been wrong they were immune from civil liability.

But the appeals court ruled that there were disputes over what happened and, since the facts were in dispute, it was enough for Lorain County Common Pleas Judge Edward Zaleski to allow the case to go to a jury.

“The facts could demonstrate that the acts were done with a malicious purpose, particularly if Officer Grassnig is found to have pulled Garvey out of the cruiser by the hair, slammed her face into the pavement and told her, ‘Now you’re going to listen to us,’” the appeals court wrote.

The appeals court also ruled that Howell’s role in Garvey’s injuries, specifically whether he assisted Grassnig in removing her from the back of the patrol car, remains in dispute.

Former Vermilion Police Chief Robert Kish previously has said the officers involved in Garvey’s arrest were cleared of wrongdoing following an internal review.

But Garvey’s lawsuit also contends that a proper investigation wasn’t done or even documented and that Grassnig had a history of using excessive force.

Garvey’s attorney contends that Grassnig had a use of force rate per number of arrests of 13.24 percent between 2004 and 2006, well above the average of the Vermilion Police Department’s average of 2.21 percent.

Grassnig also received an unsatisfactory performance evaluation in 2004 in which his superiors noted that he needed “to tone down aggression.”

The appeals court did toss out part of Garvey’s lawsuit, saying that she couldn’t sue the city over intentional infliction of emotional distress.

Mark Petroff, Garvey’s attorney, said the case will now move to trial, unless Vermilion’s attorneys appeal to the state Supreme Court.

“Our opinion is that based on the criteria the city generally uses for apprehending individuals, excessive force was used,” Petroff said Tuesday.

A call to attorneys representing Vermilion wasn’t returned Tuesday.